Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2240-1534
Comparisons of Impact of Vein Grafting with Different Indications on Outcomes of Reconstruction with Free Flaps
Funding This research was funded in part through the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748, which supports Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center's research infrastructure.Abstract
Background Prior studies have shown an increased risk of complications and flap loss with the use of vein grafts in microsurgery. We hypothesize that indication for use of a vein graft can affect flap complications and loss rates.
Methods We performed a retrospective review of all patients at our institution from 2010 to 2020 who underwent free flap reconstruction and required use of a vein graft. Indications for vein grafting included: salvage of flap during primary operation after microvascular compromise, augmentation of flow during primary operation, lengthening of the flap pedicle during the primary operation, and salvage of the flap during a secondary salvage operation after microvascular compromise.
Results A total of 79 patients met the study inclusion criteria. There were significant differences among the vein graft indication groups and the following: area of reconstruction (p = 0.002), vein graft length (p = 0.018), vessels grafted (p = 0.001), vein graft donor site (p = 0.011), and total flap loss (p = 0.047). Of the four indications for vein grafting, salvage of the flap during secondary salvage operation after microvascular compromise had the highest rate of total flap loss (26.7%). There were no significant associations between other flap complications and vein graft indications.
Conclusion Vein graft use in the primary reconstructive setting is efficacious, with low risk of thrombosis. Use in secondary procedures, however, is associated with higher rates of total flap loss, likely due to the thrombotic process, which was initiated prior to the use of the graft resulting in the salvage procedure and not secondary to the graft itself.
Notes
B.M. is an advisor to PureTech Corp and the recipient of an investigator-initiated research award from Regeneron Corp. J.H.D. is an advisor to Stryker Corporation, is on the board of Welwaze Medical LLC and has a royalty agreement with Springer Publishers for the book: Multimodal Treatment of Upper and Lower Extremity Lymphedema.
* Coriddi and Kim served as co-first authors.
Publication History
Received: 26 June 2023
Accepted: 05 January 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
08 January 2024
Article published online:
16 February 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Oliva A. Interposition vein grafting in head and neck reconstructive microsurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 1993; 9 (04) 319-320
- 2 Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP. et al. Choice of flap and incidence of free flap success. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (03) 459-463
- 3 Khouri RK, Cooley BC, Kunselman AR. et al. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (03) 711-721
- 4 Cheng HT, Lin FY, Chang SC. Evidence-based analysis of vein graft interposition in head and neck free flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (05) 853e-854e
- 5 Inbal A, Silva AK, Humphries LS, Teven CM, Gottlieb LJ. Bridging the gap: a 20-year experience with vein grafts for free flap reconstruction. The odds for success. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (03) 786-794
- 6 Maricevich M, Lin LO, Liu J, Chang EI, Hanasono MM. Interposition vein grafting in head and neck free flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (04) 1025-1034
- 7 Kapila AK, Wakure A, Morgan M, Belgaumwala T, Ramakrishnan V. Characteristics and outcomes of primary interposition vascular grafts in free flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73 (12) 2142-2149
- 8 Classen DA. The indications and reliability of vein graft use in free flap transfer. Can J Plast Surg 2004; 12 (01) 27-29
- 9 Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Grover R. et al. Vein grafting your way out of trouble: examining the utility and efficacy of vein grafts in microsurgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (06) 830-836
- 10 Bayramiçli M, Tetik C, Sönmez A, Gürünlüoğlu R, Baltaci F. Reliability of primary vein grafts in lower extremity free tissue transfers. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 48 (01) 21-29
- 11 Wettstein R, Schürch R, Banic A, Erni D, Harder Y. Review of 197 consecutive free flap reconstructions in the lower extremity. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61 (07) 772-776
- 12 Chang EI, Zhang H, Liu J, Yu P, Skoracki RJ, Hanasono MM. Analysis of risk factors for flap loss and salvage in free flap head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 2016; 38 (Suppl 1): E771-E775
- 13 Kwon YJ, Jung HS, Ahn BM, Lee JS, Park HJ, Ha YC. Survival rates and risk factors for failure using an interposition vein graft for fingertip amputations with segmental vessel defects. Microsurgery 2020; 40 (04) 447-451
- 14 Coriddi M, Myers P, Mehrara B. et al. Management of postoperative microvascular compromise and ischemia reperfusion injury in breast reconstruction using autologous tissue transfer: retrospective review of 2103 flaps. Microsurgery 2022; 42 (02) 109-116
- 15 Bui DT, Cordeiro PG, Hu QY, Disa JJ, Pusic A, Mehrara BJ. Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (07) 2092-2100
- 16 Lai CS, Chang YT, Shen CH. et al. The role of vein grafts in reconstructive head and neck microsurgery. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2021
- 17 Kuo SCH, Kuo PJ, Yen YH, Chien PC, Hsieh HY, Hsieh CH. Association between operation- and operator-related factors and surgical complications among patients undergoing free-flap reconstruction for head and neck cancers: a propensity score-matched study of 1,865 free-flap reconstructions. Microsurgery 2019; 39 (06) 528-534
- 18 Langdell HC, Shammas RL, Atia A, Chang EI, Matros E, Phillips BT. Vein grafts in free flap reconstruction: review of indications and institutional pearls. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (03) 742-749
- 19 Nemoto M, Kumazawa K, Uchinuma E, Kounoike N, Takeda A. Clinical features of primary vein grafts in free tissue transfers. Plast Surg Int 2015; 2015: 481402
- 20 Chang EI, Fearmonti RM, Chang DW, Butler CE. Cephalic vein transposition versus vein grafts for venous outflow in free-flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014; 2 (05) e141
- 21 Germann G, Steinau HU. The clinical reliability of vein grafts in free-flap transfer. J Reconstr Microsurg 1996; 12 (01) 11-17
- 22 Lin CH, Mardini S, Lin YT, Yeh JT, Wei FC, Chen HC. Sixty-five clinical cases of free tissue transfer using long arteriovenous fistulas or vein grafts. J Trauma 2004; 56 (05) 1107-1117
- 23 Henn D, Bigdeli AK, Horsch M. et al. Venous bypass grafts versus arteriovenous loops as recipient vessels for microvascular anastomosis in lower extremity reconstructions: a matched-pair analysis. Microsurgery 2020; 40 (01) 12-18
- 24 Miller MJ, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Kroll SS. Interposition vein grafting in head and neck reconstructive microsurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 1993; 9 (03) 245-251 , discussion 251–252
- 25 Sørensen JL, Muchardt O, Reumert T. Temporary arteriovenous shunt prior to free flap transfer. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1990; 24 (01) 43-46
- 26 Angel MF, Chang B, Clark N, Wong L, Ringelman P, Manson PN. Further clinical use of the interposition arteriovenous loop graft in free tissue transfers. Microsurgery 1993; 14 (08) 479-481
- 27 Knackstedt R, Aliotta R, Gatherwright J. et al. Single-stage versus two-stage arteriovenous loop microsurgical reconstruction: a meta-analysis of the literature. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (06) 706-717
- 28 Nahabedian MY, Singh N, Deune EG, Silverman R, Tufaro AP. Recipient vessel analysis for microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 52 (02) 148-155 , discussion 156–157
- 29 Di Taranto G, Chen SH, Elia R. et al. Outcomes following head neck free flap reconstruction requiring interposition vein graft or vascular bridge flap. Head Neck 2019; 41 (09) 2914-2920
- 30 Earle AS, Feng LJ, Jordan RB. Long saphenous vein grafts as an aid to microsurgical reconstruction of the trunk. J Reconstr Microsurg 1990; 6 (02) 165-169
- 31 Karanas YL, Yim KK, Johannet P, Hui K, Lineaweaver WC. Use of 20 cm or longer interposition vein grafts in free flap reconstruction of the trunk. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101 (05) 1262-1267
- 32 Hallock GG. Venae comitantes as a source of vein grafts. J Reconstr Microsurg 2007; 23 (04) 219-223
- 33 Flores JI, Rad AN, Shridharani SM, Stapleton SM, Rosson GD. Saphenous vein grafts for perforator flap salvage in autologous breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2009; 29 (03) 236-239
- 34 Stewart D, Liau J, Vasconez H. Flap pedicle vena comitant as a vein graft donor source. Microsurgery 2009; 29 (02) 115-118
- 35 Vlastou C, Earle AS. Short saphenous vein grafts as an aid to microsurgical reconstruction of the lower extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg 1988; 4 (02) 145-154
- 36 Vlastou C, Earle AS, Jordan R. Vein grafts in reconstructive microsurgery of the lower extremity. Microsurgery 1992; 13 (05) 234-235
- 37 Khouri RK, Shaw WW. Reconstruction of the lower extremity with microvascular free flaps: a 10-year experience with 304 consecutive cases. J Trauma 1989; 29 (08) 1086-1094
- 38 Swendseid B, Stewart M, Mastrolonardo E. et al. Technical considerations in pedicle management in upper and midfacial free flap reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2021; 131 (11) 2465-2470
- 39 Gazyakan E, Xiong L, Sun J, Kneser U, Hirche C. Vein grafting in microsurgical lower extremity reconstruction: outcome analysis of primary versus secondary salvage procedures. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (07) 608-616
- 40 Carney MJ, Weissler JM, Tecce MG. et al. 5000 free flaps and counting: a 10-year review of a single academic institution's microsurgical development and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (04) 855-863
- 41 Mirzabeigi MN, Wang T, Kovach SJ, Taylor JA, Serletti JM, Wu LC. Free flap take-back following postoperative microvascular compromise: predicting salvage versus failure. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (03) 579-589