Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.1055/a-1230-3586
An international survey on recognition and characterization of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00025476/202010/lookinside/thumbnails/1889_10-1055-a-1230-3586-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background and study aims Atrophic gastritis (AG) and intestinal metaplasia (IM) are premalignant conditions of gastric cancer and endoscopic recognition and characterization may help in stratifying the gastric cancer risk for screening and surveillance. However, there is currently lack of consensus in defining the severity of AG and IM. We aimed to conduct an international survey to understand the current practice of endoscopists worldwide.
Methods An online survey was designed to collect data regarding participants’ practice in endoscopic assessment of AG & IM. A test using images was conducted to evaluate the difference in accuracy of characterization of AG & IM.
Results From July to October 2017, 249 endoscopists responded to the survey. Around 70 % of participants received some form of training on recognition of AG & IM. There was significant variety in the training received across different continents. One hundred seventy-six participants (70 %) would document the presence of both AG and IM, but the classification systems used were inconsistent between endoscopists. Overall accuracy in diagnosis of AG & IM in the image test was 84.5 % and 80.7 % respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher among Japanese and Korean endoscopists compared to the rest of the world.
Conclusion Training regarding endoscopic recognition of AG & IM differs significantly in different parts of the world. The difference in diagnostic accuracy for these premalignant gastric conditions may also explain the discrepancy in the early cancer detection rates among different countries. A simple unified classification system may be beneficial for better stratification of cancer risks.
Publication History
Received: 05 April 2020
Accepted: 28 May 2020
Article published online:
22 September 2020
© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424
- 2 Noguchi Y, Yoshikawa T, Tsuburaya A. et al. Is gastric carcinoma different between Japan and the United States?. Cancer 2000; 89: 2237-2246
- 3 Pimentel-Nunes P, Libanio D, Marcos-Pinto R. et al. Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS II): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) guideline update 2019. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 365-388
- 4 Correa P. Human gastric carcinogenesis: a multistep and multifactorial process -- First American Cancer Society Award Lecture on Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Cancer Res 1992; 52: 6735-6740
- 5 Rugge M, Meggio A, Pennelli G. et al. Gastritis staging in clinical practice: the OLGA staging system. Gut 2007; 56: 631-636
- 6 Kamada T, Haruma K, Inoue K. et al. [Helicobacter pylori infection and endoscopic gastritis -Kyoto classification of gastritis]. Japanese J Gastroenterol 2015; 112: 982-993
- 7 Capelle LG, de Vries AC, Haringsma J. et al. The staging of gastritis with the OLGA system by using intestinal metaplasia as an accurate alternative for atrophic gastritis. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1150-1158
- 8 Esposito G, Pimentel-Nunes P, Angeletti S. et al. Endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM): a multicenter validation study. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 515-521
- 9 Kimura K, Takemoto T. An endoscopic recognition of the atrophic border and its significance in chronic gastritis. Endoscopy 1969; 1: 87-97
- 10 Lage J, Uedo N, Dinis-Ribeiro M. et al. Surveillance of patients with gastric precancerous conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 30: 913-922
- 11 Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH. et al. Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathology 1996; 20: 1161-1181
- 12 Kono S, Gotoda T, Yoshida S. et al. Can endoscopic atrophy predict histological atrophy? Historical study in United Kingdom and Japan. . World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 13113-13123
- 13 Kanemitsu T, Yao K, Nagahama T. et al. Extending magnifying NBI diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia in the stomach: the white opaque substance marker. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 529-535
- 14 Uedo N, Ishihara R, Iishi H. et al. A new method of diagnosing gastric intestinal metaplasia: narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 819-824