Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(09): 1282-1284
DOI: 10.1055/a-1798-1602
Commentary

Stress and Its Consequences—Biological Strain

David K. Stevenson
1   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Ian H. Gotlib
2   Department of Psychology, Stanford University School of Humanities and Science, Stanford, California
,
Jessica L. Buthmann
2   Department of Psychology, Stanford University School of Humanities and Science, Stanford, California
,
Ivana Marié 
1   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Nima Aghaeepour
3   Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Brice Gaudilliere
3   Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Martin S. Angst
3   Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Gary L. Darmstadt
1   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Maurice L. Druzin
4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology—Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Ronald J. Wong 
1   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Gary M. Shaw
1   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Michael Katz
1   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Understanding the role of stress in pregnancy and its consequences is important, particularly given documented associations between maternal stress and preterm birth and other pathological outcomes. Physical and psychological stressors can elicit the same biological responses, known as biological strain. Chronic stressors, like poverty and racism (race-based discriminatory treatment), may create a legacy or trajectory of biological strain that no amount of coping can relieve in the absence of larger-scale socio-behavioral or societal changes. An integrative approach that takes into consideration simultaneously social and biological determinants of stress may provide the best insights into the risk of preterm birth. The most successful computational approaches and the most predictive machine-learning models are likely to be those that combine information about the stressors and the biological strain (for example, as measured by different omics) experienced during pregnancy.

Keywords

pregnancy - preterm birth - omics - machine learning


Publication History

Received: 06 December 2021

Accepted: 11 March 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
15 March 2022

Article published online:
17 May 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosom Res 1967; 11 (02) 213-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Braveman PA, Arkin E, Proctor D, Kauh T, Holm N. Systemic and structural racism: definitions, examples, health damages, and approaches to dismantling. Health Aff (Millwood) 2022; 41 (02) 171-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wadhwa PD, Entringer S, Buss C, Lu MC. The contribution of maternal stress to preterm birth: issues and considerations. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38 (03) 351-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Singh GK. Trends and social inequalities in maternal mortality in the United States, 1969–2018. Int J MCH AIDS 2021; 10 (01) 29-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Becker M, Mayo JA, Phogat NK. et al. Deleterious and Protective Psychosocial and Stress-Related Factors Predict Risk of Spontaneous Preterm Birth. Am J Perinatol 2023; 40 (01) 74-88
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hobel CJ, Goldstein A, Barrett ES. Psychosocial stress and pregnancy outcome. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2008; 51 (02) 333-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hedegaard M, Henriksen TB, Secher NJ, Hatch MC, Sabroe S. Do stressful life events affect duration of gestation and risk of preterm delivery?. Epidemiology 1996; 7 (04) 339-345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Guardino CM, Schetter CD. Coping during pregnancy: a systematic review and recommendations. Health Psychol Rev 2014; 8 (01) 70-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Paarlberg KM, Vingerhoets AJ, Passchier J, Dekker GA, Van Geijn HP. Psychosocial factors and pregnancy outcome: a review with emphasis on methodological issues. J Psychosom Res 1995; 39 (05) 563-595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mesner O, Davis A, Casman E. et al. Using graph learning to understand adverse pregnancy outcomes and stress pathways. PLoS One 2019; 14 (09) e0223319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ghaemi MS, DiGiulio DB, Contrepois K. et al. Multiomics modeling of the immunome, transcriptome, microbiome, proteome and metabolome adaptations during human pregnancy. Bioinformatics 2019; 35 (01) 95-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Jehan F, Sazawal S, Baqui AH. et al; Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement, the Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth, and the Prematurity Research Center at Stanford University. Multiomics characterization of preterm birth in low- and middle-income countries. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (12) e2029655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ando K, Hédou JJ, Feyaerts D. et al. A peripheral immune signature of labor induction. Front Immunol 2021; 12: 725989
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Stelzer IA, Ghaemi MS, Han X. et al. Integrated trajectories of the maternal metabolome, proteome, and immunome predict labor onset. Sci Transl Med 2021; 13 (592) eabd9898
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cao-Lei L, Massart R, Suderman MJ. et al. DNA methylation signatures triggered by prenatal maternal stress exposure to a natural disaster: project Ice Storm. PLoS One 2014; 9 (09) e107653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Zucchi FC, Yao Y, Ward ID. et al. Maternal stress induces epigenetic signatures of psychiatric and neurological diseases in the offspring. PLoS One 2013; 8 (02) e56967
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Paxman EJ, Boora NS, Kiss D. et al. Prenatal maternal stress from a natural disaster alters urinary metabolomic profiles in project ice storm participants. Sci Rep 2018; 8 (01) 12932
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Cunningham JP, Ghahramani Z. Linear dimensionality reduction: survey, insights, and generalizations. J Mach Learn Res 2015; 16: 2859-2900
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Wainwright M. Statistical Learning with Sparsity: The Lasso and Generalization. Boca Raton, FL:: CRC Press;; 2015
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ruiz C, Zitnik M, Leskovec J. Identification of disease treatment mechanisms through the multiscale interactome. Nat Commun 2021; 12 (01) 1796
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Espinosa C, Becker M, Marić I. et al; Prematurity Research Center at Stanford. Data-driven modeling of pregnancy-related complications. Trends Mol Med 2021; 27 (08) 762-776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kazzazi F. The automation of doctors and machines: a classification for AI in medicine (ADAM framework). Future Healthc J 2021; 8 (02) e257-e262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Giurgescu C, Misra DP, Slaughter-Acey JC. et al. Neighborhoods, racism, stress, and preterm birth among African American women: a review. West J Nurs Res 2022; 44 (01) 101-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lopez M, Ruiz MO, Rovnaghi CR. et al. The social ecology of childhood and early life adversity. Pediatr Res 2021; 89 (02) 353-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Stevenson DK, Wong RJ, Aghaeepour N. et al. Towards personalized medicine in maternal and child health: integrating biologic and social determinants. Pediatr Res 2021; 89 (02) 252-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ajilore O, Thames AD. The fire this time: the stress of racism, inflammation and COVID-19. Brain Behav Immun 2020; 88: 66-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Aghaeepour N, Ganio EA, Mcilwain D. et al. An immune clock of human pregnancy. Sci Immunol 2017; 2 (15) eaan2946
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Aghaeepour N, Lehallier B, Baca Q. et al. A proteomic clock of human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218 (03) 347.e1-347.e14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Peterson LS, Stelzer IA, Tsai AS. et al. Multiomic immune clockworks of pregnancy. Semin Immunopathol 2020; 42 (04) 397-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar