Plastic versus metal stents for transmural drainage of walled-off necrosis with significant solid debris: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background and study aims Recently, larger-caliber metal stents have been increasingly used, resulting in higher efficacy in walled-off necrosis (WON) with more solid debris. However, none of the trials have included WON with significant solid debris. The aim of this study was to compare plastic stents and metal stents for drainage of symptomatic WON with significant solid debris (≥20%).

Patients and methods We conducted a single-center, open-label, noninferiority trial including 48 patients. The primary endpoint was treatment success. Secondary outcomes were technical success, total number of procedures, adverse events (AEs), duration of procedure, and treatment failure. All the outcomes were assessed at 3 weeks after drainage. Patients were followed up for 3 months to assess recurrence.

Results Treatment succeeded in 21 of 24 patients (87.5%) and 20 of 24 patients (83.3%) in the metal and plastic stent groups, respectively with P=1.05 (95% confidence interval 0.81–1.39). Assuming 10% non-inferiority margin, P<0.001 for non-inferiority, suggesting that plastic stents are non-inferior to metal stents. The technical success rate was 100%. Procedure duration was significantly shorter in the metal stent group (12.95±5.3 minutes versus 29.77±6.6 minutes, P<0.001). The number of total procedures was comparable (2.8±1 vs 2.2±1, P=0.097). There were more minor AEs in plastic stent arm but no significant difference between the two groups. A single asymptomatic recurrence was observed in the metal stent arm.

Conclusions Plastic stents are not inferior to metal stents for WON drainage with significant solid debris. However, larger sample-size studies are needed to make definite conclusions.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Endoscopic ultrasonography - Pancreas - Intervention EUS

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 05. Juli 2023

Angenommen nach Revision: 25. September 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
06. Oktober 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
10. November 2023

• References

• 1 Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C. et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62: 102-111
• 2 Rana SS, Sharma RK, Gupta P. et al. Natural course of asymptomatic walled off pancreatic necrosis. Digest Liver Dis 2019; 51: 730-734
• 3 Mukai S, Itoi T, Baron TH. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided placement of plastic vs. biflanged metal stents for therapy of walled-off necrosis: a retrospective single-center series. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 47-55
• 4 Bapaye A, Dubale NA, Sheth KA. et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transmural drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis: Comparison between a specially designed fully covered bi-flanged metal stent and multiple plastic stents. Digest Endosc 2017; 29: 104-110
• 5 Rana SS, Sharma R, Dhalaria L. et al. Efficacy and safety of plastic versus lumen-apposing metal stents for transmural drainage of walled-off necrosis: a retrospective single-center study. Ann Gastroenterol 2020; 33: 426-432
• 6 Siddiqui AA, Adler DG, Nieto J. et al. EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections and necrosis by using a novel lumen-apposing stent: a large retrospective, multicenter U.S. experience (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 699-707
• 7 Abu Dayyeh BK, Mukewar S, Majumder S. et al. Large-caliber metal stents versus plastic stents for the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 141-149
• 8 Chen I Y-, Yang J, Friedland S. et al. Lumen apposing metal stents are superior to plastic stents in pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a large international multicenter study. Endosc Int Open 2019; 07: E347-354
• 9 Lee B, Song T, Lee S. et al. Newly designed, fully covered metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: a prospective randomized study. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 1078-1084
• 10 Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan MK. et al. Non-superiority of lumen-apposing metal stents over plastic stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis in a randomised trial. Gut 2019; 68: 1200-1209
• 11 Rana S, Bhasin D, Kathiresan J. et al. Do the morphological features of walled off pancreatic necrosis on endoscopic ultrasound determine the outcome of endoscopic transmural drainage?. Endosc Ultrasound 2014; 3: 118
• 12 Pal P, Lakhtakia S, Jagtap N. et al. Interobserver Agreement on “assessment of debris” during endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 25: 213-220
• 13 Rana SS, Chaudhary V, Sharma R. et al. Comparison of abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of necrotic debris in walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2016; 4: 50-53
• 14 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
• 15 Butcher NJ, Monsour A, Mew EJ. et al. Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports: The CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 Extension. JAMA 2022; 328: 2252-2264
• 16 Karstensen JG, Novovic S, Hansen EF. et al. EUS-guided drainage of large walled-off pancreatic necroses using plastic versus lumen-apposing metal stents: a single-centre randomised controlled trial. Gut 2023; 72: 1167-1173
• 17 Bazerbachi F, Sawas T, Vargas EJ. et al. Metal stents versus plastic stents for the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 30-42
• 18 Muktesh G, Samanta J, Dhar J. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of patients with infected walled-off necrosis: Which stent to choose?. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2022; 32: 335-341
• 19 Basha J, Lakhtakia S, Nabi Z. et al. Impact of disconnected pancreatic duct on recurrence of fluid collections and new-onset diabetes: do we finally have an answer?. Gut 2021; 70: 447-449