Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2284-9739
Audit of hemostatic clip use after colorectal polyp resection in an academic endoscopy unit
Abstract
Background and study aims Prophylactic closure of endoscopic resection defects reduces delayed hemorrhage after resection of non-pedunculated colorectal lesions ≥ 20 mm that are located proximal to the splenic flexure and removed by electrocautery. The risk of delayed hemorrhage after cold (without electrocautery) resection is much lower, and prophylactic clip closure after cold resection is generally unnecessary. The aim of this study was to audit clip use after colorectal polyp resection in routine outpatient colonoscopies at two outpatient centers within an academic medical center. Patients referred for resection of known lesions were excluded.
Patients and methods Retrospective chart analysis was performed as part of a quality review of physician adherence to screening and post-polypectomy surveillance intervals.
Results Among 3784 total lesions resected cold by 29 physicians, clips were placed after cold resection on 41.7% of 12 lesions ≥ 20 mm, 19.3% of 207 lesions 10 to 19 mm in size, and 2.8% of 3565 lesions 1 to 9 mm in size. Three physicians placed clips after cold resection of lesions 1 to 9 mm in 18.8%, 25.5%, and 45.0% of cases. These physicians accounted for 8.1% of 1- to 9-mm resections, but 69.7% of clips placed in this size range. Electrocautery was used for 3.1% of all resections. Clip placement overall after cold resection (3.9%) was much lower than after resection with electrocautery (71.1%), but 62.4% of all clips placed were after cold resection.
Conclusions Audits of clip use in an endoscopy practice can reveal surprising findings, including high and variable rates of unnecessary use after cold resection. Audit can potentially reduce unnecessary costs, carbon emissions, and plastic waste.
Keywords
CRC screening - Endoscopy Lower GI Tract - Polyps / adenomas / ... - Endoscopic resection (polypectomy, EMR, ...)Publication History
Received: 12 December 2023
Accepted after revision: 26 February 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
11 March 2024
Article published online:
23 April 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Spadaccini M, Albeniz E, Pohl H. et al. Prophylactic clipping after colorectal endoscopic resection prevents bleeding of large, proximal polyps: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. Gastroenterology 2020; 159: 148-158 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.051. (PMID: 32247023)
- 2 Forbes N, Gupta S, Frehlich L. et al. Clip closure to prevent adverse events after EMR of proximal large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96: 721-731
- 3 Pohl H, Grimm IS, Moyer MT. et al. Clip closure prevents bleeding after endoscopic resection of large colon polyps in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 977-984 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.019. (PMID: 30885778)
- 4 Albeniz E, Alvarez MA, Espinos JC. et al. Clip closure after resection of large colorectal lesions with substantial risk of bleeding. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 1213-1221
- 5 Gupta S, Sidhu M, Shahidi N. et al. Effect of prophylactic endoscopic clip placement on clinically significant post-endoscopic mucosal resection bleeding in the right colon: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00384-8.
- 6 Liaquat H, Rohn E, Rex DK. Prophylactic clip closure reduced the risk of delayed postpolypectomy hemorrhage: experience in 277 clipped large sessile or flat colorectal lesions and 247 control lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 401-407 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.024. (PMID: 23317580)
- 7 Shah ED, Pohl H, Rex DK. et al. Valuing innovative endoscopic techniques: prophylactic clip closure after endoscopic resection of large colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 1353-1360 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.018. (PMID: 31962121)
- 8 Albéniz E, Enguita-Germán M, Gimeno-García AZ. et al. The answer to "when to clip" after colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection based on a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000943.
- 9 Kaltenbach T, Anderson JC, Burke CA. et al. Endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions-recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 1095-1129 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.018. (PMID: 32122632)
- 10 Thoguluva Chandrasekar V, Spadaccini M, Aziz M. et al. Cold snare endoscopic resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and pooled-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 929-936
- 11 McWhinney CD, Vemulapalli KC, El Rahyel A. et al. Adverse events and residual lesion rate after cold endoscopic mucosal resection of serrated lesions ≥10 mm. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 654-659 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.08.032. (PMID: 32891621)
- 12 Rex DK, Anderson JC, Pohl H. et al. Cold versus hot snare resection with or without submucosal injection of 6- to 15-mm colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96: 330-338 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.006. (PMID: 35288147)
- 13 Abdallah M, Ahmed K, Abbas D. et al. Cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection for colon polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2023; DOI: 10.1055/a-2129-5752.
- 14 Mangira D, Raftopoulos S, Vogrin S. et al. Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10–19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study. Endoscopy 2023; DOI: 10.1055/a-2029-9539.
- 15 Suresh S, Zhang J, Ahmed A. et al. Risk factors associated with adenoma recurrence following cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection of polyps ≥20 mm: a retrospective chart review. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E867-E873
- 16 Chang LC, Chang CY, Chen CY. et al. Cold versus hot snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps : a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176: 311-319 DOI: 10.7326/M22-2189. (PMID: 36802753)
- 17 Ponugoti PL, Cummings OW, Rex DK. Risk of cancer in small and diminutive colorectal polyps. Dig Liver Dis 2017; 49: 34-37 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.025. (PMID: 27443490)
- 18 Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC. et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 415-434 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.014. (PMID: 32044106)
- 19 Akizue N, Okimoto K, Matsumura T. et al. Utility of prophylactic clipping after colorectal cold snare polypectomy in patients on oral antithrombotic agents. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.016.
- 20 Rex DK, Risio M, Hassan C. Prioritizing an oncologic approach to endoscopic resection of pedunculated colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94: 155-159 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.03.003. (PMID: 33931206)
- 21 López-Muñoz P, Martín-Cabezuelo R, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V. et al. Life cycle assessment of routinely used endoscopic instruments and simple intervention to reduce our environmental impact. Gut 2023; 72: 1692-1697 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329544. (PMID: 37185655)
- 22 Fatima H, Tariq T, Gilmore A. et al. Bleeding risk with cold snare polypectomy of ≤ 10 mm pedunculated colon polyps. J Clin Gastroenterol 2022; DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001699.