Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) – eine Übersicht

Zusammenfassung

PROMs sind Fragebogen-Instrumente, mit denen ein Patient kostengünstig und ohne relevanten medizinischen Personalaufwand mittels Selbstevaluation den Funktionellen Status eines Organsystemes erheben kann. In Bereich der Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie stehen mittlerweile eine Vielfalt an PROMs für verschiedene Fragestellungen zur Verfügung. Mit PROMS kann ein objektives Feedback über den Krankheits-/Heilungsverlauf erstellt werden. Hiermit können individuelle Behandlungsverläufe überwacht werden, aber auch Daten für wissenschaftliche oder gesundheitsökonomische Auswertungen generiert werden.

Abstract

PROMs are questionnaire instruments with which a patient can ascertain the functional status of an organ system by means of self-evaluation at low cost and without relevant medical personnel effort. In the field of trauma surgery and orthopedics, a variety of PROMs are now available for different questions. With PROMS an objective feedback about the course of the disease/healing process can be created. This can be used to monitor individual courses of treatment, but also to generate data for scientific or health economic evaluations.

Schlüsselwörter

PROM - Patient reported outcome meassures - Selbstevaluation - Fragebogen

Key words

PROM - patient reported outcome meassures - self evaluation - questionnaire

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
10. November 2020

• Literatur

• 1 Kärrholm J. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (www.shpr.se). Acta Orthop 2010; 81: 3-4 http://www.shpr.se Acta Orthop 2010; 81: 3–4
• 2 AUC – Akademie der Unfallchirurgie, Arbeitskreis AltersTraumaRegister DGU® . Das AltersTraumaRegister DGU^® – aktueller Stand, Methodik und Publikationsrichtlinie. Unfallchirurg 2019; 122: 820-822
• 3 Waljee J, McGlinn EP, Sears ED. et al. Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 2014; 155: 799-808
• 4 Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA 1999; 282: 1737-1744
• 5 Nelson EC, Eftimovska E, Lind C. et al. Patient reported outcome measures in practice. BMJ 2015; 350: g7818
• 6 Porter M, Lee T. The Strategy That Will Fix Health Care. Harvard Business Review 2013; 91: 1-19
• 7 Raspe H. Value-based health care (VbHC): woher und wohin?. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2018; 130: 8-12
• 8 Matthes N. USA: Qualitätsbasierte Vergütung verbessert das Outcome. Dtsch Arztebl 2019; 116: A-248
• 9 Wilson I, Bohm E, Lübbeke A. et al. Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures. EFORT Open Rev 2019; 4: 357-367
• 10 Czypionka T, Achleitner S. Patient Reported Outcome and Experience Measures. 2018. Im Internet (Stand: 22.10.2020): https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Patient-Reported-Outcome-and-Experience-Measures-Czypionka-Achleitner/bce5373174bafe7dcf56265bf8a3b5792e0ec677
• 11 Rabin R, De Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001; 33: 337-343
• 12 Wille N, Badia X, Bonsel G. et al. Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res 2010; 19: 875-886
• 13 Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ 1993; 2: 217-227
• 14 Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher A, Gore S. et al. Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment. BMJ 1992; 305: 1074-1077
• 15 Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; (214) 160-164
• 16 Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 1996; 29: 602-608
• 17 Schmidutz F, Beirer M, Braunstein V. et al. The Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ): development and validation of an effective patient-reported tool for outcome measurement and patient safety in shoulder surgery. Patient Saf Surg 2012; 6: 9
• 18 Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 593-600
• 19 Roach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N. et al. Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res 1991; 4: 143-149
• 20 Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H. et al. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med 1998; 26: 764-772
• 21 Beirer M, Friese H, Lenich A. et al. The Elbow Self-Assessment Score (ESAS): development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measurement tool for elbow disorders. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25: 2230-2236
• 22 MacDermid JC. Outcome evaluation in patients with elbow pathology: issues in instrument development and evaluation. J Hand Ther 2001; 14: 105-114
• 23 King GJ, Adams RA, Morrey BF. Total elbow arthroplasty: revision with use of a non-custom semiconstrained prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79: 394-400
• 24 Morrey BF, Adams RA. Semiconstrained arthroplasty for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: 479-490
• 25 Dawson J, Doll H, Boller I. et al. The development and validation of a patient-reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 466-473
• 26 Schneeberger AG, Kösters MC, Steens W. Comparison of the subjective elbow value and the Mayo elbow performance score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23: 308-312
• 27 Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR. et al. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 1998; 23: 575-587
• 28 Beirer M, Serly J, Vester H. et al. The Munich Wrist Questionnaire (MWQ) – development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measurement tool for wrist disorders. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17: 167
• 29 MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS. et al. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma 1998; 12: 577-586
• 30 Bendebba M, Heller J, Ducker TB. et al. Cervical spine outcomes questionnaire: its development and psychometric properties. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 2116-2123
• 31 Bendebba M, Dizerega GS, Long DM. The Lumbar Spine Outcomes Questionnaire: its development and psychometric properties. Spine J 2007; 7: 118-132
• 32 Daltroy LH, Cats-Baril WL, Katz JN. et al. The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment Instrument: reliability and validity tests. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996; 21: 741-749
• 33 Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB. et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980; 66: 271-273
• 34 Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969; 51: 737-755
• 35 Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klässbo M. et al. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)–validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 10
• 36 Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 185-190
• 37 McConnell S, Kolopack P, Davis AM. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 45: 453-461
• 38 Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL. et al. Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29: 600-613
• 39 Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS. et al. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)–development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 28: 88-96
• 40 Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 1982; 10: 150-154
• 41 Beirer M, Fiedler N, Huber S. et al. The Munich Knee Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Tool for Knee Disorders. Arthroscopy 2015; 31: 1522-1529
• 42 Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D. et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80: 63-69
• 43 Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (198) 43-49
• 44 Sihvonen R, Järvelä T, Aho H. et al. Validation of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) for patients with a degenerative meniscal tear: a meniscal pathology-specific quality-of-life index. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94: e65
• 45 Domsic RT, Saltzman CL. Ankle osteoarthritis scale. Foot Ankle Int 1998; 19: 466-471
• 46 Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS. et al. Clinical Rating Systems for the Ankle-Hindfoot, Midfoot, Hallux, and Lesser Toes. Foot Ankle Int 1994; 15: 349-353
• 47 Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 561-570
• 48 Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for Ankle Ligament Reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 2001; 22: 788-794
• 49 Martin R, Irrgang J, Burdett R. et al. Evidence of validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int 2005; 26: 968-983
• 50 Hale SA, Hertel J. Reliability and Sensitivity of the Foot and Ankle Disability Index in Subjects With Chronic Ankle Instability. J Athl Train 2005; 40: 35-40
• 51 Karlsson J, Peterson L. Evaluation of ankle joint function: the use of a scoring scale. Foot 1991; 1: 15-19
• 52 Greve F, Braun KF, Vitzthum V. et al. The Munich Ankle Questionnaire (MAQ): a self-assessment tool for a comprehensive evaluation of ankle disorders. Eur J Med Res 2018; 23: 46
• 53 Olerud C, Molander H. A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1984; 103: 190-194
• 54 Karsten MM, Speiser D, Hartmann C. et al. Web-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes Using the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement Dataset in a Major German University Hospital: Observational Study. JMIR Cancer 2018; 4: e11373
• 55 Zhu R, Zhou Z. A real-time articulated human motion tracking using tri-axis inertial/magnetic sensors package. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2004; 12: 295-302
• 56 Johnson LB, Sumner S, Duong T. et al. Validity and reliability of smartphone magnetometer-based goniometer evaluation of shoulder abduction – A pilot study. Man Ther 2015; 20: 777-782
• 57 Mejia-Hernandez K, Chang A, Eardley-Harris N. et al. Smartphone applications for the evaluation of pathologic shoulder range of motion and shoulder scores–a comparative study. JSES Open Access 2018; 2: 109-114
• 58 Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Education 2017; 17: 137-144
• 59 Hostettler S, Kraft E, Bosshard C. Patient-reported outcome measures: die Patientensicht zählt. Schweiz Ärzteztg 2018; 99: 1348-1352