RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-1783-9081
Performance status of targeted biopsy alone versus Sydney protocol by non-NBI expert gastroenterologist in gastric intestinal metaplasia diagnosis
TRIAL REGISTRATION: single-center, cross-sectional study at clinicaltrials.gov
Abstract
Background and study aims According to a recent guideline, patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) should have at least five biopsies performed under the Sydney protocol to evaluate for risk of extensive GIM. However, only narrow-band imaging (NBI)-targeted biopsy may be adequate to diagnose extensive GIM.
Patients and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2019 and October 2020. Patients with histology-proven GIM were enrolled. All patients underwent standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed by a gastroenterology trainee. The performing endoscopists took biopsies from either a suspected GIM area (NBI-targeted biopsy) or randomly (if negative for GIM read by NBI) to complete five areas of the stomach as per the Sydney protocol. The gold standard for GIM diagnosis was pathology read by two gastrointestinal pathologists with unanimous agreement.
Results A total of 95 patients with GIM were enrolled and 50 (52.6%) were men with a mean age of 64 years. Extensive GIM was diagnosed in 43 patients (45.3%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of NBI-targeted biopsy vs. the Sydney protocol were 88.4% vs.100 %, 90.3% vs. 90.3%, 88.4% vs. 89.6%, 90.3% vs. 100%, and 89.5% vs. 94.7%, respectively. The number of specimens from NBI-targeted biopsy was significantly lower than that from Sydney protocol (311vs.475, P < 0.001).
Conclusions Both NBI-targeted biopsy and Sydney protocol by a gastroenterologist who was not an expert in NBI and who has experience with diagnosis of at least 60 cases of GIM provided an NPV higher than 90%. Thus, targeted biopsy alone with NBI, which requires fewer specimens, is an alternative option for extensive GIM diagnosis.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 16. Juni 2021
Angenommen nach Revision: 29. November 2021
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. April 2022
© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424
- 2 Correa P, Piazuelo MB. The gastric precancerous cascade. J Dig Dis 2012; 13: 2-9
- 3 Rokkas T, Filipe MI, Sladen GE. Detection of an increased incidence of early gastric cancer in patients with intestinal metaplasia type III who are closely followed up. Gut 1991; 32: 1110-1113
- 4 de Vries AC, van Grieken NC, Looman CW. et al. Gastric cancer risk in patients with premalignant gastric lesions: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. Gastroenterology 2008; 134: 945-952
- 5 Banks M, Graham D, Jansen M. et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of gastric adenocarcinoma. Gut 2019; 68: 1545-1575
- 6 Shichijo S, Hirata Y, Niikura R. et al. Histologic intestinal metaplasia and endoscopic atrophy are predictors of gastric cancer development after Helicobacter pylori eradication. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 618-624
- 7 Zali H, Rezaei-Tavirani M, Azodi M. Gastric cancer: prevention, risk factors and treatment. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2011; 4: 175-185
- 8 Menon S, Trudgill N. How commonly is upper gastrointestinal cancer missed at endoscopy?. A meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2014; 2: E46-E50
- 9 Ang TL, Pittayanon R, Lau JY. et al. A multicenter randomized comparison between high-definition white light endoscopy and narrow band imaging for detection of gastric lesions. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 27: 1473-1478
- 10 Wu C, Namasivayam V, Li JW. et al. A prospective randomized tandem gastroscopy pilot study of linked color imaging vs white light imaging for detection of upper gastrointestinal lesions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36: 2562-2567
- 11 Savarino E, Corbo M, Dulbecco P. et al. Narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy is accurate for detecting gastric intestinal metaplasia. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 2668-2675
- 12 Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH. et al. Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathol 1996; 20: 1161-1181
- 13 Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N, Konda V. et al. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 502 e1-e16
- 14 Rerknimitr R, Imraporn B, Klaikeaw N. et al. Non-sequential narrow band imaging for targeted biopsy and monitoring of gastric intestinal metaplasia. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 1336-1342
- 15 Pittayanon R, Rerknimitr R, Klaikaew N. et al. The risk of gastric cancer in patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia in 5-year follow-up. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2017; 46: 40-45
- 16 Yakirevich E, Resnick MB. Pathology of gastric cancer and its precursor lesions. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2013; 42: 261-284
- 17 Ren W, Yu J, Zhang ZM. et al. Missed diagnosis of early gastric cancer or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 2092-2096
- 18 Xirouchakis E, Laoudi F, Tsartsali L. et al. Screening for gastric premalignant lesions with narrow band imaging, white light and updated Sydney protocol or both?. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 1084-1090
- 19 Mommersteeg MC, Nieuwenburg SAV, den Hollander WJ. et al. Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance. Gastric Cancer 2021; 24: 680-690
- 20 Pittayanon R, Rerknimitr R, Wisedopas N. et al. Flexible spectral imaging color enhancement plus probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for gastric intestinal metaplasia detection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 28: 1004-1009
- 21 Dinis-Ribeiro M, Areia M, de Vries AC. et al. Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS): guideline from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and the Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED). Endoscopy 2012; 44: 74-94
- 22 Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG. et al. American College of G. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrettʼs Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111: 30-50 ; quiz 1
- 23 Sharma P, Shaheen NJ, Katzka D. et al. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Endoscopic Treatment of Barrett's Esophagus With Dysplasia and/or Early Cancer: Expert Review. Gastroenterol 2020; 158: 760-769
- 24 Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S. et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999; 282: 1061-1066