Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2024; 37(04): 316-325
DOI: 10.1055/a-2094-8967
Original Article

Increase in the Posterior Tibial Slope Provides Better Joint Awareness and Patient Satisfaction in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

Hiroyasu Ogawa
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ogaki Tokushukai Hospital, Ogaki, Gifu, Japan
,
Masaya Sengoku
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ogaki Tokushukai Hospital, Ogaki, Gifu, Japan
,
Yutaka Nakamura
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ogaki Tokushukai Hospital, Ogaki, Gifu, Japan
,
Tetsuya Shimokawa
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ogaki Tokushukai Hospital, Ogaki, Gifu, Japan
,
Kazuichiro Ohnishi
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ogaki Tokushukai Hospital, Ogaki, Gifu, Japan
,
Haruhiko Akiyama
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The effect of the posterior tibial slope (PTS) in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) on clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to investigate (1) the effect of alteration of the PTS on clinical outcomes, including patient satisfaction and joint awareness, and (2) the relationship between the patient-reported outcomes, the PTS, and compartment loading. Based on the alteration of the PTS after CR-TKA, 39 and 16 patients were stratified into increased and decreased PTS groups, respectively. Clinical evaluation was performed by the Knee Society Score (KSS) 2011 and the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Compartment loading was intraoperatively assessed. KSS 2011 (symptoms, satisfaction, and total score) was significantly higher (p = 0.018, 0.023, and 0.040, respectively), and FJS (“climbing stairs?”) was significantly lower (p = 0.025) in the increased PTS group compared with the decreased PTS group. The decrease in both medial and lateral compartment loading of Δ45°, Δ90°, and ΔFull was significantly greater in the increased PTS group than in the decreased PTS group (p< 0.01 for both comparisons). Medial compartment loading of Δ45°, Δ90°, and ΔFull significantly correlated with KSS 2011 for “symptom” (r = − 0.4042, −0.4164, and −0.4010, respectively; p = 0.0267, 0.0246, and 0.0311, respectively). ΔPTS significantly correlated with medial compartment loading differentials of Δ45°, Δ90°, and ΔFull (r = − 0.3288, −0.3792, and −0.4424, respectively; p = 0.0358, 0.01558, and 0.0043, respectively). Patients with increased PTS showed better symptoms and higher patient satisfaction compared with those with decreased PTS following CR-TKA, possibly due to a greater decrease in compartment loading during knee flexion.Level of evidence:level IV, therapeutic case series.

Keywords

posterior tibial slope - joint awareness - patient satisfaction - total knee arthroplasty - compartment loading

Ethical Approval

This institutional review board of the author's institution approved this retrospective study (approval number: TGE01668–066).


Ethics Approval

This is a controlled laboratory study that did not involve human subjects. Ethical approval is not required.


Authors' Contribution

H.O. was responsible for study design, data analysis, and statistical analysis. Data collection wasperformed by H.O., Y.N., M.S., T.S., and K.O. The initial draft of the manuscript was written by H.O., Y.N., M.S., T.S., K.O., and H.A. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.




Publication History

Received: 28 September 2022

Accepted: 12 May 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
16 May 2023

Article published online:
03 July 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Kang KT, Koh YG, Son J, Kwon OR, Lee JS, Kwon SK. Influence of increased posterior tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty on knee joint biomechanics: a computational simulation study. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (02) 572-579
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bae DK, Song SJ, Yoon KH, Noh JH, Moon SC. Comparative study of tibial posterior slope angle following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty using one of three implants. Int Orthop 2012; 36 (04) 755-760
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Okamoto S, Mizu-uchi H, Okazaki K, Hamai S, Nakahara H, Iwamoto Y. Effect of tibial posterior slope on knee kinematics, quadriceps force, and patellofemoral contact force after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (08) 1439-1443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bellemans J, Robijns F, Duerinckx J, Banks S, Vandenneucker H. The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005; 13 (03) 193-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Massin P, Gournay A. Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (06) 889-896
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; ;(299): 31-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Whiteside LA, Amador DD. The effect of posterior tibial slope on knee stability after Ortholoc total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1988; 3 (Suppl): S51-S57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bai B, Baez J, Testa N, Kummer FJ. Effect of posterior cut angle on tibial component loading. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (07) 916-920
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jojima H, Whiteside LA, Ogata K. Effect of tibial slope or posterior cruciate ligament release on knee kinematics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (426) 194-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Chambers AW, Wood AR, Kosmopoulos V, Sanchez HB, Wagner RA. Effect of posterior tibial slope on flexion and anterior-posterior tibial translation in posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (01) 103-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Howell SM, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik KT, Hull ML. Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (10) 2271-2280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 McEwen PJ, Dlaska CE, Jovanovic IA, Doma K, Brandon BJ. Computer-assisted kinematic and mechanical axis total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial of bilateral simultaneous surgery. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35 (02) 443-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 MacDessi SJ, Griffiths-Jones W, Chen DB. et al. Restoring the constitutional alignment with a restrictive kinematic protocol improves quantitative soft-tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B (01) 117-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nedopil AJ, Delman C, Howell SM, Hull ML. Restoring the patient's pre-arthritic posterior slope is the correct target for maximizing internal tibial rotation when implanting a PCL retaining TKA with calipered kinematic alignment. J Pers Med 2021; 11 (06) 516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Hull ML. What mechanisms are associated with tibial component failure after kinematically-aligned total knee arthroplasty?. Int Orthop 2017; 41 (08) 1561-1569
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Peters CL, Jimenez C, Erickson J, Anderson MB, Pelt CE. Lessons learned from selective soft-tissue release for gap balancing in primary total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 1216 consecutive total knee arthroplasties: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (20) e152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Heesterbeek PJ, Wymenga AB. PCL balancing, an example of the need to couple detailed biomechanical parameters with clinical functional outcome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (10) 1301-1303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ahmad R, Patel A, Mandalia V, Toms A. Posterior tibial slope: effect on, and interaction with, knee kinematics. JBJS Rev 2016; 4 (04) e31-e36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN. The new Knee Society Knee Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (01) 3-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger JM, Kuster MS. The “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (03) 430-436.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ogawa H, Matsumoto K, Akiyama H. Coronal tibiofemoral subluxation is correlated to correction angle in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (11) 3482-3490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ogawa H, Matsumoto K, Akiyama H. Effect of increased posterior tibial slope on the anterior cruciate ligament status in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy in an uninjured ACL population. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019; 105 (06) 1085-1091
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Meneghini RM, Ziemba-Davis MM, Lovro LR, Ireland PH, Damer BM. Can intraoperative sensors determine the “target” ligament balance? Early outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (10) 2181-2187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Nowakowski AM, Kamphausen M, Pagenstert G, Valderrabano V, Müller-Gerbl M. Influence of tibial slope on extension and flexion gaps in total knee arthroplasty: increasing the tibial slope affects both gaps. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (10) 2071-2077
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Mizu-uchi H, Hamai S, Doi T, Iwamoto Y. Influence of the posterior tibial slope on the flexion gap in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2014; 21 (04) 806-809
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Pan XQ, Peng AQ, Wang F. et al. Effect of tibial slope changes on femorotibial contact kinematics after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (11) 3549-3555
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kim H, Pelker RR, Gibson DH, Irving JF, Lynch JK. Rollback in posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. A radiographic analysis. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12 (05) 553-561
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Khasian M, Meccia BA, LaCour MT, Komistek RD. Effects of posterior tibial slope on a posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty kinematics and kinetics. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36 (07) 2379-2385
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Nishitani K, Yamamoto Y, Furu M. et al. The minimum clinically important difference for the Japanese version of the new Knee Society Score (2011KSS) after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2019; 24 (06) 1053-1057
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Jenny JY. The effect of posterior tibial slope on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (05) 784 , author reply 784
    PubMedGoogle Scholar