PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2021; 09(06): E927-E933
DOI: 10.1055/a-1320-0041
Original article

ERCP improves mortality in acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis

Aleksey A. Novikov
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Doylestown Hospital, Doylestown, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Jennifer H. Fieber
2   Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Monica Saumoy
3   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Russell Rosenblatt
4   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States
,
Shirley A. Cohen Mekelburg
5   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
,
Shawn L. Shah
4   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States
,
Carl V. Crawford Jr
4   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background and study aims Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an increasingly common indication for hospitalization in the United States. The necessity for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and the timing of ERCP in acute gallstone-related pancreatitis without cholangitis (AGPNC) is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of ERCP and its performance during admission with mortality and length of stay (LOS) in patients with AGPNC.

Patients and methods We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2004 to 2014 to identify all patients with admissions for gallstone AP. We excluded patients with chronic pancreatitis or concurrent cholangitis, and those who were transferred from elsewhere for treatment. Our primary outcome measure was inpatient mortality. Our secondary outcome measure was hospital length of stay (LOS).

Results We identified 491,011 records eligible for analysis. Of the patients, 30.6 % (150,101) had AGPNC. There were 1.34 deaths per 100 admissions in patients with AGPNC. The average LOS was 5.88 (± 6.38) days with a median stay of 4 days (range, 3–7). When adjusted for age, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and severe pancreatitis, patients with ERCP during admission were 43 % less likely to die. ERCP performed between Days 3 and 9 of hospitalization resulted in a significant mortality benefit. Among those who had ERCP, a shorter wait time for ERCP was associated with a shorter LOS after adjustment for demographics and severity of illness.

Conclusion ERCP performed during inpatient admission for AGPNC was associated with decreased mortality. These data support early ERCP in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis without cholangitis.

Supplementary material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 31. Januar 2020

Angenommen: 23. September 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. Mai 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Peery AF, Crockett SD, Barritt AS. et al. Burden of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology 2015; 149: 1731-1741e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Russo MW, Wei JT, Thiny MT. et al. Digestive and liver diseases statistics, 2004. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 1448-1453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hirano T, Manabe T. A possible mechanism for gallstone pancreatitis: repeated short-term pancreaticobiliary duct obstruction with exocrine stimulation in rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1993; 202: 246-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Acosta JM, Rossi R, Galli OM. et al. Early surgery for acute gallstone pancreatitis: evaluation of a systematic approach. Surgery 1978; 83: 367-370
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Senninger N, Moody FG, Coelho JC. et al. The role of biliary obstruction in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis in the opossum. Surgery 1986; 99: 688-693
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, London NJ. et al. Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones. Lancet 1988; 2: 979-983
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fan ST, Lai EC, Mok FP. et al. Early treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotomy. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 228-232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Nowak A, Nowakowska-Dulawa E, Marek TA. Department of Gastroenterology, Silesian University School of Medical Sciences. et al. Final results of the prospective, randomized, controlled study on endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conventional management in acute biliary pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 1995; 108: A380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sharma VK, Howden CW. Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 3211-3214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tse F, Yuan Y. Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012: CD009779
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J. et al. American College of Gastroenterology Guideline: Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 1400-1415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2013; 13: e1-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Crockett SD, Wani S, Gardner TB. et al. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on Initial Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2018; 154: 1096-1101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 HCUP National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). 2004–2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Rockville, MD: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp Please see in: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/tech_assist/citations.jsp
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chen Y, Zak Y, Hernandez-Boussard T. et al. The epidemiology of idiopathic acute pancreatitis, analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample from 1998 to 2007. Pancreas 2013; 42: 1-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C. et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62: 102-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kerlin MP, Weissman GE, Wonneberger KA. et al. Validation of administrative definitions of invasive mechanical ventilation across 30 intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 194: 1548-1552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Yamana H, Horiguchi H, Fushimi K. et al. Comparison of procedure-based and diagnosis-based identifications of severe sepsis and disseminated intravascular coagulation in administrative data. J Epidemiol 2016; 26: 530-537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Brown JR, Rezaee ME, Nichols EL. et al. Incidence and in-hospital mortality of acute kidney injury (AKI) and dialysis-requiring AKI (AKI-D) after cardiac catheterization in the National inpatient sample. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5: e002739
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 McNabb-Baltar J, Trinh QD, Barkun AN. Biliary drainage method and temporal trends in patients admitted with cholangitis: A national audit. Can J Gastroenterol 2013; 27: 513-518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Mazen Jamal M, Yoon EJ, Saadi A. et al. Trends in the utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 966-975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. ICD - ICD-9-CM - International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. Classif Dis Funct Disabil 2013; 2008: 1-2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wormer BA, Swan RZ, Williams KB. et al. Outcomes of pancreatic debridement in acute pancreatitis: Analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample from 1998 to 2010. Am J Surg 2014; 208: 350-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Forsmark CE, Swaroop Vege S, Wilcox CM. Acute Pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 1972-1981
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chen H-J, Wang J-J, Tsay W-I. et al. Epidemiology and outcome of acute pancreatitis in end-stage renal disease dialysis patients: a 10-year national cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2017; 32: 1731-1736
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR. et al. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 1998; 36: 8-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Cleves MA. From the help desk: Comparing areas under receiver operating characteristic curves from two or more probit or logit models. Stata J 2002; 2: 301-313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Suárez EL, Pérez CM, Nogueras GM. et al. Biostatistics in Public Health Using STATA. CRC Press; 2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Chen P, Hu B, Wang C. et al. Pilot study of urgent endoscopic intervention without fluoroscopy on patients with severe acute biliary pancreatitis in the intensive care unit. Pancreas 2010; 39: 398-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Oría A, Cimmino D, Ocampo C. et al. Early endoscopic intervention versus early conservative management in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis and biliopancreatic obstruction: A randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2007; 245: 10-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Fölsch UR, Nitsche R, Lüdtke R. et al. Early ERCP and papillotomy compared with conservative treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis. The German Study Group on Acute Biliary Pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 237-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Schepers NJ, Bakker OJ, Besselink MGH. et al. Early biliary decompression versus conservative treatment in acute biliary pancreatitis (APEC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2016; 17: 5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar