Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1816-6825
Monitoring orthodontic tooth movement in rats after piezocision by bone scintigraphy
Skelettszintigraphische Untersuchungen kieferorthopädischer Zahnbewegungen bei Ratten nach Piezotomie Supported by: Forschungsgemeinschaft Dental e. V., Köln![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00034924/202205/lookinside/thumbnails/nuk-18166825_10-1055-a-1816-6825-1.jpg)
Abstract
Aim Piezocision, corticocision of mineralized tissue by ultrasound showed promising results in accelerating tooth movement induced by orthodontic appliances although the biologic effects of this procedure are not well-understood so far. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of piezocision on bone remodeling in rats by bone SPECT imaging.
Material and Methods Ten male Wistar rats underwent surgical placement of orthodontic appliances on each side of the maxilla followed by piezocision on one side only. Each rat underwent 99mTc-MDP bone SPECT/CT imaging before surgery (T0), and 2 (T1) and 4 weeks (T2) after surgery. Bone uptake is expressed as median [IQR] min-max in percentage of the injected activity per ml computed from the 10 voxels with the highest uptake (%IAmax10/ml).
Results Pooled data regardless of the piezocision showed a significant increase in bone uptake from T0 (3.2 [2.8–3.9] 2.6–4.9) to T1 (4.4 [3.8–4.6] 3.4–4.8; p = 0.001). Thereafter, the uptake decreased to T2 (3.8 [3.1–4.4] 2.8–4.8; p = 0.116). No significant differences in bone uptake were found between the maxilla sides without and with piezocision: T1: without (4.3 [3.8–4.5] 3.4–4.8) vs. with (4.5 [3.7–4.6] 3.5–4.7; p=0.285), T2: without (4.0 [3.1–4.5] 2.8–4.8) vs. with (3.7 [3.0–4.4] 2.8–4.8; p=0.062).
Conclusion 99mTc-MDP bone SPECT imaging in rats was able to reproduce changes in bone uptake in the maxilla after placement of orthodontic appliances inducing measurable tooth movement. An additional effect of piezocision on bone remodeling in terms of bone uptake was not detectable which is probably due to the pronounced and significant effects induced by the orthodontic appliances per se, which may mask the potential effects of additional piezocision.
Zusammenfassung
Ziel Die Piezotomie, eine Kortikotomie von mineralisiertem Gewebe mittels Ultraschall, hat vielversprechende Ergebnisse bei der Beschleunigung der Zahnbewegung durch kieferorthopädische Apparaturen gezeigt, obwohl die biologischen Auswirkungen dieses Verfahrens bisher nicht gut verstanden wurden. Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Auswirkungen der Piezotomie auf die Knochenremodellierung bei Ratten mittels der Knochen-SPECT-Bildgebung zu untersuchen.
Material und Methoden Bei 10 männlichen Wistar-Ratten wurden auf beiden Seiten des Oberkiefers kieferorthopädische Apparaturen eingesetzt, gefolgt von einer Piezotomie auf nur einer Seite. Jede Ratte wurde vor dem Eingriff (T0) sowie 2 (T1) und 4 Wochen (T2) nach dem Eingriff einer 99mTc-MDP-Knochen-SPECT/CT-Bildgebung unterzogen. Der Knochen-Uptake ist als Median [IQR] min-max in Prozent der injizierten Aktivität pro ml angegeben, berechnet aus den 10 Voxeln mit der höchsten Aktivität (%IAmax10/ml).
Ergebnisse Die gepoolten Daten zeigten unabhängig von der Piezotomie eine signifikante Zunahme des Knochen-Uptake von T0 (3,2 [2,8–3,9] 2,6–4,9) bis T1 (4,4 [3,8–4,6] 3,4–4,8; p=0,001). Danach sank der Uptake (T2: 3,8 [3,1–4,4] 2,8–4,8; p=0,116). Zwischen den Oberkieferseiten ohne und mit Piezotomie wurden keine signifikanten Unterschiede im Knochen-Uptake festgestellt: T1: ohne (4,3 [3,8–4,5] 3,4–4,8) vs. mit (4,5 [3,7–4,6] 3,5–4,7; p=0,285), T2: ohne (4,0 [3,1–4,5] 2,8–4,8) vs. mit (3,7 [3,0–4,4] 2,8–4,8; p=0,062).
Schlussfolgerung Die 99mTc-MDP-Knochen-SPECT-Bildgebung bei Ratten war in der Lage, Veränderungen des Knochen-Uptake im Oberkiefer nach dem Einsetzen kieferorthopädischer Apparaturen zu reproduzieren, die messbare Zahnbewegungen induzieren. Ein zusätzlicher Effekt der Piezotomie auf die Knochenremodellierung in Bezug auf den Knochen-Uptake war nicht nachweisbar, was wahrscheinlich auf die ausgeprägten und signifikanten Effekte zurückzuführen ist, die durch die kieferorthopädischen Apparaturen per se hervorgerufen werden und die potenziellen Effekte der zusätzlichen Piezotomie überdecken können.
Schlüsselwörter
Piezotomie - Knochenremodellierung - Osteoblasten - Osteoklasten - SPECT - Regional Acceleratory Phenomenon – RAPKeywords
Piezocision - bone remodeling - osteoblasts - osteoclasts - SPECT - regional acceleratory phenomenon – RAPPublication History
Received: 22 August 2021
Accepted after revision: 04 April 2022
Article published online:
27 July 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Bishara SE, Ostby AW. White spot lesions: formation, prevention, and treatment. Seminars in orthodontics. Elsevier; 2008
- 2 Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption. Part II: The clinical aspects. Angle Orthod 2002; 72 (02) 180-184 DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0180:OIIRRP>2.0.CO;2. (PMID: 11999942)
- 3 Fink DF, Smith RJ. The duration of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 102 (01) 45-51 DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70013-Z. (PMID: 1626530)
- 4 Bagi CM, Berryman E, Moalli MR. Comparative bone anatomy of commonly used laboratory animals: implications for drug discovery. Comp Med 2011; 61 (01) 76-85 (PMID: 21819685)
- 5 Cone SG, Warren PB, Fisher MB. Rise of the Pigs: Utilization of the Porcine Model to Study Musculoskeletal Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering During Skeletal Growth. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2017; 23 (11) 763-780 DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0227. (PMID: 28726574)
- 6 Jilka RL. The relevance of mouse models for investigating age-related bone loss in humans. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013; 68 (10) 1209-1217 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glt046. (PMID: 23689830)
- 7 Pogoda P, Priemel M, Schilling AF. et al. Mouse models in skeletal physiology and osteoporosis: experiences and data on 14,839 cases from the Hamburg Mouse Archives. J Bone Miner Metab 2005; 23: 97-102 DOI: 10.1007/BF03026332. (PMID: 15984423)
- 8 Kirschneck C, Bauer M, Gubernator J. et al. Comparative assessment of mouse models for experimental orthodontic tooth movement. Sci Rep 2020; 10 (01) 12154 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69030-x. (PMID: 32699355)
- 9 Qi J, Kitaura H, Shen WR. et al. Establishment of an orthodontic retention mouse model and the effect of anti-c-Fms antibody on orthodontic relapse. PLoS One 2019; 14 (06) e0214260 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214260. (PMID: 31216288)
- 10 Ren Y, Maltha JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. The rat as a model for orthodontic tooth movement--a critical review and a proposed solution. Eur J Orthod 2004; 26 (05) 483-490 DOI: 10.1093/ejo/26.5.483. (PMID: 15536836)
- 11 Taddei SR, Moura AP, Andrade I. et al. Experimental model of tooth movement in mice: a standardized protocol for studying bone remodeling under compression and tensile strains. J Biomech 2012; 45 (16) 2729-2735 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.09.006. (PMID: 23036306)
- 12 Arıcan P, Okudan B, Şefizade R. et al. Diagnostic value of bone SPECT/CT in patients with suspected osteomyelitis. Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy 2019; 28 (03) 89 DOI: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.20053. (PMID: 31507140)
- 13 Bohuslavizki KH, Brenner W, Kerscher A. et al. The value of bone scanning in pre-operative decision-making in patients with progressive facial asymmetry. Nucl Med Commun 1996; 17 (07) 562-567 DOI: 10.1097/00006231-199607000-00005. (PMID: 8843114)
- 14 Spitz J, Lauer I, Tittel K. et al. Scintimetric evaluation of remodeling after bone fractures in man. J Nucl Med 1993; 34 (09) 1403-1409 (PMID: 8355055)
- 15 Terheyden H, Warnke P, Dunsche A. et al. Mandibular reconstruction with prefabricated vascularized bone grafts using recombinant human osteogenic protein-1: an experimental study in miniature pigs. Part II: transplantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 30 (06) 469-478 DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2000.0008. (PMID: 11829227)
- 16 Arat ZM, Gokalp H, Atasever T. et al. 99mTechnetium-labeled methylene diphosphonate uptake in maxillary bone during and after rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod 2003; 73 (05) 545-549 DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0545:MMDUIM>2.0.CO;2. (PMID: 14580022)
- 17 Nicolay OF, Khalifa ER, Lancour M. et al. 99mTc-medronate uptake in the temporomandibular joints of young rats treated with a mandibular hyperpropulsor. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 100 (05) 459-464 DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70086-c. (PMID: 1951199)
- 18 Council NR. A Strategy for Research in Space Biology and Medicine in the New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 1998
- 19 Langdahl B, Ferrari S, Dempster DW. Bone modeling and remodeling: potential as therapeutic targets for the treatment of osteoporosis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2016; 8 (06) 225-235 DOI: 10.1177/1759720X16670154. (PMID: 28255336)
- 20 Rucci N. Molecular biology of bone remodelling. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2008; 5 (01) 49-56 (PMID: 22460846)
- 21 Demontiero O, Vidal C, Duque G. Aging and bone loss: new insights for the clinician. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2012; 4 (02) 61-76 DOI: 10.1177/1759720X11430858. (PMID: 22870496)
- 22 Henneman S, Von den Hoff JW, Maltha JC. Mechanobiology of tooth movement. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30 (03) 299-306 DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjn020. (PMID: 18540017)
- 23 Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z. The effect of drugs on orthodontic tooth movement. Orthod Craniofac Res 2006; 9 (04) 163-171 DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2006.00372.x. (PMID: 17101023)
- 24 Nishimura M, Chiba M, Ohashi T. et al. Periodontal tissue activation by vibration: Intermittent stimulation by resonance vibration accelerates experimental tooth movement in rats. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2008; 133 (04) 572-583 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.046. (PMID: 18405822)
- 25 Showkatbakhsh R, Jamilian A, Showkatbakhsh M. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on the acceleration of tooth movement. World J Orthod 2010; 11 (04) e52-e56 (PMID: 21490989)
- 26 Yamaguchi M, Hayashi M, Fujita S. et al. Low-energy laser irradiation facilitates the velocity of tooth movement and the expressions of matrix metalloproteinase-9, cathepsin K, and alpha(v) beta(3) integrin in rats. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32 (02) 131-139 DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp078. (PMID: 20159792)
- 27 Charavet C, Lecloux G, Bruwier A. et al. Localized Piezoelectric Alveolar Decortication for Orthodontic Treatment in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Dent Res 2016; 95 (09) 1003-1009 DOI: 10.1177/0022034516645066. (PMID: 27129491)
- 28 Dibart S, Sebaoun JD, Surmenian J. Piezocision: a minimally invasive, periodontally accelerated orthodontic tooth movement procedure. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2009; 30 (06) 342-344 (PMID: 19715011)
- 29 Frost HM. The regional acceleratory phenomenon: a review. Henry Ford Hosp Med J 1983; 31 (01) 3-9 (PMID: 6345475)
- 30 Liou EJ, Huang CS. Rapid canine retraction through distraction of the periodontal ligament. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 114 (04) 372-382 DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70181-7. (PMID: 9790320)
- 31 Wilcko W, Wilcko MT. Accelerating tooth movement: the case for corticotomy-induced orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144 (01) 4-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.009. (PMID: 23810038)
- 32 Wilcko MT, Wilcko WM, Pulver JJ. et al. Accelerated osteogenic orthodontics technique: a 1-stage surgically facilitated rapid orthodontic technique with alveolar augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67 (10) 2149-2159 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.095. (PMID: 19761908)
- 33 Hoffmann S, Papadopoulos N, Visel D. et al. Influence of piezotomy and osteoperforation of the alveolar process on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. J Orofac Orthop 2017; 78 (04) 301-311 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-017-0085-1. (PMID: 28321457)
- 34 Papadopoulos N, Beindorff N, Hoffmann S. et al. Impact of piezocision on orthodontic tooth movement. Korean J Orthod 2021; 51 (06) 366-374 DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.6.366. (PMID: 34803025)
- 35 Lange C, Apostolova I, Lukas M. et al. Performance evaluation of stationary and semi-stationary acquisition with a non-stationary small animal multi-pinhole SPECT system. Mol Imaging Biol 2014; 16 (03) 311-316 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-013-0702-3. (PMID: 24214814)
- 36 Post-operative Weight Loss. British medical journal [Anonym]. 1955; 1: 212-213
- 37 Molina-Cimadevila MJ, Segura S, Merino C. et al. Oral self-administration of buprenorphine in the diet for analgesia in mice. Lab Anim 2014; 48 (03) 216-224 DOI: 10.1177/0023677214532454. (PMID: 24759572)
- 38 Tonouchi H, Ohmori Y, Tanaka K. et al. Postoperative weight loss during hospital stays in patients with gastric cancer undergoing surgical resection. Hepatogastroenterology 2008; 55 (82) 803-806 (PMID: 18613459)
- 39 Ohira T, De Vit A, Dibart S. Strategic Use of Ultrasonic Frequencies for Targeted Bone Biomodification Following Piezoelectric Bone Surgery in Rats. Part II: Late Phase. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2020; 40 (04) 591-600 DOI: 10.11607/prd.4216. (PMID: 32559043)
- 40 Charavet C, Van Hede D, Anania S. et al. Multilevel biological responses following piezocision to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement: A study in rats. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists 2019; 8 (03) 100-106
- 41 Gonzales C, Hotokezaka H, Yoshimatsu M. et al. Force magnitude and duration effects on amount of tooth movement and root resorption in the rat molar. Angle Orthod 2008; 78 (03) 502-509 DOI: 10.2319/052007-240.1. (PMID: 18416627)
- 42 Murphy CA, Chandhoke T, Kalajzic Z. et al. Effect of corticision and different force magnitudes on orthodontic tooth movement in a rat model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 146 (01) 55-66 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.03.024. (PMID: 24974999)
- 43 Prager TM, Meyer P, Radlanski R. et al. Microdamage in the alveolar process of rat maxillae after orthodontic tooth movement. J Orofac Orthop 2015; 76 (01) 41-50 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-014-0260-6. (PMID: 25420943)
- 44 Nakano T, Hotokezaka H, Hashimoto M. et al. Effects of different types of tooth movement and force magnitudes on the amount of tooth movement and root resorption in rats. Angle Orthod 2014; 84 (06) 1079-1085 DOI: 10.2319/121913-929.1. (PMID: 24754797)
- 45 Li Y, Jacox LA, Little SH. et al. Orthodontic tooth movement: The biology and clinical implications. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2018; 34 (04) 207-214 DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.007. (PMID: 29655409)
- 46 Holland R, Bain C, Utreja A. Osteoblast differentiation during orthodontic tooth movement. Orthod Craniofac Res 2019; 22 (03) 177-182 DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12308. (PMID: 30839159)