Ultraschall Med 2022; 43(01): 7-11
DOI: 10.1055/a-1699-7473
Editorial

Clinical Practice Guidance and Education in Ultrasound: Evidence and experience are two sides of one coin!

Leitlinien für die klinische Praxis und Ausbildung im Ultraschall: Evidenz und Erfahrung sind die zwei Seiten derselben Medaille!
Vito Cantisani
1   Radiological and Anatomo-Pathological and Oncological Sciences, Univ. Sapienza, Rome
,
Christian Jenssen
2   Brandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound at Medical University Brandenburg, Neuruppin, Germany and Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland, Strausberg, Germany
,
Christoph Frank Dietrich
3   Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin (DAIM) Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Bern, Switzerland
,
Caroline Ewertsen
4   Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Fabio Piscaglia
5   Division of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy
› Author Affiliations

In this issue of the Journal a new set of European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) guidelines is reported [1]. Some years ago it was discussed how guidelines are prepared, but things are continuously changing [2] [3].



Publication History

Article published online:
08 February 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Fodor D, Rodriguez-Garcia SC, Cantisani V. et al The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound – Part I: Extraarticular Pathologies. Ultraschall in Med 2022; 43
  • 2 Ingravallo F, Dietrich CF, Gilja OH. et al. Guidelines, clinical practice recommendations, position papers and consensus statements: definition, preparation, role and application. Ultraschall in Med 2014; 35: 395-399
  • 3 Jenssen C, Gilja OH, Serra AL. et al. European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) Policy Document Development Strategy – Clinical Practice Guidelines, Position Statements and Technological Reviews. Ultrasound Int Open 2019; 5: E2-E10
  • 4 Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D. et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2011
  • 5 Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F. et al. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156: 525-531
  • 6 Schunemann HJ, Wiercioch W, Etxeandia I. et al. Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise. CMAJ 2014; 186: E123-E142
  • 7 Semlitsch T, Blank WA, Kopp IB. et al. Evaluating Guidelines: A Review of Key Quality Criteria. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015; 112: 471-478
  • 8 Brignardello-Petersen R, Carrasco-Labra A, Guyatt GH. How to Interpret and Use a Clinical Practice Guideline or Recommendation: Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature. JAMA 2021; 326: 1516-1523
  • 9 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (short GRADE) working group. 2021 https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/
  • 10 Dietrich CF, Bamber J, Berzigotti A. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Liver Ultrasound Elastography, Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall in Med 2017; 38: e16-e47
  • 11 Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF. et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall in Med 2018; 39: e2-e44
  • 12 Dietrich CF, Nolsoe CP, Barr RG. et al. Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver-Update 2020 WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS. Ultrasound Med Biol 2020; 46: 2579-2604
  • 13 Dietrich CF, Abramowicz JS, Chammas MC. et al. World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) Policy Document Development Strategy – Clinical Practice Guidelines, Position Statements and Technological Reviews (on behalf of the WFUMB publication committee and Executive Bureau). Ultrasound Med Biol 2021; 47: 2779-2781
  • 14 PICO. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PICO_process
  • 15 Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS. et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2018; 67: 358-380
  • 16 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address eee, European Association for the Study of the L. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2018; 69: 182-236
  • 17 Ravaioli M, Piscaglia F, Cillo U. et al. Is the Strongest Level of Medical Evidence Always Required for Guidelines Recommendations?. Liver Cancer 2021; 10: 394-395
  • 18 Spellberg B, Wright WF, Shaneyfelt T. et al. The Future of Medical Guidelines: Standardizing Clinical Care With the Humility of Uncertainty. Ann Intern Med 2021; 174: 1740-1742
  • 19 Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Badea R. et al. EFSUMB statement on medical student education in ultrasound [short version]. Ultraschall in Med 2016; 37: 100-102
  • 20 Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Badea R. et al. EFSUMB Statement on Medical Student Education in Ultrasound [long version]. Ultrasound Int Open 2016; 2: E2-E7
  • 21 Dietrich CF, Hoffmann B, Abramowicz J. et al. Medical Student Ultrasound Education: A WFUMB Position Paper, Part I. Ultrasound Med Biol 2019; 45: 271-281
  • 22 Hoffmann B, Blaivas M, Abramowicz J. et al. Medical Student Ultrasound Education, a WFUMB Position Paper, Part II. A consensus statement of ultrasound societies. Med Ultrason 2020; 22: 220-229
  • 23 Prosch H, Radzina M, Dietrich CF. et al. Ultrasound Curricula of Student Education in Europe: Summary of the Experience. Ultrasound Int Open 2020; 6: E25-E33
  • 24 Hofer M, Kamper L, Heussen N. et al Influence of Clinical Expertise Between Clinician-Instructors Versus Student-Instructors on the Effectiveness of Ultrasound Courses. 2020 DOI: 10.1055/a-1176-0622 Online ahead of print.