Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2278-9539
History of Cholestasis Is Not Associated with Worsening Outcomes in Subsequent Pregnancy with Cholestasis
Funding None.Abstract
Objective Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes including intrauterine fetal demise, spontaneous preterm labor, and meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Studies have yet to determine if patients with a history of pregnancy complicated by cholestasis had an association with more severe adverse outcomes in a subsequent pregnancy complicated by cholestasis.
Study Design Retrospective cohort study of multiparous, singleton, nonanomalous live gestations complicated by cholestasis at Elmhurst Hospital Center from 2005 to 2019. We compared rates of adverse outcomes in multiparous pregnancies complicated by cholestasis with versus without prior cholestasis. Our primary outcome was rates of spontaneous preterm labor. Our secondary outcomes included rates of iatrogenic preterm birth, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart tracing. Chi-square and multivariate regression tests were used to determine the strength of association. In all analyses, a p-value less than 0.05 and 95% confidence interval not crossing 1.00 indicated statistical significance. Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this project.
Results Of the 795 multiparous pregnancies complicated by cholestasis, 618 (77.7%) had no prior history of cholestasis and 177 (23.3%) had prior history of cholestasis. Multiparous pregnancies with history of cholestasis had higher rates of prior preterm birth, earlier gestational age at diagnosis and delivery, and were more likely to receive ursodeoxycholic acid therapy. Pregnancies with history of cholestasis were not associated with spontaneous preterm labor in subsequent pregnancies with cholestasis, but history of cholestasis was associated with iatrogenic preterm birth and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. After adjusting for confounders, the association with iatrogenic preterm birth and NICU admission were no longer statistically significant. There was no significant association between history of cholestasis and other adverse obstetric outcomes.
Conclusion Findings suggests that history of prior cholestasis is not associated with worsening outcomes in subsequent pregnancies complicated by cholestasis.
Key Points
-
Prior cholestasis may not alter risk in subsequent pregnancies.
-
Unclear relationship between cholestasis and hepatobiliary disease.
-
Studies needed to develop cholestasis screening protocol.
Publication History
Received: 14 September 2023
Accepted: 26 February 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
29 February 2024
Article published online:
15 March 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Brouwers L, Koster MPH, Page-Christiaens GC. et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes associated with elevated bile acid levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (01) 100.e1-100.e7
- 2 Kawakita T, Parikh LI, Ramsey PS. et al. Predictors of adverse neonatal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213 (04) 570.e1-570.e8
- 3 Rioseco AJ, Ivankovic MB, Manzur A. et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study of perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170 (03) 890-895
- 4 Ovadia C, Seed PT, Sklavounos A. et al. Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses. Lancet 2019; 393 (10174): 899-909
- 5 Geenes V, Williamson Victoria Geenes C, Williamson C. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15 (17) 2049-2066
- 6 Lee RH, Goodwin TM, Greenspoon J, Incerpi M. The prevalence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in a primarily Latina Los Angeles population. J Perinatol 2006; 26 (09) 527-532
- 7 Pataia V, Dixon PH, Williamson C. Pregnancy and bile acid disorders. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2017; 313 (01) G1-G6
- 8 Bacq Y, Sapey T, Bréchot MC, Pierre F, Fignon A, Dubois F. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a French prospective study. Hepatology 1997; 26 (02) 358-364
- 9 Hämäläinen ST, Turunen K, Mattila KJ, Kosunen E, Sumanen M. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and comorbidity: a 44-year follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98 (12) 1534-1539
- 10 Ropponen A, Sund R, Riikonen S, Ylikorkala O, Aittomäki K. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy as an indicator of liver and biliary diseases: a population-based study. Hepatology 2006; 43 (04) 723-728
- 11 Wikström Shemer EA, Stephansson O, Thuresson M, Thorsell M, Ludvigsson JF, Marschall HU. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and cancer, immune-mediated and cardiovascular diseases: a population-based cohort study. J Hepatol 2015; 63 (02) 456-461
- 12 Lee RH, Greenberg Mara, Metz TD, Pettker CM. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine consult series #53: intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: replaces consult #13, April 2011. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 224 (02) B2-B9
- 13 Williamson C, Hems LM, Goulis DG. et al. Clinical outcome in a series of cases of obstetric cholestasis identified via a patient support group. BJOG 2004; 111 (07) 676-681
- 14 Chappell LC, Bell JL, Smith A. et al; PITCHES study group. Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (PITCHES): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019; 394 (10201): 849-860
- 15 Smith DD, Kiefer MK, Lee AJ. et al. Effect of fasting on total bile acid levels in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136 (06) 1204-1210