Ultralong C(sp3)–C(sp3) Single Bonds Shortened and Stabilized by London Dispersion

Takuya Shimajiri; Yuta Kawakami; Soki Kawaguchi; Yuki Hayashi; Kazuto Hada; Takanori Suzuki; Yusuke Ishigaki

doi:10.1055/a-1934-1346

Synlett, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Synlett 2023; 34(10): 1147-1152
DOI: 10.1055/a-1934-1346

cluster

Dispersion Effects

Ultralong C(sp³)–C(sp³) Single Bonds Shortened and Stabilized by London Dispersion

Takuya Shimajiri ∗

^aDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan

^bCreative Research Institution, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 001-0021, Japan

,

Yuta Kawakami

^aDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan

,

Soki Kawaguchi

^aDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan

,

Yuki Hayashi

^aDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan

,

Kazuto Hada

^aDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan

,

Takanori Suzuki

^aDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan

,

Yusuke Ishigaki ∗

^aDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Abstract

A carbon–carbon (C–C) single bond longer than 1.7 Å shows unique bond flexibility, even though a C–C single bond is typically rigid and robust. We report here that the bond length of flexible C–C single bonds surrounded by bulky alkyl groups in novel hexaphenylethane-type hydrocarbons might be affected by weak noncovalent interactions, such as London dispersion. Thanks to London dispersion, an ultralong and flexible C–C single bond exhibits an obvious bond contraction. X-ray analyses and Raman spectroscopy provided direct information regarding the bond length and strength, whereas density functional theory calculations explained the bond contraction driven by London dispersion. The change in bond length of an extremely elongated flexible C–C bond would be a good probe for quantifying weak interactions that are usually difficult to detect.

Key words

strained molecules - hydrocarbons - C–C bond length - X-ray analysis - London dispersion

Volltext

Referenzen

References and Notes
1 Fenniri H, Mathivanan P, Vidale KL, Sherman DM, Hallenga K, Wood KV, Stowell JG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001; 123: 3854
2 Panigrahi SK, Desiraju GR. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2007; 67: 128
3 Jain P, Antilla JC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 11884
4 Hunter CA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004; 43: 5310
5 Kahr B, Van Engen D, Mislow K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986; 108: 8305
6 Schreiner PR, Chernish LV, Gunchenko PA, Tikhonchuk EY, Hausmann H, Serafin M, Schlecht S, Dahl JE. P, Carlson RM. K, Fokin AA. Nature 2011; 477: 308
7 Rösel S, Becker J, Allen WD, Schreiner PR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 14421
8 Schümann JM, Wagner JP, Eckhardt AK, Quanz H, Schreiner PR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021; 143: 41
9 Aikawa H, Takahira Y, Yamaguchi M. Chem. Commun. 2011; 47: 1479
10 Yamaguchi M, Shigeno M, Saito N, Yamamoto K. Chem. Rec. 2014; 14: 15
11 Ikawa T, Yamamoto Y, Heguri A, Fukumoto Y, Murakami T, Takagi A, Masuda Y, Yahata K, Aoyama H, Shigeta Y, Tokiwa H, Akai S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021; 143: 10853
12 Eschmann C, Song L, Schreiner PR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 4823
13 Gomberg M. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1900; 33: 3150
14 Gomberg M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1900; 22: 757
15 Lankamp H, Nauta WT, MacLean C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968; 9: 249
16 Stein M, Winter W, Rieker A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1978; 17: 692
17 Grimme S, Schreiner PR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 12639
18 Rösel S, Balestrieri C, Schreiner PR. Chem. Sci. 2016; 8: 405
19 Rösel S, Schreiner PR. Isr. J. Chem. 2022; 62: e202200002
20 Fokin AA, Chernish LV, Gunchenko PA, Tikhonchuk EY, Hausmann H, Serafin M, Dahl JE. P, Carlson RM. K, Schreiner PR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 13641
21 Ishigaki Y, Shimajiri T, Takeda T, Katoono R, Suzuki T. Chem 2018; 4: 795
22 Shimajiri T, Suzuki T, Ishigaki Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 22252
23 Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H. J. Chem. Phys. 2010; 132: 154104
24 Diol 4 A 1.56 M solution of BuLi in hexane (1.35 mL, 2.11 mmol) was added to a suspension of 5,6-dibromo-1,2-dihydroacenaphthylene (3; 312 mg, 1.00 mmol) in dry Et₂O (20 mL) at 24 °C, and the mixture was stirred at 24 °C for 1 h. 2,8-Di-tert-butyldibenzosuberenone (669 mg, 2.10 mmol) was added, and the resulting mixture was refluxed for 4.5 h then cooled to 24 °C and diluted with H₂O. The mixture was extracted with EtOAc (×3), and the combined organic layers were washed with H₂O and brine then dried (Na₂SO₄), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by washing with MeOH (3 × 20 mL) to give a white solid; yield: 451 mg (57%); mp 193.3–203.1 °C (dec). IR (ATR): 3566, 2960, 2903, 2867, 1596, 1559, 1507, 1490, 1458, 1387, 1362, 1313, 1271, 1215, 1179, 1164, 1145, 1093, 1077, 1044, 1022, 946, 938, 891, 828, 814, 803, 783, 755, 731, 691, 677, 662, 650, 627, 549, 507, 491, 455, 428 cm^–1. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.88 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.68 (dd, J = 2.0, 8.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.25 (dd, J = 2.1, 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 6.97 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 2 H), 6.72 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 2 H), 6.69 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 6.58 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 5.63 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 2 H), 5.55 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.29–3.12 (m, 4 H), 1.41 (s, 18 H), 1.18 (s, 18 H), 0.94 (s, 2 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 149.16, 147.61, 147.41, 145.21, 138.27, 137.52, 136.41, 134.68, 133.90, 131.68, 131.54, 130.61, 129.33, 126.19, 125.01, 124.41, 124.30, 123.78, 121.38, 116.65, 78.56, 34.54, 34.08, 31.37, 31.34, 29.83. LR-MS (FD): m/z (%): 793.49 (6), 792.49 (23), 791.48 (67), 790.48 (M⁺, bp), 772.46 (5), 500.24 (6). HRMS (FD): m/z calcd for C₅₈H₆₂O₂: 790.47498; found: 790.47359. Diol 6
A 1.57 M solution of BuLi in hexane (1.35 mL, 2.11 mmol) was added to a suspension of 5,6-dibromoacenaphthylene (5; 310 mg, 1.00 mmol) in dry Et₂O (20 mL) at 22 °C, and the mixture was stirred at 22 °C for 1 h. 2,8-di-tert-butyldibenzosuberenone (668 mg, 2.10 mmol) was added, and the resulting mixture was refluxed for 6 h, allowed to cool to 24 °C, diluted with H₂O, and extracted with CHCl₃ (×3). The combined organic layers were washed with water and brine, dried (Na₂SO₄), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography [silica gel CH₂Cl₂–hexane (1:3)] to give a pale-orange solid; yield: 283 mg (36%); mp 229.5–261.3 ℃ (dec); R_f = 0.42 (silica gel CH₂Cl₂–hexane, 1:3). IR (ATR): 3560, 2956, 2866, 2362, 1602, 1559, 1507, 1490, 1384, 1361, 1313, 1264, 1206, 1093, 1045, 888, 825, 805, 741, 715, 691, 668, 651, 624, 555, 506 cm^–1. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.86 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.69 (dd, J = 2.2, 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.27 (dd, J = 2.2, 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.00 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 2 H), 6.98 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 6.75 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 2 H), 6.70 (s, 2 H), 6.62 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 5.68 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 2 H), 5.64 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 2 H), 1.42 (s, 18 H), 1.18 (s, 18 H), 0.97 (s, 2 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 149.50, 147.73, 147.10, 143.23, 138.93, 137.44, 134.41, 134.05, 131.70, 131.03, 130.54, 129.81, 128.70, 127.98, 125.97, 125.07, 124.52, 124.47, 123.80, 121.54, 121.11, 78.62, 34.58, 34.12, 31.35, 31.32. LR-MS (FD): m/z (%): 791.44 (6), 790.44 (25), 789.44 (M⁺, 65), 788.43 (bp), 773.88 (5), 772.87 (9), 772.43 (10), 771.43 (30), 770.42 (45), 499.24 (8), 498.24 (21), 356.14 (16), 301.09 (7), 300.08 (25), 152.05 (5). HRMS (FD): m/z [M⁺] calcd for C₅₈H₆₀O₂: 788.45933; found: 788.46151.
25 Polycyclic Hydrocarbon 1- ^t Bu TfOH (110 μL, 1.24 mmol) was added to a suspension of 4 (100 mg, 126 μmol) in anhyd CH₂Cl₂ (1 mL) at 0 °C. HFIP (1 mL) was added and the mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 30 min. Anhyd MeCN (2 mL) and activated Zn powder (1.24 g, 18.8 mmol) were added at 0 °C, and the resulting mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 5 min then warmed to 24 °C and stirred at 24 °C for 10 min. The resulting mixture was diluted with water at 0 °C and extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (×3). The combined organic layer was washed successively with water, sat. aq NaHCO₃, and brine then dried (MgSO₄), filtered through a silica pad, and concentrated under reduced pressure to give a white solid; yield: 95.4 mg (quant); mp 266.4–279.8 °C (dec). IR (ATR): 3028, 2951, 2864, 1603, 1559, 1500, 1476, 1458, 1440, 1429, 1382, 1359, 1290, 1264, 1230, 1206, 1147, 1065, 1023, 948, 902, 886, 841, 804, 792, 765, 752, 719, 703, 689, 654, 600, 511, 467, 447, 434, 430, 424, 420 cm^–1. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.42 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.15 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 6.77 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 4 H), 6.46 (dd, J = 2.2, 8.7 Hz, 4 H), 6.33 (s, 4 H), 6.23 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 4 H), 3.62 (s, 4 H), 1.12 (s, 36 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 148.10, 147.37, 141.98, 138.42, 137.81, 137.58, 135.75, 133.49, 132.46, 127.47, 127.38, 123.05, 121.26, 84.88, 33.73, 31.95, 31.21. LR-MS (FD): m/z (%): 759.40 (8), 758.39 (25), 757.39 (66), 756.38 (M⁺, bp). HRMS (FD): m/z calcd for C₅₈H₆₀: 756.46950; found: 756.47015. Polycyclic Hydrocarbon 2- ^t Bu A 0.79 M solution TMSClO₄ in dry toluene (1.05 mL, 830 μmol) was added to a suspension of 6 (99.7 mg, 126 μmol) in HFIP (3 mL) at 0 °C, and the solution was stirred at 0 °C for 30 min. Anhyd MeCN (7 mL) and activated Zn powder (1.24 g, 190 mmol) were added and the resulting mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 5 min, then warmed to 22 °C and stirred at 22 °C for 5 min. The mixture was then diluted with water at 0 °C and extracted with EtOAc (×3). The combined organic layers were washed with water, sat. aq NaHCO₃, and brine then dried (Na₂SO₄), filtered through a silica pad, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography to give an orange solid; yield: 89.3 mg (93%); mp 208.2–248.6 ℃ (dec.); R_f = 0.30 (silica gel, CH₂Cl₂–hexane, 1:5). IR (ATR): 3031, 2952, 2865, 2361, 1734, 1700, 1684, 1653, 1603, 1559, 1506, 1458, 1419, 1382, 1360, 1290, 1264, 1206, 1148, 1078, 949, 908, 887, 841, 832, 802, 793, 736, 684, 668, 652, 502 cm^–1. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.94 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.33 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.30 (s, 2 H), 6.79 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 4 H), 6.44 (dd, J = 2.4, 8.8 Hz, 4 H), 6.36 (s, 4 H), 6.12 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4 H), 1.12 (s, 36 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 153.62, 148.34, 138.16, 135.99, 135.66, 133.38, 132.45, 129.23, 127.47, 127.26, 126.91, 123.15, 85.85, 33.72, 31.13. LR-MS (FD): m/z (%): 757.44 (8), 756.44 (25), 755.44 (M⁺, 67), 754.43 (M⁺, bp). HR-MS (FD): m/z [M⁺] calcd for C₅₈H₅₈: 754.45385; found: 754.45572.
26 Takeda T, Uchimura Y, Kawai H, Katoono R, Fujiwara K, Suzuki T. Chem. Lett. 2013; 42: 954
27 Suzuki T, Uchimura Y, Nagasawa F, Takeda T, Kawai H, Katoono R, Fujiwara K, Murakoshi K, Fukushima T, Nagaki A, Yoshida J.-i. Chem. Lett. 2014; 43: 86
28 CCDC 2192641–2192644 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for compound 1- ^t Bu at 100, 200, 300, and 400 K, respectively, and CCDC 2192645–2192648 contain those for compound 2- ^t Bu at 100, 200, 300, and 400 K, respectively. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures
29 Hwang J, Li P, Smith MD, Shimizu KD. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 8086
30 Bader RF. W. Acc. Chem. Res. 1985; 18: 9
31 Contreras-García J, Johnson ER, Keinan S, Chaudret R, Piquemal JP, Beratan DN, Yang W. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011; 7: 625
32 Wong MW. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996; 256: 391
33 Van Helvoort K, Knippers W, Fantoni R, Stolte S. Chem. Phys. 1987; 111: 445

Zusatzmaterial

Supporting Information