Download PDF
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2024; 56(03): 192-200
DOI: 10.1055/a-2316-8102
Übersichtsarbeit

Die Daumensattelgelenksarthrose – Aspekte zur Indikationsstellung von Resektionsarthroplastik und Daumensattelgelenksprothese

Base-of-thumb osteoarthritis: aspects to be considered with the indication of trapeziectomy and CMC I prosthesis
Christian Matthias Windhofer 
1   Traumatology, AUVA Unfallkrankenhaus Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
,
Christoph Hirnsperger
1   Traumatology, AUVA Unfallkrankenhaus Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
,
Markus Lill
2   Traumatologie, Praxisgemeinschaft Unfallchirurgie, Innsbruck, Austria
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die Daumensattelgelenksarthrose stellt die häufigste operationsbedürftige Arthrose an der Hand dar, wenngleich vor jeder operativen Therapie immer die konservativen Maßnahmen ausgereizt werden sollen. Wird bei Fortschreiten der Gelenkabnutzung jedoch anhaltend die Funktion des Daumens und somit der gesamten Hand schmerzbedingt eingeschränkt, ist eine chirurgische Behandlung indiziert. Bereits 1947 publizierte Gervis Ergebnisse nach Entfernung des Trapeziums und leitete damit die Entwicklung einer Vielzahl unterschiedlicher Operationsverfahren ein. Das Hauptproblem nach Resektionsarthoplastiken mit oder ohne Sehneninterposition und/oder Suspension stellt nach wie vor die sehr lange Rehabilitationszeit dar. Nach der Einführung der ersten Prothese des Daumensattelgelenkes durch De la Caffiniere vor 50 Jahren kam es zu einer raschen Entwicklung hin zu den aktuellen modularen, bipolaren Implantaten. Vor allem im deutschsprachigen Raum besteht nach wie vor eine gewisse Skepsis bezüglich der Prothesen, weshalb diese Arbeit beide chirurgischen Verfahren mit besonderem Augenmerk auf die Aspekte der Indikationsstellung beleuchten soll.

Abstract

Base-of-thumb osteoarthritis is the most frequent osteoarthritis of the hand requiring surgical treatment, although conservative treatment options should be exhausted before surgery. If the wear process progresses with continuing pain-related loss of thumb function, thus leading to a loss of function of the whole hand, surgical treatment is indicated. In 1947, Gervis published results after trapeziectomy and heralded the development of a multitude of different surgical procedures. The long time needed for rehabilitation is a major problem of trapeziectomy with or without tendon interposition and/or suspension. After the implementation of the first CMC I prosthesis by De la Caffiniere 50 years ago, a rapid development took place, leading to the current modular bipolar implants. Especially in the German-speaking world, there is still some scepticism regarding these prostheses, which is why this review aims to illuminate both surgical procedures with a special focus placed on the aspects of indication.

Schlüsselwörter

Arthroplastik - Endoprothese - Resektions-Arthroplastik - Resektions-Actionspiel-Arthroplastik - Daumensattelgelenksprothese - Indikationsstellung

Keywords

resection arthroplasty - indication - base-of-thumb osteoarthritis - CMC I prosthesis


Publication History

Received: 28 February 2024

Accepted: 16 April 2024

Article published online:
11 June 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Gay AM, Cerlier A, Iniesta A. et al. Surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Hand Surg Rehabil 2016; 35: 238-249
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Kollig E, Bieler D, Franke A. Endoprothetik am Daumensattelgelenk: Aktueller Stellenwert der Endoprothetik zur operativen Behandlung der Rhizarthrose. Unfallchirurg 2016; 119: 1007-1014
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Cooney WP. Hand strength: normative values. J Hand Surg Am 1995; 20: 1057-1058
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Cooney WP, Chao EY. Biomechanical analysis of static forces in the thumb during hand function. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977; 59: 27-36
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Vermeulen GM, Slijper H, Feitz R. et al. Surgical management of primary thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am. 2011; 36: 157-169
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Xu L, Strauch RJ, Ateshian GA. et al. Topography of the osteoarthritic thumb carpometacarpal joint and its variations with regard to gender, age, site, and osteoarthritic stage. J Hand Surg Am 1998; 23: 454-464
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Toffoli A, Teissier J. MAÏA Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of 80 Patients with More than 6 Years of Follow-Up. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42: 838.e1-838.e8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Zschöck-Holle A, Reik M, Wölfle O. et al. Behandlung der Rhizarthrose mittels Trapezium-Resektion und Swanson-Silikonprothese. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2015; 47: 7-16
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Tropet Y, Garbuio P, Ridoux PE. et al. Trapezometacarpal osteoarthritis: review of 27 cases treated by using silicone implant arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 1995; 5: 7-14
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Fuchs S, Mönikes R, Wohlmeiner A. et al. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid compared with corticoid injections for the treatment of rhizarthrosis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14: 82-88
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Esplugas M, Lluch-Bergada A, Mobargha N. et al. Trapeziometacarpal Ligaments Biomechanical Study: Implications in Arthroscopy. J Wrist Surg 2016; 5: 277-283
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Gervis WH. Osteo-arthritis of the Trapezio-metacarpal Joint treated by Excision of the Trapezium. Proc R Soc Med 1947; 40: 492
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Shah DS, Middleton C, Gurdezi S. et al. The Effect of Surgical Treatments for Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis on Wrist Biomechanics: A Cadaver Study. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45: 389-398
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Brand J, Gaulke R, Geerling J. et al. Die Suspensionsarthroplastik am Daumensattelgelenk: Modifizierte Operationstechnik, Nachbehandlung und Ergebnisse-Eine retrospektive Analyse von 51 Operationen. Unfallchirurg 2007; 110: 402-407
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Hartigan BJ, Stern PJ, Kiefhaber TR. Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: arthrodesis compared with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 1470-1478
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Angly B, Steiger R, Stober R. Interpositions-Arthroplastik zur Behandlung der Rhizarthrose: Ergebnisvergleich der Techniken nach Epping und Weilby. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2006; 38: 90-97
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Vadstrup LS, Schou L, Boeckstyns ME. Basal joint osteoarthritis of the thumb treated with Weilby arthroplasty: a prospective study on the early postoperative course of 106 consecutive cases. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009; 34: 503-505
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Vermeulen GM, Brink SM, Sluiter J. et al. Ligament reconstruction arthroplasty for primary thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (weilby technique): prospective cohort study. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34: 1393-1401
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Cooney WP, Leddy TP, Larson DR. Revision of thumb trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31: 219-227
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Nylén S, Juhlin LJ, Lugnegard H. Weilby tendon interposition arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the trapezial joints. J Hand Surg Br 1987; 12: 68-72
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Zajonc H, Grill B, Simunovic F. et al. Vergleich der Ergebnisse der Resektions-Suspensionsarthroplastik nach Lundborg und Sirotakova zur Behandlung der Rhizarthrose. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2016; 48: 161-167
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Rab M, Gohritz A, Gohla T. et al. Ergebnisse nach Resektions-Suspensions-Arthroplastik bei Rhizarthrose: Vergleich der Abductor pollicis longus- mit der Flexor carpi radialis-Sehnensuspension. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2006; 38: 98-103
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Wajon A, Vinycomb T, Carr E. et al Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 23 2015 CD004631
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Megerle K, Grouls S, Germann G. et al. Revision surgery after trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131: 205-210
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Naram A, Lyons K, Rothkopf DM. et al. Increased Complications in Trapeziectomy with Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition Compared With Trapeziectomy Alone. Hand (N Y) 2016; 11: 78-82
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Burton RI. Complications following surgery on the basal joint of the thumb. Hand Clin 1986; 2: 265-269
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Low TH, Hales PF. High incidence and treatment of flexor carpi radialis tendinitis after trapeziectomy and abductor pollicis longus suspensionplasty for basal joint arthritis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2014; 39: 838-844
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Renfree KJ, Dell PC. Functional outcome following salvage of failed trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Br 2002; 27: 96-100
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Unglaub F, Langer MF, Löw S. et al. Komplikationsmanagement nach Resektionsarthroplastik bei Daumensattelgelenkarthrose. Handchirurgie Scan 2020; 09: 131-144
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Herren DB, Fuchs N, Schindele S. et al. Outcomes and recommendations for revision of thumb carpometacarpal resection arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2021; 46: 1101-1107
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Miller AJ, Jones CM, Martin DP. et al. Reliability of Metacarpal Subsidence Measurements after Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty. J Hand Microsurg 2018; 10: 22-25
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Munns JJ, Matthias RC, Zarezadeh A. et al. Outcomes of Revisions for Failed Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthritis Surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44: 798.e1-798.e9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Wajon A, Vinycomb T, Carr E. et al Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 23 2015 CD004631
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Windhofer C, Neureiter J, Schauer J. et. al Trapeziectomy versus Maia Prosthesis in Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis. J Wrist Surg 2023; ePub first
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 de la Caffinière JY. Total trapezo-metacarpal prosthesis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1974; 60: 299-308
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Johnston P, Getgood A, Larson D. et al. De la Caffinière thumb trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty: 16-26 year follow-up. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37: 621-624
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Caekebeke P, Duerinckx J. Can surgical guidelines minimize complications after Maïa® trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty with unconstrained cups?. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018; 43: 420-425
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Jager T, Barbary S, Dap F. et al. Evaluation of postoperative pain and early functional results in the treatment of carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Comparative prospective study of trapeziectomy vs. MAIA(®) prosthesis in 74 female patients. Chir Main 2013; 32: 55-62
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Bricout M, Rezzouk J. Complications and failures of the trapeziometacarpal Maia® prosthesis: A series of 156 cases. Hand Surg Rehabil 2016; 35: 190-198
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Andrzejewski A, Ledoux P. Maïa® trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty: Survival and clinical outcomes at 5 years' follow-up. Hand Surg Rehabil 2019; 38: 169-173
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Martin-Ferrero M. Ten-year long-term results of total joint arthroplasties with ARPE® implant in the treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2014; 39: 826-832
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Cootjans K, Vanhaecke J, Dezillie M. et al. Joint Survival Analysis and Clinical Outcome of Total Joint Arthroplasties With the ARPE Implant in the Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis With a Minimal Follow-Up of 5 Years. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42: 630-638
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Goubau JF, Goorens CK, Van Hoonacker P. et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of the Ivory arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up: a prospective single-centre cohort study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2013; 38: 866-874
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Klahn A, Nygaard M, Gvozdenovic R. et al. Elektra prosthesis for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a follow-up of 39 consecutive cases. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37: 605-609
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Thillemann JK, Thillemann TM, Munk B. et al. High revision rates with the metal-on-metal Motec carpometacarpal joint prosthesis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41: 322-327
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Seaourt AC, Dap F, Dautel G. et al Comparison between the MAIA® Implant and Trapeziectomy for Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis: Outcomes at 9 Yearsʼ Follow-Up. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2021; 26: 158-165
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Herren DB, Marks M, Neumeister S. et al. Short-term recovery after implant versus resection arthroplasty in trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2023; 48: 1048-1055
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Herren DB, Marks M, Neumeister S. et al. Low complication rate and high implant survival at 2 years after Touch® trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2023; 48: 877-883
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 de Jong TR, Bonhof-Jansen EEDJ, Brink SM. et al. Total joint arthroplasty versus trapeziectomy in the treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis: a randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2023; 48: 884-894
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Falkner F, Tümkaya AM, Thomas B. et al. Dual mobility prosthesis for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: results from a prospective study of 55 prostheses. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2023; 48: 566-574
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Jung M, Unglaub F. Daumensattelgelenkendoprothetik-eine kritische Beurteilung. Orthopäde 2019; 48: 398-401
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Kaszap B, Daecke W, Jung M. Outcome comparison of primary trapeziectomy versus secondary trapeziectomy following failed total trapeziometacarpal joint replacement. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38: 863-871.e3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Duerinckx J, Verstreken F. Total joint replacement for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: why and how?. EFORT Open Rev 2022; 7: 349-355
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Lussiez B, Falaise C, Ledoux P. Dual mobility trapeziometacarpal prosthesis: a prospective study of 107 cases with a follow-up of more than 3 years. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2021; 46: 961-967
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Myncke I, Vanhees M, Verstreken F. Unser Behandlungsschema bei Daumensattelgelenksarthrose. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2022; 54: 244-252
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Ulrich-Vinther M, Puggaard H, Lange B. Prospective 1-year follow-up study comparing joint prosthesis with tendon interposition arthroplasty in treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am. 2008; 33: 1369-1377
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Seth I, Bulloch G, Seth N. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Different Trapezium Implants for Trapeziometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hand (N Y) 2023; 2 15589447231183172
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar