Download PDF
Endoscopy 2020; 52(10): 824-832
DOI: 10.1055/a-1178-9741
Systematic review

ERCP with overtube-assisted enteroscopy in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jagpal Singh Klair
1   Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
,
Mahendran Jayaraj
2   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
,
Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar
3   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
,
Harshith Priyan
4   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Joanna Law
1   Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
,
Arvind R. Murali
5   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, United States
,
Dhruv Singh
4   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Michael Larsen
1   Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
,
Shayan Irani
1   Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
,
Richard Kozarek
1   Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
,
Andrew Ross
1   Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
,
Rajesh Krishnamoorthi
1   Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Referred to by:

Author commentary on Jagpal Singh Klair et al.Endoscopy 2020; 52(10): v35-v35
DOI: 10.1055/a-1209-0435

Abstract

Background Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) anatomy is challenging. Overtube-assisted enteroscopy (OAE) is usually needed to perform ERCP in these patients. There is significant variation in the reported rates of success and adverse events across published studies. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to reliably estimate the pooled rates of success and adverse events.

Methods We performed a systematic search of multiple electronic databases through February 2020 to identify studies reporting outcomes of OAE-ERCP in post-RYGB patients. The pooled rates of enteroscopy success, technical success, and adverse events were estimated for OAE-ERCP. The pooled rates of success and adverse events were also estimated for ERCP using double-balloon enteroscopes (DBE) alone.

Results 10 studies reporting a total of 398 procedures were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled rates of enteroscopy and technical success of OAE-ERCP were 75.3 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 64.5 – 83.6) and 64.8 % (95 %CI 53.1 – 74.9) respectively. The pooled rate of adverse events was 8.0 % (95 %CI 5.2 – 12.2). The pooled rates of enteroscopy and technical success of DBE-ERCP (four studies) were 83.5 % (95 %CI 68.3 – 92.2) and 72.5 % (95 %CI 52.3 – 86.4), respectively. The pooled rate of adverse events with DBE-ERCP was 9.0 % (95 %CI 5.4 – 14.5). Substantial heterogeneity was noted.

Conclusions OAE-ERCP appears to be effective and safe in post-RYGB patients. Among the currently available techniques, OAE-ERCP is the least invasive approach in this challenging group of patients. Future studies comparing the effectiveness and safety of alternative novel techniques, such as endosonography-directed transgastric ERCP, with OAE-ERCP are needed.

Supplementary material



Publication History

Received: 21 December 2019

Accepted: 22 April 2020

Article published online:
03 June 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Ali MF, Modayil R, Gurram KC. et al. Spiral enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in bariatric-length Roux-en-Y anatomy: a large single-center series and review of the literature (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 1241-1247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nguyen NT, Root J, Zainabadi K. et al. Accelerated growth of bariatric surgery with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 1198-1202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Pories WJ. Bariatric surgery: risks and rewards. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93 : S89-S96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 2005; 294: 1909-1917
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Stellato TA, Crouse C, Hallowell PT. Bariatric surgery: creating new challenges for the endoscopist. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 86-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hamdan K, Somers S, Chand M. Management of late postoperative complications of bariatric surgery. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1345-1355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Shiffman ML, Sugerman HJ, Kellum JH. et al. Gallstones in patients with morbid obesity. Relationship to body weight, weight loss and gallbladder bile cholesterol solubility. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1993; 17: 153-158
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Committee AT, Tierney WM, Adler DG. et al. Overtube use in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 828-834
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Haber GB. Double balloon endoscopy for pancreatic and biliary access in altered anatomy (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66 (03) S47-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kashani A, Abboud G, Lo SK. et al. Double balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy: expert vs. novice experience. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E885-E891
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ross AS. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the surgically modified gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2009; 19: 497-507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bukhari M, Kowalski T, Nieto J. et al. An international, multicenter, comparative trial of EUS-guided gastrogastrostomy-assisted ERCP versus enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88: 486-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Choi EK, Chiorean MV, Cote GA. et al. ERCP via gastrostomy vs. double balloon enteroscopy in patients with prior bariatric Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 2894-2899
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Khashab MA, El Zein MH, Sharzehi K. et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage or enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with surgical anatomy and biliary obstruction: an international comparative study. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E1322-E1327
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lennon AM, Kapoor S, Khashab M. et al. Spiral assisted ERCP is equivalent to single balloon assisted ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 1391-1398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Osoegawa T, Motomura Y, Akahoshi K. et al. Improved techniques for double-balloon-enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 6843-6849
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Saleem A, Baron TH, Gostout CJ. et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a single-balloon enteroscope in patients with altered Roux-en-Y anatomy. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 656-660
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Schreiner MA, Chang L, Gluck M. et al. Laparoscopy-assisted versus balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in bariatric post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 748-756
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Shah RJ, Smolkin M, Yen R. et al. A multicenter, U.S. experience of single-balloon, double-balloon, and rotational overtube-assisted enteroscopy ERCP in patients with surgically altered pancreaticobiliary anatomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 593-600
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Shimatani M, Matsushita M, Takaoka M. et al. Effective “short” double-balloon enteroscope for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy: a large case series. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 849-854
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Siddiqui AA, Chaaya A, Shelton C. et al. Utility of the short double-balloon enteroscope to perform pancreaticobiliary interventions in patients with surgically altered anatomy in a US multicenter study. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 858-864
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kumar U, Kroner PT, Jovanovic I. et al. Sa2016 Balloon-overtube enteroscopy assisted (BAE) versus laparoscopy-assisted ERCP in bariatric post- Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients: a comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: AB298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kedia P, Kumta NA, Widmer J. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) for Roux-en-Y anatomy: a novel technique. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 159-163
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lopes TL, Clements RH, Wilcox CM. Laparoscopy-assisted ERCP: experience of a high-volume bariatric surgery center (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 1254-1259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Saleem A, Levy MJ, Petersen BT. et al. Laparoscopic assisted ERCP in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 203-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Tyberg A, Nieto J, Salgado S. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or EUS: mid-term analysis of an emerging procedure. Clin Endosc 2017; 50: 185-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook of systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011 Available from: www.handbook.cochrane.org
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264-269
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R. et al. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991; 337: 867-872
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R. et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence – inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 1294-1302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Adler DG, Lieb JG, Cohen J. et al. Quality indicators for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 54-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar