Innovations in the Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Health: A Glimpse into the Future

Abstract

Skeletal muscle is the largest organ system in the human body and plays critical roles in athletic performance, mobility, and disease pathogenesis. Despite growing recognition of its importance by major health organizations, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding skeletal muscle health and its crosstalk with nearly every physiological system. Relevant public health challenges like pain, injury, obesity, and sarcopenia underscore the need to accurately assess skeletal muscle health and function. Feasible, non-invasive techniques that reliably evaluate metrics including muscle pain, dynamic structure, contractility, circulatory function, body composition, and emerging biomarkers are imperative to unraveling the complexities of skeletal muscle. Our concise review highlights innovative or overlooked approaches for comprehensively assessing skeletal muscle in vivo. We summarize recent advances in leveraging dynamic ultrasound imaging, muscle echogenicity, tensiomyography, blood flow restriction protocols, molecular techniques, body composition, and pain assessments to gain novel insight into muscle physiology from cellular to whole-body perspectives. Continued development of precise, non-invasive tools to investigate skeletal muscle are critical in informing impactful discoveries in exercise and rehabilitation science.

Keywords

pain - injury - rehabilitation - athlete performance - blood flow restriction - muscle quality

Publication History

Received: 26 September 2023

Accepted: 10 January 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
10 January 2024

Article published online:
24 February 2024

• References

• 1 Frontera WR, Ochala J. Skeletal muscle: a brief review of structure and function. Calcif Tissue Int 2015; 96: 183-195 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-014-9915-y.
• 2 McCuller C, Jessu R, Callahan AL. Physiology, Skeletal Muscle. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023
• 3 Goodpaster BH, Carlson CL, Visser M. et al. Attenuation of skeletal muscle and strength in the elderly: The Health ABC Study. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2001; 90: 2157-2165 DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.6.2157.
• 4 English KL, Paddon-Jones D. Protecting muscle mass and function in older adults during bed rest. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2010; 13: 34-39 DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328333aa66.
• 5 Raue U, Slivka D, Minchev K. et al. Improvements in whole muscle and myocellular function are limited with high-intensity resistance training in octogenarian women. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2009; 106: 1611-1617 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91587.2008.
• 6 Timmons JA. Variability in training-induced skeletal muscle adaptation. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2011; 110: 846-853 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00934.2010.
• 7 Churchward-Venne TA, Burd NA, Phillips SM. Nutritional regulation of muscle protein synthesis with resistance exercise: strategies to enhance anabolism. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2012; 9: 40 DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-9-40.
• 8 Teyhen DS. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging: The roadmap ahead. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007; 37: 431-433 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2007.0107.
• 9 Prentice CLS, Milanese S, Massy-Westropp N. et al. The reliability of rehabilitative ultrasound to measure lateral abdominal muscle thickness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2021; 53: 102357 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102357.
• 10 Lanza MB, Rock K, Marchese V. et al. Ultrasound measures of muscle thickness and subcutaneous tissue from the hip abductors: Inter- and intra-rater reliability. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 62: 102612 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102612.
• 11 Devorski L, Skibski A, Mangum LC. Muscle function obtained with motion mode ultrasound and surface electromyography during core endurance exercise. . Available from https://app.jove.com/t/64335/muscle-function-obtained-with-motion-mode-ultrasound-surface Accessed: 14 August 2023
• 12 Skibski A, Devorski L, Mangum LC. Providing visual biofeedback using brightness mode ultrasound during a golf swing. J Vis Exp 2022; e64333 DOI: 10.3791/64333.
• 13 Mangum LC, Sutherlin MA, Saliba SA. et al. Reliability of ultrasound imaging measures of transverse abdominis and lumbar multifidus in various positions. PM&R 2016; 8: 340-347 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.09.015.
• 14 DeJong AF, Mangum LC, Hertel J. Ultrasound imaging of the gluteal muscles during the Y-balance test in individuals with or without chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train 2020; 55: 49-57 DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-363-18.
• 15 Teyhen DS, Miltenberger CE, Deiters HM. et al. The use of ultrasound imaging of the abdominal drawing-in maneuver in subjects with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005; 35: 346-355 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.6.346.
• 16 Loturco I, Gil S, Laurino CF, de S. et al. Differences in muscle mechanical properties between elite power and endurance athletes: a comparative study. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 1723-1728 DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000803.
• 17 Parmar A, Scott M, Brand C. et al. An assessment of the contractile properties of the shoulder musculature in elite volleyball players using tensiomyography. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2020; 15: 1099-1109 DOI: 10.26603/ijspt20201099.
• 18 García-García O, Cancela-Carral JM, Huelin-Trillo F. Neuromuscular profile of top-level women kayakers assessed through tensiomyography. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 844-853 DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000702.
• 19 Piqueras-Sanchiz F, Martín-Rodríguez S, Pareja-Blanco F. et al. Mechanomyographic measures of muscle contractile properties are influenced by electrode size and stimulation pulse duration. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 8192 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65111-z.
• 20 de Paula Simola RÁ, Harms N, Raeder C. et al. Tensiomyography reliability and prediction of changes in muscle force following heavy eccentric strength exercise using muscle mechanical properties. Sports Technol 2015; 8: 58-66 DOI: 10.1080/19346182.2015.1117475.
• 21 Macgregor LJ, Hunter AM, Orizio C. et al. Assessment of skeletal muscle contractile properties by radial displacement: the case for tensiomyography. Sports Med 2018; 48: 1607-1620 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-018-0912-6.
• 22 Collett J, Dawes H, Meaney A. et al. Exercise for multiple sclerosis: a single-blind randomized trial comparing three exercise intensities. Mult Scler 2011; 17: 594-603 DOI: 10.1177/1352458510391836.
• 23 Wens I, Dalgas U, Vandenabeele F. et al. High intensity exercise in multiple sclerosis: effects on muscle contractile characteristics and exercise capacity, a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0133697 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133697.
• 24 Keytsman C, Hansen D, Wens I. et al. Impact of high-intensity concurrent training on cardiovascular risk factors in persons with multiple sclerosis – pilot study. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 41: 430-435 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1395086.
• 25 Laurentino GC, Ugrinowitsch C, Roschel H. et al. Strength training with blood flow restriction diminishes myostatin gene expression. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 406-412 DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318233b4bc.
• 26 Vechin FC, Libardi CA, Conceição MS. et al. Comparisons between low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction and high-intensity resistance training on quadriceps muscle mass and strength in elderly. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 1071-1076 DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000703.
• 27 Schoenfeld BJ, Peterson MD, Ogborn D. et al. Effects of low- vs. high-load resistance training on muscle strength and hypertrophy in well-trained men. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 2954-2963 DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000958.
• 28 Hill EC, Housh TJ, Smith CM. et al. Acute changes in muscle thickness, edema, and blood flow are not different between low-load blood flow restriction and non-blood flow restriction. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2021; 41: 452-460 DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12720.
• 29 Hill EC, Housh TJ, Keller JL. et al. Early phase adaptations in muscle strength and hypertrophy as a result of low-intensity blood flow restriction resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol 2018; 118: 1831-1843 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3918-8.
• 30 Hill EC. The effects of 4 weeks of blood flow restriction and low-load resistance training on muscle strength, power, hypertrophy, and neuromuscular adaptation. ETD collection for University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 2019 Available from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI13814015
• 31 Hill EC. Eccentric, but not concentric blood flow restriction resistance training increases muscle strength in the untrained limb. Phys Ther Sport 2020; 43: 1-7 DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.01.013.
• 32 Mattar MA, Gualano B, Perandini LA. et al. Safety and possible effects of low-intensity resistance training associated with partial blood flow restriction in polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Arthritis Res Ther 2014; 16: 473 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-014-0473-5.
• 33 Lamberti N, Straudi S, Donadi M. et al. Effectiveness of blood flow-restricted slow walking on mobility in severe multiple sclerosis: A pilot randomized trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2020; 30: 1999-2009 DOI: 10.1111/sms.13764.
• 34 Ogawa H, Nakajima T, Shibasaki I. et al. Low-intensity resistance training with moderate blood flow restriction appears safe and increases skeletal muscle strength and size in cardiovascular surgery patients: a pilot study. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 547 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10030547.
• 35 Takarada Y, Takazawa H, Ishii N. Applications of vascular occlusion diminish disuse atrophy of knee extensor muscles. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 2035-2039 DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200012000-00011.
• 36 Hughes L, Rosenblatt B, Haddad F. et al. Comparing the effectiveness of blood flow restriction and traditional heavy load resistance training in the post-surgery rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients: A UK National Health Service randomised controlled trial. Sports Med 2019; 49: 1787-1805 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-019-01137-2.
• 37 Abe T, Sakamaki M, Fujita S. et al. Effects of low-intensity walk training with restricted leg blood flow on muscle strength and aerobic capacity in older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2010; 33: 34-40
• 38 Yasuda T, Fukumura K, Iida H. et al. Effect of low-load resistance exercise with and without blood flow restriction to volitional fatigue on muscle swelling. Eur J Appl Physiol 2015; 115: 919-926 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-014-3073-9.
• 39 Barbalho M, Rocha AC, Seus TL. et al. Addition of blood flow restriction to passive mobilization reduces the rate of muscle wasting in elderly patients in the intensive care unit: a within-patient randomized trial. Clin Rehabil 2019; 33: 233-240
• 40 Proppe CE, Aldeghi TM, Rivera PM. et al. 75-repetition versus sets to failure of blood flow restriction exercise on indices of muscle damage in women. Eur J Sport Sci 2023; 1-9 DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2023.2201813.
• 41 Gray SM, Cuomo AM, Proppe CE. et al. Effects of sex and cuff pressure on physiological responses during blood flow restriction resistance exercise in young adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2023; 55: 920-931 DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003103.
• 42 Loenneke JP, Allen KM, Mouser JG. et al. Blood flow restriction in the upper and lower limbs is predicted by limb circumference and systolic blood pressure. Eur J Appl Physiol 2015; 115: 397-405 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-014-3030-7.
• 43 Reis JF, Fatela P, Mendonca GV. et al. Tissue oxygenation in response to different relative levels of blood-flow restricted exercise. Front Physiol 2019; 10: 407 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00407.
• 44 Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 231-240 DOI: 10.1519/15184.1.
• 45 Hughes L, Jeffries O, Waldron M. et al. Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions. PeerJ 2018; 6: e4697 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4697.
• 46 Hunt JEA, Stodart C, Ferguson RA. The influence of participant characteristics on the relationship between cuff pressure and level of blood flow restriction. Eur J Appl Physiol 2016; 116: 1421-1432 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-016-3399-6.
• 47 Aniceto RR, da Silva Leandro L. Practical blood flow restriction training: new methodological directions for practice and research. Sports Med Open 2022; 8: 87 DOI: 10.1186/s40798-022-00475-2.
• 48 FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group BEST. (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration (US);. 2016
• 49 Califf RM. Biomarker definitions and their applications. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2018; 243: 213-221 DOI: 10.1177/1535370217750088.
• 50 Gong F, Wei H-X, Li Q. et al. Evaluation and comparison of serological methods for COVID-19 diagnosis. Front Mol Biosci 2021; 8: 682405 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.682405.
• 51 Katsanos AH, Kyriakidi K, Karassa FB. et al. Biomarker Development in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases. In: D'Hooghe T (ed). Biomarkers for Endometriosis. Springer; Cham: 2017: 41-75 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59856-7_3
• 52 Haro I, Sanmartí R, Gómara MJ. Implications of post-translational modifications in autoimmunity with emphasis on citrullination, homocitrullination and acetylation for the pathogenesis, diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23: 15803 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232415803.
• 53 Fosang AJ, Last K, Stanton H. et al. Neoepitope antibodies against MMP-cleaved and aggrecanase-cleaved aggrecan. Methods Mol Biol 2010; 622: 312-347 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-299-5_19.
• 54 Rogers LD, Overall CM. Proteolytic post-translational modification of proteins: proteomic tools and methodology. Mol Cell Proteomics 2013; 12: 3532-3542 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M113.031310.
• 55 Arvanitidis A, Henriksen K, Karsdal MA. et al. Neo-epitope peptides as biomarkers of disease progression for muscular dystrophies and other myopathies. J Neuromuscul Dis 2016; 3: 333-346 DOI: 10.3233/JND-160150.
• 56 Karsdal MA, Henriksen K, Leeming DJ. et al. Novel combinations of Post-Translational Modification (PTM) neo-epitopes provide tissue-specific biochemical markers--are they the cause or the consequence of the disease?. Clin Biochem 2010; 43: 793-804 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.03.015.
• 57 Drescher C, Konishi M, Ebner N. et al. Loss of muscle mass: Current developments in cachexia and sarcopenia focused on biomarkers and treatment. Int J Cardiol 2016; 202: 766-772 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.10.033.
• 58 Nedergaard A, Karsdal MA, Sun S. et al. Serological muscle loss biomarkers: an overview of current concepts and future possibilities. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2013; 4: 1-17 DOI: 10.1007/s13539-012-0086-2.
• 59 Nedergaard A, Sun S, Karsdal MA. et al. Type VI collagen turnover-related peptides-novel serological biomarkers of muscle mass and anabolic response to loading in young men. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2013; 4: 267-275 DOI: 10.1007/s13539-013-0114-x.
• 60 Nedergaard A, Dalgas U, Primdahl H. et al. Collagen fragment biomarkers as serological biomarkers of lean body mass – a biomarker pilot study from the DAHANCA25B cohort and matched controls. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2015; 6: 335-342 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12027.
• 61 Sun S, Henriksen K, Karsdal MA. et al. Measurement of a MMP-2 degraded Titin fragment in serum reflects changes in muscle turnover induced by atrophy. Exp Gerontol 2014; 58: 83-89 DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2014.07.016.
• 62 Nielsen MJ, Nedergaard AF, Sun S. et al. The neo-epitope specific PRO-C3 ELISA measures true formation of type III collagen associated with liver and muscle parameters. Am J Transl Res 2013; 5: 303-315
• 63 Reule CA, Scholz C, Schoen C. et al. Reduced muscular fatigue after a 12-week leucine-rich amino acid supplementation combined with moderate training in elderly: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2016; 2: e000156 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2016-000156.
• 64 Monti E, Sarto F, Sartori R. et al. C-terminal agrin fragment as a biomarker of muscle wasting and weakness: a narrative review. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2023; 14: 730-744 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13189.
• 65 Thambisetty M, Lovestone S. Blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease: challenging but feasible. Biomark Med 2010; 4: 65-79 DOI: 10.2217/bmm.09.84.
• 66 Goodpaster BH, Park SW, Harris TB. et al. The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the health, aging and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006; 61: 1059-1064 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/61.10.1059.
• 67 Russ DW, Gregg-Cornell K, Conaway MJ. et al. Evolving concepts on the age-related changes in "muscle quality". J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2012; 3: 95-109 DOI: 10.1007/s13539-011-0054-2.
• 68 Delmonico MJ, Harris TB, Visser M. et al. Longitudinal study of muscle strength, quality, and adipose tissue infiltration. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 90: 1579-1585 DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28047.
• 69 Di Girolamo FG, Fiotti N, Milanović Z. et al. The aging muscle in experimental bed rest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Nutr 2021; 8: 633987 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.633987.
• 70 MacLennan RJ, Sahebi M, Becker N. et al. Declines in skeletal muscle quality vs. size following two weeks of knee joint immobilization. PeerJ 2020; 8: e8224 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8224.
• 71 MacLennan RJ, Ogilvie D, McDorman J. et al. The time course of neuromuscular impairment during short-term disuse in young women. Physiol Rep 2021; 9: e14677 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14677.
• 72 Correa-de-Araujo R, Harris-Love MO, Miljkovic I. et al. The need for standardized assessment of muscle quality in skeletal muscle function deficit and other aging-related muscle dysfunctions: A symposium report. Front Physiol 2017; 8: 87 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00087.
• 73 Stock MS, Thompson BJ. Echo intensity as an indicator of skeletal muscle quality: applications, methodology, and future directions. Eur J Appl Physiol 2021; 121: 369-380 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-020-04556-6.
• 74 Pinto MD, Silveira Pinto R, Nosaka K. et al. Do intramuscular temperature and fascicle angle affect ultrasound echo intensity values. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2023; 55: 740-750 DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003082.
• 75 Arts IMP, Schelhaas HJ, Verrijp KCN. et al. Intramuscular fibrous tissue determines muscle echo intensity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 2012; 45: 449-450 DOI: 10.1002/mus.22254.
• 76 Pillen S, Tak RO, Zwarts MJ. et al. Skeletal muscle ultrasound: Correlation between fibrous tissue and echo intensity. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009; 35: 443-446 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.09.016.
• 77 Young H-J, Jenkins NT, Zhao Q. et al. Measurement of intramuscular fat by muscle echo intensity. Muscle Nerve 2015; 52: 963-971 DOI: 10.1002/mus.24656.
• 78 Tanaka NI, Ogawa M, Yoshiko A. et al. Validity of extended-field-of-view ultrasound imaging to evaluate quantity and quality of trunk skeletal muscles. Ultrasound Med Biol 2021; 47: 376-385 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.11.006.
• 79 Stock MS, Mota JA, Hernandez JM. et al. Echo intensity and muscle thickness as predictors of athleticism and isometric strength in middle-school boys. Muscle Nerve 2017; 55: 685-692 DOI: 10.1002/mus.25395.
• 80 Komforti D, Joffe C, Magras A. et al. Does skeletal muscle morphology or functional performance better explain variance in fast gait speed in older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 2021; 33: 921-931 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01596-y.
• 81 Stock MS, Oranchuk DJ, Burton AM. et al. Age-, sex-, and region-specific differences in skeletal muscle size and quality. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2020; 45: 1253-1260 DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0114.
• 82 Wong V, Spitz RW, Bell ZW. et al. Exercise induced changes in echo intensity within the muscle: a brief review. J Ultrasound 2020; 23: 457-472 DOI: 10.1007/s40477-019-00424-y.
• 83 Dankel SJ, Abe T, Bell ZW. et al. The impact of ultrasound probe tilt on muscle thickness and echo-intensity: A cross-sectional study. J Clin Densitom 2020; 23: 630-638 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.10.003.
• 84 Varanoske A, Coker N, Johnson B-A. et al. Effects of rest position on morphology of the vastus lateralis and its relationship with lower-body strength and power. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2019; 4: 64 DOI: 10.3390/jfmk4030064.
• 85 Carr JC, Gerstner GR, Voskuil CC. et al. The influence of sonographer experience on skeletal muscle image acquisition and analysis. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2021; 6: 91 DOI: 10.3390/jfmk6040091.
• 86 Girts RM, Harmon KK, Pagan JI. et al. The influence of ultrasound image depth and gain on skeletal muscle echo intensity. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2022; 47: 839-846 DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2021-0810.
• 87 Seynnes OR, Cronin NJ. Simple Muscle Architecture Analysis (SMA): An ImageJ macro tool to automate measurements in B-mode ultrasound scans. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0229034 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229034.
• 88 Ritsche P, Wirth P, Franchi MV. et al. ACSauto-semi-automatic assessment of human vastus lateralis and rectus femoris cross-sectional area in ultrasound images. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 13042
• 89 American College of Sports Medicine, Lohman T, Milliken LA. ACSM’s Body Composition Assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2019
• 90 Kasper AM, Langan-Evans C, Hudson JF. et al. Come back skinfolds, all is forgiven: A narrative review of the efficacy of common body composition methods in applied sports practice. Nutrients 2021; 13: 1075 DOI: 10.3390/nu13041075.
• 91 Santos DA, Dawson JA, Matias CN. et al. Reference values for body composition and anthropometric measurements in athletes. PLoS One 2014; 9: e97846 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097846.
• 92 Fukuda D. Assessments for Sport and Athletic Performance. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2019
• 93 Slater G, Woolford S. Assessment of Physique. In: Tanner RK, Gore CJ (eds), Australian Institute of Sport. Physiological Tests for Elite Athletes. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2013
• 94 Bonilla DA, De León LG, Alexander-Cortez P. et al. Simple anthropometry-based calculations to monitor body composition in athletes: Scoping review and reference values. Nutr Health 2022; 28: 95-109 DOI: 10.1177/02601060211002941.
• 95 Defreitas JM, Beck TW, Stock MS. et al. A comparison of techniques for estimating training-induced changes in muscle cross-sectional area. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 2382-2389 DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ec86f3.
• 96 Moritani T, deVries HA. Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. Am J Phys Med 1979; 58: 115-130
• 97 Housh DJ, Housh TJ, Weir JP. et al. Anthropometric estimation of thigh muscle cross-sectional area. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 784-791
• 98 Duarte CK, De Abreu Silva L, Castro CF. et al. Prediction equations to estimate muscle mass using anthropometric data: a systematic review. Nutr Rev 2023; 81: 1414-1440 DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad022.
• 99 Lukaski H, Raymond-Pope CJ. New frontiers of body composition in sport. Int J Sports Med 2021; 42: 588-601 DOI: 10.1055/a-1373-5881.
• 100 Kim C-H, Park J-H, Kim H. et al. Modeling the human body shape in bioimpedance vector measurements. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010; 2010: 3872-3874 DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627664.
• 101 Di Vincenzo O, Marra M, Scalfi L. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle in sport: a systematic review. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2019; 16: 49 DOI: 10.1186/s12970-019-0319-2.
• 102 Cebrián-Ponce Á, Irurtia A, Carrasco-Marginet M. et al. Electrical impedance myography in health and physical exercise: A systematic review and future perspectives. Front Physiol 2021; 12: 740877
• 103 International Association for the Study of Pain. Terminology. Available from https://www.iasp-pain.org/resources/terminology/ Accessed: 13 November 2023
• 104 Cao Q-W, Peng B-G, Wang L. et al. Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9: 2077-2089 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i9.2077.
• 105 Harden RN, Bruehl SP, Gass S. et al. Signs and symptoms of the myofascial pain syndrome: a national survey of pain management providers. Clin J Pain 2000; 16: 64-72 DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200003000-00010.
• 106 Li L, Stoop R, Clijsen R. et al. Criteria used for the diagnosis of myofascial trigger points in clinical trials on physical therapy: Updated systematic review. Clin J Pain 2020; 36: 955-967 DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000875.
• 107 Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Dommerholt J. International consensus on diagnostic criteria and clinical considerations of myofascial trigger points: A Delphi study. Pain Med 2018; 19: 142-150 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnx207.
• 108 Simons DG, Stolov WC. Microscopic features and transient contraction of palpable bands in canine muscle. Am J Phys Med 1976; 55: 65-88
• 109 Srbely JZ, Dickey JP, Bent LR. et al. Capsaicin-induced central sensitization evokes segmental increases in trigger point sensitivity in humans. J Pain 2010; 11: 636-643 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.10.005.
• 110 Lucas N, Macaskill P, Irwig L. et al. Reliability of physical examination for diagnosis of myofascial trigger points: a systematic review of the literature. Clin J Pain 2009; 25: 80-89 DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31817e13b6.
• 111 Wytrążek M, Huber J, Lipiec J. et al. Evaluation of palpation, pressure algometry, and electromyography for monitoring trigger points in young participants. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2015; 38: 232-243 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.12.005.
• 112 Oliveira de AK, Dibai-Filho AV, Soleira G. et al. Reliability of pressure pain threshold on myofascial trigger points in the trapezius muscle of women with chronic neck pain. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2021; 67: 708-712 DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20201149.
• 113 Mazza DF, Boutin RD, Chaudhari AJ. Assessment of myofascial trigger points via imaging: A systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2021; 100: 1003-1014 DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001789.
• 114 Sikdar S, Shah JP, Gebreab T. et al. Novel applications of ultrasound technology to visualize and characterize myofascial trigger points and surrounding soft tissue. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 1829-1838 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.015.
• 115 Luiza da Silva Queiroz M, Bezerra Diniz PR, Nepomuceno Montenegro EJ. et al. MRI in migraineurs: are there abnormalities in the area where the myofascial trigger points are palpable and in volume measurements?. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2020; 24: 260-266 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.02.025.