Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1353-1774
COVID-19-Pandemie und Versorgung schwer psychisch erkrankter Menschen – Inwieweit wurden die Interessen psychisch erkrankter Menschen in den Schutzverordnungen des Bundes und der Länder berücksichtigt?
COVID-19 Pandemic and Psychiatry – How much have the Interests of People with Psychiatric Disorders been Considered in German Laws?Zusammenfassung
Ziel der Studie Verordnungen während des ersten COVID-19-„Lockdowns“ in Deutschland wurden analysiert bezüglich ihrer Auswirkungen auf psychisch erkrankte Menschen.
Methodik In die Auswertung wurden im Zeitraum 1. März 2020 bis 30. Juni 2020 gültige Verordnungen mit Gesundheitsaspekten einbezogen.
Ergebnisse In insgesamt 344 identifizierbaren Verordnungen wurden psychiatrische Versorgungsstrukturen insgesamt deutlich eingeschränkt, wobei Menschen mit psychischen Krankheiten selten dezidiert erwähnt wurden. Ausmaß und zeitliche Dauer der Einschränkungen unterschieden sich zwischen den Bundesländern.
Schlussfolgerung Die Belange von Menschen mit psychischen Krankheiten sollten zukünftig stärker Berücksichtigung finden.
Abstract
Objective Official regulations during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Germany were analyzed concerning their impact on patients with psychiatric disorders.
Methods All regulations valid between March 1, 2020 and June 30, 2020 with a link to health were included in the analysis.
Results A total of 344 regulations was identified. Psychiatric health care structures were severely limited with significant heterogeneity concerning extent and duration between the different Federal states. In four Federal states, psychiatric hospitals were exempted from providing capacities towards intensive care. Three Federal states loosened visiting limitations for psychiatric patients.
Conclusion During the first lockdown, a broad range of regulations concerning the health care system was adopted often without specifically addressing psychiatric disorders. In the future, the needs of psychiatric patients have to be considered more thoroughly.
* geteilte Senior-Autorenschaft
- Supplementary material
Zusätzliches Material finden Sie unter:
Publication History
Article published online:
24 February 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W. et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 727-733 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017.
- 2 WHO Director General. Opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19. Im Internet: Stand: 01.08.2020 https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020
- 3 Böhmer MM, Buchholz U, Corman VM. et al. Investigation of a COVID-19 outbreak in Germany resulting from a single travel-associated primary case: a case series. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20: 920-928 DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30314-5.
- 4 Carroll WD, Strenger V, Eber E. et al. European and United Kingdom COVID-19 pandemic experience: The same but different. Paediatr Respir Rev 2020; 35: 50-56 DOI: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.06.012.
- 5 Phua J, Weng L, Ling L. et al. Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations. Lancet Resp Med 2020; 8: 506-517 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30161-2.
- 6 Röhr S, Müller F, Jung F. et al. Psychosoziale Folgen von Quarantänemaßnahmen bei schwerwiegenden Coronavirus-Ausbrüchen: ein Rapid Review. Psychiat Prax 2020; 47: 179-189 DOI: 10.1055/a-1159-5562.
- 7 Bohlken J, Schömig F, Seehagen T. et al. Erfahrungen und Belastungserleben niedergelassener Neurologen und Psychiater während der COVID-19-Pandemie. Psychiat Prax 2020; 47: 214-217 DOI: 10.1055/a-1159-5575.
- 8 Rose L, Cook A, Casey J. et al. Restricted family visiting in intensive care during COVID-19. Intens Crit Care Nur 2020; 60: 102896 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102896.
- 9 Frank A, Hörmann S, Krombach J. et al. Psychisch krank in Krisenzeiten: Subjektive Belastungen durch COVID-19. Psychiat Prax 2020; 47: 267-272 DOI: 10.1055/a-1179-4230.
- 10 Webber M, Fendt-Newlin M. A review of social participation interventions for people with mental health problems. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2017; 52: 369-380 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-017-1372-2.
- 11 Wang J, Mann F, Lloyd-Evans B. et al. Associations between loneliness and perceived social support and outcomes of mental health problems: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18: 156 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-018-1736-5.
- 12 Weise J, Schomerus G, Speerforck S. Pandemic and an Attempted Suicide of a Patient with Delusional Disorder. Psychiat Prax 2020; 47: 218-220 DOI: 10.1055/a-1158-1745.
- 13 BAG WfbM – Menschen in Werkstätten. Im Internet: Stand: 14.11.2020 https://www.bagwfbm.de/page/25
- 14 RKI. Covid-19 – Geografische Verteilung der Fälle. Im Internet: Stand: 14.11.2020 https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Situationsberichte/2020-03-31-de.pdf
- 15 Kitano T, Piché-Renaud P-P, Groves HE. et al. Visitor Restriction Policy on Pediatric Wards during Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak: A Survey Study across North America. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2020; DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piaa126.
- 16 Andrist E, Clarke RG, Harding M. Paved With Good Intentions: Hospital Visitation Restrictions in the Age of Coronavirus Disease 2019. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; 21: e924-e926 DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002506.
- 17 Liu Y-A, Hsu Y-C, Lin M-H. et al. Hospital visiting policies in the time of coronavirus disease 2019: A nationwide website survey in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc 2020; 83: 566-570 DOI: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000326.
- 18 Han E, Tan MMJ, Turk E. et al. Lessons learnt from easing COVID-19 restrictions: an analysis of countries and regions in Asia Pacific and Europe. Lancet 2020; 396: 1525-1534 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32007-9.
- 19 Zhang Y, Sun Z, Latour JM. et al. Hospital response to the COVID‐19 outbreak: The experience in Shanghai, China. J Adv Nurs 2020; 76: 1483-1485 DOI: 10.1111/jan.14364.
- 20 S3-Leitlinie Psychosoziale Therapien bei schweren psychischen Erkrankungen: S3-Praxisleitlinien in Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-58284-8
- 21 Armitage R, Nellums LB. The COVID-19 response must be disability inclusive. Lancet Public Health 2020; 5: e257 DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30076-1.
- 22 Kuper H, Banks LM, Bright T. et al. Disability-inclusive COVID-19 response: What it is, why it is important and what we can learn from the United Kingdom’s response. Wellcome Open Res 2020; 5 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15833.1.
- 23 Carta MG, Nardi AE, Bhugra D. New technologies for social inclusion of people with psychosocial disabilities in the era of COVID-19 and beyond. Braz J Psychiatry 2020; DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2020-1175.
- 24 Willner P, Rose J, Stenfert Kroese B. et al. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of carers of people with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2020; 33: 1523-1533 DOI: 10.1111/jar.12811.
- 25 Kallert T, Gühne U, Harter C. et al. Versorgungsstrukturen in der Psychiatrie. In: Möller H-J, Laux G, Kapfhammer H-P. Hrsg. Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik, Psychotherapie. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2016: 1-35 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45028-0_54-1
- 26 Fegert JM, Baumeister H, Brieger P. et al. Mental Health Research – „Lost in Translation?“. Psychiat Prax 2019; 46: 70-72 DOI: 10.1055/a-0851-5216.
- 27 The impact of COVID-19 on mental, neurological and substance use services: results of a rapid assessment. Im Internet: Stand: 14.11.2020 https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/335838