Venöse Zugänge – Implantation und Komplikationsmanagement

Die Bedeutung der interventionellen Radiologie bei der Implantation und dem Management von Komplikationen von zentralvenösen Kathetern hat deutlich zugenommen. Da die Indikationen und Einsatzgebiete der Katheter sehr unterschiedlich sind, haben sich viele verschiedene Kathetertypen entwickelt, deren Implantationstechnik, Einsatzgebiet und Spektrum an möglichen Komplikationen sehr unterschiedlich sind. Die verschiedenen Katheter und deren Besonderheiten werden im Artikel vorgestellt. Beim Management von Katheterkomplikationen ist die interventionelle Radiologie durch ihre diagnostischen und interventionellen Methoden ein idealer Partner und kann bei langfristigen Kathetern dem Patienten viele Optionen bieten den Katheter zu bewahren. Diese werden diskutiert und erläutert.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
30. Juni 2023

• Literatur

• 1 Forssmann W. Die Sondierung des rechten Herzens. Klin Wochenzeitschr 1929; 8: 3
• 2 Gebauer B, Beck A, Wagner HJ. Zentralvenöse Katheter: Diagnostik von Komplikationen und therapeutische Optionen. Radiologie up2date 2008; 8: 135-154
• 3 Shaldon S, Silva H, Pomeroy J. et al. Percutaneous femoral venous catheterization and reusable dialysers in the treatment of acute renal failure. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1964; 10: 133-135 (PMID: 5878400)
• 4 O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA. et al. Summary of recommendations: Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52: 1087-1099 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir138. (PMID: 21467014)
• 5 O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP. et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Cen- ters for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep 2002; 51: 1-29
• 6 Broviac JW, Cole JJ, Scribner BH. A silicone rubber atrial cath- eter for prolonged parenteral alimentation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1973; 136: 602-606
• 7 Hickman RO, Buckner CD, Clift RA. et al. A modified right atrial catheter for access to the venous system in marrow transplant recipients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1979; 148: 871-875 (PMID: 109934)
• 8 Demers HG, Siebold G, Geyer G. et al. Dialyse ohne Shunt. Siliconkatheter im rechten Vorhof. Nieren Hochdruckkrankh 1986; 15: 460-462
• 9 Hoshal VLJr. Total intravenous nutrition with peripherally inserted silicone elastomer central venous catheters. Arch Surg 1975; 110: 644-646 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360110190032. (PMID: 805577)
• 10 Niederhuber JE, Ensminger W, Gyves JW. et al. Totally implant- ed venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. Surgery 1982; 92: 706-712
• 11 Moss JG, Wu O, Bodenham AR. et al. CAVA trial group. Central venous access devices for the delivery of systemic anticancer therapy (CAVA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2021; 398: 403-415 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00766-2.
• 12 Vesely TM. Central venous catheter tip position: a continuing controversy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 527-534 DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000071097.76348.72. (PMID: 12761305)
• 13 Food and Drug Administration Task Force. Precautions necessary with central venous catheters. FDA Drug Bulletin 1989; 19: 15-16
• 14 National Association of Vascular Access Networks. NAVAN Position Statement. J Vasc Access Devices 1998; 3: 8-10
• 15 Pittiruti M, Scoppettuolo G, La Greca A. et al. The EKG method for positioning the tip of PICCs: results from two preliminary studies. JAVA 2008; 13: 179-186
• 16 National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for 2006 updates: Hemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis adequacy and vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 48: S1-S322
• 17 Stonelake PA, Bodenham AR. The carina as a radiological landmark for central venous catheter tip position. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96: 335-340 DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei310. (PMID: 16415318)
• 18 National Kidney Foundation. III. NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access: Update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37: 01137-S181
• 19 Calvert N, Hind D, McWilliams R. et al. Ultrasound for central venous cannulation: economic evaluation of cost-effective- ness. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 1116-1120
• 20 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Gui- dance on the use of ultrasound locating devices for placing central venous catheters 2002. Zugriff am 10. Dezember 2014 unter: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta49/resources/guidance-on-the-use-of-ultrasound-locating-devices-for-placing-central-venous-catheters-pdf-2294585518021
• 21 Silberzweig JE, Sacks D, Khorsandi AS. et al. Reporting standards for central venous access. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 443-S452 DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000094617.61428.bc. (PMID: 14514860)
• 22 Gebauer B, El-Sheik M, Vogt M. et al. Combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy guided port catheter implantation – high success and low complication rate. Eur J Radiol 2009; 69: 517-522 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.10.018. (PMID: 19340958)
• 23 Gebauer B, Teichgraber UK, Podrabsky P. et al. Ultraschall- und durchleuchtungsgesteuerte Implantation peripher inserierter zentral-venöser Katheter (PICC). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 386-391
• 24 Gebauer B, Teichgraber UM, Werk M. et al. Sonographically guided venous puncture and fluoroscopically guided placement of tunneled, large-bore central venous catheters for bone marrow transplantation – high success rates and low complication rates. Support Care Cancer 2008; 16: 897-904 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-007-0378-9. (PMID: 18197436)
• 25 Lenhart M, Schatzler S, Manke C. et al. Radiologische Implantation zentralvenöser Portsysteme am Unterarm. Implantationsergebnisse und Langzeit-Follow-up bei 391 Patienten. Rofo 2010; 182: 20-28
• 26 Shiono M, Takahashi S, Kakudo Y. et al. Upper arm central venous port implantation: A 6-year single institutional retrospective analysis and pictorial essay of procedures for insertion. PLOS One 2014; 9 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091335.
• 27 Dawson RB. PICC Zone Insertion MethodTM (ZIMTM): A Systematic Approach to Determine the Ideal Insertion Site for PICCs in the Upper Arm. Journal of the Association for Vascular Access 2011; 16: 156-165 DOI: 10.2309/java.16-3-5.
• 28 Maurer MH, Beck A, Hamm B. et al. Central venous port catheters: evaluation of patients’ satisfaction with implantation under local anesthesia. J Vasc Access 2009; 10: 27-32
• 29 Gebauer B, Teichgraber U, Werk M. et al. Periinterventionelle prophylaktische Antibiotikagabe bei der radiologischen Portkatheterimplantation. Rofo 2007; 179: 804-810
• 30 Metzler B, Hillebrand H, Eulenbruch HP. et al. Persistent left superior vena cava with right-left shunt into the left atrium. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2002; 127: 83-86
• 31 Yousaf M, Malak SF. Left atrial drainage of a persistent left superior vena cava. Radiol Case Reports 2008; 3: 4 DOI: 10.2484/rcr.v3i4.225. (PMID: 27303557)
• 32 O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA. et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52: e162-e193 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir257. (PMID: 21460264)
• 33 Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention beim Robert Koch-Institut. Prävention Gefäßkatheter- assoziierter Infektionen. Empfehlung der Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention beim Robert Koch-Institut (RKI). Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 2002; 45: 907-924
• 34 Lang T, Jaboury S, West A. et al. Is There a Relationship Between Frequency of Port-Care Maintenance and Related Complications in Patients With Cancer?. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18: e1438-e1446 DOI: 10.1200/OP.22.00060.
• 35 Moureau N, Poole S, Murdock MA. et al. Central venous cathe- ters in home infusion care: outcomes analysis in 50.470 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002; 13: 1009-1016
• 36 Gebauer B, Teichgraber UK, Podrabsky P. et al. Radiological interventions for correction of central venous port catheter migrations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30: 216-221 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-006-0218-1. (PMID: 17200898)
• 37 Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Reminders from FDA regarding ruptured vascular access devices from power injection 31.03.2013. Zugriff am 04. Dezember 2014 unter: http://www.fda.gov/ MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/TipsandArticleson- DeviceSafety/ucm070193.htm
• 38 Blom JW, Doggen CJ, Osanto S. et al. Old and new risk factors for upper extremity deep venous thrombosis. J Thromb Haemos 2005; 3: 2471-2478 DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01625.x. (PMID: 16241945)
• 39 Prandoni P, Polistena P, Bernardi E. et al. Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis. Risk factors, diagnosis, and complications. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 57-62 (PMID: 8996041)
• 40 Joffe HV, Kucher N, Tapson VF. et al. Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis: a prospective registry of 592 patients. Circulation 2004; 110: 1605-1611 DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000142289.94369.D7. (PMID: 15353493)
• 41 Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN. et al. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population- based case-control study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 809-815 DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.6.809. (PMID: 10737280)
• 42 Gaddh M, Antun A, Yamada K. et al. Venous access catheter- related thrombosis in patients with cancer. Leukemia lymphoma 2014; 55: 501-508
• 43 Hinke DH, Zandt-Stastny DA, Goodman LR. et al. Pinch-off syndrome: a complication of implantable subclavian venous access devices. Radiology 1990; 177: 353-356 DOI: 10.1148/radiology.177.2.2217768. (PMID: 2217768)
• 44 Forauer AR, Theoharis CG, Dasika NL. Jugular vein catheter placement: histologic features and development of catheter- related (fibrin) sheaths in a swine model. Radiology 2006; 240: 427-434 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2402031129. (PMID: 16864670)
• 45 Janne d’Othee B, Tham JC, Sheiman RG. Restoration of paten- cy in failing tunneled hemodialysis catheters: a comparison of catheter exchange, exchange and balloon disruption of the fibrin sheath, and femoral stripping. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17: 1011-1015
• 46 Savader SJ, Ehrman KO, Porter DJ. et al. Treatment of hemodialysis catheter-associated fibrin sheaths by rt-PA infusion: critical analysis of 124 procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12: 711-715 DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61441-9. (PMID: 11389222)
• 47 Whigham CJ, Lindsey JI, Goodman CJ. et al. Venous port salva- ge utilizing low dose tPA. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2002; 25: 513-516
• 48 Forauer AR, Theoharis C. Histologic changes in the human vein wall adjacent to indwelling central venous catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 1163-1168 DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000086531.86489.4c. (PMID: 14514808)
• 49 Schillinger F, Schillinger D, Montagnac R. et al. Post catheterisation vein stenosis in haemodialysis: comparative angiographic study of 50 subclavian and 50 internal jugular accesses. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1991; 6: 722-724 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/6.10.722. (PMID: 1754109)
• 50 Calandra T, Cohen J. The international sepsis forum consensus conference on definitions of infection in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 1538-1548 DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000168253.91200.83. (PMID: 16003060)
• 51 Miller DL, O’Grady NP. Guidelines for the prevention of intra- vascular catheter-related infections: recommendations relevant to interventional radiology for venous catheter place- ment and maintenance. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23: 997-1007
• 52 Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. New Engl J Med 1977; 296: 1305-1309 DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197706092962301. (PMID: 323710)
• 53 Mermel LA. Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132: 391-402 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir257. (PMID: 21460264)
• 54 Bishop L, Dougherty L, Bodenham A. et al. Guidelines on the insertion and management of central venous access devices in adults. Int J Lab Hematol 2007; 29: 261-278 DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2007.00931.x. (PMID: 17617077)
• 55 Bouza E, Burillo A, Munoz P. Catheter-related infections: diagnosis and intravascular treatment. Clinical microbiology and infection: the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2002; 8: 265-274 DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2002.00385.x. (PMID: 12047403)
• 56 Hall K, Farr B. Diagnosis and management of long-term central venous catheter infections. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15: 327-334 DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000121405.46920.87. (PMID: 15064335)
• 57 Jauch KW, Schregel W, Stanga Z. et al. Leitlinie Parenterale Ernährung der DGEM: Technik und Probleme der Zugänge in der parenteralen Ernährung. Aktuel Ernaehr Med 2007; 32: 12
• 58 Vescia S, Baumgartner AK, Jacobs VR. et al. Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 9-15 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm272. (PMID: 17846025)
• 59 Widmer AF. Management of catheter-related bacteremia and fungemia in patients on total parenteral nutrition. Nutrition 1997; 13: 18S-25S DOI: 10.1016/s0899-9007(97)00218-9. (PMID: 9178306)
• 60 Wolf HH, Leithauser M, Maschmeyer G. et al. Central venous catheter-related infections in hematology and oncology: guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO). Ann Hematol 2008; 87: 863-876 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-008-0509-5. (PMID: 18629501)
• 61 Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter- related infection: 2009 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49: 1-45 DOI: 10.1086/599376. (PMID: 19489710)