Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2022; 54(01): 69-70
DOI: 10.1055/a-1717-8239
Leser fragen – Experten Antworten

Wie kann die WALA-Ridge nach Andrews bei der Bestimmung der korrekten therapeutischen Zahnbogenbreite helfen?

How can the WALA Ridge According to Andrews Aid in Determining the Correct Transversal Arch Width?
Eva Paddenberg
1   Poliklinik für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
,
Christian Kirschneck
1   Poliklinik für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Frage

Wie kann die WALA-Ridge nach Andrews bei der Bestimmung der korrekten therapeutischen Zahnbogenbreite helfen?



Publication History

Article published online:
29 June 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Andrews LF, Andrews WA. The six elements of orofacial harmony. Andrews J Orthod Orofac Harmony 2000; 1: 24-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ronay V, Miner RM, Will LA. et al. Mandibular arch form: the relationship between dental and basal anatomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 430-438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ball RL, Miner RM, Will LA. et al. Comparison of dental and apical base arch forms in Class II Division 1 and Class I malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 41-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gupta D, Miner RM, Arai K. et al. Comparison of the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in adults and children with Class I and Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 10.e1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Andrews LF. The 6-elements orthodontic philosophy: Treatment goals, classification, and rules for treating. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 148: 883-887
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Andrews LF, Andrews WA. The six elements of orofacial harmony. Andrews J 2000; 1: 13-22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Triviño T, Siqueira DF, Andrews WA. Evaluation of distances between the mandibular teeth and the alveolar process in Brazilians with normal occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 308.e1-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 O'Neil R, Kau CH. Comparison of dental arch forms created from assessment of teeth, alveolar bone, and the overlying soft tissue. J Orofac Orthop 2021; 82: 413-421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lombardo L, Fattori L, Molinari C. et al. Dental and alveolar arch forms in a Caucasian population compared with commercially available archwires. Int Orthod 2013; 11: 389-421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tremont TJ, Posnick JC. Selected Orthodontic Principles for Management of Cranio-Maxillofacial Deformities. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2020; 32: 321-338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rudzki I, Ihlow D, Fanghänel J. et al. Retentionskriterien – Rezidivgefahren – Retentionsphase. In: Ihlow D, Rudzki I (Hrsg.). Kieferorthopädische Retention: Kriterien, Regeln und Maßnahmen der Rezidivprophylaxe. Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2018: 55-89
    Google Scholar