Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1322-2638
High sensitivity of ROSE-supported ERCP-guided brushing for biliary strictures
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) plays a major role in biliary strictures, with brushing being a cheap and fast method to acquire a cytological specimen, despite a sensitivity around 45 %. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is widely used for endoscopic ultrasound-acquired cytological specimen adequacy, improving its sensitivity and specificity. Nevertheless, no study has evaluated its role for ERCP-guided brushing. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic yield of ERCP-guided brushing of biliary strictures when supported by ROSE.
Patients and methods This was a retrospective single-center study that included patients undergoing ERCP-guided brush cytology supported by ROSE for biliary strictures. Recorded data included patient clinical-radiological and ERCP features. Final diagnosis was determined after surgery, intraductal biopsy or adequate follow-up. The diagnostic yield was calculated and a subgroup analysis for factors associated with false-negative or true-positive results was performed.
Results Two hundred six patients were included, 57.3 % males, median age 72 years, 77.2 % having extrahepatic biliary strictures. Of the patients, 99 % had an adequate sample at ROSE after a mean of 2.6 passages. The diagnostic yield was accuracy 83 %, sensitivity 74.6 %, and specificity 98 %, positive and negative predictive values 98 % and 71 % respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.86. A diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma was significantly more frequent among true-positive cases (68 % vs 46.8 %; P = 0.04).
Conclusions This is the first study evaluating the use of ROSE as support for ERCP-guided brushing of biliary strictures, with a sensitivity far higher than those reported for brushing alone and at least comparable to those of more expensive and invasive techniques.
Publication History
Received: 12 August 2020
Accepted: 21 October 2020
Article published online:
19 February 2021
© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Roos E, Strijker M, Franken LC. et al. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between anatomical subtypes of resected biliary tract cancer in a Western high-volume center. HPB (Oxford) 2020; 22: 405-414
- 2 Balzano G, Zerbi A, Capretti G. et al. Effect of hospital volume on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 357-362
- 3 Bowlus C, Olson K, Gershwin E. Evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 13: 28-37
- 4 Tummala P, Munigala S, Eloubeidi MA. et al. Patients with obstructive jaundice and biliary stricture ± mass lesion on imaging: prevalence of malignancy and potential role of EUS-FNA. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 47: 532-537
- 5 Novikov A, Kowalski TE, Loren DE. Practical Management of Indeterminate Biliary Strictures. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2019; 29: 205-214
- 6 Navaneethan U, Njei B, Lourdusamy V. et al. Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 168-176
- 7 Burnett AS, Calvert TJ, Chokshi RJ. Sensitivity of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography standard cytology: 10-y review of the literature. J Surg Res 2013; 184: 304-311
- 8 Testoni PA, Mangiavillano B. Optical coherence tomography in detection of dysplasia and cancer of the gastrointestinal tract and bilio-pancreatic ductal system. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 6444-6452
- 9 Kushnir VM, Mullady DK, Das K. et al. The diagnostic yield of malignancy comparing cytology, FISH, and molecular analysis of cell free cytology brush supernatant in patients with biliary strictures undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC): a prospective study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2019; 53: 686-692
- 10 Badshah MB, Vanar V, Kandula M. et al. Peroral cholangioscopy with cholangioscopy-directed biopsies in the diagnosis of biliary malignancies: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 31: 935-940
- 11 de Vries AB, van der Heide F, Ter Steege RWF. et al. Limited diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy for indeterminate biliary strictures. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 107-114
- 12 Iglesias-Garcia J, Lariño-Noia J, Abdulkader I. et al. Rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic-ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of pancreatic masses. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 9451-9457
- 13 Han S, Tatman P, Mehrotra S. et al. Combination of ERCP-Based Modalities Increases Diagnostic Yield for Biliary Strictures. Dig Dis Sci 2020; DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06335-x.
- 14 Jang S, Stevens T, Kou L. et al. Efficacy of digital single-operator cholangioscopy and factors affecting its accuracy in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary stricture. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 385-393.e1
- 15 Ali S, Hawes RH, Kadkhodayan K. et al. Utility of rapid onsite evaluation of touch imprint cytology from endoscopic and cholangioscopic forceps biopsy sampling (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 340-344
- 16 Roth GS, Bichard P, Fior-Gozlan M. et al. Performance of bile aspiration plus brushing to diagnose malignant biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E997-E1003
- 17 Kendall T, Verheij J, Gaudio E. et al. Anatomical, histomorphological and molecular classification of cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Int 2019; 39: 7-18
- 18 van Riet PA, Cahen DL, Poley JW. et al. Mapping international practice patterns in EUS-guided tissue sampling: outcome of a global survey. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E360-E370
- 19 Kobayashi M, Ryozawa S, Araki R. et al. Investigation of Factors Affecting the Sensitivity of Bile Duct Brush Cytology. Intern Med 2019; 58: 329-335
- 20 Fior-Gozlan M, Giovannini D, Rabeyrin M. et al. Monocentric study of bile aspiration associated with biliary brushing performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 239 patients with symptomatic biliary stricture. Cancer Cytopathol 2016; 124: 330-339
- 21 Curcio G, Granata A, Barresi L. et al. Bile intraductal aspiration (BIDA): a fast method for bile collection. Endoscopy 2012; 44: E230-E231
- 22 Petrone MC, Arcidiacono PG, Carrara S. et al. Does cytotechnician training influence the accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic masses?. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44: 311-314
- 23 Deprez PH, Garces Duran R, Moreels T. et al. The economic impact of using single-operator cholangioscopy for the treatment of difficult bile duct stones and diagnosis of indeterminate bile duct strictures. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 109-118
- 24 Singhi AD, Nikiforova MN, Chennat J. et al. Integrating next-generation sequencing to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-obtained biliary specimens improves the detection and management of patients with malignant bile duct strictures. Gut 2020; 69: 52-61