Frequency of serrated polyposis syndrome recognition by community endoscopists

Abstract

Background and study aims Some data indicate serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) is underdiagnosed. We determined the frequency of SPS diagnosis by community endoscopists prior to referral to a tertiary center.

Patients and methods We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of SPS patients at a tertiary academic hospital. There were 212 patients who were referred to our center for resection of one or more lesions detected at a prior colonoscopy and who had records available that allowed determination of whether SPS was diagnosed before referral.

Results Only 25 of 212 patients (11.8%) had a diagnosis or suspicion of a polyposis syndrome prior to referral, and only 12 patients (5.7%) had a specific SPS diagnosis made prior to referral. Among 187 patients diagnosed at our center, 39 had sufficient serrated lesions removed and documented in outside records to meet SPS criteria prior to referral, but the diagnosis was not made by the referring physician despite adequate numbers of lesions resected. The remaining cases required lesions removed at our center to meet SPS diagnostic criteria. Limitations were a single center, single expert endoscopist.

Conclusions SPS is the most common colorectal polyposis syndrome, but it remains underdiagnosed by community endoscopists. Underdiagnosis may contribute to post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in patients with SPS.

Keywords

Polyps / adenomas / ... - Endoscopy Lower GI Tract - colonoscopy - sessile serrated lesion - serrated polyposis syndrome

Publication History

Received: 09 May 2023

Accepted after revision: 25 July 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
21 August 2023

Article published online:
06 October 2023

• References

• 1 IJspeert JEG, Bevan R, Senore C. et al. Detection rate of serrated polyps and serrated polyposis syndrome in colorectal cancer screening cohorts: a European overview. Gut 2017; 66: 1225-1232
• 2 Gupta S, Provenzale D, Llor X. et al. Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: colorectal, version 2.2019 featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 17: 1033-1041
• 3 Muller C, Yamada A, Ikegami S. et al. Risk of colorectal cancer in serrated polyposis syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20: 622-630
• 4 MacPhail ME, Thygesen SB, Patel N. et al. Endoscopic control of polyp burden and expansion of surveillance intervals in serrated polyposis syndrome. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90: 96-100
• 5 Rivero-Sanchez L, Lopez-Ceron M, Carballal S. et al. Reassessment colonoscopy to diagnose serrated polyposis syndrome in a colorectal cancer screening population. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 44-53
• 6 Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. Failure to recognize serrated polyposis syndrome in a cohort with large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1206-1210
• 7 Schramm C, Janhsen K, Demir M. et al. Serrated polyposis syndrome may go undiagnosed even in structured colorectal cancer screening programmes performed by endoscopists with otherwise good quality indices. Gut 2018; 67: 1746-1747
• 8 van Herwaarden YJ, Pape S, Vink-Borger E. et al. Reasons why the diagnosis of serrated polyposis syndrome is missed. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 31: 340-344
• 9 Crowder CD, Sweet K, Lehman A. et al. Serrated polyposis is an underdiagnosed and unclear syndrome: the surgical pathologist has a role in improving detection. Am J Surg Pathol 2012; 36: 1178-1185
• 10 Hui VW, Steinhagen E, Levy RA. et al. Utilization of colonoscopy and pathology reports for identifying patients meeting the World Health Organization criteria for serrated polyposis syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57: 846-850
• 11 Snover D, Ahnen DJ, Burt RW. et al. Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum and serrated (“hyperplastic”) polyposis. In: Bozman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH. WHO classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics. Tumours of the digestive system. 4th edition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2010
• 12 Rosty C, Brosens L, Dekker E. et al. Serrated polyposis. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board Digestive System Tumours. WHO Classification of Tumours series. 5th edn. Lyon; France: IARC: 2019
• 13 Arain MA, Sawhney M, Sheikh S. et al. CIMP status of interval colon cancers: another piece to the puzzle. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1189-1195
• 14 Sawhney MS, Farrar WD, Gudiseva S. et al. Microsatellite instability in interval colon cancers. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 1700-1705
• 15 Kahi CJ, Hewett DG, Norton DL. et al. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9: 42-46
• 16 Lee J, Park SW, Kim YS. et al. Risk factors of missed colorectal lesions after colonoscopy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96: e7468
• 17 de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM. et al. Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal time. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 617-623
• 18 Vemulapalli KC, Lahr RE, Rex DK. Most large colorectal polyps missed by gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy are sessile serrated lesions. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10: E659-E663