Download PDF
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2022; 72(03/04): 108-116
DOI: 10.1055/a-1494-3892
Diagnostische Verfahren

Normierung der deutschen Fassung der Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS-G) – Selbstbeurteilungsskala an einer deutschsprachigen Stichprobe

Norms of the German Version of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS-G) – Self-Assessment Scale on a German-Speaking Sample
Philipp Yorck Herzberg
1   Professur für Persönlichkeitspsychologie und Psychologische Diagnostik, Helmut-Schmidt-Universität Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Deutschland
,
Kai R. Fricke
1   Professur für Persönlichkeitspsychologie und Psychologische Diagnostik, Helmut-Schmidt-Universität Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Deutschland
,
Sandra Konrad
1   Professur für Persönlichkeitspsychologie und Psychologische Diagnostik, Helmut-Schmidt-Universität Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Problem Die deutsche Fassung der Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS-G) ist ein Verfahren zur Feststellung der Ausprägung des Merkmals Feinfühligkeit. Diese Skala wurde bisher in der deutschen Fassung validiert (Konrad & Herzberg, 2017), eine Normierung für die deutschsprachige Allgemeinbevölkerung steht allerdings noch aus.

Methode Zur Erstellung von Normwerten der Skala für die Allgemeinbevölkerung wurden N=7458 Personen (n=6251 Frauen, n=1207 Männer) im Alter von 14–80 Jahren (MW=37.80, SD=11.75) im deutschsprachigen Raum (Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz) online befragt.

Ergebnisse Die Varianzanalyse zeigte höhere Werte für Frauen, so dass geschlechtsspezifische Normen notwendig sind. Daher werden geschlechtsspezifische Normwerte für die Subskalen der HSPS-G als auch für den HSPS-G-Gesamtscore bereitgestellt. Mit diesen Prozenträngen und T-Werten stehen erstmals Vergleichsdaten für das im deutschen Sprachraum etablierte Instrument zur Verfügung, die die Interpretation interindividueller und intraindividueller Unterschiede vor dem Hintergrund von Bevölkerungsangaben erlauben.

Abstract

Problem The German version of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS-G) is an instrument for the assessment of sensitivity. Validity of the scale was confirmed in prior research (Konrad & Herzberg, 2017). This paper provides norm values of the HSPS-G for German-speaking countries.

Method To generate norms, data from 7458 participants (6251 female, 1207 male; age ranging: 14–80 years; mean=37.80; SD=11.75) were collected in an online assessment. Participants were German-speaking citizens of Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

Results Analysis of variance suggested systematic gender differences in the scores. Thus, gender-specific norms were created for the subscales and the total score of the HSPS-G. The resulting norm values comprising percentiles and T-values enable comparative interpretation of the results of the HSPS-G, enabling the assessment of inter- and intraindividual differences with respect to demographic variables.

Schlüsselwörter

Normierung - Normen - sensory-processing sensitivity - highly sensitive person scale - Persönlichkeit - Erwachsene

Key words

norm values - sensory-processing sensitivity - highly sensitive person scale - personality - adults


Publication History

Received: 04 November 2020

Accepted: 05 April 2021

Article published online:
20 September 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Pluess M. Individual differences in environmental sensitivity. Child Dev Perspect 2015; 9: 138-143 doi:10.1111/cdep.12120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Belsky J. Variation in susceptibility to environmental influence: An evolutionary argument. Psychol Inq 1997; 8: 182-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Belsky J, Pluess M. Beyond diathesis stress: differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychol Bull 2009; 135: 885-908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Boyce WT, Ellis BJ. Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary–developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Dev Psychopathol 2005; 17: 271-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Aron EN, Aron A. Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. J Pers Soc Psychol 1997; 73: 345-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Greven CU, Lionetti F, Booth C. et al. Sensory processing sensitivity in the context of environmental sensitivity: A critical review and development of research agenda. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2019; 98: 287-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Braem M, Asher L, Furrer S. et al. Development of the “Highly Sensitive Dog” questionnaire to evaluate the personality dimension “Sensory Processing Sensitivity” in dogs. PloS One 2017; 12: e0177616
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ellis BJ, Boyce WT, Belsky J. et al. Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary–neurodevelopmental theory. Dev Psychopathol 2011; 23: 7-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Stelmack RM, Cambell KB. Extraversion and auditory sensitivity to high and low frequency. Percept Mot Skills 1974; 38: 875-879
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Barnes GE. Extraversion and pain. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1975; 14: 303-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Herberner ES, Kagan J, Cohen M. Shyness and olfactory threshold. Pers Individ Differ 1989; 10: 1159-1163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Siddle DA, Morrish RB, White KD. et al. Relation of visual sensitivity to extraversion. J Exp Res Pers 1969; 3: 264-267
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Aron EN, Aron A, Jagiellowicz J. Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2012; 16: 262-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Weyn S, Van Leeuwen K, Pluess M. et al. Psychometric properties of the Highly Sensitive Child scale across developmental stage, gender, and country. Curr Psychol 2019; 1-17 DOI: 10.1007/s12144-019-00254-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Nocentini A, Menesini E, Pluess M. The personality trait of environmental sensitivity predicts children’s positive response to school-based antibullying intervention. Clin Psychol Sci 2018; 6: 848-859
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kibe C, Suzuki M, Hirano M. Individual sensitivity to the effects of resilience education: self-esteem enhancement in Japanese adolescents. Paper presented at the European Conference on Positive Psychology. Budapest, Hungary: 2018
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Konrad S, Herzberg PY. Psychometric properties and validation of a German High Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS-G). Eur J Psychol Assess 2019; 35: 364-378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Þórarinsdóttir ÞK. Psychometric Properties of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale and its Relationship to the Big Five Personality Traits in a Sample of Icelandic University Students. Im Internet http://hdl.handle.net/1946/30727Stand: 23.04.2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Evers A, Rasche J, Schabracq MJ. High Sensory-Processing Sensitivity at Work. Int J Stress Manag 2008; 15: 189-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Liss M, Mailloux J, Erchull MJ. The relationships between sensory processing sensitivity, alexithymia, autism, depression, and anxiety. Pers Individ Differ 2008; 45: 255-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Smolewska KA, McCabe SB, Woody EZ. A psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and “Big Five”. Pers Individ Differ 2006; 40: 1269-1279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kagan J, Snidman N, Arcus D. et al. Galen's prophecy: Temperament in human nature. New York: Basic Books; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Lionetti F, Aron A, Aron EN. et al. Dandelions, tulips and orchids: evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals. Transl Psychiatry 2018; 8: 24 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-017-0090-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Blach C. Ein empirischer Zugang zum komplexen Phänomen der Hochsensibilität [Dissertation]. Hamburg: disserta Verlag;; 2016
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Blach C, Egger JW. Hochsensibilität – ein empirischer Zugang zum Konstrukt der hochsensiblen Persönlichkeit. Psychologische Medizin 2014; 25: 4-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Benham G. The highly sensitive person: Stress and physical symptom reports. Pers Individ Differ 2006; 40: 1433-1440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Statistisches BundesamtIm Internet www.destatis.de Stand: 09.08.2019
    PubMed
  • 28 Blom G. Statistical estimates and transformed beta-variables. [Dissertation]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell; 1958. doi.org/10.1002/bimj.19610030410
    Google Scholar