RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00000112.xml
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2021; 130(07/08): 330-335
DOI: 10.1055/a-1539-0810
DOI: 10.1055/a-1539-0810
Fortbildung
Ein Update zur Genauigkeit von Implantatabformungen – konventionell vs. digital
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/zwr/20210708/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-a-1539-0810_zw_fort_schmidt-1.jpg)
Der vorliegende Beitrag gibt eine Übersicht zu aktuellen Möglichkeiten und Grenzen konventioneller und digitaler Implantatabformungen in klinischer Anwendung. Auf der Basis einer klinischen Studie werden Aussagen über mögliche Anwendungs- und Behandlungsempfehlungen gegeben. Der Leser sollte mögliche Indikationen zur Verwendung der unterschiedlichen Abformmethoden erfahren und Kontraindikationen bei der Abformung von Implantaten kennen.
Schlüsselwörter
Implantatabformung - Intraoralscanner - Digitale Zahnheilkunde - CAD/CAM - Digitale AbformungPublikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. August 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Patzelt SB, Bahat O, Reynolds MA. et al. The all-on-four treatment concept: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014; 16 (06) 836-855
- 2 Abduo J, Bennani V, Waddell N. et al. Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25 (03) 506-515
- 3 Katsoulis J, Takeichi T, Sol Gaviria A. et al. Misfit of implant prostheses and its impact on clinical outcomes. Definition, assessment and a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017; 10 (Suppl. 01) 121-138
- 4 Chang PK, Chen YC, Huang CC. et al. Distribution of micromotion in implants and alveolar bone with different thread profiles in immediate loading: a finite element study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27 (06) e96-e101
- 5 Winter W, Klein D, Karl M. Effect of model parameters on finite element analysis of micromotions in implant dentistry. J Oral Implantol 2013; 39 (01) 23-29
- 6 Winter W, Klein D, Karl M. Micromotion of Dental Implants: Basic Mechanical Considerations. J Med Eng 2013; 2013: 265412 DOI: 10.1155/2013/265412.
- 7 de Franca DG, Morais MH, das Neves FD. et al. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 113 (01) 22-28
- 8 Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G. et al. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17 (01) 149
- 9 Schmidt A, Häussling T, Rehmann P. et al. Accuracy of various impression materials and methods for two implant systems: An effect size study. J Prosthodont Res 2018; 62 (02) 245-251 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.10.004. (PMID: 29191609)
- 10 Wulfman C, Naveau A, Rignon-Bret C. Digital scanning for complete-arch implant-supported restorations: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2019; DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.014. (PMID: 31757443)
- 11 Weigel C, Brägger U, Sutter F. et al. [Prosthodontics on implants. Crown and bridge prosthodontics with new solid secondary parts of the ITI Dental Implant System. Internationales Team fur Implantologie]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1994; 104 (06) 756-769
- 12 Park S, Kang HC, Lee J. et al. An enhanced method for registration of dental surfaces partially scanned by a 3D dental laser scanning. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2015; 118 (01) 11-22
- 13 Güth JF, Edelhoff D, Schweiger J. et al. A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20 (07) 1487-1494 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1626-x. (PMID: 26454734)
- 14 Keul C, Güth JF. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: An in vitro and in vivo comparison. Clin Oral Investig 2020; 24 (02) 735-745
- 15 Kuhr F, Schmidt A, Rehmann P. et al. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients. J Dent 2016; 55: 68-74
- 16 Schmidt A, Klussmann L, Wöstmann B. et al. Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update. J Clin Med 2020; 9 (03) 688 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030688. (PMID: 32143433)
- 17 Müller P, Ender A, Joda T. et al. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. Quintessence Int 2016; 47 (04) 343-349
- 18 Schmidt A, Billig JW, Schlenz MA. et al. A new 3D-method to assess the inter implant dimensions in patients – A pilot study. J Clin Exp Dent 2020; 12 (02) e187-e192 DOI: 10.4317/jced.56557. (PMID: 32071701)
- 19 Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent 2019; 22 (01) 11-19
- 20 Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Effect of Software Version on the Accuracy of an Intraoral Scanning Device. Int J Prosthodont 2018; 31 (04) 375-376 DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5781. (PMID: 29624626)