Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(11): 1455-1462
DOI: 10.1055/a-2295-3329
SMFM Fellowship Series Article

Characteristics Associated with Trial of Labor among Patients with Twin Pregnancies

1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Rachael B. Cowherd
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
2   Division of Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
,
Olivia H. Barry
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Liqi Chen
3   Department of Preventive Medicine (Biostatistics), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Lynn M. Yee
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
› Institutsangaben
Funding Research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health's National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, grant number UL1TR001422. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Additionally, this work was supported by unrestricted grants for resident research from the Friends of Prentice and EDW/Biostatistical Support by the Northwestern University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Zoom Image

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to identify patient and provider factors associated with undergoing trial of labor (TOL) among eligible patients with twin gestations.

Study Design This retrospective cohort study of patients with twin gestations who received care at a large tertiary care center from 2000 to 2016 included individuals with live pregnancies greater than 23 weeks of gestation and cephalic-presenting twin. Patients with a prior uterine scar or contraindication to vaginal delivery were excluded from analyses. Maternal and clinical characteristics were compared among patients who did and did not undergo TOL. Multivariable logistic regression models included characteristics chosen a priori and those with bivariable associations with p < 0.1. Interactions between parity and other significant variables in the primary models were also investigated.

Results Among 1,888 eligible patients, 80.7% (N = 1,524) underwent TOL. Those undergoing TOL were more likely to be younger, multiparous, and have a maternal–fetal medicine physician as the delivering provider (p < 0.01). Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were less prevalent among patients undergoing TOL (20.2 vs. 27.8%, p < 0.01). In multivariable analysis, advanced maternal age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–0.74) and nulliparity (aOR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.25–0.52) conferred a lower odds of TOL, while having a maternal–fetal medicine provider (aOR: 2.74, 95% CI: 1.55–4.83) was associated with higher odds. Interaction analyses demonstrated no significant interaction effects between parity and other characteristics. Among those undergoing a TOL, 76.0% (1,158/1,524) had a successful vaginal delivery of both twins, with 48.1% (557/1,158) having breech extraction of the second twin.

Conclusion In this cohort of twin gestations with a high frequency of TOL, patient and provider characteristics are associated with attempting vaginal delivery. Variation in provider practices suggests differing skills and comfort with twin vaginal delivery may influence route of delivery decision-making in patients with twins.

Keypoints

  • Most patients with twin pregnancies undergoing TOL had successful vaginal deliveries.

  • Having an MFM delivering provider was associated with higher odds of attempting twin TOL.

  • Nulliparity and advanced maternal age were associated with lower odds of twin TOL.

Note

This abstract was presented as a poster presentation (#541) at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine 41st Annual Pregnancy Meeting, Virtual, January 25–30, 2021.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 22. November 2021

Angenommen: 24. März 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
26. März 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. April 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA