CC BY 4.0 · J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2024; 85(05): 546-552
DOI: 10.1055/a-2128-5191
Original Article

Reestablishment of the Smile after Hypoglossal–Facial Nerve Transfer: What Can We Learn?

1   ENT Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
,
C. Wever
1   ENT Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
,
E.F. Hensen
1   ENT Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
,
J.C. Jansen
1   ENT Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
,
R.W. Koot
2   Neurosurgery Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
,
M.J.A. Malessy
2   Neurosurgery Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to assess the ability to smile following a hypoglossal–facial nerve transfer (N12–N7).

Design This is a retrospective chart review.

Setting National tertiary referral center for skull base pathology.

Participants Seventeen patients.

Main Outcome Measures The ability to smile following an N12–N7 transfer was assessed by five medical doctors on photographs of the whole face and frontal, orbital, and oral segments. The (segmented) photographs were scored for the symmetry, asymmetry, and correct or incorrect assessment of the affected side.

Results Seventeen patients were analyzed by 5 assessors providing 85 assessments. The whole face at rest was judged symmetrical in 26% of the cases and mildly asymmetrical in 56%. Frontal, orbital, and oral segments were symmetrical in 63, 20, and 35%, respectively. The affected side was correctly identified in 76%. When smiling, the whole face was symmetrical in 6% and mildly asymmetric in 59%. The affected side was correctly identified in 94%. The frontal, orbital, and oral segments during smiling were symmetrical in 67, 15, and 6%, respectively. The affected side of the frontal, orbital, and buccal facial segments during smiling was correctly identified in 89, 89, and 96%, respectively. Interobserver variability with Fleiss' kappa analysis showed that the strength of the agreement during smile of the total face was good (0.771)

Conclusion Following an N12–N7 transfer, a good facial symmetry at rest can be achieved. During smiling, almost all patients showed asymmetry of the face, which was predominantly determined by the orbital and oral segments. To improve the ability to smile after an N12–N7 transfer, additional procedures are needed.



Publication History

Received: 12 November 2022

Accepted: 05 July 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
13 July 2023

Article published online:
11 August 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Coulson SE, O'dwyer NJ, Adams RD, Croxson GR. Expression of emotion and quality of life after facial nerve paralysis. Otol Neurotol 2004; 25 (06) 1014-1019
  • 2 Godefroy WP, Malessy MJ, Tromp AA, van der Mey AG. Intratemporal facial nerve transfer with direct coaptation to the hypoglossal nerve. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28 (04) 546-550
  • 3 Ryzenman JM, Pensak ML, Tew Jr JM. Facial paralysis and surgical rehabilitation: a quality of life analysis in a cohort of 1,595 patients after acoustic neuroma surgery. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26 (03) 516-521 , discussion 521
  • 4 Jowett N, Hadlock TA. Free gracilis transfer and static facial suspension for midfacial reanimation in long-standing flaccid facial palsy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2018; 51 (06) 1129-1139
  • 5 Albathi M, Oyer S, Ishii LE, Byrne P, Ishii M, Boahene KO. Early nerve grafting for facial paralysis after cerebellopontine angle tumor resection with preserved facial nerve continuity. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (01) 54-60
  • 6 Atlas MD, Lowinger DS. A new technique for hypoglossal-facial nerve repair. Laryngoscope 1997; 107 (07) 984-991
  • 7 Biglioli F. Facial reanimations: part I—recent paralyses. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 53 (10) 901-906
  • 8 Boahene K. Facial reanimation after acoustic neuroma resection: options and timing of intervention. Facial Plast Surg 2015; 31 (02) 103-109
  • 9 Kochhar A, Albathi M, Sharon JD, Ishii LE, Byrne P, Boahene KD. Transposition of the intratemporal facial to hypoglossal nerve for reanimation of the paralyzed face: the VII to XII transposition technique. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (05) 370-378
  • 10 Jandali D, Revenaugh PC. Facial reanimation: an update on nerve transfers in facial paralysis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 27 (04) 231-236
  • 11 Slattery III WH, Cassis AM, Wilkinson EP, Santos F, Berliner K. Side-to-end hypoglossal to facial anastomosis with transposition of the intratemporal facial nerve. Otol Neurotol 2014; 35 (03) 509-513
  • 12 Beutner D, Luers JC, Grosheva M. Hypoglossal-facial-jump-anastomosis without an interposition nerve graft. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (10) 2392-2396
  • 13 Ozsoy U, Hizay A, Demirel BM. et al. The hypoglossal-facial nerve repair as a method to improve recovery of motor function after facial nerve injury. Ann Anat 2011; 193 (04) 304-313
  • 14 Niziol R, Henry FP, Leckenby JI, Grobbelaar AO. Is there an ideal outcome scoring system for facial reanimation surgery? A review of current methods and suggestions for future publications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (04) 447-456
  • 15 Greene JJ, Guarin DL, Tavares J. et al. The spectrum of facial palsy: the MEEI facial palsy photo and video standard set. Laryngoscope 2020; 130 (01) 32-37
  • 16 House JW. Facial nerve grading systems. Laryngoscope 1983; 93 (08) 1056-1069
  • 17 Urban MJ, Eggerstedt M, Varelas E. et al. Hypoglossal and masseteric nerve transfer for facial reanimation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2022; 24 (01) 10-17
  • 18 House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93 (02) 146-147
  • 19 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33 (01) 159-174
  • 20 Socolovsky M, Malessy M. Brain changes after peripheral nerve repair: limitations of neuroplasticity. J Neurosurg Sci 2021; 65 (04) 421-430
  • 21 van Veen MM, Dijkstra PU, Werker PMN. A higher quality of life with cross-face-nerve-grafting as an adjunct to a hypoglossal-facial nerve jump graft in facial palsy treatment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70 (11) 1666-1674
  • 22 Bacciu A, Nusier A, Lauda L, Falcioni M, Russo A, Sanna M. Are the current treatment strategies for facial nerve schwannoma appropriate also for complex cases?. Audiol Neurotol 2013; 18 (03) 184-191
  • 23 Falcioni M, Russo A, Taibah A, Sanna M. Facial nerve tumors. Otol Neurotol 2003; 24 (06) 942-947
  • 24 Loos E, Verhaert N, Darrouzet V. et al. Intratemporal facial nerve schwannomas: multicenter experience of 80 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 277 (08) 2209-2217