Aktueller Stand der Mammasonografie

Beim Screening und in der kurativen Therapie des Mammakarzinoms ist die Mammografie die Bildgebung der Wahl. Der Brustultraschall ist jedoch ein weiterer Baustein in der Brustbildgebung und wesentlich, um z. B. Befunde aus der digitalen Mammografie oder der dynamischen MRT zu bewerten, eine Läsion als gut- oder bösartig zu klassifizieren oder verdächtige Läsionen zu biopsieren.

Publication History

Article published online:
01 December 2021

• Literatur

• 1 American College of Radiology, ed. ACR BI-RADS-Atlas der Mammadiagnostik. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-48818-8
• 2 Blaichman J, Marcus JC, Alsaadi T. et al Sonographic appearance of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast according to histologic grade. Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: W402-W408 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7374.
• 3 Irshad A, Leddy R, Pisano E. et al Assessing the role of ultrasound in predicting the biological behavior of breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: 284-290 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.8781.
• 4 Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D. et al ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 2012; 307: 1394-1404 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.388.
• 5 Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM. et al Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 2012; 265: 59-69 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120621.
• 6 Weigert J, Steenbergen S. The Connecticut Experiment: The Role of Ultrasound in the Screening of Women With Dense Breasts. Breast J 2012; 18: 517-522 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12003.
• 7 Wöckel A, Festl J, Stüber T. et al Interdisciplinary Screening, Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Breast Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/045OL, December 2017) – Part 2 with Recommendations for the Therapy of Primary, Recurrent and Advanced Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78: 1056-1088 DOI: 10.1055/a-0646-4630.
• 8 Kelly KM, Dean J, Lee SJ. et al Breast cancer detection: radiologists’ performance using mammography with and without automated whole-breast ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 2557-2564 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1844-1.
• 9 Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS. et al Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 734-742 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1588-y.
• 10 Wilczek B, Wilczek HE, Rasouliyan L. et al Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85: 1554-1563 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.06.004.
• 11 Brem RF, Tabár L, Duffy SW. et al Assessing Improvement in Detection of Breast Cancer with Three-dimensional Automated Breast US in Women with Dense Breast Tissue: The SomoInsight Study. Radiology 2014; 274: 663-673 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132832.
• 12 Giger ML, Inciardi MF, Edwards A. et al Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers. Am J Roentgenol 2016; 206: 1341-1350 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.15367.
• 13 Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Neal CH. et al Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast abnormalities: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 134: 923-931 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2020-x.
• 14 Sim YT, Vinnicombe S, Whelehan P. et al Value of shear-wave elastography in the diagnosis of symptomatic invasive lobular breast cancer. Clin Radiol 2015; 70: 604-609 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.02.004.
• 15 Lee SH, Chang JM, Cho N. et al Practice guideline for the performance of breast ultrasound elastography. Ultrasonography 2014; 33: 3-10 DOI: 10.14366/usg.13012.
• 16 Fausto A, Rubello D, Carboni A. et al Clinical value of relative quantification ultrasound elastography in characterizing breast tumors. Biomed Pharmacother 2015; 75: 88-92 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2015.08.029.
• 17 Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Doré CJ. et al BE1 Investigators. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 2012; 262: 435-449 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110640.
• 18 Kaproth-Joslin KA, Nicola R, Dogra VS. The History of US: From Bats and Boats to the Bedside and Beyond: RSNA Centennial Article. Radiographics 2015; 35: 960-970 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015140300.