Download PDF
Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2020; 55(09): 536-548
DOI: 10.1055/a-1022-3051
Topthema
CME-Fortbildung

Psychotherapie in der interdisziplinären multimodalen Schmerztherapie: Update

Psychotherapy in the Context of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy: Update
Maike Müller
,
Anne-Kathrin Bräscher
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Psychotherapie bei chronischen Schmerzen? Was auf den ersten Blick unpassend erscheint, entpuppt sich als hilfreiche und wirksame Intervention für Störungsbilder, bei denen rein somatisch orientierte Behandlungsversuche scheitern. Eingebettet in die interdisziplinäre multimodale Schmerztherapie stellt die Schmerzpsychotherapie heutzutage einen essenziellen Bestandteil der Behandlung chronischer Schmerzen dar.

Abstract

Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) is based on the biopsychosocial model of pain and describes an integrated treatment for patients with chronic pain. IMPT incorporates a close cooperation of different disciplines, including physicians, psychotherapists, physiotherapists, and others. IMPT mainly aims to restore and increase patientsʼ physical, social and psychological functional capacity. The efficacy of IMPT has been evidenced by systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A number of studies further indicate IMPTʼs cost-efficiency. Psychotherapy is an essential component of IMPT. Its main goal within the framework of IMPT is to identify and modify dysfunctional patterns of pain coping, and to diagnose and potentially treat psychological comorbidities. Pain psychotherapy comprises mostly cognitive-behavioral interventions which address dysfunctional coping at the three levels of the pain experience (i.e., cognitive, emotional, and behavioral). Research into the efficacy of pain psychotherapy is rather sparse and studies have mostly focused on chronic back pain, yet existing results show promising evidence both for psychotherapy within IMPT and for psychotherapy as a monotherapy. This paper aims at providing an overview of (a) commonly employed cognitive-behavioral psychotherapeutic approaches and strategies in the treatment of chronic pain, and (b) the existing empirical evidence of pain psychotherapy both within the framework of IMPT and as a monotherapy. Future research should include a wider range of pain diagnoses and also investigate the potential benefit of individually-tailored treatments.

Kernaussagen

  • Die Schmerzpsychotherapie bzw. die Beteiligung von PsychotherapeutInnen ist integraler Bestandteil der IMST und zumeist kognitiv-verhaltenstherapeutisch orientiert.

  • Hauptziele der Schmerzpsychotherapie sind Erfassung und Veränderung bestehender dysfunktionaler Muster der Schmerzbewältigung sowie Diagnostik und ggf. Behandlung psychischer Komorbiditäten.

  • In der Schmerzpsychotherapie werden Techniken angewandt, die sich auf alle Ebenen des Schmerzerlebens (Kognition, Emotion, Verhalten) beziehen.

  • Funktionale Schmerzbewältigung umfasst hierbei unter anderem die Etablierung eines angepassten Aktivitätsniveaus, das Hinterfragen automatischer Gedanken und Überzeugungen, eine adäquate Emotionsregulation sowie die Anwendung von Entspannungs- und selbstregulativen Verfahren.

  • Neuere Entwicklungen verlagern den Behandlungsfokus hin zu einer den Schmerz annehmenden Haltung, welche die Notwendigkeit betont, sich so gut wie möglich mit den bestehenden Schmerzen zu arrangieren.

  • Der Einbezug von Schmerzpsychotherapie in der IMST scheint wesentlich zu sein für einen langfristigen Behandlungserfolg.

Schlüsselwörter

Interdisziplinäre multimodale Schmerztherapie (IMST) - chronischer Schmerz - Schmerzpsychotherapie - Wirksamkeit

Key words

Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy - chronic pain - psychological pain therapy - efficacy


Publication History

Article published online:
11 September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Cheatle MD. Biopsychosocial Approach to Assessing and Managing Patients with Chronic Pain. Med Clin North Am 2016; 100: 43-53
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Gatchel RJ, Peng YB, Peters ML. et al. The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 581-624
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Arnold B, Brinkschmidt T, Casser HR. et al. [Multimodal pain therapy for treatment of chronic pain syndrome. Consensus paper of the ad hoc commission on multimodal interdisciplinary pain management of the German Pain Society on treatment contents]. Schmerz 2014; 28: 459-472
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Kaiser U, Treede RD, Sabatowski R. Multimodal pain therapy in chronic noncancer pain-gold standard or need for further clarification?. Pain 2017; 158: 1853-1859
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Pfingsten M, Arnold B, Boger A. et al. [Cross-sectoral interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy: Recommendations on structural and process parameters of the ad hoc commission “Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy” of the German Pain Society (Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft e. V.)]. Schmerz 2019; 33: 191-203
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Arnold B, Brinkschmidt T, Casser HR. et al. [Multimodal pain therapy: principles and indications]. Schmerz 2009; 23: 112-120
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Casser HR, Arnold B, Brinkschmidt T. et al. [Multidisciplinary assessment for multimodal pain therapy. Indications and range of performance]. Schmerz 2013; 27: 363-370
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Buchner M, Zahlten-Hinguranage A, Schiltenwolf M. et al. Therapy outcome after multidisciplinary treatment for chronic neck and chronic low back pain: a prospective clinical study in 365 patients. Scand J Rheumatol 2006; 35: 363-367
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Buchner M, Neubauer E, Zahlten-Hinguranage A. et al. The influence of the grade of chronicity on the outcome of multidisciplinary therapy for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 3060-3066
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Moradi B, Zahlten-Hinguranage A, Barie A. et al. The impact of pain spread on the outcome of multidisciplinary therapy in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain – a prospective clinical study in 389 patients. Eur J Pain 2010; 14: 799-805
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Schutze A, Kaiser U, Ettrich U. et al. [Evaluation of a multimodal pain therapy at the University Pain Centre Dresden]. Schmerz 2009; 23: 609-617
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Pohlmann K, Tonhauser T, Joraschky P. et al. [The Dachau multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic pain. Efficacy data of a diagnosis-independent multidisciplinary treatment program for back pain and other types of chronic pain]. Schmerz 2009; 23: 40-46
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Nagel B, Korb J. [Interdisciplinary treatment. Long-lasting, effective, and cost-effective]. Orthopade 2009; 38: 907-908 910–912
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Hafenbrack K, Heinrich M, Muller G. et al. [Effects of interdisciplinary functional restoration treatment with cognitive behavior therapy in patients with chronic back pain: healthcare research in the context of selective contracts]. Schmerz 2013; 27: 566-576
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Flor H. Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review. Pain 1992; 49: 221-230
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A. et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (09) CD000963
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Scascighini L, Toma V, Dober-Spielmann S. et al. Multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes. Rheumatology 2008; 47: 670-678
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Bromme J, Mohokum M, Disch AC. et al. [Multidisciplinary outpatient care program vs. usual care: Cost-benefit analysis in patients with chronic low back pain]. Schmerz 2015; 29: 195-202
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Wagner CJ, Ayyad G, Otzdorff A. et al. [Treatment effects and cost-effectiveness of interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment of patients with back pain : A controlled observational intervention study based on claims data and survey data of participants]. Schmerz 2019; 33: 128-138
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Kröner-Herwig B, Frettlöh J. Behandlung chronischer Schmerzsyndrome: Plädoyer für einen interdisziplinären Therapieansatz. In: Kröner-Herwig B, Frettlöh J, Klinger R, Nilges P. Hrsg. Schmerzpsychotherapie. Heidelberg: Springer; 2017: 277-301
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Schmahl C, Bär KJ. Psychopathologie und Schmerz. In: Kröner-Herwig B, Frettlöh J, Klinger R, Nilges P. Hrsg. Schmerzpsychotherapie. Heidelberg: Springer; 2017: 687-698
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Von Wachter M, Kappis B. Therapie-Tools Schmerzstörungen. Weinheim: Beltz; 2019
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Glombiewski JA. [Exposure therapy for chronic back pain]. Schmerz 2018; 32: 274-282
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Wertli MM, Rasmussen-Barr E, Weiser S. et al. The role of fear avoidance beliefs as a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Spine J 2014; 14: 816-836.e4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy 2004; 35: 639-665
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 McCracken LM, Eccleston C. A prospective study of acceptance of pain and patient functioning with chronic pain. Pain 2005; 118: 164-169
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Baker KS, Gibson S, Georgiou-Karistianis N. et al. Everyday Executive Functioning in Chronic Pain: Specific Deficits in Working Memory and Emotion Control, Predicted by Mood, Medications, and Pain Interference. Clin J Pain 2016; 32: 673-680
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Lutz J, Gross RT, Vargovich AM. Difficulties in emotion regulation and chronic pain-related disability and opioid misuse. Addict Behav 2018; 87: 200-205
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Lumley MA, Schubiner H, Lockhart NA. et al. Emotional awareness and expression therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and education for fibromyalgia: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Pain 2017; 158: 2354-2363
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Pfingsten M. [Functional restoration–it depends on an adequate mixture of treatment]. Schmerz 2001; 15: 492-498
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Huge V, Schloderer U, Steinberger M. et al. Impact of a functional restoration program on pain and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain. Pain Med 2006; 7: 501-508
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Schiltenwolf M, Buchner M, Heindl B. et al. Comparison of a biopsychosocial therapy (BT) with a conventional biomedical therapy (MT) of subacute low back pain in the first episode of sick leave: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 1083-1092
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Fritsche G, Kroner-Herwig B, Kropp P. et al. [Psychological therapy of migraine: systematic review]. Schmerz 2013; 27: 263-274
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Hoffman BM, Papas RK, Chatkoff DK. et al. Meta-analysis of psychological interventions for chronic low back pain. Health Psychol 2007; 26: 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Williams AC, Eccleston C, Morley S. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (11) CD007407
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Sielski R, Rief W, Glombiewski JA. Efficacy of Biofeedback in Chronic back Pain: a Meta-Analysis. Int J Behav Med 2017; 24 (01) 25-41
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Nicht-spezifischer Kreuzschmerz – Langfassung. 2017 30.03.2020]; 2. Aufl. Im Internet (Stand: 17.02.2020): http://www.kreuzschmerz.versorgungsleitlinien.de
    PubMed
  • 38 Eichler J, Rachinger-Adam B, Kraft E. et al. [Efficacy of biofeedback in patients with chronic low back pain: Impact on pain intensity, psychological factors and stress markers]. Schmerz 2019; 33: 539-548
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Nestoriuc Y, Martin A. Efficacy of biofeedback for migraine: a meta-analysis. Pain 2007; 128: 111-127
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Nestoriuc Y, Rief W, Martin A. Meta-analysis of biofeedback for tension-type headache: efficacy, specificity, and treatment moderators. J Consult Clin Psychol 2008; 76: 379-396
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Dahl J, Luciano C, Wilson K. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for chronic Pain. Reno, NV: New Harbinger Publications; 2005
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 42 Hughes LS, Clark J, Colclough JA. et al. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Clin J Pain 2017; 33: 552-568
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Linton SJ, Kienbacher T. Psychological Subgrouping to Assess the Risk for the Development or Maintenance of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Is This the Way Forward?. Clin J Pain 2020; 36: 172-177
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar