Diagnostic approach to splenic lesions

Abstract

Background Splenic lesions are rare and mostly incidental findings on cross-sectional imaging. Most lesions are of benign nature and can be correctly identified based on imaging characteristics. Further, invasive evaluation is only necessary in cases of splenic lesions with uncertain or potentially malignant etiology.

Method While in most cases a correct diagnosis can be made from computed tomography (CT), (additional) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can aid in the identification of lesions. As these lesions are rare, only a few of the differential diagnoses are regularly diagnosed in the clinical routine.

Result and Conclusion This review presents the differential diagnoses of splenic lesions, including imaging characteristics and a flowchart to determine the right diagnosis. In conjunction with laboratory results and clinical symptoms, histological workup is necessary only in a few cases, especially in incidental findings. In these cases, image-guided biopsies should be preferred over splenectomy, if possible.

Key Points 

• Splenic lesions are rare and are usually incidental findings on abdominal imaging

• CT imaging and MRI imaging are the diagnostic tools of choice for the further workup of splenic lesions

• Based on their image morphological characteristics, a large number of splenic lesions can be assigned to one entity and do not need histological analysis

Citation Format

• Krähling H, Seidensticker M, Heindel WL et al. Diagnostic approach to splenic lesions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 573 – 581

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Milzläsionen sind seltene und zumeist inzidentelle Befunde in der Schnittbildgebung. Der Großteil dieser Läsionen sind benignen Ursprungs und können korrekt anhand der Charakteristika in der Bildgebung identifiziert werden, nur in Fällen unsicherer oder potenziell maligner Ätiologie ist eine invasive weitere Abklärung notwendig.

Methode Während in den meisten Fällen die korrekte Diagnose anhand einer Computertomographie (CT) gestellt werden kann, kann eine (zusätzliche) Magnet-Resonanz-Tomographie helfen, die Läsion richtig zu identifizieren. Da diese Läsionen selten sind, werden nur einige der Differenzialdiagnosen regelmäßig im klinischen Alltag diagnostiziert.

Ergebnisse und Schlussfolgerung In diesem Übersichtsartikel werden die Differenzialdiagnosen von Milzläsionen erörtert, basierend auf den Charakteristika in der Bildgebung; ein Fließschema unterstützt in der Diagnosestellung. In Verbindung mit laborchemischen Ergebnissen und etwaigen Symptomen ist nur in wenigen Fällen eine histologische Sicherung notwendig, insbesondere bei Zufallsbefunden. In diesen Fällen sollte die bildgestützte Biopsie vor der Splenektomie bevorzugt werden.

Kernaussagen 

• Milzläsionen sind selten und zumeist inzidentelle Nebenbefunde abdominaler Bildgebung.

• CT-und MR-Bildgebung sind die diagnostischen Mittel der Wahl zur weiteren Abklärung von Milzläsionen.

• Anhand ihrer bildmorphologischen Charakteristika lässt sich eine Vielzahl von Milzläsionen einer Entität zuordnen und benötigen keine histologische Abklärung.

Keywords

spleen - diagnostic radiology - CT - MR-imaging

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 16. August 2023

Angenommen: 19. September 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. November 2023

• References

• 1 Caremani M, Occhini U, Caremani A. et al. Focal splenic lesions: US findings. J Ultrasound 2013; 16: 65-74 DOI: 10.1007/s40477-013-0014-0.
• 2 Kaltenbach TE, Engler P, Kratzer W. et al. Prevalence of benign focal liver lesions: ultrasound investigation of 45,319 hospital patients. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016; 41: 25-32 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0605-7.
• 3 Volk M, Strotzer M. [Diagnostic imaging of splenic disease]. Radiologe 2006; 46: 229-243; quiz 244 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-005-1333-8.
• 4 Luna A, Ribes R, Caro P. et al. MRI of focal splenic lesions without and with dynamic gadolinium enhancement. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 1533-1547 DOI: 10.2214/Am J Roentgenol.04.1249.
• 5 Singh AK, Shankar S, Gervais DA. et al. Image-guided percutaneous splenic interventions. Radiographics 2012; 32: 523-534 DOI: 10.1148/rg.322115135.
• 6 McInnes MD, Kielar AZ, Macdonald DB. Percutaneous image-guided biopsy of the spleen: systematic review and meta-analysis of the complication rate and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 2011; 260: 699-708 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110333.
• 7 Patel N, Dawe G, Tung K. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous splenic biopsy using an 18-G core biopsy needle: our experience with 52 cases. Br J Radiol 2015; 88: 20150400 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150400.
• 8 Kim N, Auerbach A, Manning MA. Algorithmic Approach to the Splenic Lesion Based on Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics 2022; 42: 683-701 DOI: 10.1148/rg.210071.
• 9 Thipphavong S, Duigenan S, Schindera ST. et al. Nonneoplastic, benign, and malignant splenic diseases: cross-sectional imaging findings and rare disease entities. Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203: 315-322 DOI: 10.2214/Am J Roentgenol.13.11777.
• 10 Palas J, Matos AP, Ramalho M. The spleen revisited: an overview on magnetic resonance imaging. Radiol Res Pract 2013; 2013: 219297 DOI: 10.1155/2013/219297.
• 11 Rabushka LS, Kawashima A, Fishman EK. Imaging of the spleen: CT with supplemental MR examination. Radiographics 1994; 14: 307-332 DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.14.2.8190956.
• 12 Urrutia M, Mergo PJ, Ros LH. et al. Cystic masses of the spleen: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 1996; 16: 107-129 DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.16.1.107.
• 13 Franquet T, Montes M, Lecumberri FJ. et al. Hydatid disease of the spleen: imaging findings in nine patients. Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154: 525-528 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.154.3.2106214.
• 14 Gwee A, Chinnappan M, Connell TG. et al. The water lily sign. J Pediatr 2013; 162: 1294-1294 e1291 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.12.068.
• 15 Giovagnoni A, Giorgi C, Goteri G. Tumours of the spleen. Cancer Imaging 2005; 5: 73-77 DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0002.
• 16 Warshauer DM, Hall HL. Solitary splenic lesions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2006; 27: 370-388 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2006.06.003.
• 17 Lin SF, Zheng L, Zhou L. Solitary splenic tuberculosis: a case report and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol 2016; 14: 154 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-016-0905-6.
• 18 Elsayes KM, Narra VR, Mukundan G. et al. MR imaging of the spleen: spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics 2005; 25: 967-982 DOI: 10.1148/rg.254045154.
• 19 Bachler P, Baladron MJ, Menias C. et al. Multimodality Imaging of Liver Infections: Differential Diagnosis and Potential Pitfalls. Radiographics 2016; 36: 1001-1023 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016150196.
• 20 Pappas PG, Lionakis MS, Arendrup MC. et al. Invasive candidiasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018; 4: 18026 DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.26.
• 21 Kamaya A, Weinstein S, Desser TS. Multiple lesions of the spleen: differential diagnosis of cystic and solid lesions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2006; 27: 389-403 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2006.06.004.
• 22 Ito K, Mitchell DG, Honjo K. et al. MR imaging of acquired abnormalities of the spleen. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 697-702 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.168.3.9057518.
• 23 Sekine T, Amano Y, Hidaka F. et al. Hepatosplenic and muscular sarcoidosis: characterization with MR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 2012; 11: 83-89 DOI: 10.2463/mrms.11.83.
• 24 Warshauer DM, Semelka RC, Ascher SM. Nodular sarcoidosis of the liver and spleen: appearance on MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 4: 553-557 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880040407.
• 25 Davidson J, Tung K. Splenic peliosis: an unusual entity. Br J Radiol 2010; 83: e126-128 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/71300465.
• 26 Maves CK, Caron KH, Bisset GS. et al. Splenic and hepatic peliosis: MR findings. Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 75-76 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.158.1.1727362.
• 27 Abbott RM, Levy AD, Aguilera NS. et al. From the archives of the AFIP: primary vascular neoplasms of the spleen: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2004; 24: 1137-1163 DOI: 10.1148/rg.244045006.
• 28 Singer A, Maldjian P, Simmons MZ. Extramedullary hematopoiesis presenting as a focal splenic mass: a case report. Abdom Imaging 2004; 29: 710-712 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-003-0164-1.
• 29 Gabata T, Kadoya M, Mori A. et al. MR imaging of focal splenic extramedullary hematopoiesis in polycythemia vera: case report. Abdom Imaging 2000; 25: 514-516 DOI: 10.1007/s002610000045.
• 30 Willcox TM, Speer RW, Schlinkert RT. et al. Hemangioma of the spleen: presentation, diagnosis, and management. J Gastrointest Surg 2000; 4: 611-613 DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80110-9.
• 31 Disler DG, Chew FS. Splenic hemangioma. Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 44 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.157.1.2048536.
• 32 Ramani M, Reinhold C, Semelka RC. et al. Splenic hemangiomas and hamartomas: MR imaging characteristics of 28 lesions. Radiology 1997; 202: 166-172 DOI: 10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988207.
• 33 Liu D, Chen Z, Wang T. et al. Littoral-cell angioma of the spleen: a case report. Cancer Biol Med 2017; 14: 194-195 DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0094.
• 34 Gaetke-Udager K, Wasnik AP, Kaza RK. et al. Multimodality imaging of splenic lesions and the role of non-vascular, image-guided intervention. Abdom Imaging 2014; 39: 570-587 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0080-6.
• 35 Yazici P, Aydin U, Ersin S. et al. Hamartoma – a rare benign tumor of the spleen: a report of four cases. Eurasian J Med 2008; 40: 48-51
• 36 Lee HJ, Kim JW, Hong JH. et al. Cross-sectional Imaging of Splenic Lesions: RadioGraphics Fundamentals | Online Presentation. Radiographics 2018; 38: 435-436 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170119.
• 37 Li L, Fisher DA, Stanek AE. Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation (SANT) of the spleen: addition of a case with focal CD68 staining and distinctive CT features. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29: 839-841 DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000160441.23523.d1.
• 38 Ma ZH, Tian XF, Ma J. et al. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the spleen: A case report and review of published cases. Oncol Lett 2013; 5: 1955-1957 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2013.1286.
• 39 Li M, Zhang L, Wu N. et al. Imaging findings of primary splenic lymphoma: a review of 17 cases in which diagnosis was made at splenectomy. PLoS One 2013; 8: e80264 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080264.
• 40 Vrachliotis TG, Bennett WF, Vaswani KK. et al. Primary angiosarcoma of the spleen--CT, MR, and sonographic characteristics: report of two cases. Abdom Imaging 2000; 25: 283-285 DOI: 10.1007/s002610000034.
• 41 Neuhauser TS, Derringer GA, Thompson LD. et al. Splenic angiosarcoma: a clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic study of 28 cases. Mod Pathol 2000; 13: 978-987 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3880178.
• 42 Ferrozzi F, Bova D, Draghi F. et al. CT findings in primary vascular tumors of the spleen. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 1097-1101 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.166.5.8615251.
• 43 Imaoka I, Sugimura K, Furukawa M. et al. CT and MR findings of splenic angiosarcoma. Radiat Med 1999; 17: 67-70
• 44 Li X, Ma X, Hao J. et al. Primary splenic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma with diffuse metastases revealed by FDG PET/CT imaging: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100: e25065 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025065.
• 45 Wang Z, Zhang L, Zhang B. et al. Hemangioendothelioma arising from the spleen: A case report and literature review. Oncol Lett 2015; 9: 209-212 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2014.2693.
• 46 Comperat E, Bardier-Dupas A, Camparo P. et al. Splenic metastases: clinicopathologic presentation, differential diagnosis, and pathogenesis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131: 965-969 DOI: 10.5858/2007-131-965-SMCPDD.
• 47 Sufficool K, Wang J, Doherty S. Isolated splenic metastasis from carcinoma of the breast: a case report. Diagn Cytopathol 2013; 41: 914-916 DOI: 10.1002/dc.22860.