Innovative Clinical Scenario Simulator for Step-by-Step Microsurgical Training

Abstract

Background Microsurgical training should be implemented with consideration of operative difficulties that occur in actual clinical situations. We evaluated the effectiveness of a novel clinical scenario simulator for step-by-step microsurgical training that progressed from conventional training to escalated training with additional obstacles.

Methods A training device was designed according to multiple and intricate clinical microsurgery scenarios. Twenty surgical residents with no experience in microsurgery were randomly assigned to either the control group (conventional training curricula, n = 10) or the experimental group (step-by-step training courses, n = 10). After 4 weeks of laboratory practice, the participants were scheduled to perform their first microvascular anastomoses on patients in an operating room. The Global Rating Scale (GRS) scores and operative duration were used to compare microsurgical skills between the two groups.

Results There were no significant differences in the participants' baseline characteristics before microsurgical training between the groups with respect to age, sex, postgraduate year, surgical specialty, or mean GRS score (p < 0.05). There were also no significant differences in recipient sites between the two groups (p = 0.735). After training, the GRS scores in both groups were significantly improved (p = 0.000). However, in the actual microsurgical situations, the GRS scores were significantly higher in the experimental than control group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the operative duration between the two groups (p < 0.13).

Conclusion Compared with a traditional training program, this step-by-step microsurgical curriculum based on our clinical scenario simulator results in significant improvement in acquisition of microsurgical skills.

Keywords

microsurgical training - step-by-step microsurgical training - clinical scenario simulator

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for Publication

The authors sought consent from all individuals to publish their data before manuscript submission.

Authors' Contributions

Study conception and design: L.C., Y.D.H., Y.H., H.G.S., L.R.H.; acquisition of data: L.C., Y.D.H., B.L.J., M. Chai, M. Chen, J.S., W.W.P., X.L.; analysis and interpretation of data: L.C., Y.D.H., B.L.J., M. Chai, M. Chen, J.S., W.W.P., X.L.; drafting of manuscript: L.C., Y.D.H., Y.H., L.R.H. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version.

Publication History

Received: 06 July 2023

Accepted: 05 January 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
08 January 2024

Article published online:
12 February 2024

• References

• 1 Abi-Rafeh J, Zammit D, Mojtahed Jaberi M, Al-Halabi B, Thibaudeau S. Nonbiological microsurgery simulators in plastic surgery training: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (03) 496e-507e
• 2 Costa F, di Summa PG, Srinivasan J. Microsurgery arena: a new device to develop microsurgical skills. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (08) e3782
• 3 Titov O, Salamov I, Titov I, Demidova M, Bykanov A. Microworld: a novel device for training of basic microsurgical skills in different vectors and planes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148 (04) 689e-690e
• 4 Dos Reis JMC, Teixeira RKC, Santos DRD. et al. Novel porcine kidney-based microsurgery training model for developing basic to advanced microsurgical skills. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (02) 119-123
• 5 Shaffrey EC, Zeng W, Nicksic PJ. et al. Latex-infused porcine abdominal model: a novel microsurgery simulator for deep inferior epigastric perforator dissection. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40 (01) 23-29
• 6 M N, Sharma R, Suri A. Microsurgical suturing assessment scores: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev 2022; 45 (01) 119-124
• 7 Franco-González IT, Pérez-Escamirosa F, Minor-Martínez A, Rosas-Barrientos JV, Hernández-Paredes TJ. Development of a 3D motion tracking system for the analysis of skills in microsurgery. J Med Syst 2021; 45 (12) 106
• 8 Navia A, Tejos R, Canahuate S. et al. MicrosimUC: validation of a low-cost, portable, do-it-yourself microsurgery training kit. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (05) 409-419
• 9 Malik MM, Hachach-Haram N, Tahir M, Al-Musabi M, Masud D, Mohanna PN. Acquisition of basic microsurgery skills using home-based simulation training: a randomised control study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70 (04) 478-486
• 10 Chen J, Xun H, Abousy M, Long C, Sacks JM. No microscope? No problem: a systematic review of microscope-free microsurgery training models. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (02) 106-114
• 11 Mattar TGDM, Santos GBD, Telles JPM, Rezende MR, Wei TH, Mattar Júnior R. Structured evaluation of a comprehensive microsurgical training program. Clinics (São Paulo) 2021; 76: e3194
• 12 Juratli MA, Becker F, Palmes D. et al. Microsurgical training course for clinicians and scientists: a 10-year experience at the Münster University Hospital. BMC Med Educ 2021; 21 (01) 295
• 13 Wang Z, Wang H, Kong F. et al. Application of a microsurgical space restrictor in microsurgical simulation training. World Neurosurg 2020; 140: e289-e293
• 14 Papavasiliou T, Ubong S, Khajuria A, Chatzimichail S, Chan JCY. 3D printed chest wall: a tool for advanced microsurgical training simulating depth and limited view. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (09) e3817
• 15 Joy MT, Applebaum MA, Anderson WM, Serletti JM, Capito AE. Impact of high-fidelity microvascular surgery simulation on resident training. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023
• 16 Ziolkowski NI, Sun KZ, McMillan C, Ryzynski A, Snell L, Lipa JE. Simulating the IMA recipient site for DIEP flap surgery: a new model for dynamic microsurgery simulation with real-time respiration and a pilot study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (04) 254-263
• 17 Chauhan R, Ingersol C, Wooden WA. et al. Fundamentals of microsurgery: a novel simulation curriculum based on validated laparoscopic education approaches. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (07) 517-525