PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2023; 08(01): e45-e50
DOI: 10.1055/a-2086-4988
Original Article

Perfusion Changes in Perforator-Based Propeller Flaps

Silvia Bernuth
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Clinic of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
,
Adrian Vater
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Clinic of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
,
Konrad F. Fuchs
2   Clinic of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
,
Rainer H. Meffert
2   Clinic of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
,
Rafael G. Jakubietz
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Clinic of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background To cover soft tissue defects, the perforator-based propeller flap offers the option to rotate healthy tissue into complex wounds. By rotating the flap, the perforator is torqued. As a result, perfusion changes are possible.

Methods A retrospective data analysis of patients was done, who received a propeller flap to cover soft tissue defects of the lower extremity as well as a peri- and postoperative perfusion monitoring with a laser-Doppler-spectrophotometry system. Additionally, patient-specific data were collected.

Results Seven patients were identified. Four patients experienced early complications, two epidermolysis of the distal flap areas, three wound healing disorders, and one partial flap necrosis. Intraoperative perfusion monitoring showed a decline of blood flow after incision of the flap, especially at distal flap site. In case of complications, there were prolonged blood flow declines up to the first postoperative day.

Conclusion Torqueing the perforator by rotating the flap can cause an impairment in inflow and outflow. If the impairment is prolonged, perfusion-associated complications are possible. The identification of a viable perforator is particularly important. In addition, a conservative postoperative mobilization is necessary to compensate for the impaired and adapting outflow.

Keywords

propeller flap - perfusion - lower extremity


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 25. Oktober 2022

Angenommen: 28. Februar 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
04. Mai 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. Juni 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

 

  • References

  • 1 Jakubietz RG, Jakubietz MG, Gruenert JG, Kloss DF. The 180-degree perforator-based propeller flap for soft tissue coverage of the distal, lower extremity: a new method to achieve reliable coverage of the distal lower extremity with a local, fasciocutaneous perforator flap. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59 (06) 667-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Teo TC. The propeller flap concept. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (04) 615-626 , vi
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Pignatti M, Ogawa R, Hallock GG. et al. The “Tokyo” consensus on propeller flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (02) 716-722
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gir P, Cheng A, Oni G, Mojallal A, Saint-Cyr M. Pedicled-perforator (propeller) flaps in lower extremity defects: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (09) 595-601
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Schaverien M, Saint-Cyr M. Perforators of the lower leg: analysis of perforator locations and clinical application for pedicled perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (01) 161-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rad AN, Singh NK, Rosson GD. Peroneal artery perforator-based propeller flap reconstruction of the lateral distal lower extremity after tumor extirpation: case report and literature review. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (08) 663-670
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Attinger C, Cooper P, Blume P. Vascular anatomy of the foot and ankle. Operat Techniq Plastic ReconstructSurg 1997; 4 (04) 183-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Quaba O, Quaba A. Pedicled perforator flaps for the lower limb. Semin Plast Surg 2006; 20 (02) 103-111
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bekara F, Herlin C, Somda S, de Runz A, Grolleau JL, Chaput B. Free versus perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity reconstruction: what is the safest coverage? A meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (01) 109-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Masia J, Moscatiello F, Pons G, Fernandez M, Lopez S, Serret P. Our experience in lower limb reconstruction with perforator flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 58 (05) 507-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Jakubietz RG, Jakubietz DF, Gruenert JG, Schmidt K, Meffert RH, Jakubietz MG. Reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the Achilles tendon with rotation flaps, pedicled propeller flaps and free perforator flaps. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (08) 608-613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kneser U, Beier JP, Schmitz M. et al. Zonal perfusion patterns in pedicled free-style perforator flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (01) e9-e17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Brazio PS, Kovach SJ, Rosson GD, Rad AN. A review of propeller flaps for distal lower extremity soft tissue reconstruction: is flap loss too high?. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (07) 578-586
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Taylor GI, Palmer JH. The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg 1987; 40 (02) 113-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Topalan M, Bilgin SS, Ip WY, Chow SP. Effect of torsion on microarterial anastomosis patency. Microsurgery 2003; 23 (01) 56-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wong CH, Cui F, Tan BK. et al. Nonlinear finite element simulations to elucidate the determinants of perforator patency in propeller flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59 (06) 672-678
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Salgarello M, Lahoud P, Selvaggi G, Gentileschi S, Sturla M, Farallo E. The effect of twisting on microanastomotic patency of arteries and veins in a rat model. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 47 (06) 643-646
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Selvaggi G, Anicic S, Formaggia L. Mathematical explanation of the buckling of the vessels after twisting of the microanastomosis. Microsurgery 2006; 26 (07) 524-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Saint-Cyr M, Schaverien M, Arbique G, Hatef D, Brown SA, Rohrich RJ. Three- and four-dimensional computed tomographic angiography and venography for the investigation of the vascular anatomy and perfusion of perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (03) 772-780
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chang SM, Zhang F, Xu DC, Yu GR, Hou CL, Lineaweaver WC. Lateral retromalleolar perforator-based flap: anatomical study and preliminary clinical report for heel coverage. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (03) 697-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Jakubietz RG, Schmidt K, Bernuth S, Meffert RH, Jakubietz MG. Evaluation of the intraoperative blood flow of pedicled perforator flaps using indocyanine green-fluorescence angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (09) e2462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Scaglioni MF, Macek A. Perforator propeller flaps in lower limb reconstruction: a literature review and case reports. Plast Aesthet Res 2019; DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2019.41.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cho MJ, Kwon JG, Pak CJ, Suh HP, Hong JP. The role of duplex ultrasound in microsurgical reconstruction: review and technical considerations. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (07) 514-521
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rothenberger J, Amr A, Schaller HE, Rahmanian-Schwarz A. Evaluation of a non-invasive monitoring method for free flap breast reconstruction using laser Doppler flowmetrie and tissue spectrophotometry. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (05) 350-357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hölzle F, Loeffelbein DJ, Nolte D, Wolff KD. Free flap monitoring using simultaneous non-invasive laser Doppler flowmetry and tissue spectrophotometry. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006; 34 (01) 25-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hölzle F, Rau A, Loeffelbein DJ, Mücke T, Kesting MR, Wolff KD. Results of monitoring fasciocutaneous, myocutaneous, osteocutaneous and perforator flaps: 4-year experience with 166 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 39 (01) 21-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar