Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1541-8924
Psychiatrische Patientinnen in der Geburtsmedizin in Deutschland – die juristischen Grundlagen und eine thematische Analyse von Fallbeispielen
Psychiatric Patients in Obstetrics in Germany – The Legal Basis and a Thematic Analysis of Case Reports![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/zgn/202201/lookinside/thumbnails/02-2021-0429_10-1055-a-1541-8924-1.jpg)
Zusammenfassung
Die Betreuung von erwachsenen Patientinnen mit insbesondere schwersten psychiatrischen Erkrankungen im klinischen geburtshilflichen Alltag ist selten, stellt aber aufgrund ihrer Komplexität eine große Herausforderung für alle beteiligten Professionen dar. Die Krankheitsbilder sind sehr variabel. In der Versorgung gibt es eine Reihe von Zuständigkeiten, die ineinandergreifen. Für die Geburtsplanung ist die medizinisch-fachliche Zusammenarbeit von Psychiatrie, Geburtsmedizin und Pädiatrie notwendig. Die Patientinnen werden oftmals durch gesetzliche Betreuer*innen vertreten. Für das Wohl der Familie und der Kinder ist das Jugendamt zuständig. Die rechtlichen Grundlagen liefern im Wesentlichen das Bürgerliche Gesetzbuch, das Strafgesetzbuch und spezifisches Landesrecht, deren Einhaltung durch Gerichte überwacht wird. Anhand von Fallbeispielen werden typische psychiatrische Krankheitsbilder exemplarisch vorgestellt. Juristisch definierte Anwendungen wie Unterbringung, unterbringungsähnliche freiheitsentziehende Maßnahmen, ärztliche Zwangsmaßnahmen und rechtfertigender Notstand werden erläutert. Im Sinne einer thematischen Analyse werden diese auf die Fallbeispiele angewendet und das peripartale Management wird vor dem rechtlichen Hintergrund diskutiert. Die genaue Kenntnis der juristischen Hintergründe erleichtert Geburtsmediziner*innen die Handlungsabläufe und die interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit insbesondere an perinatologischen Zentren.
Abstract
The care of adult patients with particularly severe psychiatric illnesses in the daily routine of inpatient obstetrics is rare, but due to its complexity it represents a great challenge for all professions involved. The clinical pictures are very variable. There are a number of interlocking responsibilities in the provision of care. For planning of the birth, the medical-professional cooperation of psychiatry, obstetrics and pediatrics is necessary. Patients are often represented by legal guardians. The Youth Welfare Office is responsible for the welfare of the family and the children. The legal basis is essentially provided by the Civil Code, the Criminal Code and specific state laws, compliance with which is monitored by the courts. Typical psychiatric clinical pictures are presented by means of case reports. Legally defined applications such as accommodation, measures similar to deprivation of liberty, compulsory medical measures and justifiable necessity are explained. In the sense of a thematic analysis, these are applied to the case reports and peripartum management is discussed against the legal background. The precise knowledge of the legal background makes it easier for obstetricians to follow the procedures and interdisciplinary cooperation, especially at perinatalogical centres.
Schlüsselwörter
Ethik - Geburtshilfe - interdisziplinäres Vorgehen - mütterliche Risiken - RechtssprechungPublication History
Received: 26 February 2021
Accepted after revision: 18 June 2021
Article published online:
07 September 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Ilska M, Przybyła-Basista H. Measurement of women’s prenatal attitudes towards maternity and pregnancy and analysis of their predictors. Health Psychology Report 2014; 2: 176-188 doi:10.5114/hpr.2014.45300
- 2 Webster J, Linnane JWJ, Dibley LM. et al. Measuring social support in pregnancy: Can it be simple and meaningful?. Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 2000; 27: 97-101 doi:10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00097.x
- 3 Austin M-P. Perinatal Mental Health: Opportunities and Challenges for Psychiatry. Australasian Psychiatry 2003; 11: 399-403 doi:10.1046/j.1440-1665.2003.02027.x
- 4 Howard LM, Molyneaux E, Dennis CL. et al. Perinatal mental health 1 Non-psychotic mental disorders in the perinatal period. Lancet 2014; 384: 1775-1788 doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61276-9
- 5 Meltzer-Brody S, Howard LM, Bergink V. et al. Postpartum psychiatric disorders. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2018; 4: doi:10.1038/nrdp.2018.22
- 6 Oates M. Perinatal psychiatric disorders: a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. British Medical Bulletin 2003; 67: 219-229 doi:10.1093/bmb/ldg011
- 7 Vesga-Lopez O, Blanco C, Keyes K. et al. Psychiatric disorders in pregnant and postpartum women in the United States. Archives of General Psychiatry 2008; 65: 805-815 doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.7.805
- 8 Kurki T, Hiilesmaa V, Raitasalo R. et al. Depression and anxiety in early pregnancy and risk for preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 487-490 doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00602-x
- 9 Jablensky AV, Morgan V, Zubrick SR. et al. Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal complications in a population cohort of women with schizophrenia and major affective disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 2005; 162: 79-91 doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.1.79
- 10 Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G. et al. Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. Bjog 2011; 118: 1-203 doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02847.x
- 11 Mendelsohn CP, Kirby DP, Castle DJ. Smoking and mental illness. An update for psychiatrists. Australas Psychiatry 2015; 23: 37-43 doi:10.1177/1039856214562076
- 12 Apelt S, Lauffer P, Hoch E.
- 13 Hoch E, Apelt SM, Lauffer P. et al. Substanzgebrauch während der Schwangerschaft und seine Folgen für Mu tter und Kind–Fokus Cannabis. ( Pilotprojekt CaSCH-T1 )
- 14 Vigod SN, Kurdyak PA, Dennis CL. et al. Maternal and newborn outcomes among women with schizophrenia: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2014; 121: 566-574 doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12567
- 15 Weinberg MK, Tronick EZ. The impact of maternal psychiatric illness on infant development. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1998; 59: 53-61
- 16 Kim HG, Mandell M, Crandall C. et al. Antenatal psychiatric illness and adequacy of prenatal care in an ethnically diverse inner-city obstetric population. Archives of Womens Mental Health 2006; 9: 103-107 doi:10.1007/s00737-005-0117-5
- 17 Patton SW, Misri S, Corral MR. et al. Antipsychotic medication during pregnancy and lactation in women with schizophrenia: Evaluating the risk. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie 2002; 47: 959-965
- 18 Rogers A, Obst S, Teague SJ. et al. Association Between Maternal Perinatal Depression and Anxiety and Child and Adolescent Development: A Meta-analysis. Jama Pediatrics 2020; 174: 1082-1092 doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.2910
- 19 Kelly RH, Danielsen BH, Golding JM. et al. Adequacy of prenatal care among women with psychiatric diagnoses giving birth in California in 1994 and 1995. Psychiatric Services 1999; 50: 1584-1590 doi:10.1176/ps.50.12.1584
- 20 Lin H-C, Chen Y-H, Lee H-C. Prenatal Care and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Among Women With Schizophrenia: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Taiwan. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 2009; 70: 1297-1303 doi:10.4088/JCP.09m05087
- 21 Seeman MV. Relational ethics: when mothers suffer from psychosis. Archives of women’s mental health 2004; 7: 201-210
- 22 Ben-Sheetrit J, Huller-Harari L, Rasner M. et al. Psychiatric disorders and compliance with prenatal care: A 10-year retrospective cohort compared to controls. European Psychiatry 2018; 49: 23-29 doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.11.011
- 23 Appelbaum PS. Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine 2007; 357: 1834-1840 doi:10.1056/NEJMcp074045
- 24 Hornstra D. A realistic approach to maternal-fetal conflict. Hastings Center Report 1998; 28: 7-12 doi:10.2307/3528225
- 25 Harris LH. Rethinking maternal-fetal conflict: Gender and equality in perinatal ethics. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 786-791 doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01021-8