Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/a-1553-9846
Durability of per-oral endoscopic myotomy beyond 6 years
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00025476/202111/lookinside/thumbnails/2078_10-1055-a-1553-9846-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background and study aims The aim of this study was to assess long-term clinical outcomes beyond 6 years in patients who underwent per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for the treatment of achalasia.
Patients and methods Patients with achalasia who underwent POEM between 2010 and 2012 and had follow-up of at least 6 years were retrospectively identified at eight tertiary care centers. The primary outcome evaluated was clinical success defined by an Eckardt symptom score (ESS) ≤ 3 for the duration of the follow-up period. The clinical success cohort was compared to failure (ESS > 3 at any time during follow-up) in order to identify characteristics associated with symptom relapse. The incidence of patient-reported gastroesophageal reflux (GER) was also evaluated.
Results Seventy-three patients with 6-year follow-up data were identified. Sustained clinical remission was noted in 89 % (65/73) at 6-years. Mean ESS decreased from 7.1 ± 2.3 pre-procedure to 1.1 ± 1.1 at 6 years (P < 0.001). Symptomatic reflux was reported by 27 of 72 patients (37.5 %). Type I achalasia (OR 10.8, P = 0.04) was found to be associated with clinical failure on logistic regression analysis.
Conclusions In patients with achalasia, POEM provides high initial clinical success with excellent long-term outcomes. There are high rates of patient-reported gastroesophageal reflux post-procedure which persist at long-term follow-up.
Publication History
Received: 03 August 2020
Accepted: 26 April 2021
Article published online:
12 November 2021
© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Boeckxstaens GE, Zaninotto G, Richter JE. Achalasia. Lancet 2014; 383: 83-93
- 2 Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I. et al. Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 761-764
- 3 Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 265-271
- 4 Parsa N, Khashab MA. POEM in the treatment of esophageal disorders. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2018; 16: 27-40
- 5 Evensen H, Kristensen V, Larssen L. et al. Outcome of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in treatment-naive patients. A systematic review. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019; DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1549271.
- 6 Familiari P, Gigante G, Marchese M. et al. Per-oral Endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: outcomes of the first 100 patients with short-term follow-up. Ann Surg 2016; 263: 82-87
- 7 Ling T, Guo H, Zou X. Effect of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia patients with failure of prior pneumatic dilation: A prospective case-control study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 29: 1609-1613
- 8 Ramchandani M, Reddy DN, Darisetty S. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: Treatment analysis and follow up of over 200 consecutive patients at a single center. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 19-26
- 9 Sharata AM, Dunst CM, Pescarus R. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal primary motility disorders: analysis of 100 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19: 161-170
- 10 Von Renteln D, Fuchs K, Fockens P. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: an international prospective multicenter study. Gastroenterology 2013; 145: 309-311.e3
- 11 von Renteln D, Inoue H, Minami H. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a prospective single center study. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 411-417
- 12 Ellis FG. The natural history of achalasia of the cardia abridged. Proc R Soc Med 1960; 53: 663-666
- 13 Salvador R, Voltarel G, Savarino E. et al. The natural history of achalasia: Evidence of a continuum – “The evolutive pattern theory”. Dig Liver Dis 2018; 50: 342-347
- 14 Guo H, Yang H, Zhang X. et al. Long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for patients with achalasia: a retrospective single-center study. Dis Esophagus 2017; 30: 1-6
- 15 Hungness ES, Sternbach JM, Teitelbaum EN. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after the learning curve: durable long-term results with a low complication rate. Ann Surg 2016; 264: 508-517
- 16 Martinek J, Svecova H, Vackova Z. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): mid-term efficacy and safety. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 1293-1302
- 17 Kumbhari V, Familiari P, Bjerregaard NC. et al. Gastroesophageal reflux after per-oral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter case-control study. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 634-642
- 18 Arevalo G, Sippey M, Martin-Del-Campo LA. et al. Post-POEM reflux: who’s at risk?. Surg Endosc 2019; DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07086-1.
- 19 Haito-Chavez Y, Inoue H, Beard KW. et al. Comprehensive Analysis of adverse events associated with per oral endoscopic myotomy in 1826 patients: an international multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112: 1267-1276
- 20 Chen Y-I, Inoue H, Ujiki M. et al. An international multicenter study evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in octogenarians. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 956-961
- 21 Brewer Gutierrez OI, Moran R, Familiari P. et al. Long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia patients with a minimum follow-up of 4 years: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: AB564-AB565
- 22 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
- 23 Eckardt VF, Aignherr C, Bernhard G. Predictors of outcome in patients with achalasia treated by pneumatic dilation. Gastroenterology 1992; 103: 1732-1738
- 24 Taft TH, Carlson DA, Triggs J. et al. Evaluating the reliability and construct validity of the Eckardt symptom score as a measure of achalasia severity. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2018; 30: e13287
- 25 Peng L, Tian S, Du C. et al. Outcome of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for treating achalasia compared with laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2017; 27: 60-64
- 26 Werner YB, Hakanson B, Martinek J. et al. Endoscopic or surgical myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 2219-2229
- 27 Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M. et al. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil Off J Eur Gastrointest Motil Soc 2015; 27: 160-174
- 28 Teitelbaum EN, Dunst CM, Reavis KM. et al. Clinical outcomes five years after POEM for treatment of primary esophageal motility disorders. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 421-427
- 29 Li Q-L, Wu Q-N, Zhang X-C. et al. Outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of esophageal achalasia with a median follow-up of 49 months. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 1405-1412.e3
- 30 Stavropoulos SN, Modayil RJ, Zhang X. et al. Tu1146 per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) For achalasia: long term outcomes from a large prospective single-center US series. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: AB540-AB541
- 31 Ujiki MB, Yetasook AK, Zapf M. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: A short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery 2013; 154: 893-900
- 32 Bhayani NH, Kurian AA, Dunst CM. et al. A comparative study on comprehensive, objective outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 1098-1103
- 33 Teitelbaum EN, Rajeswaran S, Zhang R. et al. Per-oral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy produce a similar short-term anatomic and functional effect. Surgery 2013; 154: 885-891 ; discussion 891–892
- 34 Inoue H, Sato H, Ikeda H. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: a series of 500 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221: 256-264
- 35 Kim WH, Cho JY, Ko WJ. et al. Comparison of the outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia according to manometric subtype. Gut Liver 2017; 11: 642-647
- 36 Kumbhari V, Tieu AH, Onimaru M. et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for the treatment of Type III achalasia in 75 patients: a multicenter comparative study. Endosc Int Open 2015; 3: E195-E201
- 37 Tyberg A, Seewald S, Sharaiha RZ. et al. A multicenter international registry of redo per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after failed POEM. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 1208-1211
- 38 Li Q-L, Yao L-Q, Xu X-Y. et al. Repeat per-oral endoscopic myotomy: a salvage option for persistent/recurrent symptoms. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 134-140
- 39 Ngamruengphong S, Inoue H, Ujiki MB. et al. Efficacy and safety of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia after failed Heller myotomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc 2017; 15: 1531-1537.e3
- 40 Fumagalli U, Rosati R, De Pascale S. et al. Repeated Surgical or endoscopic myotomy for recurrent dysphagia in patients after previous myotomy for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 20: 494-499