CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open
DOI: 10.1055/a-2301-6248
Original article

White ring sign is useful for differentiating between fundic gland polyp and gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type

1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38051)
,
Takahiro Sasaki
2   Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
,
Nobuhiro Ueno
3   Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical College, Asahikawa-city, Japan
,
Haruka Maguchi
4   Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38051)
,
Shion Tachibana
5   Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine,, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38051)
,
Ryunosuke Hayashi
4   Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38051)
,
Yu Kobayashi
6   Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
,
Yuya Sugiyama
6   Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
,
Aki Sakatani
7   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
,
8   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38051)
,
Shin Kashima
9   Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
,
Kentaro Moriichi
4   Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38051)
,
10   Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical College, Asahikawa, Japan
,
Kazumichi Harada
11   Gastroenterology, Harada Hospital, Chiyoda-ku, Japan
,
Sayaka Yuzawa
12   Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38051)
,
Shin Ichihara
13   Department of Surgical Pathology, Sapporo Kosei General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
,
Toshikatsu Okumura
6   Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
,
Mikihiro Fujiya
14   Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
› Author Affiliations

Background: Gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type (GA-FG) is characterized by an elevated lesion with vessel dilation exhibiting branching architectures (DVBA). However, this feature is also found in fundic gland polyp (FGP), posing a challenge in their differentiation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features of gastric elevated lesions with DVBA and assess the efficacy of the white ring sign (WRS) as a novel marker for distinguishing between FGP and GA-FG. Methods: We analyzed 159 gastric elevated lesions without DVBA and 51 gastric elevated lesions with DVBA, further dividing the latter into 39 in the positive-WRS group and 12 in the negative-WRS group. The clinicopathological features, diagnostic accuracy, and inter-rater reliability were analyzed. Results: Univariate and multivariate analyses for gastric elevated lesions with DVBA identified the histological type consistent with FGP and GA-FG, along with the presence of round pits in the background gastric mucosa, as independent predictors. FGPs were present in 92.3% (36/39) of the positive-WRS group and GA-FGs were observed in 50.0% (6/12) of the negative-WRS group. Positive- and negative-WRS exhibited high diagnostic accuracy, with 100% sensitivity, 80.0% specificity, and 94.1% accuracy for FGP, and 100% sensitivity, 86.7% specificity, and 88.2% accuracy for GA-FG. Kappa values of WRS between experts and nonexperts were 0.891 and 0.841, respectively, indicating excellent agreement. Conclusions: Positive- and negative-WRS demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability for FGP and GA-FG, respectively, suggesting that WRS is a useful novel marker for distinguishing between FGP and GA-FG.



Publication History

Received: 06 August 2023

Accepted after revision: 03 April 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
08 April 2024

© . The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany