Download PDF
Gastroenterologie up2date 2021; 17(04): 322-335
DOI: 10.1055/a-1369-5222
Schritt für Schritt

Endoskopische Vakuumtherapie der Anastomoseninsuffizienz – Schritt für Schritt

Marcus Kantowski
,
Karl-Frederick Karstens
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Die endoskopische Vakuumtherapie (EVT) ist ein fester Bestandteil der Therapie postoperativer Anastomoseninsuffizienzen im Gastrointestinaltrakt. In jüngster Zeit wird die EVT auch bei anderen Indikationen wie Perforationen, endoskopisch zugänglichen Abszessen oder enterokutanen Fisteln mit Erfolg angewendet. Dieser Beitrag erläutert schrittweise den Gebrauch der EVT und zeigt die Möglichkeiten, aber auch Risiken und Grenzen der Therapie auf.

Schlüsselwörter

endoskopische Vakuumtherapie - Anastomoseninsuffizienz - innovative Indikationen - Sondenmaterialien - Sogaufbau


Publication History

Article published online:
20 August 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J. et al. Population-based study of risk factors for postoperative death after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 498-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Abdalla S, Cotte E, Epin A. et al. Short-term and long-term outcome of endoluminal vacuum therapy for colorectal or coloanal anastomotic leakage: Results of a nationwide multicenter cohort study from the French GRECCAR group. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63: 371-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kamarajah SK, Lin A, Tharmaraja T. et al. Risk factors and outcomes associated with anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 2020; 33: doz089
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Vermeer TA, Orsini RG, Daams F. et al. Anastomotic leakage and presacral abscess formation after locally advanced rectal cancer surgery: Incidence, risk factors and treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40: 1502-1509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gessler B, Eriksson O, Angenete E. Diagnosis, treatment, and consequences of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32: 549-556
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Verstegen MHP, Bouwense SAW, van Workum F. et al. Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review. World J Emerg Surg 2019; 14: 17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Popivanov GI, Mutafchiyski VM, Cirocchi R. et al. Endoluminal negative pressure therapy in colorectal anastomotic leaks. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22: 243-253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Polese L, Vecchiato M, Frigo AC. et al. Risk factors for colorectal anastomotic stenoses and their impact on quality of life: what are the lessons to learn?. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: e124-e128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kim HR. Stricture following esophageal reconstruction. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 53: 222-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Goenka MK, Goenka U. Endotherapy of leaks and fistula. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7: 702-713
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 de Moura DTH, Sachdev AH, Thompson CC. Endoscopic full-thickness defects and closure techniques. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2018; 16: 386-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bemelman WA, Baron TH. Endoscopic management of transmural defects, including leaks, perforations, and fistulae. Gastroenterology 2018; 154: 1938-1946.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Baptista A, Hourneaux De Moura DT. et al. Efficacy of the cardiac septal occluder in the treatment of post-bariatric surgery leaks and fistulas. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 671-679.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kumar N, Thompson CC. A novel method for endoscopic perforation management by using abdominal exploration and full-thickness sutured closure. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 156-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Loske G, Müller CT. Tips and tricks for endoscopic negative pressure therapy. Chirurg 2019; 90 (Suppl. 01) 7-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Weidenhagen R, Gruetzner KU, Wiecken T. et al. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a new method. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1818-1825
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kuehn F, Loske G, Schiffmann L. et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy for various defects of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 3449-3458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Davydov IA, Larichev AB, Menʼkov KG. [Bacteriologic and cytologic evaluation of vacuum therapy of suppurative wounds]. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek 1988; 141: 48-52
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kostiuchenok BM, Kolker II, Karlov VA. et al. [Vacuum treatment in the surgical management of suppurative wounds]. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek 1986; 137: 18-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38: 563-576 discussion 577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lalezari S, Lee CJ, Borovikova AA. et al. Deconstructing negative pressure wound therapy. Int Wound J 2017; 14: 649-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Scognamiglio P, Reeh M, Karstens K. et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy versus stenting for postoperative esophago-enteric anastomotic leakage: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 632-642
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 do Monte Junior ES, de Moura DTH, Ribeiro IB. et al. ndoscopic vacuum therapy versus endoscopic stenting for upper gastro-intestinal transmural defects: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2020; DOI: 10.1111/den.13813.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kühn F, Janisch F, Schwandner F. et al. Comparison between endoscopic vacuum therapy and conventional treatment for leakage after rectal resection. World J Surg 2020; 44: 1277-1282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Loeck J, von Lücken H-J, Kehrl W. et al. Endoskopische Unterdrucktherapie einer pharyngokutanen Fistel nach Laryngektomie – Erstbeschreibung eines neuen Therapieverfahrens. HNO 2019; 67: 706-709
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Loske G, Lang U, Schorsch T. et al. Komplexe Vakuumtherapie einer abszedierenden Magenperforation: Fallbericht eines innovativen operativ endoskopischen Managements. Chirurg 2015; 86: 486-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Loske G, Rucktaeschel F, Schorsch T. et al. Endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT) for duodenal leakage – novel repair technique using open-pore film (OFD) and polyurethane-foam drainages (OPD). Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E1424-E1431
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Wulfert C-H, Müller CT, Abdel-Kawi AF. et al. Intrauterine negative-pressure therapy (IU-NPT) to treat peritonitis after caesarean section. Innov Surg Sci 2020; 5: 67-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Abstracts GAV. Innov Surg Sci 2017; 2 (Suppl. 01) s1-168
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Loske G, Schorsch T, Rucktaeschel F. et al. Open-pore film drainage (OFD): a new multipurpose tool for endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT). Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E865-871
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Loske G, Schorsch T, Müller C. Prevention of reflux after esophagectomy with endoscopic negative pressure therapy using a new double-lumen open-pore film drainage with an intestinal feeding tube. Endoscopy 2017; 49: E294-E295
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Kantowski M, Kunze A. Neue Strategien und Materialien bei der endoskopischen Vakuumtherapie im unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt. Chirurg 2018; 89: 960-968
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kouladouros K, Belle S, Reissfelder C. et al. Endoscopic negative pressure therapy for leaks with large cavities in the upper gastrointestinal tract: is it a feasible therapeutic option?. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56: 193-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Vogt PM, Kall S, Boorboor P. et al. [Several aspects of foam materials and their possible interactions with the wound surface in the vacuum therapy]. Zentralbl Chir 2004; 129 (Suppl. 01) S92-S94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Morykwas MJ, Faler BJ, Pearce DJ. et al. Effects of varying levels of subatmospheric pressure on the rate of granulation tissue formation in experimental wounds in swine. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 47: 547-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar