Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2023; 84(05): 423-432
DOI: 10.1055/a-1886-5500
Original Article

Generating Operative Workflows for Vestibular Schwannoma Resection: A Two-Stage Delphi's Consensus in Collaboration with the British Skull Base Society. Part 1: The Retrosigmoid Approach

Hugo Layard Horsfall 
1   Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
2   Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
,
Danyal Z. Khan
1   Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
2   Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
,
Justin Collins
3   Department of Urooncology, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Stephen Cooke
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
,
Simon R. Freeman
5   Department of Otolaryngology, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom
,
Nihal Gurusinghe
6   Department of Neurosurgery, Lancashire Teaching Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom
,
Susie Hampton
7   Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
,
Carl Hardwidge
8   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
,
Richard Irving
9   Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
,
Neil Kitchen
1   Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
,
Andrew King
10   Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
11   Northern Care Alliance National Health Service Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
,
Sherif Khalil
1   Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
12   The Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
Chan H. Koh
1   Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
2   Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
,
Colin Leonard
7   Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
,
Hani J. Marcus
1   Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
2   Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
,
William Muirhead
1   Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
2   Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
,
Rupert Obholzer
1   Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
12   The Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
Omar Pathmanaban
13   Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom
,
Iain J. A. Robertson
14   Department of Neurosurgery, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, United Kingdom
,
Jonathan Shapey
15   Department of Neurosurgery, Kings College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
Danail Stoyanov
2   Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
,
Mario Teo
16   Bristol Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
,
James R. Tysome
17   Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom
,
Shakeel R. Saeed   *
1   Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
12   The Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
Patrick Grover   *
1   Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective An operative workflow systematically compartmentalizes operations into hierarchal components of phases, steps, instrument, technique errors, and event errors. Operative workflow provides a foundation for education, training, and understanding of surgical variation. In this Part 1, we present a codified operative workflow for the retrosigmoid approach to vestibular schwannoma resection.

Methods A mixed-method consensus process of literature review, small-group Delphi's consensus, followed by a national Delphi's consensus, was performed in collaboration with British Skull Base Society (BSBS). Each Delphi's round was repeated until data saturation and over 90% consensus was reached.

Results Eighteen consultant skull base surgeons (10 neurosurgeons and 8 ENT [ear, nose, and throat]) with median 17.9 years of experience (interquartile range: 17.5 years) of independent practice participated. There was a 100% response rate across both Delphi's rounds. The operative workflow for the retrosigmoid approach contained three phases and 40 unique steps as follows: phase 1, approach and exposure; phase 2, tumor debulking and excision; phase 3, closure. For the retrosigmoid approach, technique, and event error for each operative step was also described.

Conclusion We present Part 1 of a national, multicenter, consensus-derived, codified operative workflow for the retrosigmoid approach to vestibular schwannomas that encompasses phases, steps, instruments, technique errors, and event errors. The codified retrosigmoid approach presented in this manuscript can serve as foundational research for future work, such as operative workflow analysis or neurosurgical simulation and education.

Keywords

retrosigmoid - translabyrinthine - vestibular schwannoma - skull base surgery - consensus - Delphi

Previous Presentations

This work has not been presented, either partly or wholly.


Authors' Contributions

Study conception and methodology was led by H.J.M., J.C., M.F., M.G., D.Z.K., C.H.K., H.L.H. and W.M. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by H.L.H., D.Z.K., J.C., S.C., S.R.F., N.G., S.H., C.H., R.I., N.K., A.K., S.K., C.H.K., C.L., H.J.M., W.M., R.O., O.P., I.J.A.R., J.S., D.S., M.T., J.R.T., S.R.S., and P.G. contributed to data collection. The first draft of the manuscript was written by H.L.H., H.J.M. and P.G. All authors reviewed and edited subsequent versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


Ethical and Informed Consent

Ethical approval and informed consent were unnecessary due to the nature of the study (consensus process amongst health care professionals).


Data Availability

The data for this article is available upon reasonable request.


* Denotes joint senior authorship.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 03 March 2022

Accepted: 20 June 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
28 June 2022

Article published online:
10 October 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Chamoun R, MacDonald J, Shelton C, Couldwell WT. Surgical approaches for resection of vestibular schwannomas: translabyrinthine, retrosigmoid, and middle fossa approaches. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 33 (03) E9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lin EP, Crane BT. The management and imaging of vestibular schwannomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38 (11) 2034-2043
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Silk PS, Lane JI, Driscoll CL. Surgical approaches to vestibular schwannomas: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics 2009; 29 (07) 1955-1970
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gupta VK, Thakker A, Gupta KK. Vestibular schwannoma: what we know and where we are heading. Head Neck Pathol 2020; 14 (04) 1058-1066
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Irving RM, Jackler RK, Pitts LH. Hearing preservation in patients undergoing vestibular schwannoma surgery: comparison of middle fossa and retrosigmoid approaches. J Neurosurg 1998; 88 (05) 840-845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ansari SF, Terry C, Cohen-Gadol AA. Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 33 (03) E14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gharabaghi A, Samii A, Koerbel A, Rosahl SK, Tatagiba M, Samii M. Preservation of function in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Neurosurgery 2007; 60(02, Suppl 01) ONS124–ONS127, discussion ONS127–ONS128
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lalys F, Jannin P. Surgical process modelling: a review. Int J CARS 2014; 9 (03) 495-511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sarker SK, Chang A, Albrani T, Vincent C. Constructing hierarchical task analysis in surgery. Surg Endosc 2008; 22 (01) 107-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Vedula SS, Malpani AO, Tao L. et al. Analysis of the structure of surgical activity for a suturing and knot-tying task. PLoS One 2016; 11 (03) e0149174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dijkstra FA, Bosker RJI, Veeger NJGM, van Det MJ, Pierie JPEN. Procedural key steps in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, consensus through Delphi methodology. Surg Endosc 2015; 29 (09) 2620-2627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dharamsi A, Gray S, Hicks C, Sherbino J, McGowan M, Petrosoniak A. Bougie-assisted cricothyroidotomy: Delphi-derived essential steps for the novice learner. CJEM 2019; 21 (02) 283-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf Manage 2004; 42: 15-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Marcus HJ, Khan DZ, Borg A. et al. Pituitary society expert Delphi consensus: operative workflow in endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection. Pituitary 2021; 24 (06) 839-853
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Tsao MN, Sahgal A, Xu W. et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guideline. J Radiosurg SBRT 2017; 5 (01) 5-24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kanzaki J, Tos M, Sanna M, Moffat DA, Monsell EM, Berliner KI. New and modified reporting systems from the consensus meeting on systems for reporting results in vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 2003; 24 (04) 642-648 , discussion 648–649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Starnoni D, Giammattei L, Cossu G. et al. Surgical management for large vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020; 162 (11) 2595-2617
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Strauss G, Fischer M, Meixensberger J. et al. Workflow analysis to assess the efficiency of intraoperative technology using the example of functional endoscopic sinus surgery [in German]. HNO 2006; 54 (07) 528-535
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Krauss A, Muensterer OJ, Neumuth T. et al. Workflow analysis of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in infant pigs- a model for surgical feedback and training. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009; 19 (suppl 1): S117-S122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Layard HorsfallH, Khan DZ, Collins J. et al. Generating Operative Workflows for Vestibular (Schwannoma Resection: A Two-Stage Delphi's Consensus in Collaboration with the British Skull Base Society. Part 2: The Translabyrinthine Approach. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2023; 84 (05) 433-443
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 State of the states: defining surgery. Accessed July 13, 2022 at: https://bulletin.facs.org/2012/05/state-of-the-states-defining-surgery/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Greenberg MS. Handbook of Neurosurgery. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2019
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Winn H. Youmans and Winn Neurological Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Gagliardi F, Gragnaniello G, Mortini P, Caputy A. Operative Cranial Neurosurgical Anatomy. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2019
    Google Scholar
  • 25 The British Skull Base Society. The UK's society for clinicians involved in the care of patients with skull base pathology. Accessed July 13, 2022 at: https://skullbase.co.uk/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 General Medical Council. The specialist register. Accessed July 13, 2022 at: https://www.gmc-uk.org/registration-and-licensing/the-medical-register/a-guide-to-the-medical-register/specialist-registration
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Is my study research?. Accessed July 13, 2022 at: http://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/research/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Blakeley JO, Evans DG, Adler J. et al. Consensus recommendations for current treatments and accelerating clinical trials for patients with neurofibromatosis type 2. Am J Med Genet A 2012; 158A (01) 24-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Zhang Z, Nguyen Y, De Seta D. et al. Surgical treatment of sporadic vestibular schwannoma in a series of 1006 patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2016; 36 (05) 408-414
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Wang AY, Wang JT, Dexter M, Da Cruz M. The vestibular schwannoma surgery learning curve mapped by the cumulative summation test for learning curve. Otol Neurotol 2013; 34 (08) 1469-1475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ward BK, Gourin CG, Francis HW. Vestibular schwannoma surgical volume and short-term outcomes in Maryland. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 138 (06) 577-583
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Davids J, Manivannan S, Darzi A, Giannarou S, Ashrafian H, Marcus HJ. Simulation for skills training in neurosurgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and analysis of progressive scholarly acceptance. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 44 (04) 1853-1867
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Betka J, Zvěřina E, Balogová Z. et al. Complications of microsurgery of vestibular schwannoma. BioMed Res Int 2014; 2014: 315952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sade B, Mohr G, Dufour J-J. Vascular complications of vestibular schwannoma surgery: a comparison of the suboccipital retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine approaches. J Neurosurg 2006; 105 (02) 200-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Cobb MI-PH, Taekman JM, Zomorodi AR, Gonzalez LF, Turner DA. Simulation in neurosurgery-A brief review and commentary. World Neurosurg 2016; 89: 583-586
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Guazzo E, Panizza B, Lomas A. et al. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma-a prospective study and suggested management paradigm. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41 (02) e273-e279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Abou-Al-Shaar H, Gozal YM, Alzhrani G, Karsy M, Shelton C, Couldwell WT. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis after vestibular schwannoma surgery: a call for evidence-based management guidelines. Neurosurg Focus 2018; 45 (01) E4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH. The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Technol Assess 2001; 5 (22) 1-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Vávra P, Roman J, Zonča P. et al. Recent development of augmented reality in surgery: a review. J Healthc Eng 2017; 2017: 4574172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 McDougall EM. Validation of surgical simulators. J Endourol 2007; 21 (03) 244-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar