Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2021; 42(06): 494-496
DOI: 10.1055/a-1342-7708
Review

Are We Exploring the Potential Role of Specialized Techniques in Muscle Hypertrophy?

Witalo Kassiano 
1   Metabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, Londrina State University, Londrina, Brazil
,
Bruna Daniella de Vasconcelos Costa 
1   Metabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, Londrina State University, Londrina, Brazil
,
João Pedro Nunes 
1   Metabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, Londrina State University, Londrina, Brazil
,
Andreo Fernando Aguiar
2   University of Northern Paraná, Londrina, PR, Brazil
,
Belmiro F. de Salles
3   Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Alex Silva Ribeiro
1   Metabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, Londrina State University, Londrina, Brazil
2   University of Northern Paraná, Londrina, PR, Brazil
› Author Affiliations Funding: No external sources of funding were used in the preparation of this article.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Specialized resistance training techniques (e.g., drop-set, rest-pause) are commonly used by well-trained subjects for maximizing muscle hypertrophy. Most of these techniques were designed to allow a greater training volume (i.e., total repetitions×load), due to the supposition that it elicits greater muscle mass gains. However, many studies that compared the traditional resistance training configuration with specialized techniques seek to equalize the volume between groups, making it difficult to determine the inherent hypertrophic potential of these advanced strategies, as well as, this equalization restricts part of the practical extrapolation on these findings. In this scenario, the objectives of this manuscript were 1) to present the nuance of the evidence that deals with the effectiveness of these specialized resistance training techniques and — primarily — to 2) propose possible ways to explore the hypertrophic potential of such strategies with greater ecological validity without losing the methodological rigor of controlling possible intervening variables; and thus, contributing to increasing the applicability of the findings and improving the effectiveness of hypertrophy-oriented resistance training programs.

Key words

muscle mass - strength training - resistance-trained subjects - resistance training configurations


Publication History

Received: 03 August 2020

Accepted: 15 December 2020

Article published online:
27 January 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Joanisse S, Lim C, McKendry J. et al. Recent advances in understanding resistance exercise training-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy in humans. F1000Res 2020; 9: F1000 Faculty Rev-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 ACSM. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 687-708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Figueiredo VC, De Salles BF, Trajano GS. Volume for muscle hypertrophy and health outcomes: the most effective variable in resistance training. Sports Med 2017; 48: 499-505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Schoenfeld BJ. The use of specialized training techniques to maximize muscle hypertrophy. Strength Cond J 2011; 33: 60-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ribeiro AS, Nunes JP, Cunha PM. et al. Potential role of pre-exhaustion training in maximizing muscle hypertrophy: A review of the literature. Strength Cond J 2019; 41: 75-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Stragier S, Baudry S, Carpentier A. et al. Efficacy of a new strength training design: The 3/7 method. Eur J Appl Physiol 2019; 119: 1093-1104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Nunes JP, Costa BDV, Kassiano W. et al. Different foot positioning during calf training to induce portion-specific gastrocnemius muscle hypertrophy. J Strength Cond Res 2020; 34: 2347-2351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Schoenfeld B, Grgic J. Can drop set training enhance muscle growth?. Strength Cond J 2018; 40: 95-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Schoenfeld B, Grgic J. Evidence-based guidelines for resistance training volume to maximize muscle hypertrophy. Strength Cond J 2018; 40: 107-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Angleri V, Ugrinowitsch C, Libardi CA. Crescent pyramid and drop-set systems do not promote greater strength gains, muscle hypertrophy, and changes on muscle architecture compared with traditional resistance training in well-trained men. Eur J Appl Physiol 2017; 117: 359-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ozaki H, Kubota A, Natsume T. et al. Effects of drop sets with resistance training on increases in muscle CSA, strength, and endurance: A pilot study. J Sports Sci 2018; 36: 691-696
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Prestes J, Tibana RA, Sousa E. et al. Strength and muscular adaptations following 6 weeks of rest-pause versus traditional multiple-sets resistance training in trained subjects. J Strength Cond Res 2019; 33: S113-S121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Dankel SJ, Jessee MB, Mattocks KT. et al. Training to fatigue: The answer for standardization when assessing muscle hypertrophy?. Sports Med 2017; 47: 1021-1027
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Dankel SJ, Mattocks KT, Jessee MB. et al. Do metabolites that are produced during resistance exercise enhance muscle hypertrophy?. Eur J Appl Physiol 2017; 117: 2125-2135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Goto K, Nagasawa M, Yanagisawa O. et al. Muscular adaptations to combinations of high- and low-intensity resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18: 730-737
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Walker S, Blazevich AJ, Haff GG. et al. Greater strength gains after training with accentuated eccentric than traditional isoinertial loads in aready strength-trained men. Front Physiol 2016; 7: 149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 English KL, Loehr JA, Lee SM. et al. Early-phase musculoskeletal adaptations to different levels of eccentric resistance after 8 weeks of lower body training. Eur J Appl Physiol 2014; 114: 2263-2280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Aguiar AF, Buzzachera CF, Pereira RM. et al. A single set of exhaustive exercise before resistance training improves muscular performance in young men. Eur J Appl Physiol 2015; 115: 1589-1599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fink J, Schoenfeld BJ, Kikuchi N. et al. Effects of drop set resistance training on acute stress indicators and long-term muscle hypertrophy and strength. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2018; 58: 597-605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ribeiro AS, Aguiar AF, Schoenfeld BJ. et al. Effects of different resistance training systems on muscular strength and hypertrophy in resistance-trained older women. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 32: 545-553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Nunes JP, Pina FLC, Ribeiro AS. et al. Responsiveness to muscle mass gain following 12 and 24 weeks of resistance training in older women. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; Online ahead of print DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01587-z.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Roberts MD, Haun CT, Mobley CB. et al. Physiological differences between low versus high skeletal muscle hypertrophic responders to resistance exercise training: current perspectives and future research directions. Front Physiol 2018; 9: 834
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Harriss DJ, MacSween A, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar