Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(05): 543-547
DOI: 10.1055/a-1990-8668
Short Communication

Trends in Attempted Vaginal Delivery among Pregnancies Complicated by Gastroschisis, 2014 to 2020

Christina N. Schmidt 
1   School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
,
Timothy Wen
2   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California
,
Alexander M. Friedman
3   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
,
Mary E. D'Alton
3   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
,
Maria Andrikopoulou 
3   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective Gastroschisis is a full-thickness congenital defect of the abdominal wall through which intestines and other organs may herniate. In a prior analysis, attempted vaginal delivery with fetal gastroschisis appeared to increase through 2013, although cesarean delivery remained common. The objective of this analysis was to update current trends in attempted vaginal birth among pregnancies complicated by gastroschisis.

Study Design We performed an updated cross-sectional analysis of live births from 2014 and 2020 using data from the U.S. National Vital Statistics System and evaluated trends in attempted vaginal deliveries among births with gastroschisis. Trends were evaluated using joinpoint regression. We constructed logistic regression models to evaluate the association between demographic and clinical variables and attempted vaginal delivery in the setting of gastroschisis.

Results Among 5,355 deliveries with gastroschisis meeting inclusion criteria, attempted vaginal delivery increased significantly from 68.9% to 75.1%, an average annual percent change of 1.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8–2.5). Among gastroschisis-complicated pregnancies, patients 35 to 39 years old (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37–0.79) and Hispanic race/ethnicity (aOR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58–0.62) were at lower likelihood of attempted vaginal delivery in adjusted analyses.

Conclusion These findings suggest that vaginal delivery continues to increase in the setting of gastroschisis. Further reduction of surgical delivery for this fetal defect may be possible.

Key Points

  • Vaginal deliveries increased among gastroschisis pregnancies.

  • Hispanic patients were less likely to attempt vaginal delivery.

  • Some gastroschisis pregnancies still deliver surgically.

Keywords

gastroschisis - vaginal delivery - cesarean section - joinpoint regression

Note

Given that all data sources used were de-identified and publicly available, this study was granted an exemption by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board (identifier: 20–32165: November 17, 2020).




Publication History

Received: 16 September 2022

Accepted: 15 November 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
30 November 2022

Article published online:
16 January 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Segel SY, Marder SJ, Parry S, Macones GA. Fetal abdominal wall defects and mode of delivery: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98 (5, pt 1): 867-873
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kirollos DW, Abdel-Latif ME. Mode of delivery and outcomes of infants with gastroschisis: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2018; 103 (04) F355-F363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Friedman AM, Ananth CV, Siddiq Z, D'Alton ME, Wright JD. Gastroschisis: epidemiology and mode of delivery, 2005-2013. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (03) 348.e1-348.e9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About the National Vital Statistics Program. Accessed July 6, 2022 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/about_nvss.htm
    PubMed
  • 5 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC WONDER: Natality Information. Accessed July 6, 2022 at: https://wonder.cdc.gov/natality.html
    PubMed
  • 6 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: final data for 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018; 67 (01) 1-55
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 National Cancer Institute. Joinpoint Regression Analysis Software. Accessed March 2, 2022 at: https://surveillance.cancer.gov/joinpoint/
    PubMed
  • 8 Gillis D, Edwards BPM. The utility of joinpoint regression for estimating population parameters given changes in population structure. Heliyon 2019; 5 (11) e02515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Faraone SV. Interpreting estimates of treatment effects: implications for managed care. P&T 2008; 33 (12) 700-711
    PubMedGoogle Scholar