Alternativen histologischer Materialgewinnung – Wann und wie ist die histologische Sicherung mittels Ultraschall (US), Computertomografie (CT) oder Endosonografie (EUS) sinnvoll?

Kathleen Möller; Christoph F. Dietrich; Siegbert Faiss; Sven Mutze; Leonie Goelz

doi:10.1055/a-1482-9448

Subscribe to RSS

Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.

https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000094.xml

Share / Bookmark

Facebook X Linkedin Weibo

Download PDF

Z Gastroenterol 2022; 60(06): 937-958
DOI: 10.1055/a-1482-9448

Originalarbeit

Alternativen histologischer Materialgewinnung – Wann und wie ist die histologische Sicherung mittels Ultraschall (US), Computertomografie (CT) oder Endosonografie (EUS) sinnvoll?

Alternatives of histological material collection – When and how is histological confirmation by ultrasound (US), computer tomography (CT) or endosonography (EUS) useful?

Kathleen Möller

¹Klinik für Innere Medizin/Gastroenterologie, Berlin, Germany, SANA-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany

,

Christoph F. Dietrich

²Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin Hirslanden Bern, Bern, Switzerland

,

Siegbert Faiss

¹Klinik für Innere Medizin/Gastroenterologie, Berlin, Germany, SANA-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany

,

Sven Mutze

³Institut für Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, BG Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany

⁴Institut für Radiologie, SANA-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany

⁵Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN60634)

,

Leonie Goelz

³Institut für Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, BG Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany

⁵Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN60634)

› Author Affiliations

› Further Information

Also available at

Abstract
Full Text
References

Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die histologische Sicherung von Tumoren ist zusammen mit einem adäquaten Staging die Voraussetzung für eine stadiengerechte und personalisierte Therapie. Beschrieben werden Indikationen, technische Möglichkeiten und Einschränkungen sowie potenzielle Komplikationen der bildgebend geführten Nadelbiopsie mittels Ultraschalls (US), Computertomografie (CT) und Endosonografie (EUS). Welches Verfahren für welches Organ und welche Läsion?

Abstract

Histological classifications of tumorous lesions together with adequate staging are necessary for stage-appropriate and personalized therapies. The indications, technical possibilities, and limitations as well as potential complications of image-guided needle biopsy by ultrasound, computed tomography, and endosonography are described. Which procedure for which organ and which lesion?

Schlüsselwörter

sonografisch gestützte Biopsie - endosonografisch gestützte Biopsie - computertomografisch gestützte Biopsie - Nadelbiopsie

Keywords

sonographic-guided biopsy - endosonographic-guided biopsy - computertomographic-guided biopsy - needle biopsy

Publication History

Received: 10 February 2021

Accepted after revision: 11 April 2021

Article published online:
15 November 2021

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Literatur
1 Lorentzen T, Nolsoe CP, Ewertsen C, Nielsen MB, Leen E, Havre RF, Gritzmann N. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part I. General Aspects (long Version). Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: E1-14 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1553593. (PMID: 26468774)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
2 Lorentzen T, Nolsoe CP, Ewertsen C, Nielsen MB, Leen E, Havre RF, Gritzmann N. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part I. General Aspects (Short Version). Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: 464-472 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1553601. (PMID: 26468772)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
3 Sidhu PS, Brabrand K, Cantisani V, Correas JM, Cui XW, D’Onofrio M, Essig M. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part II. Diagnostic Ultrasound-Guided Interventional Procedures (Long Version). Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: E15-35 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1554036. (PMID: 26669871)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
4 Sidhu PS, Brabrand K, Cantisani V, Correas JM, Cui XW, D’Onofrio M, Essig M. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part II. Diagnostic Ultrasound-Guided Interventional Procedures (Short Version). Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: 566-580 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1566760. (PMID: 26669869)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
5 Jenssen C, Hocke M, Fusaroli P, Gilja OH, Buscarini E, Havre RF, Ignee A. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part IV – EUS-guided interventions: General Aspects and EUS-guided Sampling (Short Version). Ultraschall in Med 2016; 37: 157-169 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1553788. (PMID: 27058434)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
6 Jenssen C, Hocke M, Fusaroli P, Gilja OH, Buscarini E, Havre RF, Ignee A. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part IV – EUS-guided Interventions: General aspects and EUS-guided sampling (Long Version). Ultraschall in Med 2016; 37: E33-76 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1553785. (PMID: 26515966)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
7 Dietrich CF, Arcidiacono PG, Braden B, Burmeister S, Carrara S, Cui X, Di Leo M. et al. What should be known prior to performing EUS?. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8: 3-16 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_54_18. (PMID: 30777940)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
8 Dietrich CF, Arcidiacono PG, Braden B, Burmeister S, Carrara S, Cui X, Leo MD. et al. What should be known prior to performing EUS exams? (Part II). Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8: 360-369 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_57_19. (PMID: 31571619)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
9 Strobel D, Bernatik T, Blank W, Will U, Reichel A, Wustner M, Keim V. et al. Incidence of bleeding in 8172 percutaneous ultrasound-guided intraabdominal diagnostic and therapeutic interventions – results of the prospective multicenter DEGUM interventional ultrasound study (PIUS study). Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: 122-131 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1399282. (PMID: 25876060)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
10 Schuler A, Reuss J, Delorme S, Hagendorff A, Giesel F. Costs of clinical ultrasound examinations – an economical cost calculation and analysis. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 379-386 DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245283. (PMID: 20183779)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
11 Faccioli N, Dietrich CF, Foti G, Santi E, Comai A, D’Onofrio M. Activity-Based Cost Analysis of Including Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Diagnostic Pathway of Focal Pancreatic Lesions Detected by Abdominal Ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2019; 40: 618-624 DOI: 10.1055/a-0869-7861. (PMID: 30895585)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
12 Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2277-2284 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra072149. (PMID: 18046031)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
13 Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, Berrington de Gonzalez A. et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 2078-2086 DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427. (PMID: 20008690)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
14 Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler F, Land C. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 2071-2077 DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440. (PMID: 20008689)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
15 Caraiani C, Yi D, Petresc B, Dietrich C. Indications for abdominal imaging: When and what to choose?. J Ultrason 2020; 20: e43-e54 DOI: 10.15557/JoU.2020.0008. (PMID: 32320166)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
16 Caraiani C, Petresc B, Dong Y, Dietrich CF. Contraindications and adverse effects in abdominal imaging. Med Ultrason 2019; 21: 456-463 DOI: 10.11152/mu-2145. (PMID: 31765455)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
17 Caraiani C, Dong Y, Rudd AG, Dietrich CF. Reasons for inadequate or incomplete imaging techniques. Med Ultrason 2018; 20: 498-507 DOI: 10.11152/mu-1736. (PMID: 30534659)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
18 England JR, Fischbeck T, Tchelepi H. The Value of Needle-Guidance Technology in Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Procedures Performed by Radiology Residents: A Comparison of Freehand, In-Plane, Fixed-Angle, and Electromagnetic Needle Tracking Techniques. J Ultrasound Med 2019; 38: 399-405 DOI: 10.1002/jum.14701. (PMID: 30027597)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
19 Dietrich CF, Lorentzen T, Appelbaum L, Buscarini E, Cantisani V, Correas JM, Cui XW. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part III – Abdominal Treatment Procedures (Short Version). Ultraschall in Med 2016; 37: 27-45 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1553965. (PMID: 26871408)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
20 Dietrich CF, Lorentzen T, Appelbaum L, Buscarini E, Cantisani V, Correas JM, Cui XW. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part III – Abdominal Treatment Procedures (Long Version). Ultraschall in Med 2016; 37: E1-E32 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1553917. (PMID: 26670019)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
21 Mao F, Dong Y, Ji Z, Cao J, Wang WP. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Guided Biopsy of Undetermined Abdominal Lesions: A Multidisciplinary Decision-Making Approach. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017: 8791259 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8791259. (PMID: 28133613)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
22 Dong Y, Feng M, Wen Ping W, Zheng Biao J, Fan PL. Contrast-enhanced US-guided percutaneous biopsy of anterior mediastinal lesions. Diagn Interv Radiol 2017; 23: 43-48

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
23 Huang DY, Yusuf GT, Daneshi M, Ramnarine R, Deganello A, Sellars ME, Sidhu PS. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in abdominal intervention. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43: 960-976 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1473-8. (PMID: 29450615)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
24 Francica G, Meloni MF, de Sio, Terracciano F, Caturelli E, Riccardi L, Roselli P. et al. Biopsy of Liver Target Lesions under Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Guidance – A Multi-Center Study. Ultraschall in Med 2018; 39: 448-453 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-122496. (PMID: 29232723)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
25 Zhou JH, Shan HB, Ou W, Mo YX, Xiang J, Wang Y, Li J. et al. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Improves the Pathological Outcomes of US-Guided Core Needle Biopsy That Targets the Viable Area of Anterior Mediastinal Masses. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018: 9825709 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9825709. (PMID: 29581992)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
26 Gummadi S, Eisenbrey JR, Lyshchik A. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in interventional oncology. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43: 3166-3175 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1581-5. (PMID: 29632993)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
27 Kessner R, Nakamoto DA, Kondray V, Partovi S, Ahmed Y, Azar N. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Guidance for Interventional Procedures. J Ultrasound Med 2019; 38: 2541-2557 DOI: 10.1002/jum.14955. (PMID: 30714653)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
28 Bevilacqua A, D’Amuri FV, Pagnini F, Sabatino V, Russo U, Maggialetti N, Palumbo P. et al. Percutaneous needle biopsy of retroperitoneal lesions: technical developments. Acta Biomed 2019; 90: 62-67 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i5-S.8331. (PMID: 31085974)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
29 Schaffler-Schaden D, Birsak T, Zintl R, Lorber B, Schaffler G. Risk of needle tract seeding after coaxial ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy for primary and metastatic tumors of the liver: report of a single institution. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45: 3301-3306 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02120-1. (PMID: 31278460)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
30 Tam AL, Ensor JE, Zvavanjanja RC, Philip A, Abdelsalam ME, Huang SY, Gupta S. et al. JOURNAL CLUB: Standardizing CT-Guided Biopsy Procedures: Patient Dose and Image Noise. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 205: W390-399 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13324. (PMID: 26397346)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
31 Götzberger M, Jenssen C. Lymphknoten, Ganglion coeliacum, Milz: Einstellungen, Normalbefunde, Varianten, Charakterisierung. In: Jenssen C, Gottschalk U, Schachschall G, Dietrich CF. Kursbuch Endosonographie. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2011: 139-152

Google Scholar
32 Kovacevic B, Vilmann P. EUS tissue acquisition: From A to B. Endosc Ultrasound 2020; 9: 225-231 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_21_20. (PMID: 32655082)

Google Scholar
33 Kandel P, Wallace MB. Recent advancement in EUS-guided fine needle sampling. J Gastroenterol 2019; 54: 377-387 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-019-01552-2. (PMID: 30809717)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
34 Hocke M, Topalidis T, Braden B, Dietrich CF. „Clinical“ cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide. Endosc Ultrasound 2017; 6: 83-89 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_21_17. (PMID: 28440233)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
35 Hocke M, Ignee A, Topalidis T, Dietrich CF. Back to the roots – should gastroenterologists perform their own cytology?. Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51: 191-195 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313148. (PMID: 23417363)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
36 Jenssen C, Möller K, Wagner S, Sarbia M. Endosonographisch gestützte Biopsie: diagnostischer Ertrag, Fallstricke, Qualitätssicherung. Teil 1: Optimierung von Materialgewinnung und diagnostischer Effizienz. Z Gastroenterol 2008; 46: 590-600 DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027413. (PMID: 18537087)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
37 Moller K, Papanikolaou IS, Toermer T, Delicha EM, Sarbia M, Schenck U, Koch M. et al. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: high yield of 2 passes with combined histologic-cytologic analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 60-69 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.10.008. (PMID: 19394012)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
38 Dietrich CF, Nolsoe CP, Barr RG, Berzigotti A, Burns PN, Cantisani V, Chammas MC. et al. Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver-Update 2020 WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS. Ultrasound Med Biol 2020; 46: 2579-2604 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.030. (PMID: 32713788)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
39 Dietrich CF, Nolsoe CP, Barr RG, Berzigotti A, Burns PN, Cantisani V, Chammas MC. et al. Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver – Update 2020 – WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS. Ultraschall in Med 2020; 41: 562-585 DOI: 10.1055/a-1177-0530. (PMID: 32707595)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
40 Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI, Cosgrove DO, Kudo M, Nolsoe CP, Piscaglia F. et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012: A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39: 187-210 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.09.002. (PMID: 23137926)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
41 Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI, Cosgrove DO, Kudo M, Nolsoe CP, Piscaglia F. et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver--update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34: 11-29 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325499. (PMID: 23129518)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
42 Dietrich CF, Mertens JC, Braden B, Schuessler G, Ott M, Ignee A. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of histologically proven liver hemangiomas. Hepatology 2007; 45: 1139-1145 DOI: 10.1002/hep.21615. (PMID: 17464990)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
43 Doolittle DA, Atwell TD, Sanchez W, Mounajjed T, Hough DM, Schmit GD, Kurup AN. Safety and Outcomes of Percutaneous Biopsy of 61 Hepatic Adenomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 206: 871-876 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.15301. (PMID: 26866339)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
44 Dietrich CF, Tannapfel A, Jang HJ, Kim TK, Burns PN, Dong Y. Ultrasound Imaging of Hepatocellular Adenoma Using the New Histology Classification. Ultrasound Med Biol 2019; 45: 1-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.06.015. (PMID: 30396597)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
45 Dietrich CF, Schuessler G, Trojan J, Fellbaum C, Ignee A. Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Br.J. Radiol 2005; 78: 704-707 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/88181612. (PMID: 16046421)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
46 Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Trojan J, Fellbaum C, Schuessler G. Improved characterisation of histologically proven liver tumours by contrast enhanced ultrasonography during the portal venous and specific late phase of SHU 508A. Gut 2004; 53: 401-405 DOI: 10.1136/gut.2003.026260. (PMID: 14960524)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
47 Dong Y, Wang WP, Mao F, Fan M, Ignee A, Serra C, Sparchez Z. et al. Contrast enhanced ultrasound features of hepatic cystadenoma and hepatic cystadenocarcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol 2017; 52: 365-372 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1259652. (PMID: 27887203)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
48 Dong Y, Wang WP, Cantisani V, D’Onofrio M, Ignee A, Mulazzani L, Saftoiu A. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of histologically proven hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 4741-4749 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i19.4741. (PMID: 27217705)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
49 Dong Y, Teufel A, Trojan J, Berzigotti A, Cui XW, Dietrich CF. Contrast enhanced ultrasound in mixed hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: Case series and review of the literature. Dig Liver Dis 2018; 50: 401-407 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.11.003. (PMID: 29233685)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
50 Dong Y, Wang WP, Mao F, Zhang Q, Yang D, Tannapfel A, Meloni MF. et al. Imaging Features of Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2020; DOI: 10.1055/a-1110-7124. (PMID: 32102105)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
51 Bornschein J, Schlosser S, Schreyer AG, Müller-Schilling M. Das hepatozelluläre Karzinom. Der Gastroenterologe 2016; 11: 368-382

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
52 Greten TF, Malek NP, Schmidt S, Arends J, Bartenstein P, Bechstein W, Bernatik T. et al. Diagnosis of and therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51: 1269-1326 DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1355841. (PMID: 24243572)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
53 AWMF. Diagnostik und Therapie des Hepatozellulären Karzinoms und biliärer Karzinome, Langversion 2.01, AWMF Registriernummer: 032/-053OL. In: Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie. https://leitlinienprogramm-Onkologie.de/leitlinien/hepatozellulaeres-karzinom-hcc/: Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e.V. AWMF. 2021

PubMed Google Scholar
54 Dietrich CF, Potthoff A, Helmberger T, Ignee A, Willmann JK, Group CL-RW. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS). Z Gastroenterol 2018; 56: 499-506 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-124874. (PMID: 29734449)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
55 Dietrich CF, Dong Y, Kono Y, Caraiani C, Sirlin CB, Cui XW, Tang A. LI-RADS ancillary features on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Ultrasonography 2020; 39: 221-228 DOI: 10.14366/usg.19052. (PMID: 32475089)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
56 Schellhaas B, Bernatik T, Bohle W, Borowitzka F, Chang J, Dietrich CF, Dirks K. et al. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Algorithms (CEUS-LIRADS/ESCULAP) for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma – A Prospective Multicenter DEGUM Study. Ultraschall in Med 2020; DOI: 10.1055/a-1220-8561. (PMID: 32717752)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
57 Wilson SR, Lyshchik A, Piscaglia F, Cosgrove D, Jang HJ, Sirlin C, Dietrich CF. et al. CEUS LI-RADS: algorithm, implementation, and key differences from CT/MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43: 127-142 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1250-0. (PMID: 28819825)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
58 Tang A, Bashir MR, Corwin MT. et al. Evidence Supporting LI-RADS Major Features for CT- and MR Imaging-based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. Radiology 2017; 170554

PubMed Google Scholar
59 Piscaglia F, Wilson SR, Lyshchik A, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, Jang HJ, Kim TK. et al. American College of Radiology Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) for the diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a pictorial essay. Ultraschall in Med 2017; 38: 320-324 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-124661. (PMID: 28329875)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
60 Li J, Chen M, Wang ZJ, Li SG, Jiang M, Shi L, Cao CL. et al. Interobserver agreement for contrast-enhanced ultrasound of liver imaging reporting and data system: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8: 5589-5602 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5589. (PMID: 33344549)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
61 Kono Y, Lyshchik A, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, Jang HJ, Kim TK, Piscaglia F. et al. Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS(R)): the official version by the American College of Radiology (ACR). Ultraschall in Med 2017; 38: 85-86 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-124369. (PMID: 28249328)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
62 Kim TK, Noh SY, Wilson SR, Kono Y, Piscaglia F, Jang HJ, Lyshchik A. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) 2017 – a review of important differences compared to the CT/MRI system. Clin Mol Hepatol 2017; 23: 280-289 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2017.0037. (PMID: 28911220)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
63 Dietrich CF, Kono Y, Cosgrove D, Jang HY, Kim TK, Piscaglia F, Sirlin CB. et al. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS). Solutions in CONTRAST IMAGING; 2016

Google Scholar
64 Dietrich CF, Averkiou M, Nielsen MB, Barr RG, Burns PN, Calliada F, Cantisani V. et al. How to perform Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS). Ultrasound Int Open 2018; 4: E2-E15 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-123931. (PMID: 29423461)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
65 Navin PJ, Venkatesh SK. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: State of the Art Imaging and Recent Advances. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2019; 7: 72-85 DOI: 10.14218/JCTH.2018.00032. (PMID: 30944823)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
66 Di Tommaso L, Spadaccini M, Donadon M, Personeni N, Elamin A, Aghemo A, Lleo A. Role of liver biopsy in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25: 6041-6052 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i40.6041. (PMID: 31686761)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
67 Varela-Ponte R, Martinez-Lago N, Vieito-Villar M, Carreira-Villamor JM. Impact of risk factors on the efficacy and complications of ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy of space-occupying lesions. Radiologia 2020; DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2020.09.011. (PMID: 33257053)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
68 Helck A, Schumann C, Aumann J, Thierfelder K, Strobl FF, Braunagel M, Niethammer M. et al. Automatic path proposal computation for CT-guided percutaneous liver biopsy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2016; 11: 2199-2205 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1349-0. (PMID: 26811078)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
69 Meier B, Caca K, Klinger C. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of focal liver lesions. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2015; 140: 820-823 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-102520. (PMID: 26080721)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
70 Möller K, Martin H, Reitzig P. Sonographisch gestützte Punktion raumfordernder Prozesse – Diagnostischer Stellenwert und Bedeutung für das therapeutische Vorgehen. Endoskopie heute 2003; 16: 1-8

PubMed Google Scholar
71 Buscarini L, Fornari F, Bolondi L, Colombo P, Livraghi T, Magnolfi F, Rapaccini GL. et al. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of focal liver lesions: techniques, diagnostic accuracy and complications. A retrospective study on 2091 biopsies. J Hepatol 1990; 11: 344-348 DOI: 10.1016/0168-8278(90)90219-h. (PMID: 2290025)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
72 Chen QW, Cheng CS, Chen H, Ning ZY, Tang SF, Zhang X, Zhu XY. et al. Effectiveness and complications of ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration for primary liver cancer in a Chinese population with serum alpha-fetoprotein levels </=200 ng/ml--a study based on 4,312 patients. PLoS One 2014; 9: e101536 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101536. (PMID: 25170868)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
73 Hollerbach S, Willert J, Topalidis T, Reiser M, Schmiegel W. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of liver lesions: histological and cytological assessment. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 743-749 DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41593. (PMID: 12929021)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
74 Chon HK, Yang HC, Choi KH, Kim TH. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy Using a Core Needle for Hepatic Solid Mass. Clin Endosc 2019; 52: 340-346 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2018.175. (PMID: 31302987)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
75 Srinivasan I, Tang SJ, Vilmann AS, Menachery J, Vilmann P. Hepatic applications of endoscopic ultrasound: Current status and future directions. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 12544-12557 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i44.12544. (PMID: 26640331)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
76 Cholongitas E, Senzolo M, Standish R, Marelli L, Quaglia A, Patch D, Dhillon AP. et al. A systematic review of the quality of liver biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 2006; 125: 710-721 DOI: 10.1309/W3XC-NT4H-KFBN-2G0B. (PMID: 16707372)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
77 Sporea I, Gherhardt D, Popescu A, Sirli R, Cornianu M, Herman D, Bota S. Does the size of the needle influence the number of portal tracts obtained through percutaneous liver biopsy?. Ann Hepatol 2012; 11: 691-695 (PMID: 22947531)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
78 Dietrich CF, Bamber J, Berzigotti A, Bota S, Cantisani V, Castera L, Cosgrove D. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Liver Ultrasound Elastography, Update 2017 (Short Version). Ultraschall in Med 2017; 38: 377-394 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-103955. (PMID: 28407654)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
79 Dietrich CF, Bamber J, Berzigotti A, Bota S, Cantisani V, Castera L, Cosgrove D. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Liver Ultrasound Elastography, Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall in Med 2017; 38: e16-e47 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-103952. (PMID: 28407655)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
80 Dietrich CF, Shi L, Wei Q, Dong Y, Cui XW, Lowe A, Worni M. et al. What does liver elastography measure? Technical aspects and methodology. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 2020; DOI: 10.23736/S1121-421X.20.02787-7.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
81 Dietrich CF, Ferraioli G, Sirli R, Popescu A, Sporea I, Pienar C, Kunze C. et al. General advice in ultrasound based elastography of pediatric patients. Med Ultrason 2019; 21: 315-326 DOI: 10.11152/mu-2063. (PMID: 31476212)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
82 Ferraioli G, Wong VW, Castera L, Berzigotti A, Sporea I, Dietrich CF, Choi BI. et al. Liver Ultrasound Elastography: An Update to the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Guidelines and Recommendations. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018; 44: 2419-2440 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.07.008. (PMID: 30209008)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
83 Dietrich CF, Trenker C, Fontanilla T, Gorg C, Hausmann A, Klein S, Lassau N. et al. New Ultrasound Techniques Challenge the Diagnosis of Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018; 44: 2171-2182 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.06.002. (PMID: 30076031)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
84 Bhogal N, Lamb B, Arbeiter B, Malik S, Sayles H, Lazenby AJ, Chandan S. et al. Safety and adequacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided random liver biopsy in comparison with transjugular and percutaneous approaches. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8: E1850-E1854 DOI: 10.1055/a-1274-9763. (PMID: 33269320)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
85 Lavian JD, Thornton LM, Zybulewski A, Kim E, Nowakowski SF, Ranade M, Patel RS. et al. Safety of percutaneous versus transjugular liver biopsy: A propensity score matched analysis. Eur J Radiol 2020; 133: 109399 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109399. (PMID: 33202374)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
86 Borquez AA, Silva-Sepulveda J, Lee JW, Vavinskaya V, Vodkin I, El-Sabrout H, Towbin R. et al. Transjugular liver biopsy for Fontan associated liver disease surveillance: Technique, outcomes and hemodynamic correlation. Int J Cardiol 2020; DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.037. (PMID: 33278420)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
87 Zhang GH, Wang M, Chen G, Yu JA, Ma H, Ou XJ, Wang Y. Evaluation of clinical application of transjugular liver biopsy in 61 cases. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi 2020; 28: 949-953 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20190909-00328. (PMID: 33256281)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
88 Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, Dhar A, Vlavianos P, Monahan KJ. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 319-331 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.049. (PMID: 22248600)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
89 Chen G, Liu S, Zhao Y, Dai M, Zhang T. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology 2013; 13: 298-304 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.01.013. (PMID: 23719604)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
90 Puli SR, Bechtold ML, Buxbaum JL, Eloubeidi MA. How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass?: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Pancreas 2013; 42: 20-26 DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182546e79. (PMID: 23254913)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
91 AWMF. S3-Leitlinie zum exokrinen Pankreaskarzinom Kurzversion. AWMF 2013; 1-69 https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/032–010OLk_S3_Exokrines_Pankreaskarzinom_21112013-abgelaufen.pdf

PubMed Google Scholar
92 Ignee A, Jenssen C, Arcidiacono PG, Hocke M, Moller K, Saftoiu A, Will U. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography of small solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter study. Endoscopy 2018; DOI: 10.1055/a-0588-4941. (PMID: 29689572)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
93 Dietrich CF, Sahai AV, D’Onofrio M, Will U, Arcidiacono PG, Petrone MC, Hocke M. et al. Differential diagnosis of small solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 933-940 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.034. (PMID: 27155592)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
94 Dong Y, D’Onofrio M, Hocke M, Jenssen C, Potthoff A, Atkinson N, Ignee A. et al. Autoimmune pancreatitis: Imaging features. Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7: 196-203 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_23_17. (PMID: 28836516)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
95 Hocke M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2011; 43 Suppl 2 UCTN: E381-E382 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256893. (PMID: 22139794)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
96 Dietrich CF, Hirche TO, Ott M, Ignee A. Real-time tissue elastography in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 718-720 DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1214866. (PMID: 19618344)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
97 Dong Y, Jurgensen C, Puri R, D’Onofrio M, Hocke M, Wang WP, Atkinson N. et al. Ultrasound imaging features of isolated pancreatic tuberculosis. Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7: 119-127 DOI: 10.4103/2303-9027.210901. (PMID: 28721972)

Google Scholar
98 Möller K, Hartmann D. Pankreas: Solide Tumoren in „Kursbuch Endosonographie“. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme: 2014

Google Scholar
99 Dietrich CF, Burmeister S, Hollerbach S, Arcidiacono PG, Braden B, Fusaroli P, Hocke M. et al. Do we need elastography for EUS?. Endosc Ultrasound 2020; 9: 284-290 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_25_20. (PMID: 32675464)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
100 Saftoiu A, Napoleon B, Arcidiacono PG, Braden B, Burmeister S, Carrara S, Cui XW. et al. Do we need contrast agents for EUS?. Endosc Ultrasound 2020; 9: 361-368 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_20_20. (PMID: 32675463)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
101 Dietrich CF, Jenssen C. Modern ultrasound imaging of pancreatic tumors. Ultrasonography 2020; 39: 105-113 DOI: 10.14366/usg.19039. (PMID: 31962384)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
102 D’Onofrio M, Barbi E, Dietrich CF, Kitano M, Numata K, Sofuni A, Principe F. et al. Pancreatic multicenter ultrasound study (PAMUS). Eur.J. Radiol 2012; 81: 630-638 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.053. (PMID: 21466935)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
103 Dietrich CF, Sahai A, D’Onofrio M, Will U, Arciadacono P, Petrone MC, Hocke M. et al. Differential diagnosis of small solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.034.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
104 Braden B, Jenssen C, D’Onofrio M, Hocke M, Will U, Moller K, Ignee A. et al. B-mode and contrast-enhancement characteristics of small nonincidental neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors. Endosc Ultrasound 2017; 6: 49-54 DOI: 10.4103/2303-9027.200213. (PMID: 28218201)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
105 Kitano M, Sakamoto H, Matsui U, Ito Y, Maekawa K, von Schrenck T, Kudo M. A novel perfusion imaging technique of the pancreas: contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 141-150 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.07.045. (PMID: 18155437)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
106 Fusaroli P, Spada A, Mancino MG, Caletti G. Contrast harmonic echo-endoscopic ultrasound improves accuracy in diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 629-634 e621 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.04.012. (PMID: 20417721)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
107 Napoleon B, Alvarez-Sanchez MV, Gincoul R, Pujol B, Lefort C, Lepilliez V, Labadie M. et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound in solid lesions of the pancreas: results of a pilot study. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 564-570 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255537. (PMID: 20593334)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
108 Kitano M, Kudo M, Yamao K, Takagi T, Sakamoto H, Komaki T, Kamata K. et al. Characterization of small solid tumors in the pancreas: the value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 303-310 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.354. (PMID: 22008892)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
109 Dietrich CF, Dong Y, Jenssen C, Ciaravino V, Hocke M, Wang WP, Burmester E. et al. Serous pancreatic neoplasia, data and review. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23: 5567-5578 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i30.5567. (PMID: 28852316)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
110 Dietrich CF. EFSUMB guidelines 2015 on interventional ultrasound. Med Ultrason 2015; 17: 521-527 DOI: 10.11152/mu.2013.2066.174.e. (PMID: 26649349)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
111 Möller K, Jenssen C. EUS-FNP: Vorbereitung, Nadeln, Techniken in „Kursbuch Endosonografie“. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2014

Google Scholar
112 Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Doi S, Ando N, Nakashima M, Adachi S, Hirose Y. et al. Use of samples from endoscopic ultrasound-guided 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 316-322 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.09.032. (PMID: 22019795)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
113 Kanno A, Ishida K, Hamada S, Fujishima F, Unno J, Kume K, Kikuta K. et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-FNA by using a 22-gauge needle based on the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 594-602 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.014. (PMID: 22898417)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
114 Okasha HH, Naga MI, Esmat S, Naguib M, Hassanein M, Hassani M, El-Kassas M. et al. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Focal Pancreatic Masses. Endosc Ultrasound 2013; 2: 190-193 DOI: 10.4103/2303-9027.121239. (PMID: 24949394)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
115 Kannengiesser K, Mahlke R, Petersen F, Peters A, Ross M, Kucharzik T, Maaser C. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound is able to discriminate benign submucosal lesions from gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Scand J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 1515-1520 DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2012.729082. (PMID: 23148660)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
116 Ignee A, Jenssen C, Hocke M, Dong Y, Wang WP, Cui XW, Woenckhaus M. et al. Contrast-enhanced (endoscopic) ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound elastography in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Endosc Ultrasound 2017; 6: 55-60 DOI: 10.4103/2303-9027.200216. (PMID: 28218202)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
117 Dietrich CF, Jenssen C, Hocke M, Cui XW, Woenckhaus M, Ignee A. Imaging of gastrointestinal stromal tumours with modern ultrasound techniques – a pictorial essay. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50: 457-467 DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1282076. (PMID: 22581701)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
118 Pesenti C, Bories E, Caillol F, Ratone JP, Godat S, Monges G, Poizat F. et al. Characterization of subepithelial lesions of the stomach and esophagus by contrast-enhanced EUS: A retrospective study. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8: 43-49 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_89_17. (PMID: 30264741)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
119 Akahoshi K, Oya M, Koga T, Koga H, Motomura Y, Kubokawa M, Gibo J. et al. Clinical usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for gastric subepithelial lesions smaller than 2 cm. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2014; 23: 405-412 DOI: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.234.eug. (PMID: 25531999)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
120 Larghi A, Fuccio L, Chiarello G, Attili F, Vanella G, Paliani GB, Napoleone M. et al. Fine-needle tissue acquisition from subepithelial lesions using a forward-viewing linear echoendoscope. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 39-45 DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344895. (PMID: 24218311)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
121 Eckardt AJ, Adler A, Gomes EM, Jenssen C, Siebert C, Gottschalk U, Koch M. et al. Endosonographic large-bore biopsy of gastric subepithelial tumors: a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24: 1135-1144 DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328356eae2. (PMID: 22797706)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
122 Kim GH, Cho YK, Kim EY, Kim HK, Cho JW, Lee TH, Moon JS. et al. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014; 49: 347-354 DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2013.867361. (PMID: 24325591)

Google Scholar
123 de Sio, Gravina AG, Federico A, Cotticelli G, D’Armiento FP, Romano M. Incidental diagnosis of stromal tumor of the stomach by percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsy. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2010; 19: 465-467 (PMID: 21188348)

PubMed Google Scholar
124 Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Gilja OH, Saftoiu A, Bartels E, Bertolotto M. et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Short Version). Ultraschall in Med 2018; 39: 154-180 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-101254. (PMID: 29510440)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
125 Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Gilja OH, Saftoiu A, Bartels E, Bertolotto M. et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall in Med 2018; 39: e2-e44 DOI: 10.1055/a-0586-1107. (PMID: 29510439)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
126 Cui XW, Ignee A, De Molo C, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Woenckhaus M, Dietrich CF. Littoral cell angioma of the spleen. Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51: 209-212 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325556. (PMID: 23417366)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
127 von Herbay A, Barreiros AP, Ignee A, Westendorff J, Gregor M, Galle PR, Dietrich C. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with SonoVue: differentiation between benign and malignant lesions of the spleen. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28: 421-434 DOI: 10.7863/jum.2009.28.4.421. (PMID: 19321670)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
128 Ignee A, Cui X, Hirche T, Demolo C, Barreiros AP, Schuessler G, Dietrich CF. Percutaneous biopsies of splenic lesions--a clinical and contrast enhanced ultrasound based algorithm. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2014; 58: 529-541 DOI: 10.3233/CH-141813. (PMID: 24448731)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
129 Tana C, Schiavone C, Ticinesi A, Ricci F, Giamberardino MA, Cipollone F, Silingardi M. et al. Ultrasound imaging of abdominal sarcoidosis: State of the art. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7: 809-818 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i7.809. (PMID: 31024952)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
130 Chon HK, Choi KH, Kim TH. Sarcoidosis with splenic involvement diagnosed via endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy. Korean J Intern Med 2018; 33: 449-450 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2016.393. (PMID: 28502160)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
131 Tana C, Silingardi M, Dietrich CF. New trends in ultrasound of hepatosplenic sarcoidosis. Z Gastroenterol 2015; 53: 283-284 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1399122. (PMID: 25860577)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
132 Tana C, Dietrich CF, Schiavone C. Hepatosplenic sarcoidosis: contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings and implications for clinical practice. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 926203 DOI: 10.1155/2014/926203. (PMID: 25215299)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
133 Lindgren PG, Hagberg H, Eriksson B, Glimelius B, Magnusson A, Sundstrom C. Excision biopsy of the spleen by ultrasonic guidance. Br J Radiol 1985; 58: 853-857 DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-58-693-853. (PMID: 3916062)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
134 Gomez-Rubio M, Lopez-Cano A, Rendon P, Munoz-Benvenuty A, Macias M, Garre C, Segura-Cabral JM. Safety and diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsy of the spleen: a multicenter study. J Clin Ultrasound 2009; 37: 445-450 DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20608. (PMID: 19582827)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
135 McInnes MD, Kielar AZ, Macdonald DB. Percutaneous image-guided biopsy of the spleen: systematic review and meta-analysis of the complication rate and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 2011; 260: 699-708 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110333. (PMID: 21693659)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
136 Patel N, Dawe G, Tung K. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous splenic biopsy using an 18-G core biopsy needle: our experience with 52 cases. Br J Radiol 2015; 88: 20150400 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150400. (PMID: 26337505)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
137 Civardi G, Vallisa D, Berte R, Giorgio A, Filice C, Caremani M, Caturelli E. et al. Ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy of the spleen: high clinical efficacy and low risk in a multicenter Italian study. Am J Hematol 2001; 67: 93-99 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.1085. (PMID: 11343380)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
138 Cavanna L, Civardi G, Fornari F, Di Stasi M, Sbolli G, Buscarini E, Vallisa D. et al. Ultrasonically guided percutaneous splenic tissue core biopsy in patients with malignant lymphomas. Cancer 1992; 69: 2932-2936 DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920615)69:12<2932::AID-CNCR2820691211>3.0.CO;2-7. (PMID: 1591686)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
139 Suzuki T, Shibuya H, Yoshimatsu S, Suzuki S. Ultrasonically guided staging splenic tissue core biopsy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Cancer 1987; 60: 879-882 DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870815)60:4<879::AID-CNCR2820600427>3.0.CO;2-4. (PMID: 3297301)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
140 Olson MC, Atwell TD, Harmsen WS, Konrad A, King RL, Lin Y, Wall DJ. Safety and Accuracy of Percutaneous Image-Guided Core Biopsy of the Spleen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 206: 655-659 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.15125. (PMID: 26901024)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
141 Fritscher-Ravens A, Mylonaki M, Pantes A, Topalidis T, Thonke F, Swain P. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of focal lesions of the spleen. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1022-1027 DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07399.x. (PMID: 12809823)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
142 Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Tsurumi H, Goto N, Nakashima M, Doi S, Hirose Y. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for splenic tumor: a case series. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 179-182 DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1119474. (PMID: 19214901)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
143 Rana SS, Sharma V, Sharma R, Srinivasan R, Gupta R. Safety and utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of focal splenic lesions: a retrospective analysis. Ann Gastroenterol 2017; 30: 559-563 (PMID: 28845112)

PubMed Google Scholar
144 Eloubeidi MA, Varadarajulu S, Eltoum I, Jhala D, Chhieng DC, Jhala NC. Transgastric endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and flow cytometry of suspected lymphoma of the spleen. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 617-620 DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-921111. (PMID: 16685607)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
145 Ban T, Kawakami H, Kubota Y, Sato Y. Impact of Franseen needle on rapid onsite evaluation and histological examination following endoscopic ultrasonography-guided tissue acquisition in patients with splenic malignant lymphoma. Arab J Gastroenterol 2018; 19: 91-95 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajg.2018.03.004. (PMID: 29858116)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
146 Dietrich CF, Correas JM, Dong Y, Nolsoe C, Westerway SC, Jenssen C. WFUMB position paper on the management incidental findings: adrenal incidentaloma. Ultrasonography 2020; 39: 11-21 DOI: 10.14366/usg.19029. (PMID: 31786909)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
147 Nurnberg D. Ultrasound of adrenal gland tumours and indications for fine needle biopsy (uFNB). Ultraschall in Med 2005; 26: 458-469 DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858885. (PMID: 16453217)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
148 Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Barreiros AP, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Sienz M, Bojunga J, Braden B. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for imaging of adrenal masses. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 163-168 DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109357. (PMID: 19401979)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
149 Dietrich CF, Wehrmann T, Hoffmann C, Herrmann G, Caspary WF, Seifert H. Detection of the adrenal glands by endoscopic or transabdominal ultrasound. Endoscopy 1997; 29: 859-864 DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1004322. (PMID: 9476771)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
150 Jhala NC, Jhala DN, Chhieng DC, Eloubeidi MA, Eltoum IA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. A cytopathologist's perspective. Am J Clin Pathol 2003; 120: 351-367 DOI: 10.1309/MFRF-J0XY-JLN8-NVDP. (PMID: 14502798)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
151 Jhala D, Eloubeidi M, Chhieng DC, Frost A, Eltoum IA, Roberson J, Jhala N. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the islet cell tumor of pancreas: a comparison between computerized axial tomography and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy. Ann Diagn Pathol 2002; 6: 106-112 DOI: 10.1053/adpa.2002.30613. (PMID: 12004358)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
152 Eloubeidi MA, Seewald S, Tamhane A, Brand B, Chen VK, Yasuda I, Cerfolio RJ. et al. EUS-guided FNA of the left adrenal gland in patients with thoracic or GI malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 627-633 DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)00296-2. (PMID: 15114304)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
153 DeWitt J, Alsatie M, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, Sherman S. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of left adrenal gland masses. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 65-71 DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-945042. (PMID: 17252463)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
154 Eloubeidi MA, Morgan DE, Cerfolio RJ, Eltoum IA. Transduodenal EUS-guided FNA of the right adrenal gland. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 522-527 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.031. (PMID: 18234198)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
155 Uemura S, Yasuda I, Kato T, Doi S, Kawaguchi J, Yamauchi T, Kaneko Y. et al. Preoperative routine evaluation of bilateral adrenal glands by endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration in patients with potentially resectable lung cancer. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 195-201 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325988. (PMID: 23299524)

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
156 Patel S, Jinjuvadia R, Devara A, Naylor PH, Anees M, Jinjuvadia K, Al-Haddad M. Performance characteristics of EUS-FNA biopsy for adrenal lesions: A meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8: 180-187 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_42_18. (PMID: 30880721)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
157 Morris R, Shepherd K, Cribb G, Singh J, Tyrrell P, Cool P. Bone biopsy results in patients with a history of malignancy: a case series of 378 patients. Skeletal Radiol 2020; DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03652-0. (PMID: 33097964)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
158 Zhang L, Wang Y, Gu Y, Hou Y, Chen Z. The need for bone biopsies in the diagnosis of new bone lesions in patients with a known primary malignancy: A comparative review of 117 biopsy cases. J Bone Oncol 2019; 14: 100213 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2018.100213. (PMID: 30666287)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
159 Huang JW, Souza C, Jibri Z, Rakhra KS. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous rib biopsy: a safe procedure with high diagnostic yield. Clin Radiol 2019; 74: 650 e651-650 e656 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.04.009. (PMID: 31084972)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
160 Chambers M, O'Hern K, Kerr DA. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of bone and soft tissue lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2020; 9: 429-441 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.05.012. (PMID: 32622858)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
161 Tsukushi S, Nishida Y, Yamada Y, Yoshida M, Ishiguro N. CT-guided needle biopsy for musculoskeletal lesions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130: 699-703 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-009-1030-6. (PMID: 20033699)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
162 Liu B, Limback J, Kendall M, Valente M, Armaly J, Grekoski V, Pinizzotto A. et al. Safety of CT-Guided Bone Marrow Biopsy in Thrombocytopenic Patients: A Retrospective Review. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28: 1727-1731 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.08.009. (PMID: 29042170)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
163 AWMF. S3-Leitlinie Prävention, Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Lungenkarzinoms. AWMF; 2018 https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/020–007OL_l_S3_Lungenkarzinom_2018–03.pdf

PubMed Google Scholar
164 Jenssen C, Annema JT, Clementsen P. Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part 2: mediastinal lymph node anatomy and diagnostic reach of ultrasound techniques, clinical work up of neoplastic and inflammatory mediastinal lymphadenopathy using ultrasound techniques and how to learn mediastinal endosonography. J Thorac Dis 2016; 7: E439

PubMed Google Scholar
165 Dietrich CF, Annema JT, Clementsen P, Cui XW, Borst MM, Jenssen C. Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part I: endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and transcutaneous mediastinal ultrasound (TMUS), introduction into ultrasound techniques. J Thorac Dis 2015; 7: E311-325 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.09.40. (PMID: 26543620)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
166 Drumm O, Joyce EA, de Blacam C, Gleeson T, Kavanagh J, McCarthy E, McDermott R. et al. CT-guided Lung Biopsy: Effect of Biopsy-side Down Position on Pneumothorax and Chest Tube Placement. Radiology 2019; 292: 190-196 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182321. (PMID: 31084480)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
167 Chang YY, Chen CK, Yeh YC, Wu MH. Diagnostic feasibility and safety of CT-guided core biopsy for lung nodules less than or equal to 8 mm: A single-institution experience. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 796-806 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5027-1. (PMID: 28884222)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
168 Buda N, Kosiak W, Welnicki M, Skoczylas A, Olszewski R, Piotrkowski J, Skoczynski S. et al. Recommendations for Lung Ultrasound in Internal Medicine. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10080597. (PMID: 32824302)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
169 Guo YQ, Liao XH, Li ZX, Chen YY, Wang SD, Wang JH, Liao XS. et al. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Needle Biopsy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: Diagnostic Accuracy and Influencing Factors. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018; 44: 1003-1011 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.01.016. (PMID: 29525458)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
170 Bugalho A, Ferreira D, Eberhardt R, Dias SS, Videira PA, Herth FJ, Carreiro L. Diagnostic value of endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for accessible lung cancer lesions after non-diagnostic conventional techniques: a prospective study. BMC Cancer 2013; 13: 130 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-130. (PMID: 23510132)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
171 Han Y, Kim HJ, Kong KA, Kim SJ, Lee SH, Ryu YJ, Lee JH. et al. Diagnosis of small pulmonary lesions by transbronchial lung biopsy with radial endobronchial ultrasound and virtual bronchoscopic navigation versus CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0191590 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191590. (PMID: 29357388)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
172 Heerink WJ, de Bock GH, de Jonge GJ, Groen HJ, Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M. Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 138-148 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4357-8. (PMID: 27108299)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
173 Lee MH, Lubner MG, Hinshaw JL, Pickhardt PJ. Ultrasound Guidance Versus CT Guidance for Peripheral Lung Biopsy: Performance According to Lesion Size and Pleural Contact. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 210: W110-W117 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.17.18014. (PMID: 29364723)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
174 Elhamdoust E, Motamedfar A, Gharibvand MM, Jazayeri SN. Investigation of the value of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy from pathologic lymph nodes to the diagnosis of lymphoma. J Family Med Prim Care 2020; 9: 2801-2805 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1260_19. (PMID: 32984129)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
175 He Y, Ji X, Xie Y, He B, Xu X, Chen X, Zhang Q. Clinical application of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy with multiple punches in the diagnosis of lymphoma. World J Surg Oncol 2015; 13: 126 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-015-0537-2. (PMID: 25885784)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
176 Li J, Han J, Wang Y, Mo Y, Li J, Xiang J, Li Z. et al. Core Needle Biopsy Targeting the Viable Area of Deep-Sited Dominant Lesion Verified by Color Doppler and/or Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Contribute to the Actionable Diagnosis of the Patients Suspicious of Lymphoma. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 500153 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.500153. (PMID: 33117672)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
177 Lachar WA, Shahab I, Saad AJ. Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of core needle biopsy in the evaluation of suspected lymphoma: a study of 101 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131: 1033-1039 DOI: 10.5858/2007-131-1033-AACOCN. (PMID: 17616988)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
178 de Kerviler E, Benet C, Briere J, de Bazelaire C. Image-guided needle biopsy for diagnosis and molecular biology in lymphomas. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2012; 25: 29-39 DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2012.01.006. (PMID: 22409821)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
179 Pedersen OM, Aarstad HJ, Lokeland T, Bostad L. Diagnostic yield of biopsies of cervical lymph nodes using a large (14-gauge) core biopsy needle. APMIS 2013; 121: 1119-1130 DOI: 10.1111/apm.12058. (PMID: 23489251)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
180 Oh KH, Woo JS, Cho JG, Baek SK, Jung KY, Kwon SY. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided core needle gun biopsy in diagnosing cervical lymphadenopathy. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2016; 133: 401-404 DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2016.01.013. (PMID: 27592165)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
181 Groneck L, Quaas A, Hallek M, Zander T, Weihrauch MR. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsies for workup of lymphadenopathy and lymphoma. Eur J Haematol 2016; 97: 379-386 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12742. (PMID: 26833691)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
182 Han F, Xu M, Xie T, Wang JW, Lin QG, Guo ZX, Zheng W. et al. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy in cervical lymphadenopathy: A retrospective study of 6,695 cases. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 1809-1817 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5116-1. (PMID: 29188372)

Google Scholar
183 Puli SR, Batapati Krishna Reddy J, Bechtold ML, Ibdah JA, Antillon D, Singh S, Olyaee M. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound: it's accuracy in evaluating mediastinal lymphadenopathy? A meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 3028-3037 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.3028. (PMID: 18494054)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
184 von Bartheld MB, Veselic-Charvat M, Rabe KF, Annema JT. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 213-217

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
185 Wang J, Chen Q, Wu X, Wang Y, Hou W, Cheng B. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in evaluating mediastinal and intra-abdominal lymphadenopathies of unknown origin. Oncol Lett 2018; 15: 6991-6999 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8253. (PMID: 29725426)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
186 Kipper B, McGahan JP, Loehfelm TW, Fananapazir G. Is Ultrasound-Guided Core Biopsy as Safe as Fine-Needle Aspiration, and Does It Add Significantly to the Diagnosis of Suspected Peritoneal Malignancy?. J Ultrasound Med 2020; 39: 239-245 DOI: 10.1002/jum.15095. (PMID: 31329309)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
187 Allah MH, Salama ZA, El-Hindawy A, Al Kady N. Role of peritoneal ultrasonography and ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology/biopsy of extravisceral masses in the diagnosis of ascites of undetermined origin. Arab J Gastroenterol 2012; 13: 116-124 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajg.2012.08.004. (PMID: 23122452)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
188 Spencer JA, Swift SE, Wilkinson N, Boon AP, Lane G, Perren TJ. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: image-guided peritoneal core biopsy for tumor type and patient care. Radiology 2001; 221: 173-177 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2203010070. (PMID: 11568336)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
189 Yu H, Zhang C, Liu S, Jiang G, Li S, Zhang L, Wang Y. et al. Clinical value of CT-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy for peritoneal lesions. BMC Med Imaging 2020; 20: 122 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-020-00512-0. (PMID: 33138781)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
190 Souza FF, Mortele KJ, Cibas ES, Erturk SM, Silverman SG. Predictive value of percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy of peritoneal and omental masses: results in 111 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 131-136 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1283. (PMID: 19098191)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
191 Szpakowski JL, Drasin TE, Lyon LL. Rate of seeding with biopsies and ablations of hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study. Hepatol Commun 2017; 1: 841-851 DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1089. (PMID: 29404497)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
192 Silva MA, Hegab B, Hyde C, Guo B, Buckels JA, Mirza DF. Needle track seeding following biopsy of liver lesions in the diagnosis of hepatocellular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2008; 57: 1592-1596 DOI: 10.1136/gut.2008.149062. (PMID: 18669577)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
193 Zhong-Yi Z, Wei Y, Kun Y, Ying D, Wei W, Jung-Chieh L, Min-Hua C. Needle track seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: 14-year experience at a single centre. Int J Hyperthermia 2017; 33: 454-458 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1278630. (PMID: 28049374)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
194 NIH state-of-the-science statement on management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass („incidentaloma“). NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2002; 19: 1-25 (PMID: 14768652)

PubMed Google Scholar
195 Berger-Richardson D, Swallow CJ. Needle tract seeding after percutaneous biopsy of sarcoma: Risk/benefit considerations. Cancer 2017; 123: 560-567 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30370. (PMID: 27859013)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
196 Wang KX, Ben QW, Jin ZD, Du YQ, Zou DW, Liao Z, Li ZS. Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated with EUS-guided FNA: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 283-290 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.045. (PMID: 21295642)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
197 Mizuide M, Ryozawa S, Fujita A, Ogawa T, Katsuda H, Suzuki M, Noguchi T. et al. Complications of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10110964. (PMID: 33213103)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
198 Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Chang KJ, Wiersema LM. Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1087-1095 DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70164-1. (PMID: 9097990)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
199 Brugge WR, Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandrowski E, Centeno BA, Szydlo T, Regan S, del Castillo CF. et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 1330-1336 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.02.013. (PMID: 15131794)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
200 Lee LS, Saltzman JR, Bounds BC, Poneros JM, Brugge WR, Thompson CC. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts: a retrospective analysis of complications and their predictors. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3: 231-236 DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00618-4. (PMID: 15765442)

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

Subscribe to RSS

Share / Bookmark

Alternativen histologischer Materialgewinnung – Wann und wie ist die histologische Sicherung mittels Ultraschall (US), Computertomografie (CT) oder Endosonografie (EUS) sinnvoll?

Zusammenfassung

Abstract

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Publication History

Literatur