PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2022; 10(08): E1095-E1104
DOI: 10.1055/a-1869-9202
Original article

Endoscopy-related injury among gastroenterology trainees

Swati Pawa
1   Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
2   W. G. (Bill) Hefner VA Healthcare System, Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
,
Sarah L. Martindale
1   Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
2   W. G. (Bill) Hefner VA Healthcare System, Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
,
Jill K.J. Gaidos
3   Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
,
Promila Banerjee
4   Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, United States
5   Hines VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois, United States
,
Shivangi Kothari
6   University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States
,
Sharlene L. D’Souza
7   Gastroenterology Consultants, PC, Medford, Oregon, United States
,
Amy S. Oxentenko
8   Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
,
Carol A. Burke
9   Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background and study aims Endoscopy-related injury (ERI) is widespread among practicing gastroenterologists. However, less is known about the incidence among trainees. This study assesses the rate of self-reported ERI occurrence, patterns of injury, and knowledge of preventive strategies in a nationally representative sample of gastroenterology fellows.

Methods A 38-item electronic survey was sent to members of the American College of Gastroenterology. One hundred and sixty-eight gastroenterology fellows were included in analyses. Descriptive and univariate analyses evaluated the likelihood of ERI by workload parameters and gender.

Results ERI was reported by 54.8 % of respondents. ERI was most common in the thumb (58.7 %), hand/finger (56.5 %), and wrist (47.8 %). There was no significant difference in the reported occurrence of ERI between male and female gastroenterology fellows. However, female fellows were significantly more likely to report a greater number of body areas affected by ERI, and male fellows were more likely to report elbow pain. Most respondents (85.1 %) reported discussion about, or training in, ergonomic strategies during gastroenterology fellowship.

Conclusions ERI is reported to occur as early as gastroenterology fellowship. Results of this study support this finding and highlight the need for ongoing implementation and monitoring of a formal ergonomics training program as well as development of ergonomically appropriate instruments. Implications of these findings likely extend to trainees in other procedural related specialties like orthopedics and general surgery, though further research is required. Ergonomics training in gastroenterology fellowship and monitoring of its impact on trainees reported ERI is important due to negative effects on productivity and career longevity.

Supplementary material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 15. Februar 2022

Angenommen nach Revision: 31. Mai 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
07. Juni 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. August 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Pawa S, Banerjee P, Kothari S. et al. Are all endoscopy-related musculoskeletal injuries created equal? Results of a national gender-based survey. . Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116: 530-538
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Austin K, Schoenberger H, Sesto M. et al. Musculoskeletal injuries are commonly reported among gastroenterology trainees: Results of a national survey. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64: 1439-1447
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Villa E, Attar B, Trick W. et al. Endoscopy-related musculoskeletal injuries in gastroenterology fellows. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E808-E812
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Shergill AK, McQuaid KR. Ergonomic endoscopy: An oxymoron or realistic goal?. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90: 966-970
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Shergill A, Harris Adamson C. Failure of an engineered sytem: The gastrointestinal endoscope. Tech Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 21: 116-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Matern U, Faist M, Kehl K. et al. Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 436-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Berquer R, Smith W, Davis S. An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endoscop Other Intervent Tech 2002; 16: 416-421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Park AE, Zahiri HR, Hallbeck MS. et al. Intraoperative “micro breaks” with targeted stretching enhance surgeon physical function and mental focus. Annals Surgery 2017; 265: 340-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Shelly A. Best practices: Ergonomic standing surfaces for workers. Occupat Health Safety 2005; 74: 128, 130-124
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Matsuzaki I, Ebara T, Tsunemi M. et al. Effects of endoscopy-related procedure time on musculoskeletal disorders in Japanese endoscopists: A cross-sectional study. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E674-E683
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Byun YH, Lee JH, Park MK. et al. Procedure-related musculoskeletal symptoms in gastrointestinal endoscopists in korea. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 4359-4364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Herring-Marler TL, Spirduso WW, Eakin RT. et al. Maximum voluntary isometric pinch contraction and force-matching from the fourth to the eighth decades of life. Int J Rehabil Res 2014; 37: 159-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Puh U. Age-related and sex-related differences in hand and pinch grip strength in adults. Int J Rehabil Res 2010; 33: 4-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cohen DL, Naik JR, Tamariz LJ. et al. The perception of gastroenterology fellows towards the relationship between hand size and endoscopic training. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53: 1902-1909
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ridtitid W, Cote GA, Leung W. et al. Prevalence and risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries related to endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 294-302 e294
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Nielsen RO, Parner ET, Nohr EA. et al. Excessive progression in weekly running distance and risk of running-related injuries: An association which varies according to type of injury. J OrthoP SPorts Phys Ther 2014; 44: 739-747
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN. et al. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995; 273: 402-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Anderson JT. Optimizing ergonomics during endoscopy training. Tech Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 21: 143-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Shergill AK, McQuaid KR, Rempel D. Ergonomics and gi endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 145-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Walsh CM, Qayed E, Aihara H. et al. Core curriculum for ergonomics in endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 1222-1227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Shergill AK, Rempel D, Barr A. et al. Biomechanical risk factors associated with distal upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders in endoscopists performing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 704-711 e703
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Khan R, Scaffidi MA, Satchwell J. et al. Impact of a simulation-based ergonomics training curriculum on work-related musculoskeletal injury risk in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92: 1070-1080 e1073
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Chengalur SN. Kodakʼs ergonomic design for people at work. John Wiley & Sons; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Markwell SA, Garman KS, Vance IL. et al. Individualized ergonomic wellness approach for the practicing gastroenterologist (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94: 248-259 e242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chowdhury R, Shah D, Payal AR. Healthy worker effect phenomenon: Revisited with emphasis on statistical methods – a review. Indian J OccuP Environ Med 2017; 21: 2-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Morais R, Vilas-Boas F, Pereira PR. Prevalence, risk factors and global impact of musculoskeletal injuries among endoscopists: a nationwide European study. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8: E470-E480
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar