Akzeptanz und Nutzung einer Website mit Gesundheitsinformationen zu psychischen Erkrankungen – www.psychenet.de

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung Wir untersuchen die Akzeptanz und Nutzung der Website www.psychenet.de, welche evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsinformationen, Selbsttests und Entscheidungshilfen zu psychischen Erkrankungen und Themen anbietet.

Methodik Mithilfe einer Online-Umfrage (Akzeptanzermittlung) und automatisch generierter Daten der Online-Protokollierung (Nutzungsanalyse) wurde die Website evaluiert.

Ergebnisse Insgesamt erzielt die Website psychenet.de bei ihren Nutzer*innen hohe Akzeptanzwerte. Zudem haben sich die Besucher*innenzahlen der Website stetig gesteigert.

Schlussfolgerung Die Ergebnisse weisen darauf hin, dass psychenet.de ein Angebot darstellt, welches insbesondere von bestimmten Zielgruppen in Anspruch genommen wird (z. B. Menschen mit hohem Bildungsstand). Zukünftige Forschung sollte unterschiedliche Darbietungsformen von Gesundheitsinformationen (z. B. Text- vs. Videobeiträge) für schwer erreichbare Zielgruppen untersuchen, sodass Gesundheitsinformationen möglicherweise einem noch breiteren Publikum zugänglich gemacht werden können.

Abstract

Objectives Aim of our study was to investigate acceptance and use of the German e-mental health website – www.psychenet.de offering evidence-based health information, self-tests and patient decision aids concerning mental disorders and issues.

Methods The website was evaluated by means of an online survey (acceptance) and automatically generated data by web analysis software (use).

Results Overall, the website psychenet.de achieved high acceptance ratings among its users. In addition, the number of visitors to the website has increased steadily.

Conclusion Results indicate that psychenet.de offers mental health information that are more likely to be used by certain groups (e. g., highly educated persons). Future research should focus on different presentation modes of health information (e. g. text- vs. video-based) for hard to reach target groups in order to potentially increase reach of health information to a broader audience.

Schlüsselwörter

E-Mental-Health - Internet - evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsinformationen - psychische Erkrankungen

Keywords

e-mental health - internet - evidence-based health information - mental disorders

• Literatur

• 1 Initiative 21. D21 Digital Index 2019/2020. Jährliches Lagebild zur digitalen Gesellschaft. https://initiatived21.de/app/uploads/2020/02/d21_index2019_2020.pdf Stand: 23.07.2020
• 2 Kummervold PE, Wynn R. Health information accessed on the internet: the development in 5 European countries. Int J Telemed Appl 2012; 2012
• 3 Pew Research Center. The Social Life of Internet Users. 11.06.2009 https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2009/06/11/the-social-life-of-health-information/ Stand: 20.05.2021
• 4 Fox S, Purcell K. Chronic disease and the Internet. 24.03.2010 https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2010/03/24/chronic-disease-and-the-internet/ Stand: 20.04.2021
• 5 Madrigal L, Escoffery C. Electronic Health Behaviors Among US Adults With Chronic Disease: Cross-Sectional Survey. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21: e11240
• 6 Sadasivam RS, Kinney RL, Lemon SC. et al. Internet health information seeking is a team sport: analysis of the Pew Internet Survey. Int J Med Inform 2013; 82: 193-200
• 7 Alpay LL, Henkemans OB, Otten W. et al. E-health Applications and Services for Patient Empowerment: Directions for Best Practices in The Netherlands. Telemed J E-Health 2010; 16: 787-791
• 8 Alpay L, van der Boog P, Dumaij A. An empowerment-based approach to developing innovative e-health tools for self-management. Health Inform J 2011; 17: 247-255
• 9 Xie B, Wang M, Feldman R. et al. Internet Use Frequency and Patient-Centered Care: Measuring Patient Preferences for Participation Using the Health Information Wants Questionnaire. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15: 140-156
• 10 Berger M, Wagner TH, Baker LC. Internet use and stigmatized illness. Soc Sci Med 2005; 61: 1821-1827
• 11 Webelhorst C, Jepsen L, Rummel-Kluge C. Utilization of e-mental-health and online self-management interventions of patients with mental disorders – A cross-sectional analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0231373
• 12 Eichenberg C, Wolters C, Brähler E. The Internet as a Mental Health Advisor in Germany – Results of a National Survey. Plos One 2013; 8
• 13 Kalckreuth S, Trefflich F, Rummel-Kluge C. Mental health related Internet use among psychiatric patients: a cross-sectional analysis. Bmc Psychiatry 2014; 14
• 14 Conell J, Bauer R, Glenn T. et al. Online information seeking by patients with bipolar disorder: results from an international multisite survey. Int J Bipolar Disord 2016; 4: 17
• 15 Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä M, Bell JS, Helakorpi S. et al. Is the Internet replacing health professionals? A population survey on sources of medicines information among people with mental disorders. Soc Psych Psych Epid 2011; 46: 373-379
• 16 Reavley NJ, Jorm AF. The quality of mental disorder information websites: A review. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 85: E16-E25
• 17 Stossel LM, Segar N, Gliatto P. et al. Readability of Patient Education Materials Available at the Point of Care. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27: 1165-1170
• 18 Neter E, Brainin E. eHealth Literacy: Extending the Digital Divide to the Realm of Health Information. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14
• 19 Walsh K, Pryor TAM, Reynolds KA. et al. Searching for answers: How well do depression websites answer the publicʼs questions about treatment choices?. Patient Educ Couns 2019; 102: 99-105
• 20 Sun Y, Zhang Y, Gwizdka J. et al. Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21: e12522
• 21 Shim M, Jo HS. What quality factors matter in enhancing the perceived benefits of online health information sites? Application of the updated DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model. Int J Med Inform 2020; 137
• 22 Scanlan F, Jorm A, Reavley N. et al. Treatment choices for depression: Young people’s response to a traditional e-health versus a Health 2.0 website. Digit Health 2017; 3
• 23 Kuosmanen L, Jakobsson T, Hyttinen J. et al. Usability evaluation of a web-based patient information system for individuals with severe mental health problems. J Adv Nurs 2010; 66: 2701-2710
• 24 Jeong D, Cheng M, St-Jean M. et al. Evaluation of eMentalHealth.ca, a Canadian Mental Health Website Portal: Mixed Methods Assessment. JMIR Ment Health 2019; 6: e13639
• 25 de Graaf M, Totte J, Breugem C. et al. Evaluation of the Compliance, Acceptance, and Usability of a Web-Based eHealth Intervention for Parents of Children With Infantile Hemangiomas: Usability Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2013; 2: e54
• 26 Tlach L, Thiel J, Härter M. et al. Acceptance of the German e-mental health portal www.psychenet.de: an online survey. PeerJ 2016; 4: e2093
• 27 Davis FD. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 1989; 13: 319-340
• 28 Chau PYK, Hu PJ. Examining a Model of Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: An Exploratory Study. J Manag Inf Syst 2002; 18: 191-229
• 29 Sbaffi L, Rowley J. Trust and credibility in web-based health information: a review and agenda for future research. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19: e218
• 30 Sillence E, Blythe JM, Briggs P. et al. A Revised Model of Trust in Internet-Based Health Information and Advice: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21: e11125
• 31 Kwan G, Shaw JA, Murnane L. Internet Usage within Healthcare: How College Students Use the Internet to Obtain Health Information. J Consum Health Internet 2019; 23: 366-377
• 32 Hou J, Shim M. The role of provider–patient communication and trust in online sources in Internet use for health-related activities. J Health Commun 2010; 15: 186-199
• 33 Foley K, Freeman T, Ward P. et al. Exploring access to, use of and benefits from population-oriented digital health services in Australia. Health Promot Int 2020;
• 34 Klawitter E, Hargittai E. “I went home to Google”: How users assess the credibility of online health information. In eHealth: Current evidence, promises, perils and future directions: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2018
• 35 Grundmann J. Google Update 2019: Gewinner & Verlierer beim March 2019 Core Update (18.03.2019). https://blog.searchmetrics.com/de/google-core-update-march-2019/ Stand: 22.01.2021