Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40(05): 363-370
DOI: 10.1055/a-2199-4151
Original Article

Patient-Reported Abdominal Morbidity Following Abdomen-Based Breast Reconstruction

Jacob Maus 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
,
Ivo A. Pestana 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Abdominal wall morbidity occurs with increased frequency following flap harvest in the obese abdomen. Its impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in breast reconstruction has been poorly characterized.

Methods A retrospective review of obese patients undergoing abdominal-based free autologous breast reconstruction was conducted over 15 years. Patient operative characteristics were recorded and outcomes were analyzed. PROs were assessed using the BREAST-Q abdominal survey.

Results In total, 75 women (108 flaps) with the mean body mass index (BMI) of 33.2 were included. Flaps included deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (24%), muscle-sparing (43%), and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps (f-TRAM; 33%). World Health Organization (WHO) obesity class, BMI, and flap type did not affect flap failure (1%) or complication rates. Hernia developed in 7%; all necessitated repair. Eight percent developed abdominal bulge; one was repaired. Hernia formation was associated with increased patient age (p < 0.05). Bulge formation occurred more often in f-TRAM donor sites (p = 0.005). BMI, WHO class, flap type, and mesh use were not related to hernia or bulge occurrence in either univariate or multivariate analysis. The survey response rate was 63%. Abdominal Physical Well-Being (proxy for abdominal wall function) and Satisfaction with Abdomen (patient-perceived cosmesis) were similar across flap types, age, and WHO classification groups. Patients with postoperative bulge reported higher abdominal physical well-being scores, regardless of flap type (p < 0.01). Bulge was correlated with lower satisfaction (p < 0.05).

Conclusion The incidence of abdominal wall morbidity following abdominal free-tissue transfer for breast reconstruction was acceptably low in our population of obese patients. Hernia was a clinically significant complication, warranting surgical repair. Bulge was primarily a cosmetic concern and did not detract from patient-reported abdominal wall function. Age may represent an independent risk factor for hernia formation in this population.

Keywords

breast reconstruction - obesity - autologous breast reconstruction - abdominal donor site morbidity - PRO - bulge - hernia - DIEP flap - TRAM

Note

All authors listed above have no disclosures, financial, or otherwise. This project has been presented at the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress on October 23, 2021.




Publication History

Received: 10 July 2023

Accepted: 21 October 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
26 October 2023

Article published online:
14 December 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Lee K, Kruper L, Dieli-Conwright CM, Mortimer JE. The impact of obesity on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. Curr Oncol Rep 2019; 21 (05) 41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM, Wu LC, Kanchwala S. Impact of obesity on outcomes in breast reconstruction: analysis of 15,937 patients from the ACS-NSQIP datasets. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217 (04) 656-664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rudolph M, Moore C, Pestana IA. Operative risk stratification in the obese female undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction. Breast J 2019; 25 (06) 1182-1186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Panayi AC, Agha RA, Sieber BA, Orgill DP. Impact of obesity on outcomes in breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (05) 363-375
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Nguyen KT, Hanwright PJ, Smetona JT, Hirsch EM, Seth AK, Kim JY. Body mass index as a continuous predictor of outcomes after expander-implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 73 (01) 19-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schaverien MV, Mcculley SJ. Effect of obesity on outcomes of free autologous breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (06) 484-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Srinivasa DR, Clemens MW, Qi J. et al. Obesity and breast reconstruction: complications and patient-reported outcomes in a multicenter, prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (03) 481e-490e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lee KT, Mun GH. Effects of obesity on postoperative complications after breast reconstruction using free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous, deep inferior epigastric perforator, and superficial inferior epigastric artery flap: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (05) 576-584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, Watson JP, DaLio AL, Crisera CA. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (05) 1519-1526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Klement KA, Hijjawi JB, LoGiudice JA, Alghoul M, Omesiete-Adejare P. Microsurgical breast reconstruction in the obese: a better option than tissue expander/implant reconstruction?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (03) 539-546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Garvey PB, Villa MT, Rozanski AT, Liu J, Robb GL, Beahm EK. The advantages of free abdominal-based flaps over implants for breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) 991-1000
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Boczar D, Huayllani MT, Forte AJ, Rinker B. Microsurgical breast reconstruction in the obese patient using abdominal flaps: complication profile and patient satisfaction. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 84 (6S, Suppl 5): S361-S363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Velazquez C, Siska RC, Pestana IA. Breast reconstruction completion in the obese: does reconstruction technique make a difference in its achievement?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (09) 720-727
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Chang DW, Wang B, Robb GL. et al. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (05) 1640-1648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA. et al. Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (06) 1383-1391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Chang EI, Liu J. Prospective evaluation of obese patients undergoing autologous abdominal free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (02) 120e-125e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Shubinets V, Fox JP, Sarik JR, Kovach SJ, Fischer JP. Surgically treated hernia following abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction: prevalence, outcomes, and expenditures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (03) 749-757
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Man LX, Selber JC, Serletti JM. Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: a meta-analysis and critical review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (03) 752-764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Erdmann-Sager J, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL. et al. Complications and patient-reported outcomes after abdominally based breast reconstruction: results of the mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (02) 271-281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Nelson JA, Sobti N, Patel A. et al. The impact of obesity on patient-reported outcomes following autologous breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27 (06) 1877-1888
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Nahabedian MY, Dooley W, Singh N, Manson PN. Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: the role of muscle preservation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (01) 91-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Momeni A, Ahdoot MA, Kim RY, Leroux E, Galaiya DJ, Lee GK. Should we continue to consider obesity a relative contraindication for autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction?. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (04) 420-425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Wen YE, Steppe C, Teotia SS, Haddock NT. Operative time predicts long-term abdominal morbidity and complication requiring treatment after DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40 (03) 217-226
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bond ES, Soteropulos CE, Yang Q, Poore SO. The impact of prior abdominal surgery on complications of abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (07) 566-579
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Daly LT, Doval AF, Lin SJ, Tobias A, Lee BT, Dowlatshahi AS. Role of CTA in women with abdominal scars undergoing DIEP breast reconstruction: review of 1,187 flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (04) 294-300
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Gignoux B, Bayon Y, Martin D. et al. Incidence and risk factors for incisional hernia and recurrence: retrospective analysis of the French national database. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23 (06) 1515-1523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bosanquet DC, Ansell J, Abdelrahman T. et al. Systematic review and meta-regression of factors affecting midline incisional hernia rates: analysis of 14,618 patients. PLoS One 2015; 10 (09) e0138745
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Huang H, Lu Wang M, Chen Y, Chadab TM, Vernice NA, Otterburn DM. A machine learning approach to predicting donor site complications following DIEP flap harvest. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40 (01) 70-77
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Löfstrand J, Paganini A, Lidén M, Hansson E. Donor-site satisfaction of DIEP and latissimus dorsi flaps—a comparative cohort study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (06) 472-481
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar