Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2020; 08(03): E291-E300
DOI: 10.1055/a-1067-4563
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020

Self-expanding metal stents versus TIPS in treatment of refractory bleeding esophageal varices: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Babu P. Mohan
1   Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona, United States
,
Saurabh Chandan
2   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
,
Shahab R. Khan
1   Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona, United States
,
Rajesh Kotagiri
1   Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona, United States
,
Lena L. Kassab
3   Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Babatunde Olaiya
4   Internal Medicine, Marshfield Medical Center, Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States
,
Suresh Ponnada
5   Internal Medicine, Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital, Roanoke, Virginia, United States
,
Andrew Ofosu
6   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States
,
Douglas G. Adler
7   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 06 August 2019

accepted after revision 15 October 2019

Publication Date:
21 February 2020 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background and study aims Refractory and recurrent esophageal variceal (EV) bleeding can be life threatening. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have been used as a “bridge” therapy. However, their role in the treatment protocol is not established due to paucity in data.

Methods We searched multiple databases from inception through May 2019 to identify studies that reported on SEMS and TIPS in refractory EV hemorrhage. Our primary goals were to analyze and compare the pooled all-cause mortality, immediate bleeding control and rebleeding rates.

Results Five hundred forty-seven patients from 21 studies were analyzed (SEMS: 12 studies, 176 patients; TIPS: 9 studies, 398 patients). The pooled rate of all-cause mortality with SEMS was 43.6 % (95 % CI 28.6–59.8, I2  = 38) and with TIPS was 27.9 % (95 % CI 16.3–43.6, I2  = 91). The pooled rate of immediate bleeding control with SEMS was 84.5 % (95 % CI 74–91.2, I2  = 40) and with TIPS was 97.9 % (95 % CI 87.7–99.7, I2  = 0). The pooled rate of rebleeding with SEMS was 19.4 % (95 % CI 11.9–30.4, I2  = 32) and with TIPS was 8.8 % (95 % CI 4.8–15.7, I2  = 40).

Conclusion Use of SEMS in refractory EV hemorrhage demonstrates acceptable immediate bleeding control with good technical success rate. Mortality and rebleeding rates were lesser with TIPS, however, its superiority and/ or inferiority cannot be validated due to limitations in the comparison methodology.

Supplementary material

 

  • References

  • 1 Garcia-Pagan JC, Reverter E, Abraldes JG. et al. Acute variceal bleeding. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 33: 46-54
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Reiberger T, Puspok A, Schoder M. et al. Austrian consensus guidelines on the management and treatment of portal hypertension (Billroth III). Wien Klin Wochenschr 2017; 129: 135-158
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 de Franchis R. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2015; 63: 743-752
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Sharara AI, Rockey DC. Gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 669-681
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 de Franchis R. Evolving consensus in portal hypertension. Report of the Baveno IV consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2005; 43: 167-176
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Garcia-Pagan JC, Caca K, Bureau C. et al. Early use of TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 2370-2379
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Goenka MK, Goenka U, Tiwary IK. et al. Use of self-expanding metal stents for difficult variceal bleed. Indian J Gastroenterol 2017; 36: 468-473
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Holster IL, Kuipers EJ, Van Buuren HR. et al. Self-expandable metal stents as definitive treatment for esophageal variceal bleeding. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 485-488
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Pfisterer N, Riedl F, Pachofszky T. et al. Outcomes after placement of a SX-ELLA oesophageal stent for refractory variceal bleeding-A national multicentre study. Liver Int 2019; 39: 290-298
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The prisma statement. Annals Internal Med 2009; 151: 264-269
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC. et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283: 2008-2012
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Europ J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 603-605
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Glenny A, Altman D, Song F. et al. Indirect comparisons of competing interventions. Health Technol Assess 2005; 9: 1-134
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 de Franchis R. Revising consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno V consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2010; 53: 762-768
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR. et al. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. John Wiley & Sons Ltd New York 2000; 205-228
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Higgins J, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re‐evaluation of random‐effects meta‐analysis. Stat Med 2009; 172: 137-159
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Riley RD, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ 2011; 342: d549
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Mohan BP, Adler DG. Heterogeneity in systematic review and meta-analysis: how to read between the numbers. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 902-903
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Kanwal F, White D. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 11: 1184-1186
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ. et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R. et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 1294-1302
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Easterbrook PJ, Gopalan R, Berlin JA. et al. Publication bias in clinical research. The Lancet 1991; 8746: 867-872
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000; 56: 455-463
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. John Wiley & Sons; 2006
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Dechene A, El Fouly AH, Bechmann LP. et al. Acute management of refractory variceal bleeding in liver cirrhosis by self-expanding metal stents. Digestion 2012; 85: 185-191
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Drastich P, Brezina J, Sperl J. et al. Treatment of uncontrollable acute variceal bleeding with self-expanding metal stent: A single center experience. Gastroenterology 2016; 1: S339
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Escorsell A, Pavel O, Cardenas A. et al. Esophageal balloon tamponade versus esophageal stent in controlling acute refractory variceal bleeding: A multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology 2016; 63: 1957-1967
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Fierz FC, Kistler W, Stenz V. et al. Treatment of esophageal variceal hemorrhage with self-expanding metal stents as a rescue maneuver in a swiss multicentric cohort. Case Rep 2013; 7: 97-105
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Mishin I, Zastavnitsky G, Ghidirim G. et al. Self-expanding metal stents: A new hemostasis method for bleeding esophageal varices. Hepatol Int 2013; 1: S540
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Muller M, Seufferlein T, Perkhofer L. et al. Self-expandable metal stents for persisting esophageal variceal bleeding after band ligation or injection-therapy: a retrospective study. PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0126525
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Wright G, Lewis H, Hogan B. et al. A self-expanding metal stent for complicated variceal hemorrhage: experience at a single center. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 71-78
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Zakaria MS, Hamza IM, Mohey MA. et al. The first Egyptian experience using new self-expandable metal stents in acute esophageal variceal bleeding: pilot study. Saudi J 2013; 19: 177-181
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Zehetner J, Shamiyeh A, Wayand W. et al. Results of a new method to stop acute bleeding from esophageal varices: implantation of a self-expanding stent. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 2149-2152
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Cello JP, Ring EJ, Olcott EW. et al. Endoscopic sclerotherapy compared with percutaneous transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt after initial sclerotherapy in patients with acute variceal hemorrhage. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 858-865
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Garcia-Pagan JC, Di Pascoli M, Caca K. et al. Use of early-TIPS for high-risk variceal bleeding: results of a post-RCT surveillance study. J Hepatol 2013; 58: 45-50
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Monescillo A, Martinez-Lagares F, Ruiz-del-Arbol L. et al. Influence of portal hypertension and its early decompression by TIPS placement on the outcome of variceal bleeding. Hepatology 2004; 40: 793-801
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Popovic P, Stabuc B, Skok P. et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus endoscopic sclerotherapy in the elective treatment of recurrent variceal bleeding. J Int Med Res 2010; 38: 1121-1133
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 39 Rudler M, Cluzel P, Corvec TL. et al. Early-TIPSS placement prevents rebleeding in high-risk patients with variceal bleeding, without improving survival. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014; 40: 1074-8010
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Shi Y, Tian X, Hu J. et al. Efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with adjunctive embolotherapy with cyanoacrylate for esophageal variceal bleeding. Dig Dis Sci 2014; 59: 2325-2332
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Xue H, Zhang M, Pang JX. et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt vs endoscopic therapy in preventing variceal rebleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 7341-7347
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Orloff MJ, Vaida F, Haynes KS. et al. Randomized controlled trial of emergency transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus emergency portacaval shunt treatment of acute bleeding esophageal varices in cirrhosis. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 2094-2111
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Hogan B, Patch D, Burroughs A. et al. Use of the sx-ella self-expanding mesh metal stent in the management of complex variceal haemorrhage: initial experience in a single centre. J Hepatol 2009; 50: S86-S87
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Hubmann R, Bodlaj G, Czompo M. et al. The use of self-expanding metal stents to treat acute esophageal variceal bleeding. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 896-901
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Puhan MA, Schunemann HJ, Murad MH. et al. A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis. BMJ 2014; 349: g5630
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 McCarty TR, Njei B. Self-expanding metal stents for acute refractory esophageal variceal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig 2016; 28: 539-547
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Marot A, Trepo E, Doerig C. et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: self-expanding metal stents in patients with cirrhosis and severe or refractory oesophageal variceal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 42: 1250-1260
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Shao XD, Qi XS, Guo XZ. Esophageal stent for refractory variceal bleeding: a systemic review and meta-analysis. BioMed Research Int 2016; 2016: 4054513
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Qi X, Jia J, Bai M. et al. Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Acute Variceal Bleeding: A Meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 49: 495-505
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar