Drug Res (Stuttg) 2021; 71(S 01): S3-S4
DOI: 10.1055/a-1606-4913
Extended Abstract

Endoscopy as a Diagnostic Tool for Personalized Therapy in IBD: Prediction of Response to Biological Therapy

Raja Atreya

Both Crohnʼs disease [1] and ulcerative colitis [2] are chronic relapsing disorders of the gastrointestinal tract that are characterized pathologically by intestinal inflammation. Both inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) entities are progressive conditions that can lead to bowel damage and disability, having a major impact on an individualʼs quality of life. Furthermore, ongoing inflammatory activity is causative for occurrence of strictures, fistula, abscesses, as well as heightened incidence of colitis-associated neoplasia. Optimized anti-inflammatory therapy is therefore essential in the management of IBD patients [1], [2]. Advances in understanding the underlying immunopathogenesis in ulcerative colitis have led to the development of biological therapies, which selectively inhibit crucial pathways of involved inflammatory processes. Blockade of the pro-inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF) by neutralizing antibodies was the first approved treatment modality, which was complemented by the anti-adhesion antibody vedolizumab directed against the α4β7 integrin. Subsequently, the anti-IL-12/IL-23p40 antibody ustekinumab and the JAK-inhibitor tofacitinib have broadened our therapeutic armamentarium. In spite of their effectiveness, it was found that only subgroups of IBD patients benefit from these therapies. Depending on the duration and the clinical endpoints chosen, only 30 – 60% of patients will show an improvement of active disease. There is therefore the currently unmet clinical need to predict therapeutic responses prior to the initiation of therapy. Reliable prediction would enable the treating physician to directly introduce the patient to the most efficient therapy, which would enable time-efficient control of the disease and prevent the onset of irreversible structural damage. This would also be essential to avoid exposure of patients to associated potential side effects of an inefficient therapy and reduce the substantial costs of an inappropriate therapy for the health care systems [3].



Publication History

Article published online:
17 November 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Torres J, Mehandru S, Colombel JF. et al. Crohnʼs disease. Lancet 2017; 389: 1741-1755
  • 2 Kobayashi T, Siegmund B, Le Berre C. et al. Ulcerative colitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020; 6: 74
  • 3 Atreya R, Neurath MF. Mechanisms of molecular resistance and predictors of response to biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3: 790-802
  • 4 Digby-Bell JL, Atreya R, Monteleone G. et al. Interrogating host immunity to predict treatment response in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 17: 9-20
  • 5 Atreya R, Zimmer M, Bartsch B. et al. Antibodies gainst tumor necrosis factor (TNF) induce T-cell apoptosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases via TNF receptor 2 and intestinal CD14+ macrophages. Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 2026-2038
  • 6 Atreya R, Neumann H, Neufert C. et al. In vivo imaging using fluorescent antibodies to tumor necrosis factor predicts therapeutic response in Crohnʼs disease. Nature Medicine 2014; 20: 313-318
  • 7 Rath T, Bojarski C, Neurath MF. Molecular imaging of mucosal α4β7 integrin expression with the fluorescent anti-adhesion antibody vedolizumab in Crohnʼs disease. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2017; 86: 406-408