Rofo 2024; 196(05): 451-462
DOI: 10.1055/a-2193-0205
Review

Acute abdomen in pediatric radiology

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Nina Lochbühler
Department of Pediatric Radiology Olgahospital, Klinikum Stuttgart Olgahospital Frauenklinik, Stuttgart, Germany
,
Petra Bölle
Department of Pediatric Radiology Olgahospital, Klinikum Stuttgart Olgahospital Frauenklinik, Stuttgart, Germany
,
Peter Müller-Abt
Department of Pediatric Radiology Olgahospital, Klinikum Stuttgart Olgahospital Frauenklinik, Stuttgart, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Imaging is a common part of the workup for acute abdomen in childhood and adolescence. Rapid diagnosis is crucial for adequate therapy, especially in young children.

Method This review is intended to provide an overview of the typical causes of acute abdomen in children and adolescents and is specifically aimed at radiologists who do not regularly work in pediatric radiology.

Results and Conclusion Age-specific peculiarities make a division into three age groups useful: Newborns, infants and toddlers, and schoolchildren. Possible causes of acute abdomen in children range from congenital lesions, particularly in newborns, to entities well known in adult radiology, more commonly in school-aged children. Since younger children have a higher sensitivity to radiation and often a limited ability to cooperate, sonography and conventional X-ray are the primary imaging modalities used. Decisive advantages of sonography, especially in younger children, include its widespread availability, the lack of need for sedation, and the possibility of bedside examination. Supplementary cross-sectional imaging, usually MRI, is reserved for special clinical questions. Close interdisciplinary cooperation between attending clinicians and radiologists is essential for efficient diagnostics in this patient group.

Key points:

  • Age-specific features must be observed

  • Sonography and radiography are the most important modalities

  • Both congenital and acquired pathologies play a role

  • Good interdisciplinary cooperation is essential in this patient group

Citation Format

  • Lochbühler N, Bölle P, Müller-Abt P. Acute abdomen in pediatric radiology. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 451 – 462



Publication History

Article published online:
22 December 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Gayoung C, Bo-Kyung J, Yu JK. Gastrointestinal Emergency in Neonates and Infants: A Pictorial Essay Korean. J Radiol 2022; 23 (01) 124-138
  • 2 Michel A. et al. Hypothyreose bei Neugeborenen nach intestinaler Verabreichung von jodhaltigem Kontrastmittel- Fallberichte und Literaturübersicht. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193 (Suppl. 02) S90A
  • 3 Deeg KH, Sonographische U. Dopplersonographische Diagnose der nekrotisierenden Enterokolitis bei Früh- und Neugeborenen. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2019; 40: 292-318
  • 4 Genzel-Boroviczény O, Jenke A, Mihatsch W. et al. Nekrotisierende Enterokolitis (NEK). Leitlinie der Gesellschaft für Neonatologie und Pädiatrische Intensivmedizin, der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, der Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Gastroenterologie und Ernährung und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinderchirurgie. https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/024-009
  • 5 Epelman M. et al. Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Review of State of the Art Imaging Findings with Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics 2007; 27 (02) 285-305 DOI: 10.1148/rg.272055098.
  • 6 Roopali S. et al. How to use abdominal X rays in preterm Infants suspected ofdeveloping necrotising enterocolitis. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2020; 105 (01) 50-57 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315252.
  • 7 Okuyama H. et al. A comparison of the clinical presentation and outcome of focal intestinal perforation and necrotizing enterocolitis in very-low-birth-weight neonates. Pediatr Surg int 2002; 18: 704-706
  • 8 Anjali V. et al. Neonatal Intestinal Obstruction: A 15 Year Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Clin Diadn Res 2016; 10 (02) SC10-3 DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17204.7268.
  • 9 Gorter RR, Karimi A, Sleebom C. et al. Clinical and genetic characteristics of meconium ileus in newborns with and without cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010; 50 (05) 569
  • 10 Mandeville K. et al. Intussusception: clinical presentations and imaging characteristics. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012; 28 (09) 842-844
  • 11 Ko HS. et al. Current radiological management of intussusception in children. Eur Radiol 2007; 17 (09) 2411
  • 12 Plut D. et al. Practical Imaging Strategies for Intussusception in Children. Am J Roentgenol 2020; 215 (06) 1449-1463 DOI: 10.2214/Am J Roentgenol.19.22445.
  • 13 Edwards EA, Pigg N, Courtier J. et al. Intussusception: past, present and future. Pediatr Radiol 2017; 47: 1101-1108 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-017-3878-x.
  • 14 Shen G, Liu H, Guan Z. et al. Clinical features and factors leading to early recurrence of intussusception after saline reduction. J Pak Med Assoc 2020; 70 (10) 1727-1730
  • 15 Guo WL, Hu ZC, Tan YL. et al. Risk factors for recurrent intussusception in children: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2017; 7 (11) e018604 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018604.
  • 16 Chang WL, Yang YH, Lin YT. et al. Gastrointestinal manifestations in Henoch-Schönlein purpura: a review of 261 patients. Acta Paediatr 2004; 93 (11) 1427
  • 17 Hernanz-Schulman M. Pyloric stenosis: role of imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39 (Suppl. 02) S134-S139
  • 18 Sivitz AB, Tejani C, Cohen SG. Evaluation of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis by pediatric emergency physician sonography. Acad Emerg Med 2013; 20 (07) 646-651
  • 19 Zani A. et al. Incidentally detected Meckel diverticulum: to resect or not to resect?. Ann Surg 2008; 247 (02) 276
  • 20 Chen Q. Multifaceted behavior of Meckel's diverticulum in children. J Pediatr Surg 2018; 53 (04) 676
  • 21 Uyemura MC. Foreign body ingestion in children. Am Fam Physician 2005; 72 (02) 287
  • 22 Sharma S, Yadav AK, Mandal AK. et al. Enteric Duplication Cysts in Children: A Clinicopathological Dilemma. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9 (08) EC08-11 DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12929.6381.
  • 23 Wunsch R, Wunsch C. Bildgebung beim akuten Abdomen im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Radiologe 2014; 54: 923-936 , Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
  • 24 Krüger PC, Menzel HJ. Radiologische Abklärung des akuten Abdomens beim Kind. Radiologe 2019; 59: 146-153
  • 25 Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ. US or CT for Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children and Adults? A Meta-Analysis. Radiology 2006; 241 (01) 83
  • 26 Telesmanich ME, Orth RC, Zhang W. et al. Searching for certainty: findings predictive of appendicitis in equivocal ultrasound exams. Pediatr Radiol 2016; 46 (11) 1539
  • 27 Duke E, Kalb B, Arif-Tiwari H. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis. Am J Roentgenol 2016; 206 (03) 508-517
  • 28 https://register.awmf.org/assets/guidelines/064-016l_S1_Bauchschmerz_Kinder_2020-07.pdf
  • 29 Deeg KH, Hofmann V, Hoyer PFR. Ultraschalldiagnostik in Pädiatrie und Kinderheilkunde. 4. Auflage. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2014
  • 30 Hörmann M, Scharitzer M, Puig S. Das akute Abdomen beim Kind. Radiologe 2002; 42: 162-170 , Springer Verlag
  • 31 Moro F, Bolomini G, Sibal M. et al. Imaging in gynecological disease (20): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of adnexal torsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56 (06) 934
  • 32 Chang HC, Bhatt S, Dogra VS. Pearls and pitfalls in diagnosis of ovarian torsion. Radiographics 2008; 28 (05) 1355-1368 DOI: 10.1148/rg.285075130.