Download PDF
Int J Sports Med
DOI: 10.1055/a-2289-0873
Training & Testing

Open Water Swimming in Elite Triathletes: Physiological and Biomechanical Determinants

Óscar López-Belmonte 
1   Aquatics Lab, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
,
Ana Gay 
1   Aquatics Lab, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
,
Jesús J. Ruiz-Navarro 
1   Aquatics Lab, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
,
Francisco Cuenca-Fernández 
1   Aquatics Lab, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
2   Department of Sports and Computer Sciences, Pablo de Olavide University, Sevilla, Spain
,
Roberto Cejuela 
3   Physical Education and Sports, University of Alicante, Alacant, Spain
,
Raúl Arellano 
1   Aquatics Lab, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
› Author Affiliations Funding Information MCIN/AEl/10.13039/501100011033 and “ERDF A way of making Europe”, by the “European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR” — PID2022–142147NB-I00: SWIM III Ministry of Universities — FPU19/02477
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This study aimed (i) to analyze the 1500 m open water swimming performance, (ii) to examine the associations between physiological and biomechanical variables with swimming performance, and (iii) to determine which variables can predict swimming performance in triathletes. Fourteen elite triathletes (23.4±3.8 y) performed a 1500 m test in open water swimming conditions. Swimming performance was assessed using World Aquatics Points Scoring, and data were obtained from the 1500 m open water swimming test. Heart rate, end-exercise oxygen uptake (EE˙VO2) and blood lactate concentrations were measured. The initial 250 m of the 1500 m swimming test presented the highest values of biomechanical variables in males (i. e. swimming speed, stroke rate (SR), length (SL), index (SI)). A decrease in SL was observed in the last 250 m in both sexes. Positive association were found between EE˙VO2 (r=0.513; p=0.030), swimming speed (r=0.873; p<0.001) and SI (r=0.704; p=0.002) with swimming performance. In contrast, time constant of the oxygen uptake (r=−0.500; p=0.034) and buoy-turn times (r=−0.525; p=0.027) were negatively associated with performance. SI was the main predictor (R 2=0.495) of open water swimming performance in triathletes. In conclusion, triathletes and coaches must conduct open water training sessions to maximize SI (i. e. swimming efficiency).

Keywords

triathlon - performance - kinematics - energetic - endurance


Publication History

Received: 30 October 2023

Accepted: 26 February 2024

Article published online:
22 April 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 World Triathlon. World Triathlon Competition Rules 2023. 2023; Internet: https://www.triathlon.org/about/downloads/category/competition_rules; accessed: May 1, 2023
    PubMed
  • 2 Van Rensburg JP, Kielblock AJ, Van Der Linde A. Physiologic and biochemical changes during a triathlon competition. Int J Sports Med 1986; 7: 30-35
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Vleck VE, Bentley DJ, Millet GP. et al. Pacing during an elite Olympic distance triathlon: Comparison between male and female competitors. J Sci Med Sport 2008; 11: 424-432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bentley DJ, Millet GP, Vleck VE. et al. Specific aspects of contemporary triathlon: Implications for physiological analysis and performance. Sport Med 2002; 32: 345-359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Olaya-Cuartero J, Cejuela R. Influence of biomechanical parameters on performance in elite triathletes along 29 weeks of training. Appl Sci 2021; 11: 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Peeling P, Landers G. Swimming intensity during triathlon: A review of current research and strategies to enhance race performance. J Sports Sci 2009; 27: 1079-1085
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 López-Belmonte Ó, Ruiz-Navarro JJ, Gay A. et al. Determinants of 1500-m Front-Crawl Swimming Performance in Triathletes: Influence of Physiological and Biomechanical Variables. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2023; 18: 1328-1335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dengel DR, Flynn MG, Costill DL. et al. Determinants of success during triathalon competition. Res Q Exerc Sport 1989; 60: 234-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Vleck VE, Bürgi A, Bentley DJ. The consequences of swim, cycle, and run performance on overall result in elite Olympic distance triathlon. Int J Sports Med 2006; 27: 43-48
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Landers GJ, Blanksby BA, Ackland TR. et al. Swim Positioning and its Influence on Triathlon Outcome. Int J Exerc Sci 2008; 1: 96-105
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bentley DJ, Libicz S, Jougla A. et al. The effects of exercise intensity or drafting during swimming on subsequent cycling performance in triathletes. J Sci Med Sport 2007; 10: 234-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cejuela R, Cala A, Pérez-Turpin JA. et al. Temporal activity in particular segments and transitions in the Olympic triathlon. J Hum Kinet 2013; 36: 87-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Millet GP, Vleck VE, Bentley DJ. Physiological requirements in triathlon. J Hum Sport Exerc 2011; 6: 184-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Zamparo P, Cortesi M, Gatta G. The energy cost of swimming and its determinants. Eur J Appl Physiol 2020; 120: 41-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 López-Belmonte Ó, Ruiz-Navarro JJ, Gay A. et al. Analysis of pacing and kinematics in 3000 m freestyle in elite level swimmers. Sport Biomech 2023; 1-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Millet GP, Chollet D, Chalies S. et al. Coordination in front crawl in elite triathletes and elite swimmers. Int J Sports Med 2002; 23: 99-104
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Toussaint HM. Differences in propelling efficiency between competitive and triathlon swimmers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990; 22: 409-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Costill DL, Kovaleski J, Porter D. et al. Energy expenditure during front crawl swimming: Predicting success in middle-distance events. Int J Sports Med 1985; 6: 266-270
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zacca R, Neves V, da Silva Oliveira T. et al. 5 Km Front Crawl in Pool and Open Water Swimming: Breath-By-Breath Energy Expenditure and Kinematic Analysis. Eur J Appl Physiol 2020; 120: 2005-2018
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Baldassarre R, Bonifazi M, Zamparo P. et al. Characteristics and challenges of open-water swimming performance: A review. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2017; 12: 1275-1284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 McKay AKA, Stellingwerff T, Smith ES. et al. Defining Training and Performance Caliber: A Participant Classification Framework. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2022; 17: 317-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Cejuela R, Esteve-Lanao J. Quantifying the Training Load in Triathlon. In: Triathlon Medicine. Springer International Publishing; 2020: 291-316
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Ruiz-Navarro JJ, Gay A, Zacca R. et al. Biophysical Impact of 5-Week Training Cessation on Sprint Swimming Performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2022; 17: 1463-1472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Zacca R, Azevedo R, Figueiredo P. et al. Vo2fitting: A free and open-source software for modelling oxygen uptake kinetics in swimming and other exercise modalities. Sports 2019; 7: 1–16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chang W, Cheng J, Allaire J, Xie YMJ. Shiny: Web application framework for R. 2015 Internet http://cran.r-project.org/package=shiny; accessed: May 1, 2023
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ma S, Rossiter HB, Barstow TJ. et al. Clarifying the equation for modeling of V̇o2 kinetics above the lactate threshold. J Appl Physiol 2010; 109: 1283-1284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Monteiro AS, Carvalho DD, Azevedo R. et al. Post-swim oxygen consumption: Assessment methodologies and kinetics analysis. Physiol Meas 2020; 41: 105005
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Borg GAV. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14: 377-381
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sousa A, Figueiredo P, Pendergast D. et al. Critical evaluation of oxygen-uptake assessment in swimming. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2014; 9: 190-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Zamparo P, Capelli C, Pendergast D. Energetics of swimming: A historical perspective. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 367-378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Thevelein X, Daly D, Persyn U. Measurement of total energy use in the evaluation of competitive swimmers. In: Bachl N, Prakop L, Suckaert R, eds. Current Topics in Sports Medicine. Wien: Urban & Schwartzenberg; 1984: 668-676
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Di Prampero PE, Ferretti G. The energetics of anaerobic muscle metabolism: A reappraisal of older and recent concepts. Respir Physiol. 1999. 118. 103-115
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Rodriguez F, Chaverri D, Iglesias X. et al. Validity of postexercise measurements to estimate peak VO2 in 200-m and 400-m maximal swims. Int J Sports Med 2017; 38: 426-438
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 World Aquatics. World Aquatics Points, united by water 2023. 2023; Internet: https://www.worldaquatics.com/SWIMMING/POINTS; accessed: May 1, 2023
    PubMed
  • 35 Ruiz-Navarro JJ, López-Belmonte Ó, Gay A. et al. A new model of performance classification to standardize the research results in swimming. Eur J Sport Sci 2023; 23: 478-488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ferguson C. An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof Psychol Res Pract 2009; 40: 532-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM. et al. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 3-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Epskamp S, Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ. et al. Qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. J Stat Softw 2012; 48: 1-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Fiori JM, Bandeira PFR, Zacca R. et al. The Impact of a Swimming Training Season on Anthropometrics, Maturation, and Kinematics in 12-Year-Old and Under Age-Group Swimmers: A Network Analysis. Front Sport Act Living 2022; 4: 799690
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Morais JE, Barbosa TM, Forte P. et al. Stability analysis and prediction of pacing in elite 1500 m freestyle male swimmers. Sport Biomech 2023; 22: 1496-1513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Reis JF, Alves FB, Bruno PM. et al. Oxygen uptake kinetics and middle distance swimming performance. J Sci Med Sport 2012; 15: 58-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Demarle AP, Slawinski JJ, Laffite LP. et al. Decrease of O2 deficit is a potential factor in increased time to exhaustion after specific endurance training. J Appl Physiol 2001; 90: 947-953
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Baldassarre R, Pennacchi M, La Torre A. et al. Do the fastest open-water swimmers have a higher speed in middle- and long-distance pool swimming events?. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2019; 4: 1-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Ofoghi B, Zeleznikow J, Macmahon C. et al. Performance analysis and prediction in triathlon. J Sports Sci 2016; 34: 607-612
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Fernandes RJ, Vilas-Boas JP. Time to exhaustion at the VO2max velocity in swimming: A review. J Hum Kinet 2012; 32: 121-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar