Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Ultrasound Int Open 2024; 10
DOI: 10.1055/a-2271-0098
Original Article

Shoulder and Knee Arthroscopy Access Point: Prospective Comparison of Sonographic and Palpatory Detection – Which Method is Better for Novices?

Andreas Michael Weimer   ‡
1   Clinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN27178)
,
Johannes M. Weimer    ‡
2   Rudolf-Frey Teaching Department, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39068)
,
Svenja Berthold
3   Department for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN36642)
,
Stephan Stein
1   Clinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN27178)
,
Lukas Müller
4   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39068)
,
Holger Buggenhagen
2   Rudolf-Frey Teaching Department, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39068)
,
Gerd Balser
2   Rudolf-Frey Teaching Department, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39068)
,
Kay Stankov
5   Corporate Finance, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN26536)
,
Mirco Sgroi
6   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN27197)
,
Gerhard Schmidmaier
1   Clinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN27178)
,
Roman Kloeckner    *
7   Institute of Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN54360)
,
Christian Schamberger   *
1   Clinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN27178)
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose Arthroscopy is one of the most common interventions in orthopedics. Hence it is important to train users early in order to ensure the safest possible identification of access portals (AP). This prospective study aimed to compare a palpatory (PalpMethod) with a sonographic (SonoMethod) method for AP location in the shoulder and knee joints.

Materials and Methods The study included trainee doctors (n=68) attending workshops (lasting approx. 90 minutes). In these workshops a teaching video initially demonstrated the PalpMethod and SonoMethod of AP identification. An experienced operator first marked the access portals on the test subject with a UV pen (determined ideal point [DIP]). Adhesive film was then affixed to the puncture regions. Subsequently participants marked on shoulders and knees first the point determined by palpation, then the point determined by sonography. Analysis involved DIP visualization with a UV lamp and employed a coordinate system around the central DIP. In addition, participants completed an evaluation before and after the workshop.

Results The analysis included 324 measurements (n=163 shoulders and n= 161 knees). The majority of participants had not previously attended any courses on manual examination (87.9%) or musculoskeletal ultrasound (93.9%). Overall, the markings participants made on the shoulder using the SonoMethod were significantly closer to the DIP than those made by the PalpMethod (Palp 18.8mm ± 14.5mm vs. Sono 11.2mm ± 7.2mm; p<0.001). On the knee, however, the markings made by the PalpMethod were significantly closer to the DIP overall (Palp 8.0mm ± 3.2mm vs. Sono 12.8mm ± 5.2mm; p<0.001). Conclusion The results show that the SonoMethod produces more accurate markings on the shoulder, while the PalpMethod is superior for the knee.

Keywords

musculoskeletal ultrasound - arthroscopy - ultrasound-guided procedure - knee joint - shoulder joint

‡ These authors contributed equally to this work and share first-authorship.


* These authors contributed equally to this work and share senior authorship.


Zusatzmaterial



Publication History

Received: 06 November 2023

Accepted after revision: 03 February 2024

Article published online:
04 April 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
Andreas Michael Weimer, Johannes M. Weimer, Svenja Berthold, Stephan Stein, Lukas Müller, Holger Buggenhagen, Gerd Balser, Kay Stankov, Mirco Sgroi, Gerhard Schmidmaier, Roman Kloeckner, Christian Schamberger. Shoulder and Knee Arthroscopy Access Point: Prospective Comparison of Sonographic and Palpatory Detection – Which Method is Better for Novices?. Ultrasound Int Open 2024; 10.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2271-0098
 

  • References

  • 1 Kouk S. The Evolution of Arthroscopy A Historical Perspective. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2021; 79: 23-29
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Bundesamt S. Die 20 häufigsten Operationen insgesamt 2022 [cited 2023 06.04]. Available from: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Gesundheit/Krankenhaeuser/Tabellen/drg-operationen-insgesamt.html
  • 3 Martin KD, Patterson DP, Cameron KL. Arthroscopic Training Courses Improve Trainee Arthroscopy Skills: A Simulation-Based Prospective Trial. Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 2228-2232
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Paxton ES, Backus J, Keener J, Brophy RH. Shoulder arthroscopy: basic principles of positioning, anesthesia, and portal anatomy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013; 21: 332-342
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Mayr HO, Stoehr A. [Complications of knee arthroscopy]. Orthopade. 2016; 45: 4-12
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Moen TC, Rudolph GH, Caswell K, Espinoza C, Burkhead WZ, Krishnan SG. Complications of shoulder arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014; 22: 410-419
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Mehta P, Rand EB, Visco CJ, Wyss J. Resident Accuracy of Musculoskeletal Palpation With Ultrasound Verification. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37: 1719-1724
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Rho ME, Chu SK, Yang A, Hameed F, Lin CY, Hurh PJ. Resident accuracy of joint line palpation using ultrasound verification. Pm r 2014; 6: 920-925
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Claessen F, Kachooei AR, Kolovich GP, Buijze GA, Oh LS, van den Bekerom MPJ. et al. Portal placement in elbow arthroscopy by novice surgeons: cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25: 2247-2254
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Weinrauch P, Kermeci S. Ultrasound-assisted hip arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech 2014; 3: e255-e259
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Prenaud C, Loubeyre J, Soubeyrand M. Decompression of the suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular notch under combined arthroscopic and ultrasound guidance. Scientific Reports 2021; 11: 18906
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Hua Y, Yang Y, Chen S, Wang Y, Li Y, Chen J. et al. Ultrasound-guided establishment of hip arthroscopy portals. Arthroscopy 2009; 25: 1491-1495
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Mhaskar VA, Agrahari H, Maheshwari J. Ultrasound guided arthroscopic meniscus surgery. J Ultrasound 2023; 26: 577-581
    Google Scholar
  • 14 van Loon FHJ, Buise MP, Claassen JJF, Dierick-van Daele ATM, Bouwman ARA. Comparison of ultrasound guidance with palpation and direct visualisation for peripheral vein cannulation in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2018; 121: 358-366
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Sage W, Pickup L, Smith TO, Denton ER, Toms AP. The clinical and functional outcomes of ultrasound-guided vs landmark-guided injections for adults with shoulder pathology – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013; 52: 743-751
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Patel DN, Nayyar S, Hasan S, Khatib O, Sidash S, Jazrawi LM. Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus blind glenohumeral injections: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21: 1664-1668
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Kumar V, Rajnish RK. Knee Examination. In: Dhatt SS, Prabhakar S, editors. Handbook of Clinical Examination in Orthopedics: An Illustrated Guide. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2019. p 247-254
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Prabhakar S, Syam K. Shoulder Examination. In: Dhatt SS, Prabhakar S, editors. Handbook of Clinical Examination in Orthopedics: An Illustrated Guide. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2019. p 53-132
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Dienst M, Kohn D. Grundlagen der Kniearthroskopie. In: Pfeil J, Siebert W, Janousek A, Josten C, editors. Minimal-invasive Verfahren in der Orthopädie und Traumatologie. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2000. p 179-184
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Bachmann CE, Gruber G, Konermann W, Arnold A, Gruber GM, Ueberle F. et al. Ultrasound Examination — Standard Ultrasound Cross Sectional Planes (DEGUM Recommendations). In: Bachmann CE, Gruber G, Konermann W, Arnold A, Gruber GM, Ueberle F, et al., editors. ESWT and Ultrasound Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System. Heidelberg: Steinkopff; 2001. p 37-55
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Cicak N, Matasović T, Bajraktarević T. Ultrasonographic guidance of needle placement for shoulder arthrography. J Ultrasound Med 1992; 11: 135-137
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Konermann W, Gruber G. Ultraschalldiagnostik der Bewegungsorgane: Kursbuch nach den Richtlinien der DEGUM und der DGOU. Georg Thieme Verlag; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Walrod BJ, Schroeder A, Conroy MJ, Boucher LC, Bockbrader M, Way DP. et al. Does Ultrasound-Enhanced Instruction of Musculoskeletal Anatomy Improve Physical Examination Skills of First-Year Medical Students?. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37: 225-232
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Gazzillo GP, Finnoff JT, Hall MM, Sayeed YA, Smith J. Accuracy of palpating the long head of the biceps tendon: an ultrasonographic study. Pm r 2011; 3: 1035-1040
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Gaudreault N, Lebel K, Bédard S, Daigle F, Venne G, Balg F. Using ultrasound imaging to assess novice physiotherapy students' ability to locate musculoskeletal structures with palpation. Physiotherapy. 2021; 113: 53-60
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Meyer M, Graveleau N, Hardy P, Landreau P. Anatomic risks of shoulder arthroscopy portals: anatomic cadaveric study of 12 portals. Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 529-536
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Lin JS, Gimarc DC, Adler RS, Beltran LS, Merkle AN. Ultrasound-Guided Musculoskeletal Injections. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2021; 25: 769-784
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Amoo-Achampong K, Nwachukwu BU, McCormick F. An orthopedist’s guide to shoulder ultrasound: a systematic review of examination protocols. The Physician and Sportsmedicine 2016; 44: 407-416
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Gillman LM, Kirkpatrick AW. Portable bedside ultrasound: the visual stethoscope of the 21st century. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2012; 20: 18
    Google Scholar
  • 30 AGA. Ausbildung www.aga-online.ch​: Gesellschaft für Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie; 2023 [cited 2023 02.06]. Available from: https://www.aga-online.ch/ausbildung/
  • 31 Alomar AZ. Undergraduate Medical Students' Perceptions of an Online Audio-Visual-Based Module for Teaching Musculoskeletal Physical Examination Skills. J Med Educ Curric Dev 2022; 9 23821205221078794
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Blechschmidt V, Recker F. Representation of sonographic learning objectives in the NKLM 2.0. Ultraschall Med 2022; 43: 30
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Weimer JM, Rink M, Müller L, Dirks K, Ille C, Bozzato A. et al. Development and Integration of DOPS as Formative Tests in Head and Neck Ultrasound Education: Proof of Concept Study for Exploration of Perceptions. Diagnostics. 2023; 13: 661
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Murphy RF, LaPorte DM, Wadey VM. Musculoskeletal education in medical school: deficits in knowledge and strategies for improvement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: 2009-2014
    Google Scholar