Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2102-0040
Aesthetic Implications of Bilateral Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps on Thigh and Buttock Proportions
Funding None.![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/jrm/202402/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-a-2102-0040_22100296-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has emerged as an excellent secondary option for autologous breast reconstruction. Despite the increased acceptance, potential secondary benefits concerning aesthetic proportions of proximal thigh and buttock at the donor site have never been systematically investigated.
Methods A retrospective review of 151 patients who underwent breast reconstruction with horizontally designed PAP flaps (292 flaps) from 2012 to 2020 was performed. Patient characteristics, complications, and numbers of revision surgeries were collected. In bilateral reconstructions, pre- and postoperative standardized patient photographs were analyzed to identify postoperative changes in proximal thigh and buttock contour. The patients' own perception of postoperative aesthetic changes was determined by an electronic survey.
Results The patients had a mean age of 51 and a mean body mass index of 26.3 kg/m2. The most common complications were minor and major wound complications affecting 35.1% of patients, followed by cellulitis (12.6%), seroma (7.9%), and hematoma (4.0%). A total of 38 patients (25.2%) underwent revision of the donor site. After reconstruction, patients were found to have aesthetically improved proximal thigh and buttock proportions, indicated by a wider thigh gap (thigh gap-hip ratio: 0.05 ± 0.04 vs. 0.13 ± 0.05, p < 0.0001) and reduction in lateral thigh-to-buttock ratio (0.85 ± 0.05 vs. 0.76 ± 0.05, p < 0.0001). Among the 85 patients who responded to the survey (56.3% response rate), 70.6% felt that PAP surgery had aesthetically either improved their thigh contour (54.12%) or not changed it (16.47%), whereas only 29.4% reported that the surgery negatively impacted their thigh contour.
Conclusion PAP flap breast reconstruction leads to improved aesthetic proportions of the proximal thigh and buttock. This approach is ideal for patients with ptotic tissue of the inferior buttocks and medial thigh, a poorly defined infragluteal fold, and inadequate anterior-posterior buttock projection.
Publication History
Received: 11 December 2022
Accepted: 23 May 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
26 May 2023
Article published online:
05 July 2023
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32 (01) 32-38
- 2 Allen RJ, Haddock NT, Ahn CY, Sadeghi A. Breast reconstruction with the profunda artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (01) 16e-23e
- 3 Haddock NT, Gassman A, Cho MJ, Teotia SS. 101 consecutive profunda artery perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: lessons learned with our early experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (02) 229-239
- 4 Haddock N, Nagarkar P, Teotia SS. Versatility of the profunda artery perforator flap: creative uses in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (03) 606e-612e
- 5 Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Consecutive 265 profunda artery perforator flaps: refinements, satisfaction, and functional outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (04) e2682
- 6 Haddock NT, Cho MJ, Gassman A, Teotia SS. Stacked profunda artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction in failed or unavailable deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (03) 488e-494e
- 7 Aesthetic Plastic Surgery National Databank Statistics. The Aesthetic Society. Accessed June 10, 2023 at: https://www.surgery.org/media/statistics
- 8 Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (Suppl. 03) 1-24
- 9 Wong WW, Motakef S, Lin Y, Gupta SC. Redefining the ideal buttocks: a population analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (06) 1739-1747
- 10 Vartanian E, Gould DJ, Hammoudeh ZS, Azadgoli B, Stevens WG, Macias LH. The ideal thigh: a crowdsourcing-based assessment of ideal thigh aesthetic and implications for gluteal fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (08) 861-869
- 11 Haddock NT, Suszynski TM, Teotia SS. An individualized patient-centric approach and evolution towards total autologous free flap breast reconstruction in an academic setting. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (04) e2681
- 12 Haddock NT, Greaney P, Otterburn D, Levine S, Allen RJ. Predicting perforator location on preoperative imaging for the profunda artery perforator flap. Microsurgery 2012; 32 (07) 507-511
- 13 Wong C, Nagarkar P, Teotia S, Haddock NT. The profunda artery perforator flap: investigating the perforasome using three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (05) 915-919
- 14 Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL. et al; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208
- 15 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
- 16 Kim HB, Han SJ, Kim EK, Eom JS, Han HH. Comparative study of DIEP and PAP flaps in breast reconstruction: reconstructive outcomes and fat necrosis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; DOI: 10.1055/a-2040-1368.
- 17 Nam YS, Kim HB, Kim SH, Eom JS, Han HH. Cadaveric study for safe elevation of a profunda artery perforator flap: anatomy of the perforators and obturator nerves. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (09) 727-733
- 18 Jo T, Jeon DN, Han HH. The PAP flap breast reconstruction: a practical option for slim patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (01) 27-33
- 19 Cho MJ, Garza R, Teotia SS, Haddock NT. Utility of ERAS pathway in nonabdominal-based microsurgical breast reconstruction: efficacy in PAP flap reconstruction?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (05) 371-377
- 20 Cho MJ, Teotia SS, Haddock NT. Classification and management of donor-site wound complications in the profunda artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (02) 110-115
- 21 Lockwood T. Medial thigh surgery. Aesthet Surg J 1996; 16 (02) 94-96
- 22 Candiani P, Campiglio GL, Signorini M. Fascio-fascial suspension technique in medial thigh lifts. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1995; 19 (02) 137-140
- 23 Kirwan L. Anchor thighplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2004; 24 (01) 61-64
- 24 Gassman A, Mehta A, Bucholdz E. et al. Positive outcomes with negative pressure therapy over primarily closed large abdominal wall reconstruction reduces surgical site infection rates. Hernia 2015; 19 (02) 273-278
- 25 Sisti A, Cuomo R, Zerini I. et al. Complications associated with medial thigh lift: a comprehensive literature review. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2015; 8 (04) 191-197
- 26 Cuenca-Guerra R, Quezada J. What makes buttocks beautiful? A review and classification of the determinants of gluteal beauty and the surgical techniques to achieve them. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004; 28 (05) 340-347
- 27 Our obsession with the “thigh gap”. Aesthetic Society. 2013 . Accessed June 10, 2023 at: https://www.surgery.org/consumers/plastic-surgery-news-briefs/obsession-thigh-gap-1050634
- 28 Ralph-Nearman C, Arevian AC, Puhl M. et al. A novel mobile tool (Somatomap) to assess body image perception pilot tested with fashion models and nonmodels: cross-sectional study. JMIR Ment Health 2019; 6 (10) e14115
- 29 Centeno RF. Gluteal aesthetic unit classification: a tool to improve outcomes in body contouring. Aesthet Surg J 2006; 26 (02) 200-208
- 30 Mendieta CG, Sood A. Classification system for gluteal evaluation: revisited. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (02) 159-177