Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/a-1475-3624
Artificial intelligence-assisted colonic endocytoscopy for cancer recognition: a multicenter study
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00025476/202107/lookinside/thumbnails/2246_10-1055-a-1475-3624-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background and study aims Large adenomas are sometimes misidentified as cancers during colonoscopy and are surgically removed. To address this overtreatment, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) tool that identified cancerous pathology in vivo with high specificity. We evaluated our AI tool under the supervision of a government agency to obtain regulatory approval.
Patients and methods The AI tool outputted three pathological class predictions (cancer, adenoma, or non-neoplastic) for endocytoscopic images obtained at 520-fold magnification and previously trained on 68,082 images from six academic centers. A validation test was developed, employing 500 endocytoscopic images taken from various parts of randomly selected 50 large (≥ 20 mm) colorectal lesions (10 images per lesion). An expert board labelled each of the 500 images with a histopathological diagnosis, which was made using endoscopic and histopathological images. The validation test was performed using the AI tool under a controlled environment. The primary outcome measure was the specificity in identifying cancer.
Results The validation test consisted of 30 cancers, 15 adenomas, and five non-neoplastic lesions. The AI tool could analyze 83.6 % of the images (418/500): 231 cancers, 152 adenomas, and 35 non-neoplastic lesions. Among the analyzable images, the AI tool identified the three pathological classes with an overall accuracy of 91.9 % (384/418, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 88.8 %–94.3 %). Its sensitivity and specificity for differentiating cancer was 91.8 % (212/231, 95 % CI: 87.5 %–95.0 %) and 97.3 % (182/187, 95 % CI: 93.9 %–99.1 %), respectively.
Conclusions The newly developed AI system designed for endocytoscopy showed excellent specificity in identifying colorectal cancer.
Publication History
Received: 21 December 2020
Accepted: 23 February 2021
Article published online:
17 June 2021
© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Bertelson NL, Kalkbrenner KA, Merchea A. et al. Colectomy for endoscopically unresectable polyps: how often is it cancer?. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 1111-1116
- 2 Shimura T, Ebi M, Yamada T. et al. Magnifying chromoendoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography measure invasion depth of early stage colorectal cancer with equal accuracy on the basis of a prospective trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12: 662-668
- 3 Chao G, Ye F, Li T. et al. Estimation of invasion depth of early colorectal cancer using EUS and NBI-ME: a meta-analysis. Techniq Coloproctol 2019; 23: 821-830
- 4 Takeda K, Kudo S, Mori Y. et al. Accuracy of diagnosing invasie colorectal cancer using computer-aided endocytoscopy. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 798-802
- 5 Hetzel JT, Huang CS, Coukos JA. et al. Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2656-2664
- 6 Mori Y, Kudo SE, Misawa M. et al. Real-time use of artificial intelligence in identification of diminutive polyps during colonoscopy: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169: 357-366
- 7 Anonymous Anonymous. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: S3-S43
- 8 Fox JP, Tyler JA, Vashi AA. et al. A variation in the value of colectomy for cancer across hospitals: mortality, readmissions, and costs. Surgery 2014; 156: 849-856
- 9 Vleugels JLA, Koens L, Dijkgraaf MGW. et al. Suboptimal endoscopic cancer recognition in colorectal lesions in a national bowel screening programme. Gut 2020; 69: 977-980
- 10 Bisschops R, East JE, Hassan C. et al. Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2019. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 1155-1179
- 11 Kudo SE, Misawa M, Mori Y. et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted system improves endoscopic identification of colorectal neoplasms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 1874-1881
- 12 Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y. et al. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc 2015; 27: 417-434