Ultrasound in sports traumatology

Abstract

Background Ultrasound (US) has numerous applications in sports traumatology. The technical progress of mobile US devices has led to increasing use of ultrasound as a primary diagnostic tool. New applications such as elastography and 3 D vascularization are used for special indications.

Method The purpose of this review is to present the current status of ultrasound in the diagnosis of sports injuries and sport traumatology including established applications and new technical advances. US is presented both in its comparison to other imaging modalities and as a sole diagnostic tool.

Results and Conclusion US can be used for initial diagnosis to improve the clinical examination and for intensive short-term follow-up imaging. The main areas of application are currently the diagnosis of acute muscle and tendon injuries as well as overuse injuries. In particular, the exclusion of structural muscle injuries can be adequately ensured with US in the majority of anatomical regions. The recently published guideline on fracture ultrasound has strengthened the clinical evidence in this area, especially in comparison to conventional radiography and in the development of algorithms and standards. The increasing use of mobile ultrasound equipment with adequate image quality makes US a location-independent modality that can also be used at training sites or during road games.

Key points: 

• Typically used for quick, focused initial diagnostic assessment and short-term follow-up after injury

• Mobile US devices allow increased use in training centers and training camps

• New US applications (SWE, 3 D) increase standardization in follow-up of tendon injuries

• Targeted use of US for musculoskeletal diagnostic assessment saves money and frees up capacity

Citation Format

• Lerchbaumer MH, Perschk M, Gwinner C. Ultrasound in sports traumatology. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 440 – 449

Key words

ultrasound - muscular - tendons - bones - ultrasound-color doppler

Publication History

Received: 07 April 2023

Accepted: 31 August 2023

Article published online:
09 November 2023

• References

• 1 Ackermann O, Fischer C, Grosser K. et al. AWMF 085-003 S2e Leitlinie, Fraktursonografie. Accessed June 30, 2023 at: https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/085-003
• 2 Sconfienza LM, Albano D, Allen G. et al. Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound updated in 2017 by European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus. Eur. Radiol 2018; 28: 5338-5351
• 3 Parker L, Nazarian LN, Carrino JA. et al. Musculoskeletal imaging: medicare use, costs, and potential for cost substitution. J. Am. Coll. Radiol 2008; 5: 182-188
• 4 Heiss R, Janka R, Uder M. et al. Bildgebung von Muskelverletzungen im Sport. Die Radiol 2023; 63: 249-258
• 5 Guillodo Y, Bouttier R, Saraux A. Value of sonography combined with clinical assessment to evaluate muscle injury severity in athletes. J. Athl. Train 2011; 46: 500-504
• 6 Connell DA, Schneider-Kolsky ME, Hoving JL. et al. Longitudinal study comparing sonographic and MRI assessments of acute and healing hamstring injuries. Am J Roentgenol. Am. J. Roentgenol 2004; 183: 975-984
• 7 Paoletta M, Moretti A, Liguori S. et al. medicina Ultrasound Imaging in Sport-Related Muscle Injuries: Pitfalls and Opportunities. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021; 57 (10) 1040
• 8 Maffulli N, Oliva F, Frizziero A. et al. ISMuLT Guidelines for muscle injuries. Muscles. Ligaments Tendons J 2013; 3: 241
• 9 Draghi F, Zacchino M, Canepari M. et al. Muscle injuries: ultrasound evaluation in the acute phase. J. Ultrasound 2013; 16: 209
• 10 Crema MD, Yamada AF, Guermazi A. et al. Imaging techniques for muscle injury in sports medicine and clinical relevance. Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med 2015; 8: 154
• 11 Mueller-Wohlfahrt HW, Haensel L, Mithoefer K. et al. Terminology and classification of muscle injuries in sport: The Munich consensus statement. Br. J. Sports Med 2013; 47: 342
• 12 Hotfiel T, Carl HD, Swoboda B. et al. Kontrastmittelsonografie (CEUS) in der bildgebenden Diagnostik von Muskelverletzungen – Perfusionsdarstellung in der früharteriellen Phase. Sportverletzung-Sportschaden 2016; 30: 54-57
• 13 Hotfiel T, Heiss R, Swoboda B. et al. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound as a New Investigative Tool in Diagnostic Imaging of Muscle Injuries-A Pilot Study Evaluating Conventional Ultrasound, CEUS, and Findings in MRI. Clin. J. Sport Med 2018; 28: 332-338
• 14 Ossola C, Curti M, Calvi M. et al. Role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the prognosis and classification of muscle injuries in professional football players: correlation between imaging and return to sport time. Radiol. Medica 2021; 126: 1460-1467
• 15 Wangensteen A, Almusa E, Boukarroum S. et al. MRI does not add value over and above patient history and clinical examination in predicting time to return to sport after acute hamstring injuries: a prospective cohort of 180 male athletes. Br. J. Sports Med 2015; 49: 1579-1587
• 16 De Vos RJ, Reurink G, Goudswaard GJ. et al. Clinical findings just after return to play predict hamstring re-injury, but baseline MRI findings do not. Br. J. Sports Med 2014; 48: 1377-1384
• 17 Pedret C, Balius R, Blasi M. et al. Ultrasound classification of medial gastrocnemious injuries. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2020; 30: 2456-2465
• 18 Sidhu PS. Multiparametric Ultrasound (MPUS) Imaging: Terminology Describing the Many Aspects of Ultrasonography. Ultraschall Der Medizin 2015; 36: 315-317
• 19 Dirrichs T, Quack V, Gatz M. et al. Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) for the Evaluation of Patients with Tendinopathies. Acad. Radiol 2016; 23: 1204-1213
• 20 Dirrichs T, Quack V, Gatz M. et al. Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) for Monitoring of Treatment of Tendinopathies: A Double-blinded, Longitudinal Clinical Study. Acad. Radiol 2018; 25: 265-272
• 21 Orlandi D, Corazza A, Arcidiacono A. et al. Ultrasound-guided procedures to treat sport-related muscleinjuries. Br. J. Radiol 2016; 89 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150484.
• 22 Setayesh K, Villarreal A, Gottschalk A. et al. Treatment of Muscle Injuries with Platelet-Rich Plasma: a Review of the Literature. Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med 2018; 11: 635
• 23 Rossi LA, Molina Rómoli AR, Bertona Altieri BA. et al. Does platelet-rich plasma decrease time to return to sports in acute muscle tear? A randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc 2017; 25: 3319-3325
• 24 Tougas C, Brimmo O. Common and Consequential Fractures That Should Not Be Missed in Children. Pediatr. Ann 2022; 51: e357-e363
• 25 Akinmade A, Ikem I, Ayoola O. et al. Comparing ultrasonography with plain radiography in the diagnosis of paediatric long-bone fractures. Int. Orthop 2019; 43: 1143-1153
• 26 Wawrzyk M, Sokal J, Andrzejewska E. et al. The Role of Ultrasound Imaging of Callus Formation in the Treatment of Long Bone Fractures in Children. Polish J. Radiol 2015; 80: 473-478
• 27 Le MPT, Voigt L, Nathanson R. et al. Comparison of four handheld point-of-care ultrasound devices by expert users. Ultrasound J 2022; 14: 1-9
• 28 Turton P, Hay R, Welters I. Assessment of peripheral muscle thickness and architecture in healthy volunteers using hand-held ultrasound devices; A comparison study with standard ultrasound. BMC Med. Imaging 2019; 19 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-019-0373-x.
• 29 James P, Barbour T, Stone I. The match day use of ultrasound during professional football finals matches. Br. J. Sports Med 2010; 44: 1149-1152
• 30 Hees T, Bierke S, Häner M. et al. Stellenwert portabler Ultraschallgeräte in der Sporttraumatologie. Sport. Orthop. Traumatol 2020; 36: 143-149
• 31 Falkowski AL, Jacobson JA, Freehill MT. et al. Hand-Held Portable Versus Conventional Cart-Based Ultrasound in Musculoskeletal Imaging. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8 (02) DOI: 10.1177/2325967119901017.
• 32 Constantinescu EC, Nicolau C, Săftoiu A. Recent Developments in Tele-Ultrasonography. Curr. Heal. Sci. J 2018; 44: 101-106