PDF herunterladen
J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39(05): 350-360
DOI: 10.1055/a-1886-5697
Original Article

Exceeding the Limits of Static Cold Storage in Limb Transplantation Using Subnormothermic Machine Perfusion

Marion Goutard 
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
2   Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
3   Department of Research, Shriners Children's, Boston, Massachusetts
4   Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
,
Reinier J. de Vries
2   Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
3   Department of Research, Shriners Children's, Boston, Massachusetts
5   Department of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
6   Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers – location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Pierre Tawa
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
2   Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
3   Department of Research, Shriners Children's, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Casie A. Pendexter
2   Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
3   Department of Research, Shriners Children's, Boston, Massachusetts
5   Department of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Ivy A. Rosales
7   Immunopathology Research Laboratory, Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Shannon N. Tessier
2   Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
3   Department of Research, Shriners Children's, Boston, Massachusetts
5   Department of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Laura C. Burlage
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
2   Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
3   Department of Research, Shriners Children's, Boston, Massachusetts
8   Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
9   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery within the Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
,
Laurent Lantieri
4   Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
,
Mark A. Randolph
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
2   Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
3   Department of Research, Shriners Children's, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Alexandre G. Lellouch
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
2   Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
3   Department of Research, Shriners Children's, Boston, Massachusetts
4   Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
,
Curtis L. Cetrulo Jr   *
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
2   Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
3   Department of Research, Shriners Children's, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Korkut Uygun   *
2   Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
3   Department of Research, Shriners Children's, Boston, Massachusetts
5   Department of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
› Institutsangaben Funding This work was supported by the Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Reconstructive Transplant Research Program, Technology Development Award under Awards No. W81XWH-17-1-0680 and W81XWH-19-1-0440. This material is partially based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. EEC 1941543. Partial support from the US National Institutes of Health (R01EB028782) is gratefully acknowledged. Funding from the Shriners Children's is gratefully acknowledged, including the award 986579 to KU, and the support by Shriners Special Shared Facilities that enabled this work.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background For 50 years, static cold storage (SCS) has been the gold standard for solid organ preservation in transplantation. Although logistically convenient, this preservation method presents important constraints in terms of duration and cold ischemia-induced lesions. We aimed to develop a machine perfusion (MP) protocol for recovery of vascularized composite allografts (VCA) after static cold preservation and determine its effects in a rat limb transplantation model.

Methods Partial hindlimbs were procured from Lewis rats and subjected to SCS in Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate solution for 0, 12, 18, 24, and 48 hours. They were then either transplanted (Txp), subjected to subnormothermic machine perfusion (SNMP) for 3 hours with a modified Steen solution, or to SNMP + Txp. Perfusion parameters were assessed for blood gas and electrolytes measurement, and flow rate and arterial pressures were monitored continuously. Histology was assessed at the end of perfusion. For select SCS durations, graft survival and clinical outcomes after transplantation were compared between groups at 21 days.

Results Transplantation of limbs preserved for 0, 12, 18, and 24-hour SCS resulted in similar survival rates at postoperative day 21. Grafts cold-stored for 48 hours presented delayed graft failure (p = 0.0032). SNMP of limbs after 12-hour SCS recovered the vascular resistance, potassium, and lactate levels to values similar to limbs that were not subjected to SCS. However, 18-hour SCS grafts developed significant edema during SNMP recovery. Transplantation of grafts that had undergone a mixed preservation method (12-hour SCS + SNMP + Txp) resulted in better clinical outcomes based on skin clinical scores at day 21 post-transplantation when compared to the SCS + Txp group (p = 0.01613).

Conclusion To date, VCA MP is still limited to animal models and no protocols are yet developed for graft recovery. Our study suggests that ex vivo SNMP could help increase the preservation duration and limit cold ischemia-induced injury in VCA transplantation.

Keywords

preservation - reconstructive surgery - VCA - cold storage - machine perfusion - transplantation

Note

The U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity, 820 Chandler Street, Fort Detrick MD 21702-5014 is the awarding and administering acquisition office. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Defense.


* Shared senior authorship.


Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 14. Oktober 2021

Angenommen: 23. Juni 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
28. Juni 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
31. Oktober 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Pribaz JJ, Caterson EJ. Evolution and limitations of conventional autologous reconstruction of the head and neck. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24 (01) 99-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Diaz-Siso JR, Bueno EM, Sisk GC, Marty FM, Pomahac B, Tullius SG. Vascularized composite tissue allotransplantation–state of the art. Clin Transplant 2013; 27 (03) 330-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cherikh WS, Cendales LC, Wholley CL. et al. Vascularized composite allotransplantation in the United States: a descriptive analysis of the organ procurement and transplantation network data. Am J Transplant 2019; 19 (03) 865-875
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wainright JL, Wholley CL, Cherikh WS, Musick JM, Klassen DK. OPTN vascularized composite allograft waiting list: current status and trends in the United States. Transplantation 2018; 102 (11) 1885-1890
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mendenhall SD, Brown S, Ben-Amotz O, Neumeister MW, Levin LS. Building a hand and upper extremity transplantation program: lessons learned from the first 20 years of vascularized composite allotransplantation. Hand (N Y) 2020; 15 (02) 224-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Giwa S, Lewis JK, Alvarez L. et al. The promise of organ and tissue preservation to transform medicine. Nat Biotechnol 2017; 35 (06) 530-542
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 McAnulty JF. Hypothermic organ preservation by static storage methods: current status and a view to the future. Cryobiology 2010; 60 (Suppl. 03) S13-S19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Southard JH, Belzer FO. Organ preservation. Annu Rev Med 1995; 46: 235-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Blaisdell FW. The pathophysiology of skeletal muscle ischemia and the reperfusion syndrome: a review. Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 10 (06) 620-630
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lee WP, Yaremchuk MJ, Pan YC, Randolph MA, Tan CM, Weiland AJ. Relative antigenicity of components of a vascularized limb allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87 (03) 401-411
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Deng R, Gu G, Wang D. et al. Machine perfusion versus cold storage of kidneys derived from donation after cardiac death: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8 (03) e56368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 O'Callaghan JM, Morgan RD, Knight SR, Morris PJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of hypothermic machine perfusion versus static cold storage of kidney allografts on transplant outcomes. Br J Surg 2013; 100 (08) 991-1001
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hameed AM, Pleass HC, Wong G, Hawthorne WJ. Maximizing kidneys for transplantation using machine perfusion: from the past to the future: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95 (40) e5083
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tingle SJ, Figueiredo RS, Moir JA, Goodfellow M, Talbot D, Wilson CH. Machine perfusion preservation versus static cold storage for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 3: CD011671
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hosgood SA, Nicholson ML. First in man renal transplantation after ex vivo normothermic perfusion. Transplantation 2011; 92 (07) 735-738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Koerner MM, Ghodsizad A, Schulz U, El Banayosy A, Koerfer R, Tenderich G. Normothermic ex vivo allograft blood perfusion in clinical heart transplantation. Heart Surg Forum 2014; 17 (03) E141-E145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Dutkowski P, Polak WG, Muiesan P. et al. First comparison of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion versus static cold storage of human donation after cardiac death liver transplants: an international-matched case analysis. Ann Surg 2015; 262 (05) 764-770 , discussion 770–771
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Samoylova ML, Nash A, Kuchibhatla M, Barbas AS, Brennan TV. Machine perfusion of donor kidneys may reduce graft rejection. Clin Transplant 2019; 33 (10) e13716
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Cypel M, Feld JJ, Galasso M. et al. Prevention of viral transmission during lung transplantation with hepatitis C-viraemic donors: an open-label, single-centre, pilot trial. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8 (02) 192-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chin LY, Carroll C, Raigani S. et al. Ex vivo perfusion-based engraftment of genetically engineered cell sensors into transplantable organs. PLoS One 2019; 14 (12) e0225222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bishawi M, Roan JN, Milano CA. et al. A normothermic ex vivo organ perfusion delivery method for cardiac transplantation gene therapy. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 8029
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Renne J, Gutberlet M, Voskrebenzev A. et al. Functional pulmonary magnetic resonance imaging for detection of ischemic injury in a porcine ex-vivo lung perfusion system prior to transplantation. Acad Radiol 2019; 26 (02) 170-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lonati C, Battistin M, Dondossola DE. et al. NDP-MSH treatment recovers marginal lungs during ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP). Peptides 2021; 141: 170552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Wong A, Zamel R, Yeung J. et al. Potential therapeutic targets for lung repair during human ex vivo lung perfusion. Eur Respir J 2020; 55 (04) 1902222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Gok E, Alghanem F, Moon R. et al. Development of an ex-situ limb perfusion system for a rodent model. ASAIO J 2019; 65 (02) 167-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Duraes EFR, Madajka M, Frautschi R. et al. Developing a protocol for normothermic ex-situ limb perfusion. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (02) 185-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fahradyan V, Said SA, Ordenana C. et al. Extended ex vivo normothermic perfusion for preservation of vascularized composite allografts. Artif Organs 2020; 44 (08) 846-855
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Kruit AS, Brouwers K, van Midden D. et al. Successful 18-h acellular extracorporeal perfusion and replantation of porcine limbs—histology versus nerve stimulation. Transpl Int 2021; 34 (02) 365-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ozer K, Rojas-Pena A, Mendias CL, Bryner B, Toomasian C, Bartlett RH. Ex situ limb perfusion system to extend vascularized composite tissue allograft survival in swine. Transplantation 2015; 99 (10) 2095-2101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Werner NL, Alghanem F, Rakestraw SL. et al. Ex situ perfusion of human limb allografts for 24 hours. Transplantation 2017; 101 (03) e68-e74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Belzer FO, Ashby BS, Gulyassy PF, Powell M. Successful seventeen-hour preservation and transplantation of human-cadaver kidney. N Engl J Med 1968; 278 (11) 608-610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Dutkowski P, Schlegel A, de Oliveira M, Müllhaupt B, Neff F, Clavien PA. HOPE for human liver grafts obtained from donors after cardiac death. J Hepatol 2014; 60 (04) 765-772
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 van Rijn R, Schurink IJ, de Vries Y. et al; DHOPE-DCD Trial Investigators. Hypothermic machine perfusion in liver transplantation - a randomized trial. N Engl J Med 2021; 384 (15) 1391-1401
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Goutard M, Randolph MA, Taveau CB. et al. Partial heterotopic hindlimb transplantation model in rats. J Vis Exp 2021;172
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Gok E, Kubiak CA, Guy E, Kemp SWP, Ozer K. Effect of static cold storage on skeletal muscle after vascularized composite tissue allotransplantation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (01) 9-15
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Arai K, Hotokebuchi T, Miyahara H. et al. Successful long-term storage of rat limbs. The use of simple immersion in Euro-Collins solution. Int Orthop 1993; 17 (06) 389-396
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Datta N, Devaney SG, Busuttil RW, Azari K, Kupiec-Weglinski JW. Prolonged cold ischemia time results in local and remote organ dysfunction in a murine model of vascularized composite transplantation. Am J Transplant 2017; 17 (10) 2572-2579
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Bruinsma BG, Berendsen TA, Izamis ML, Yarmush ML, Uygun K. Determination and extension of the limits to static cold storage using subnormothermic machine perfusion. Int J Artif Organs 2013; 36 (11) 775-780
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Berendsen TA, Bruinsma BG, Lee J. et al. A simplified subnormothermic machine perfusion system restores ischemically damaged liver grafts in a rat model of orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant Res 2012; 1 (01) 6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Tolboom H, Izamis ML, Sharma N. et al. Subnormothermic machine perfusion at both 20°C and 30°C recovers ischemic rat livers for successful transplantation. J Surg Res 2012; 175 (01) 149-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Guy A, McGrogan D, Inston N, Ready A. Hypothermic machine perfusion permits extended cold ischemia times with improved early graft function. Exp Clin Transplant 2015; 13 (02) 130-137
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Arni S, Maeyashiki T, Citak N, Opitz I, Inci I. Subnormothermic ex vivo lung perfusion temperature improves graft preservation in lung transplantation. Cells 2021; 10 (04) 748
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Arni S, Maeyashiki T, Opitz I, Inci I. Subnormothermic ex vivo lung perfusion attenuates ischemia reperfusion injury from donation after circulatory death donors. PLoS One 2021; 16 (08) e0255155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Sucher R, Oberhuber R, Margreiter C. et al. Orthotopic hind-limb transplantation in rats. J Vis Exp 2010; (41) 2022
    PubMedGoogle Scholar